Page 1
6
CONTRIBUTIONS OF THINKERS OF
MAHARASHTRA TO ECONOMIC
NATIONALISM
Unit Structure
6.0 Objectives
6 .1 Introduction
6.2 Contributions of thinkers of Maharashtra to Economic Nationalism
6.2.1 Dadabhai Naoroji
6.2.2 M. G. Ranade and Economic Nationalism
6.2.3 Ganesh Vyankatesh Joshi
6.3 Summary
6.4 Questions
6.5 Additional Reading
6.0 OBJECTIVES :
After the study of this unit, the student will be able to:
INTRODUCTION
Jambhekar who is regarded as a pioneer of Renaissance in Maharashtra.
Another reformer Tarkhadkar represented a secular approach and was one
of the sponsors of reforming the traditional Hindu religion. Deshmukh
alias Lokahitawadi did not confine his liberal thought to merely one or two
fields but applied it to all walks of life. These reformers were not received
with open arms by the society which was drilled and disciplined to preserve
its social and spiritual values over centuries. Moreover, the traditional
Maratha society had the privilege of witnessing the rise of the Maratha
political influence throughout India. The people of Maharashtra whether
in the cities like Bombay or Pune would hardly admit of any change
inspired by their British conquerers.
Page 2
6
CONTRIBUTIONS OF THINKERS OF
MAHARASHTRA TO ECONOMIC
NATIONALISM
Unit Structure
6.0 Objectives
6 .1 Introduction
6.2 Contributions of thinkers of Maharashtra to Economic Nationalism
6.2.1 Dadabhai Naoroji
6.2.2 M. G. Ranade and Economic Nationalism
6.2.3 Ganesh Vyankatesh Joshi
6.3 Summary
6.4 Questions
6.5 Additional Reading
6.0 OBJECTIVES :
After the study of this unit, the student will be able to:
INTRODUCTION
Jambhekar who is regarded as a pioneer of Renaissance in Maharashtra.
Another reformer Tarkhadkar represented a secular approach and was one
of the sponsors of reforming the traditional Hindu religion. Deshmukh
alias Lokahitawadi did not confine his liberal thought to merely one or two
fields but applied it to all walks of life. These reformers were not received
with open arms by the society which was drilled and disciplined to preserve
its social and spiritual values over centuries. Moreover, the traditional
Maratha society had the privilege of witnessing the rise of the Maratha
political influence throughout India. The people of Maharashtra whether
in the cities like Bombay or Pune would hardly admit of any change
inspired by their British conquerers.
The second half of the nineteenth century was dominated by the activities
of another three leaders of liberal thought. They were Dadabhai Naoroji,
Mahadev Govind Ranade and Gopal Krishna Gokhale. Their ideas and
activities were to influence not only Bombay and Maharashtra but the
whole country in general. In this connection Dr. K. Mukerji observes that
Maharashtra never had a general renaissance in the sense that Bengal had
one after 1815. Prof. J.V. Naik’s rejoinder that the predecessors of Ranade-
Agarkar had done a substantial rethinking in response to the socio-economic
life in the colonial situation and thus the work of Ranade-Agarkar had
influenced the main stream of Maharashtrian thought deserves
consideration. Although most of these enlightened reformers were
confined to cities, their influence on the people of Maharashtra was
profound which will be clear from the activities of the institutions and
organisation that they established. We shall now discuss the achievements
of Dadabhai Naoroji, Mahadev Govind Ranade and Gopal Krishna
Gokhale in the following pages.
CONTRIBUTIONS OF THINKERS OF
MAHARASHTRA TO ECONOMIC NATIONALISM
DADABHAI NAOROJI (1825-1917) :
The manifold achievements of Dadabhai Naorojl the Grand old Man of
Indian History cannot be justly compressed in a few pages. The story of
his long life reflects the several memorable epochs in the history of
political life of India. His ‘simple but heroic life devoutly dedicated to the
service of humanity, cannot be properly represented by fixing attention
only on fleeting activities of his college days. It is therefore necessary to
enumerate the important events of his life after discussing his contribution
to the Students Literary and Scientific Society.
