CAT  >  100 RCs for Practice  >  CAT 2017 Reading Comprehension Questions - 4

CAT 2017 Reading Comprehension Questions - 4 - Notes | Study 100 RCs for Practice - CAT

1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you?

Passage: Evolutionary diversity

Scientists have long recognised the incredible diversity within a species. But they thought it reflected evolutionary changes that unfolded imperceptibly, over millions of years. That divergence between populations within a species was enforced, according to Ernst Mayr, the great evolutionary biologist of the 1940s, when a population was separated from the rest of the species by a mountain range or a desert, preventing breeding across the divide over geologic scales of time. Without the separation, gene flow was relentless. But as the separation persisted, the isolated population grew apart and speciation occurred.

In the mid-1960s, the biologist Paul Ehrlich - author of The Population Bomb (1968) - and his Stanford University colleague Peter Raven challenged Mayr's ideas about speciation. They had studied checkerspot butterflies living in the Jasper Ridge Biological Preserve in California, and it soon became clear that they were not examining a single population. Through years of capturing, marking and then recapturing the butterflies, they were able to prove that within the population, spread over just 50 acres of suitable checkerspot habitat, there were three groups that rarely interacted despite their very close proximity.

Among other ideas, Ehrlich and Raven argued in a now classic paper from 1969 that gene flow was not as predictable and ubiquitous as Mayr and his cohort maintained, and thus evolutionary divergence between neighbouring groups in a population was probably common. They also asserted that isolation and gene flow were less important to evolutionary divergence than natural selection (when factors such as mate choice, weather, disease or predation cause better-adapted individuals to survive and pass on their successful genetic traits). For example, Ehrlich and Raven suggested that, without the force of natural selection, an isolated population would remain unchanged and that, in other scenarios, natural selection could be strong enough to overpower gene flow...

Question for CAT 2017 Reading Comprehension Questions - 4
Try yourself:Which of the following best sums up Ehrlich and Raven's argument in their classic 1969 paper?
View Solution

Question for CAT 2017 Reading Comprehension Questions - 4
Try yourself:All of the following statements are true according to the passage EXCEPT
View Solution

Question for CAT 2017 Reading Comprehension Questions - 4
Try yourself:The author discusses Mayr, Ehrlich and Raven to demonstrate that
View Solution

The document CAT 2017 Reading Comprehension Questions - 4 - Notes | Study 100 RCs for Practice - CAT is a part of the CAT Course 100 RCs for Practice.
All you need of CAT at this link: CAT
32 videos|119 docs
Use Code STAYHOME200 and get INR 200 additional OFF
Use Coupon Code
32 videos|119 docs
Download as PDF

How to Prepare for CAT

Read our guide to prepare for CAT which is created by Toppers & the best Teachers

Download free EduRev App

Track your progress, build streaks, highlight & save important lessons and more!

Related Searches

practice quizzes

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

Important questions

,

Semester Notes

,

MCQs

,

Sample Paper

,

Exam

,

Free

,

Summary

,

CAT 2017 Reading Comprehension Questions - 4 - Notes | Study 100 RCs for Practice - CAT

,

mock tests for examination

,

ppt

,

Viva Questions

,

pdf

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

video lectures

,

Extra Questions

,

Objective type Questions

,

study material

,

past year papers

,

CAT 2017 Reading Comprehension Questions - 4 - Notes | Study 100 RCs for Practice - CAT

,

CAT 2017 Reading Comprehension Questions - 4 - Notes | Study 100 RCs for Practice - CAT

;