Archaea is a modern Latin word derived from the Greek word “arkhaios” meaning ‘primitive’. The singular of archaea is archaeon. Archaea is the plural form of “archaeon“.
When biological sciences are studied, a variety of different organisms come into the picture. Understanding one organism in relation to the other is very difficult due to the vast diversity. For ease of studying, classification systems are proposed. In the history of life science, several such methods have been proposed. Look at the table below for a brief summary of the different classification systems over the course of time.
Table 1: Summary of the Different Classification Systems
Notice the introduction of archaea in 1990 by Carl R. Woese. It was at this time that nucleotide sequences of the small subunit of rRNA (16S ribosomal RNA) were compared from all the cellular life forms from common ancestors. Since this molecule is conserved in all other life forms that are cellular in nature, the genome phylogeny (phylogenetic structures derived from phylogenetic trees upon phylogenetic analyses) derived from this work turned out revolutionary. What was earlier believed to be just “monera” was now split into “bacteria and archaea”. This global phylogeny overturned the existing notions of purely prokaryotic and eukaryotic cell dichotomy. An understanding of the prokaryotic domain deepened from this point.
Since they were earlier placed under the monera kingdom up till the 5-kingdom classification (1969), they are called archaebacteria then. But after the introduction of the 3-domain system (1990) and the identification of the major differences between archaea and bacteria, the term “archaebacteria” has fallen out of use in the scientific community.
Eukarya group is in red, the bacteria group is in blue and the archaea group is in green. Notice the close affinity of archaea with eukarya rather than with bacteria.
Look at the table of comparison below to learn about the major differences between these 2 domains of life; archaea vs bacteria. Both of these domains have been found to be evolutionarily distinct as per 16S rRNA phylogeny.
Table 2: Summary of the Differences between Archaea and Bacteria
Notice the differences in the structure of RNAP (RNA polymerase) required for the transcription process. Archaeal lineage RNAP shares similarities with eukaryotic RNAP II, while the RNAP of bacteria is different from both groups.
Archaeal membrane is formed by lipids containing ether links. Contrastingly, bacterial membranes are formed by lipids containing ester links.
Archaea were first identified from extreme environments like volcanoes, hydrothermal vents, etc. But as the sequencing technology became more widely available, the archaeal presence was found to be ubiquitous. Now they are known to inhabit a vast range of natural environments and habitats. Besides constituting a major part of the ecosystem, they play an instrumental role in its functioning, too. They inhabit both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.
Where do archaebacteria live? To answer that, here’s the list of some of their major habitats:
Since archaea inhabit extreme habitats, they are called extremophiles. Within extremophiles, there are different physiological categories or types of archaea like:
An archaeon doesn’t necessarily come under only one of these categories. In fact, many archaea are a combination of two or more of these features.
The Great Salt Lake of Utah in the United States is home to halophilic archaea species. They inhabit the salt crust (shown in [a]). Figure [b] shows them growing in lab conditions on salt agar. Figure [c] shows the pinkish tinge that these halophilic archaea impart to the Utah lake.
Picrophilus torridus is an acidophilic archaeon whose membrane integrity is disturbed at pH above 4.00. It was isolated for the 1st time from dry hot soil samples from Hokkaido in Japan.
So, read the archaea characteristics in this section and get an answer to what is special about archaea.
Energy sources used by archaea
This is a picture of a lake in India, Lonar lake that recently turned color to pinkish red. A probe led by the scientists from CSIR-NEERI lab brought to light the presence of salt-tolerant Haloarchaea populations in the lake. The photo pigment (for phototropism) of these archaea organisms is called ‘bacteriorhodopsin’ which is opaque to long wavelengths (red) and imparts this color to the lake.
Ferroglobus placidus is a lithotrophic archaea. It is an extremophile and can grow at temperatures up to 113°C.
Pyrococcus furiosus is an extreme thermophilic organotrophic archaeon that can grow at temperatures up to 100°C. The main metabolic pathway in this organism is anaerobic oxidation/ respiration as it’s an anaerobic archaeon. This metabolism makes it a suitable candidate for microbial fuel cell (MFC) development. MFCs are biological cells that can generate power at temperatures close to boiling point. As can be seen in the picture, the main source of energy is the organic compound “malt-short form of maltose”.
Because of their methanogenic and extremophilic activity, archaea are extensively used in the commercial production of biogas and also in sewage treatment plants. Biotechnological advancements enable the exploitation of archaeal enzymes from these extremophilic species. Since processes including high temperatures, pressures, and usage of organic solvents are mainstream in biogas production and sewage treatment; these hydrogenotrophic species widen the scope.
Archaea, although different from bacteria, share many common features with bacteria too. Both of them being prokaryotic life forms lack nuclei and membrane-bound cell organelles.
Structure of archaeal cells
The cell wall is present in most archaea except Thermoplasma and Ferroplasma. The surface-layer proteins encoded constitute the cell wall or S-layer. The role of the S-layer or cell wall in archaea is for physical and chemical protection. While bacterial cell walls are made up of peptidoglycan, archaea cell walls lack it. They rather possess pseudo-peptidoglycan like in Methanobacteriales. Pseudopeptidoglycan is similar to bacterial peptidoglycan (morphologically, functionally) but is chemically distinct (no D-amino acids & N-acetylmuramic acid). Rather, they have N-Acetyltalosaminuronic acid. The name for archaeal flagella is archaella. It functions similar to bacterial flagella.
Notice the presence of pseudopeptidoglycan in the archaeal cell walls
Notice the presence of archaeol, ether-links and branched isoprene chains in the archaeal membrane. Contrastingly, bacterial membranes lack archaeol and possess unbranched fatty acids with ester links. Archaea cell structure is distinct in a number of ways.
Archaeols are unique core membrane lipids synthesized by the archaea group. The process of archaeol synthesis is carried out via an ‘alternate MVA pathway’. For the synthesis of the isoprenoid chains constituting archaeol, a total of 3 unique steps have been identified.
Archaeal metabolism displays a range of biochemical reactions. Some of these are common to all archaeal species; others are specific to certain taxa.
Chemical structure of methanofuran, a unique coenzyme possessed by methanogenic archaea
Let’s briefly discuss archaeal genomes and genetic material.
Gene transfer, exchange, and horizontal gene transfer/ lateral gene transfer happen via inter-cell cytoplasmic bridges.
The illustration shows the “cytoplasmic bridge” formation between 2 Haloferax volcanii cells. These are extreme halophilic archaeal species.
Cellular aggregations are also known for genetic exchange and recombinations in archaeal species. These aggregations are induced by physical agents (UV, pH, temperature) or chemical agents (mitomycin C, bleomycin). These homologous recombinations serve as the repair mechanisms for the DNA damage caused due to different agents. Some scientists have also speculated this as an alternative type of sexual reproduction in primitive archaeal species.
“Cellular aggregation” has been studied in hyperthermophilic archaeal species Sulfolobus solfataricus.
Pic A: Cellular aggregation after different UV doses.
Pic B: Light micrographs of Sulfolobus solfataricus cell aggregates at different UV doses.
Pic C: A cell aggregate at 75 J/m2 UV dose.
A number of viruses target archaea; some are archaea-specific while some are cosmopolitan. In contrast to bacterial viruses which either conduct lytic or lysogenic pathways or display a mixed version of both, archaeal viruses usually maintain stable, lysogenic-like pathways.
Archaea reproduction strategies encompass:
73 videos|18 docs|7 tests
|
|
Explore Courses for MCAT exam
|