Students Literary and Scientific Society
Dadabhai was born in Bombay in a poor Parsi priest family on September
4, 1825. He was educated in a free school conducted by the ‘Native
Education Society’. The school had two branches English and Vernacular.
The society was conducted under Government auspices. He received his
college education in the Elphinstone Institution. The Elphinstone College
and the school conducted by the Native Education Society were combined
to form Etphinstone Institution. He received the Clare scholarship in 1840
and in 1842 he was admitted to the newly opened class of Normal
Scholars.
Dadabhai was very active during his college days. In 1848 some of the
members of the Native Literary Society assembled in the hall of the
Elphinstone Institution and formed a new society. It was named as
‘Students Literary and Scientific Society’. Dadabhai was appointed as
Treasurer of the Society and, Professor Patton its President. From that time
onwards Dadabhai devoted himself to the work of education and social
reform.
Page 3
6
CONTRIBUTIONS OF THINKERS OF
MAHARASHTRA TO ECONOMIC
NATIONALISM
Unit Structure
6.0 Objectives
6 .1 Introduction
6.2 Contributions of thinkers of Maharashtra to Economic Nationalism
6.2.1 Dadabhai Naoroji
6.2.2 M. G. Ranade and Economic Nationalism
6.2.3 Ganesh Vyankatesh Joshi
6.3 Summary
6.4 Questions
6.5 Additional Reading
6.0 OBJECTIVES :
After the study of this unit, the student will be able to:
INTRODUCTION
Jambhekar who is regarded as a pioneer of Renaissance in Maharashtra.
Another reformer Tarkhadkar represented a secular approach and was one
of the sponsors of reforming the traditional Hindu religion. Deshmukh
alias Lokahitawadi did not confine his liberal thought to merely one or two
fields but applied it to all walks of life. These reformers were not received
with open arms by the society which was drilled and disciplined to preserve
its social and spiritual values over centuries. Moreover, the traditional
Maratha society had the privilege of witnessing the rise of the Maratha
political influence throughout India. The people of Maharashtra whether
in the cities like Bombay or Pune would hardly admit of any change
inspired by their British conquerers.
The second half of the nineteenth century was dominated by the activities
of another three leaders of liberal thought. They were Dadabhai Naoroji,
Mahadev Govind Ranade and Gopal Krishna Gokhale. Their ideas and
activities were to influence not only Bombay and Maharashtra but the
whole country in general. In this connection Dr. K. Mukerji observes that
Maharashtra never had a general renaissance in the sense that Bengal had
one after 1815. Prof. J.V. Naik’s rejoinder that the predecessors of Ranade-
Agarkar had done a substantial rethinking in response to the socio-economic
life in the colonial situation and thus the work of Ranade-Agarkar had
influenced the main stream of Maharashtrian thought deserves
consideration. Although most of these enlightened reformers were
confined to cities, their influence on the people of Maharashtra was
profound which will be clear from the activities of the institutions and
organisation that they established. We shall now discuss the achievements
of Dadabhai Naoroji, Mahadev Govind Ranade and Gopal Krishna
Gokhale in the following pages.
CONTRIBUTIONS OF THINKERS OF
MAHARASHTRA TO ECONOMIC NATIONALISM
DADABHAI NAOROJI (1825-1917) :
The manifold achievements of Dadabhai Naorojl the Grand old Man of
Indian History cannot be justly compressed in a few pages. The story of
his long life reflects the several memorable epochs in the history of
political life of India. His ‘simple but heroic life devoutly dedicated to the
service of humanity, cannot be properly represented by fixing attention
only on fleeting activities of his college days. It is therefore necessary to
enumerate the important events of his life after discussing his contribution
to the Students Literary and Scientific Society.
Students Literary and Scientific Society
Dadabhai was born in Bombay in a poor Parsi priest family on September
4, 1825. He was educated in a free school conducted by the ‘Native
Education Society’. The school had two branches English and Vernacular.
