Passage
Until the 1970s it was assumed that, despite the very large number of species that appeared during the Cambrian explosion, nearly all fit into the same rather small number of phyla that exist today. Each phylum—a group of organisms with the same basic pattern of organization, such as the radial symmetry of jellyfish and other coelenterates or the segmented structure of worms and other annelids—was seen as evolutionarily stable.
Innumerable individual species have arisen and died out, but development and extinction were assumed to take place within existing phyla; the elimination of entire phyla was thought to be extremely rare. A diverse group of marine fossils, known collectively as the Problematica, present difficulties for this interpretation. They show patterns of organization so bizarre that it is hard to fit any of them into present-day phyla. They include the banana-shaped Tullimonstrum and the spiked, spiny Hallucigenia, creatures whose very names reflect the classifier‘s discomfort.
The ―Ediacaran fauna,‖ which respired, absorbed nutrients, and eliminated wastes directly through their external surfaces, are also included among the Problematica. Theirs was an approach taken by only a few modern multicelled creatures (such as tapeworms) that are otherwise totally unlike them. Several theorists have argued that the Problematica are not just hard to classify—they are evidence that the conventional view of the Cambrian explosion is wrong. They contend that the Cambrian explosion represented the simultaneous appearance of a much larger number of animal phyla than exists today. Each was a separate ―experiment‖ in basic body design, and the Cambrian seas teemed with many different phyla, or basic body plans, each represented by only a few species.
Today, the number of phyla has fallen drastically, but each surviving phylum contains a much larger number of species. The Problematica, then, were not unsuccessful variants within present-day phyla; each represented a distinct phylum in its own right. Revisionists contend that the selection process eliminated not only particular unfavourable traits, but entire body plans and approaches to survival. The Ediacaran fauna, for example, represented a particular structural solution to the basic problems of gas and fluid exchange with the environment.
This approach to body engineering was discarded at the same time as the Ediacaran fauna themselves were wiped out; given the improbability of duplicating an entire body plan through chance mutation, it was unlikely that this particular approach would ever be tried again. Revisionists and conventional theorists agree that modern marine species are products of natural selection. Up until 30 years ago, the pattern of early marine animal evolution seemed to be well established. Most present-day marine animal phyla had appeared during the ―Cambrian explosion,‖ an extraordinary burgeoning of multicellular life in the warm seas of the Cambrian period, between 570 and 500 million years ago.
Question for 100 RCs for Practice Questions- 4
Try yourself:The description by the author in the third paragraph of how the Ediacaran fauna carried out respiration, absorption, and excretion tends to support the view that the Ediacaran fauna:
Explanation
Before reading the text closely, predict based on your map. What does ¶3 present? Evidence that challenges the traditional view that everything can be classified according to presently-existing phyla. (A) rewards the strong map instantly.
(A): The correct answer
(B): Opposite. The author says that the Edicarian physiological processes took an approach ―taken by only a few modern multicelled creatures,‖ which means that these processes were not unique.
(C): Opposite. The author states explicitly in the passage that they could absorb and excrete.
(D): Distortion. Though the Tullimonstrum phylum is part of Problematica too, the author doesn‘t suggest that it and the Ediacaran fauna are part of the same phylum.
Report a problem
Question for 100 RCs for Practice Questions- 4
Try yourself:According to the passage, the Problematica are difficult to classify because:
I. some had unusual shapes.
II. some of them functioned physiologically differently from modern organisms.
III. they became extinct at the end of the Cambrian period.
Explanation
Where are the Problematica discussed? Evaluate the Roman Numerals with an eye to ¶s2 and 3. Start with RN I, which appears in three choices: The author says in the passage that their patterns of organization were bizarre, and that this makes it hard to fit them into modern phyla. RN I therefore fits, eliminate (B). Evaluate RN II: The Ediacaran fauna are an example of different physiological functioning, so this statement is valid also. At this point, only (C) is a viable answer choice, and there‘s no need to evaluate RN III. A quick look at RN III shows a statement with no support in the passage: the author doesn‘t discuss when the Problematica went extinct, only that they did.
(A): Opposite. As described above.
(B): Opposite. As above.
(C): The correct answer
(D): Opposite. As above.
Report a problem
Question for 100 RCs for Practice Questions- 4
Try yourself:The passage implies that conventional and revisionist theorists disagree about all of the following EXCEPT:
Explanation
Evaluate the wording carefully. The two sides disagree on all the answer choices except the correct one, which means that they agree on the correct choice. Predict a point of agreement between the two sides. ¶6‘s opening line gives a big hint: The two sides agree that ―modern marine species are products of natural selection.‖ (D) jumps out quickly when the prediction is made beforehand.
(A): Opposite. The basis of the revisionist view is that the conventional view of static phyla is wrong.
(B): Opposite. Traditionalists think that there were only a few phyla with lots of species; revisionists believe that there were many phyla, as discussed in ¶3.
(C): Opposite. Since revisionists believe that many ancient species fit into existing phyla and revisionists believe that they belonged to now-extinct phyla, the two sides would disagree on whether phyla are likely to become extinct.
(D): The correct answer
Report a problem
