Differences between the Plum Pudding and Nuclear model Table
An experiment, designed to investigate the ‘plum pudding’ model, involved firing alpha particles at a thin gold foil. If the ‘plum pudding’ model was correct, then most of the alpha particles would go straight through the gold foil. A few would be deflected but by very small angles.
The results of the experiment were unexpected. Although most of the alpha particles did go straight through the gold foil, about 1 in every 8 000 was deflected by very large angles. Using the nuclear model, the scientist Ernest Rutherford devised an equation to predict the proportion of alpha particles that would be deflected through various angles.
The results of the experiment were the same as the predictions made by Rutherford.
Explain:
(a) Why this experiment led to a new model of the atom, called the nuclear model, which replaced the ‘plum pudding’ model.
(b) Why it is important that the experimental results and the predictions are the same.
(a) The experimental results of the gold foil experiment could not be explained using the plum pudding model
Therefore, the plum pudding model was disapproved and a new model, the nuclear model, was devised to match the results
(b) If the predictions are correct, then this proves that the nuclear model is correct
124 videos|149 docs|37 tests
|
|
Explore Courses for Grade 10 exam
|