The society was conducted under Government auspices. He received his
college education in the Elphinstone Institution. The Elphinstone College
and the school conducted by the Native Education Society were combined
to form Etphinstone Institution. He received the Clare scholarship in 1840
and in 1842 he was admitted to the newly opened class of Normal
Scholars.
Dadabhai was very active during his college days. In 1848 some of the
members of the Native Literary Society assembled in the hall of the
Elphinstone Institution and formed a new society. It was named as
‘Students Literary and Scientific Society’. Dadabhai was appointed as
Treasurer of the Society and, Professor Patton its President. From that time
onwards Dadabhai devoted himself to the work of education and social
reform.
The Rules of the Society
The aim of the Society was to develop the interest in literary and scientific
knowledge. In keeping with this aim one of the rules of the Society
provided that two members should be nominated by the Secretary of the
society to read papers on literary scientific or social subjects, The meeting
of the Society was held twice a month. The Society was keen on activating
the members to do independent thinking on these matters of public interest.
The Students and teachers should shoulder the responsibility of educating
the people and therefore an in depth study of the current issues was
also intended. The Society however did not encourage entanglement of the
political matters and religious questions.
The society maintained a strict discipline and therefore wished to weed out
useless members or those who only accepted the membership as a sort of
ornament. Those who failed to read a paper in the first instance were fined
a rupee. The fine for second failure was two rupees and if the member
failed to read his paper on the subject offered by him the third time he was
expelled.
The questions that were made the subjects of the papers were discussed in
the meetings of the Society. It was not to be merely an academic discussion
to be confined within the four walls of the class room but the conclusions
were to be exposed to the full view of the public through the columns of
journals conducted by two vernacular branches of the society. One was the
‘Gujarati Dnyan Prasarak Mandali’ and the other was a ‘Marathi Dnyan
Prasarak Mandali’. The Gujarati journal was edited by Dadabhai Naoroji
which published the debates.
The work undertaken by the ‘Dnyan Prasarak Mandali under the guidance
and direction of Dadabhai Naoroji was of far-reaching importance. In
1849, a paper on female education was read by Behramji Kharshetji
Gandbi. The discussion on this much-debated issue led to a practical
operation. The students began to visit several Parsi and Hindu parents to
allow them to sit on their verandahs and to teach their girls. In a few days
after the decision about the propagation of education among the girls the
students could get the consent of parents. In the seven schools they could
register 44 Parsi girls and 24 Hindu girls. The move to educate women
attracted the attention of some leaders of Bombay. Jagannath Shankar Sheth
gave a cottage to be used as school-house. This inspired others to give
concrete assistance for female education. Khershedji Nasanwanji Cama
gave a substantial donation to the Society. This enabled the Society to
maintain schools for girls both Hindu and Parsi.
The social reform successfully undertaken by the Society encouraged some
Parsi reformers to remove some pernicious customs from the Parsi society.
In 1851 Naoroji Furdoomji the ‘Tribunal of the people’ was persuaded to
found the ‘Rahnumae Mazdaysnam Sabha’ or ‘Guides on the Mazdayasnan
Path’. Naoroji Furdoomji was appointed President and Dadabhai Secretary.
Some of the reformers were zealous to reform the old Zorostrian faith
according to the Western ideas. The Rahnumane Sabha achieved its goal
Page 4
6
CONTRIBUTIONS OF THINKERS OF
MAHARASHTRA TO ECONOMIC
NATIONALISM
Unit Structure
6.0 Objectives
6 .1 Introduction
6.2 Contributions of thinkers of Maharashtra to Economic Nationalism
6.2.1 Dadabhai Naoroji
6.2.2 M. G. Ranade and Economic Nationalism
6.2.3 Ganesh Vyankatesh Joshi
6.3 Summary
6.4 Questions
6.5 Additional Reading
6.0 OBJECTIVES :
After the study of this unit, the student will be able to:
INTRODUCTION
Jambhekar who is regarded as a pioneer of Renaissance in Maharashtra.
Another reformer Tarkhadkar represented a secular approach and was one
of the sponsors of reforming the traditional Hindu religion. Deshmukh
alias Lokahitawadi did not confine his liberal thought to merely one or two
fields but applied it to all walks of life. These reformers were not received
with open arms by the society which was drilled and disciplined to preserve
its social and spiritual values over centuries. Moreover, the traditional
Maratha society had the privilege of witnessing the rise of the Maratha
political influence throughout India. The people of Maharashtra whether
in the cities like Bombay or Pune would hardly admit of any change
inspired by their British conquerers.
The second half of the nineteenth century was dominated by the activities
of another three leaders of liberal thought. They were Dadabhai Naoroji,
Mahadev Govind Ranade and Gopal Krishna Gokhale. Their ideas and
activities were to influence not only Bombay and Maharashtra but the
whole country in general. In this connection Dr. K. Mukerji observes that
Maharashtra never had a general renaissance in the sense that Bengal had
one after 1815. Prof. J.V. Naik’s rejoinder that the predecessors of Ranade-
Agarkar had done a substantial rethinking in response to the socio-economic
life in the colonial situation and thus the work of Ranade-Agarkar had
influenced the main stream of Maharashtrian thought deserves
consideration. Although most of these enlightened reformers were
confined to cities, their influence on the people of Maharashtra was
profound which will be clear from the activities of the institutions and
organisation that they established. We shall now discuss the achievements
of Dadabhai Naoroji, Mahadev Govind Ranade and Gopal Krishna
Gokhale in the following pages.
CONTRIBUTIONS OF THINKERS OF
MAHARASHTRA TO ECONOMIC NATIONALISM
DADABHAI NAOROJI (1825-1917) :
The manifold achievements of Dadabhai Naorojl the Grand old Man of
Indian History cannot be justly compressed in a few pages. The story of
his long life reflects the several memorable epochs in the history of
political life of India. His ‘simple but heroic life devoutly dedicated to the
service of humanity, cannot be properly represented by fixing attention
only on fleeting activities of his college days. It is therefore necessary to
enumerate the important events of his life after discussing his contribution
to the Students Literary and Scientific Society.
Students Literary and Scientific Society
Dadabhai was born in Bombay in a poor Parsi priest family on September
4, 1825. He was educated in a free school conducted by the ‘Native
Education Society’. The school had two branches English and Vernacular.
The society was conducted under Government auspices. He received his
college education in the Elphinstone Institution. The Elphinstone College
and the school conducted by the Native Education Society were combined
to form Etphinstone Institution. He received the Clare scholarship in 1840
and in 1842 he was admitted to the newly opened class of Normal
Scholars.
Dadabhai was very active during his college days. In 1848 some of the
members of the Native Literary Society assembled in the hall of the
Elphinstone Institution and formed a new society. It was named as
‘Students Literary and Scientific Society’. Dadabhai was appointed as
Treasurer of the Society and, Professor Patton its President. From that time
onwards Dadabhai devoted himself to the work of education and social
reform.
The Rules of the Society
The aim of the Society was to develop the interest in literary and scientific
knowledge. In keeping with this aim one of the rules of the Society
provided that two members should be nominated by the Secretary of the
society to read papers on literary scientific or social subjects, The meeting
of the Society was held twice a month. The Society was keen on activating
the members to do independent thinking on these matters of public interest.
The Students and teachers should shoulder the responsibility of educating
the people and therefore an in depth study of the current issues was
also intended. The Society however did not encourage entanglement of the
political matters and religious questions.
The society maintained a strict discipline and therefore wished to weed out
useless members or those who only accepted the membership as a sort of
ornament. Those who failed to read a paper in the first instance were fined
a rupee. The fine for second failure was two rupees and if the member
failed to read his paper on the subject offered by him the third time he was
expelled.
The questions that were made the subjects of the papers were discussed in
the meetings of the Society. It was not to be merely an academic discussion
to be confined within the four walls of the class room but the conclusions
were to be exposed to the full view of the public through the columns of
journals conducted by two vernacular branches of the society. One was the
‘Gujarati Dnyan Prasarak Mandali’ and the other was a ‘Marathi Dnyan
Prasarak Mandali’. The Gujarati journal was edited by Dadabhai Naoroji
which published the debates.
The work undertaken by the ‘Dnyan Prasarak Mandali under the guidance
and direction of Dadabhai Naoroji was of far-reaching importance. In
1849, a paper on female education was read by Behramji Kharshetji
Gandbi. The discussion on this much-debated issue led to a practical
operation. The students began to visit several Parsi and Hindu parents to
allow them to sit on their verandahs and to teach their girls. In a few days
after the decision about the propagation of education among the girls the
students could get the consent of parents. In the seven schools they could
register 44 Parsi girls and 24 Hindu girls. The move to educate women
attracted the attention of some leaders of Bombay. Jagannath Shankar Sheth
gave a cottage to be used as school-house. This inspired others to give
concrete assistance for female education. Khershedji Nasanwanji Cama
gave a substantial donation to the Society. This enabled the Society to
maintain schools for girls both Hindu and Parsi.
The social reform successfully undertaken by the Society encouraged some
Parsi reformers to remove some pernicious customs from the Parsi society.
In 1851 Naoroji Furdoomji the ‘Tribunal of the people’ was persuaded to
found the ‘Rahnumae Mazdaysnam Sabha’ or ‘Guides on the Mazdayasnan
Path’. Naoroji Furdoomji was appointed President and Dadabhai Secretary.
Some of the reformers were zealous to reform the old Zorostrian faith
according to the Western ideas. The Rahnumane Sabha achieved its goal
of restoring the ancient religion to its pristine purity.
Dadabhai lived to witness the diamond Jubilee of the Society and the
Dnyan Prakash Mandali. The Society had also undertaken the work of
translating books into Marathi and Gujarati. The work of the Society was
also getting wider publicity as Elphinstonians of the first generation were
interested in journalism. Among the Marathi speaking alumni journalism
had become a favourite tool to propose social and religious reforms.
Dadabhai also felt an urgent need of an independent journal for the cause
of reform. Dadabhai and Kharshedji Cama decided to start a fornightly
journal ‘Rast Goftar’ (Truth
Teller). Cama agreed to provide the necessary funds and Dadabhai agreed
to run it without remuneration. The new journal was issued on November
15, 1851. This was incidently the sixth journal in Gujarati but the only one
with an independent ideology. The journal was started in the wake of
Muslim- Parsi riot which broke out on October 7, 1851. Within two months
the journal with progressive views found favour with the readers and in
January 1852 the fortnightly was converted into a weekly. Dadabhai was
fully supported by the Society boys and his connection with the journal
continued even after he left India in 1855 and made England his home.
The Students Society had a wider acceptance and its activities were
assuming larger dimensions under the able leadership of Dadabhai. On
September 2,1852 a meeting was held in Elphinstone College to perpetuate
the memory of Framji Cowasji Benaji, the great philanthropist and patron
of education. It was decided at the meeting that the fund collected for
helping the zorostrians in Iran was to be now utilised for the formation of a
museum in connection with the Students Literary and Scientific Society
and named the Framaji Cowasji Institute. Here was a professor setting a
great ideal before his students. Several students of the Elphinstone College
joined in the work of collecting funds for a noble cause. R.P. Masani
remarks. “It is a teacher’s office to lead as well as to teach and by the
spark of his personal example to set the heart of his pupils on fire.
Dadabhai fulfilled that mission, not only in regard to his college pupils but
also in regard to his disciples through- out his Iife.
Important Events In his life
It would not be out of place if some important events in the life of the
‘Grand Old Man’ of Indian history are mentioned here in the context of
his all-out efforts for building a new India and from such discussion
regional history cannot be separated. He was appointed Professor of
Mathematics and Natural Philosophy in 1852. He was the first Indian to
hold, such a high position in any prominent colleges in the country. He left
India in 1855 to settle in England. He joined the Cams Company and after
a few years he started his own trading company. During the first decade he
tried to educate the British public opinion on the Civil Service
Examination. He stressed the Importance of Sanskrit and the Arabic the
two classical languages and the London Indian Society was able to force
the British Government to give up the proposal of reducing the marks
Page 5
6
CONTRIBUTIONS OF THINKERS OF
MAHARASHTRA TO ECONOMIC
NATIONALISM
Unit Structure
6.0 Objectives
6 .1 Introduction
6.2 Contributions of thinkers of Maharashtra to Economic Nationalism
6.2.1 Dadabhai Naoroji
6.2.2 M. G. Ranade and Economic Nationalism
6.2.3 Ganesh Vyankatesh Joshi
6.3 Summary
6.4 Questions
6.5 Additional Reading
6.0 OBJECTIVES :
After the study of this unit, the student will be able to:
INTRODUCTION
Jambhekar who is regarded as a pioneer of Renaissance in Maharashtra.
Another reformer Tarkhadkar represented a secular approach and was one
of the sponsors of reforming the traditional Hindu religion. Deshmukh
alias Lokahitawadi did not confine his liberal thought to merely one or two
fields but applied it to all walks of life. These reformers were not received
with open arms by the society which was drilled and disciplined to preserve
its social and spiritual values over centuries. Moreover, the traditional
Maratha society had the privilege of witnessing the rise of the Maratha
political influence throughout India. The people of Maharashtra whether
in the cities like Bombay or Pune would hardly admit of any change
inspired by their British conquerers.
The second half of the nineteenth century was dominated by the activities
of another three leaders of liberal thought. They were Dadabhai Naoroji,
Mahadev Govind Ranade and Gopal Krishna Gokhale. Their ideas and
activities were to influence not only Bombay and Maharashtra but the
whole country in general. In this connection Dr. K. Mukerji observes that
Maharashtra never had a general renaissance in the sense that Bengal had
one after 1815. Prof. J.V. Naik’s rejoinder that the predecessors of Ranade-
Agarkar had done a substantial rethinking in response to the socio-economic
life in the colonial situation and thus the work of Ranade-Agarkar had
influenced the main stream of Maharashtrian thought deserves
consideration. Although most of these enlightened reformers were
confined to cities, their influence on the people of Maharashtra was
profound which will be clear from the activities of the institutions and
organisation that they established. We shall now discuss the achievements
of Dadabhai Naoroji, Mahadev Govind Ranade and Gopal Krishna
Gokhale in the following pages.
CONTRIBUTIONS OF THINKERS OF
MAHARASHTRA TO ECONOMIC NATIONALISM
DADABHAI NAOROJI (1825-1917) :
The manifold achievements of Dadabhai Naorojl the Grand old Man of
Indian History cannot be justly compressed in a few pages. The story of
his long life reflects the several memorable epochs in the history of
political life of India. His ‘simple but heroic life devoutly dedicated to the
service of humanity, cannot be properly represented by fixing attention
only on fleeting activities of his college days. It is therefore necessary to
enumerate the important events of his life after discussing his contribution
to the Students Literary and Scientific Society.
Students Literary and Scientific Society
Dadabhai was born in Bombay in a poor Parsi priest family on September
4, 1825. He was educated in a free school conducted by the ‘Native
Education Society’. The school had two branches English and Vernacular.
The society was conducted under Government auspices. He received his
college education in the Elphinstone Institution. The Elphinstone College
and the school conducted by the Native Education Society were combined
to form Etphinstone Institution. He received the Clare scholarship in 1840
and in 1842 he was admitted to the newly opened class of Normal
Scholars.
Dadabhai was very active during his college days. In 1848 some of the
members of the Native Literary Society assembled in the hall of the
Elphinstone Institution and formed a new society. It was named as
‘Students Literary and Scientific Society’. Dadabhai was appointed as
Treasurer of the Society and, Professor Patton its President. From that time
onwards Dadabhai devoted himself to the work of education and social
reform.
The Rules of the Society
The aim of the Society was to develop the interest in literary and scientific
knowledge. In keeping with this aim one of the rules of the Society
provided that two members should be nominated by the Secretary of the
society to read papers on literary scientific or social subjects, The meeting
of the Society was held twice a month. The Society was keen on activating
the members to do independent thinking on these matters of public interest.
The Students and teachers should shoulder the responsibility of educating
the people and therefore an in depth study of the current issues was
also intended. The Society however did not encourage entanglement of the
political matters and religious questions.
The society maintained a strict discipline and therefore wished to weed out
useless members or those who only accepted the membership as a sort of
ornament. Those who failed to read a paper in the first instance were fined
a rupee. The fine for second failure was two rupees and if the member
failed to read his paper on the subject offered by him the third time he was
expelled.
The questions that were made the subjects of the papers were discussed in
the meetings of the Society. It was not to be merely an academic discussion
to be confined within the four walls of the class room but the conclusions
were to be exposed to the full view of the public through the columns of
journals conducted by two vernacular branches of the society. One was the
‘Gujarati Dnyan Prasarak Mandali’ and the other was a ‘Marathi Dnyan
Prasarak Mandali’. The Gujarati journal was edited by Dadabhai Naoroji
which published the debates.
The work undertaken by the ‘Dnyan Prasarak Mandali under the guidance
and direction of Dadabhai Naoroji was of far-reaching importance. In
1849, a paper on female education was read by Behramji Kharshetji
Gandbi. The discussion on this much-debated issue led to a practical
operation. The students began to visit several Parsi and Hindu parents to
allow them to sit on their verandahs and to teach their girls. In a few days
after the decision about the propagation of education among the girls the
students could get the consent of parents. In the seven schools they could
register 44 Parsi girls and 24 Hindu girls. The move to educate women
attracted the attention of some leaders of Bombay. Jagannath Shankar Sheth
gave a cottage to be used as school-house. This inspired others to give
concrete assistance for female education. Khershedji Nasanwanji Cama
gave a substantial donation to the Society. This enabled the Society to
maintain schools for girls both Hindu and Parsi.
The social reform successfully undertaken by the Society encouraged some
Parsi reformers to remove some pernicious customs from the Parsi society.
In 1851 Naoroji Furdoomji the ‘Tribunal of the people’ was persuaded to
found the ‘Rahnumae Mazdaysnam Sabha’ or ‘Guides on the Mazdayasnan
Path’. Naoroji Furdoomji was appointed President and Dadabhai Secretary.
Some of the reformers were zealous to reform the old Zorostrian faith
according to the Western ideas. The Rahnumane Sabha achieved its goal
of restoring the ancient religion to its pristine purity.
Dadabhai lived to witness the diamond Jubilee of the Society and the
Dnyan Prakash Mandali. The Society had also undertaken the work of
translating books into Marathi and Gujarati. The work of the Society was
also getting wider publicity as Elphinstonians of the first generation were
interested in journalism. Among the Marathi speaking alumni journalism
had become a favourite tool to propose social and religious reforms.
Dadabhai also felt an urgent need of an independent journal for the cause
of reform. Dadabhai and Kharshedji Cama decided to start a fornightly
journal ‘Rast Goftar’ (Truth
Teller). Cama agreed to provide the necessary funds and Dadabhai agreed
to run it without remuneration. The new journal was issued on November
15, 1851. This was incidently the sixth journal in Gujarati but the only one
with an independent ideology. The journal was started in the wake of
Muslim- Parsi riot which broke out on October 7, 1851. Within two months
the journal with progressive views found favour with the readers and in
January 1852 the fortnightly was converted into a weekly. Dadabhai was
fully supported by the Society boys and his connection with the journal
continued even after he left India in 1855 and made England his home.
The Students Society had a wider acceptance and its activities were
assuming larger dimensions under the able leadership of Dadabhai. On
September 2,1852 a meeting was held in Elphinstone College to perpetuate
the memory of Framji Cowasji Benaji, the great philanthropist and patron
of education. It was decided at the meeting that the fund collected for
helping the zorostrians in Iran was to be now utilised for the formation of a
museum in connection with the Students Literary and Scientific Society
and named the Framaji Cowasji Institute. Here was a professor setting a
great ideal before his students. Several students of the Elphinstone College
joined in the work of collecting funds for a noble cause. R.P. Masani
remarks. “It is a teacher’s office to lead as well as to teach and by the
spark of his personal example to set the heart of his pupils on fire.
Dadabhai fulfilled that mission, not only in regard to his college pupils but
also in regard to his disciples through- out his Iife.
Important Events In his life
It would not be out of place if some important events in the life of the
‘Grand Old Man’ of Indian history are mentioned here in the context of
his all-out efforts for building a new India and from such discussion
regional history cannot be separated. He was appointed Professor of
Mathematics and Natural Philosophy in 1852. He was the first Indian to
hold, such a high position in any prominent colleges in the country. He left
India in 1855 to settle in England. He joined the Cams Company and after
a few years he started his own trading company. During the first decade he
tried to educate the British public opinion on the Civil Service
Examination. He stressed the Importance of Sanskrit and the Arabic the
two classical languages and the London Indian Society was able to force
the British Government to give up the proposal of reducing the marks
gained by the Indian candidates in one of these languages as optional
subjects.
In February 1866 John Crawford, President of the Ethnological Society of
London read a paper in which he sought to prove that the Asians as a race
were inferior in intellect compared to the Europeans. In the following
month Dadabhai gave a fitting rejoinder to Crawford’s thesis. Dadabhai’s
spirited defense of the Asiatic contribution to literature and science silenced
arrogant European ethnologists.
Dadabhai’s achievements in the political field are many. He became the
first Member of the British Parliament. He worked as a Diwan of Baroda.
He worked for the establishment of the Indian National Congress of
which he was elected President thrice in his career. His greatest
contribution to the intellectual field was his book ‘Poverty and Un-British
Rule in India’ published in 1901. In 1876 when he was a Municipal
Councilor of Bombay. He read a paper on the subject of the poverty of
India before the Bombay branch of East India Association.
Dadabhai’s achievements are put in a nutshel by Lokmanya Tilak when
the efforts’ of Tilak’ were frustrated by Moderates in the Congress to be
elected President at the Calcutta Congress in 1906. He writes, ‘‘Why do we
respect Dadabhai so much? We do not consider that late Mr. Mandalik,
Bhau Daji or Mr. Naoroji Fardumji were in any way inferior in their
contribution to the national welfare to Dadabhai. Even if we point out that
he was the first Indian to be elected the Member of British Parliament,
subsequently Bhavnagari also achieved that distinction. These events do
not explain why Dadabhai enjoys a unique place in the hearts of Indian
people. The explanation is so obvious. His greatness does not lie in the
number of institutions he started, or a number of lectures he delivered on
different subjects or his work in this capacity or that. His greatness rests on
his ‘theory of drain’ that he propounded not merely by guess-work but by
indefatigable industry to collect the statistics and prove, his thesis. In the
mildest of psychophants eulogising the blessings’’ the British rule after the
fall of the Peshwa regime, here was a man brave enough to prove to the
British masters that they were responsible for the poverty and the
miserable conditions of the Indian people. He thrust on the attention of the
people of India that the outward appearance of the British Rule may be
attractive but it acts as a disease to destroy the national interest of India.
The ‘drain theory’ that he developed created a consciousness among the
educated Indians, throughout the country that self-rule has no substitute.
Although he spent most of his life in England he never missed any
opportunity to uphold the national honour. He had the good fortune to
enjoy a long life. His political hopes of a better deal from the British rulers
at the outbreak of World War I were very high. Gopal Krishna Gokhale was
another leader who laid implicit faith in the benevolence of the British
rulers. Dadabhai did not live long enough to see the constitutional changes
after World War I.
Read More