Page 1
MALE DEITIES
In the preceding chapter female deities have been dealt.
The male Saivite deities discussed in this chapter. It has
been already mentioned that Siva is a non-Aryan deity and has
origins. in the tribal society. This can be seen even in the
region of Goa. Mangesh is a regional deity of Goa and is an
aspect of Siva and Gavdas were associated with the origin of
Mangesh The other deities like N -agesh, Chandreshwar,
Bhutan-5th, Saptakoteshwar, Ramanath,. Ravalraith, Vetal, Paik
deva Dadd and ancestor worship are discussed in this chapter.
a) MANGESH
In Goa Mangesh is one of the epithets of Siva and is a
well known deity of Goa. The shrine of Mangesh was originally
in Kushasthali which was known as Kutthali in leonkani and it
became Cortalim after the Portuguese conquest. After the
destruction of Mangesh shrine of Kushasthali the LLI&I of
Mangcsh was reconstructed in Priol village in Ponda taluka.
In the list of the temple destroyed by the Portuguese the
name of this deity is not mentioned as Mangesh butManganath
and therefore is a deity of the Nath-Panthis.I The traces of
Na -th-Panthis found in Goa arc earlier to the period in which
Mangesh Mall'atmya (now onwards abbreviated as M.M.) was
Page 2
MALE DEITIES
In the preceding chapter female deities have been dealt.
The male Saivite deities discussed in this chapter. It has
been already mentioned that Siva is a non-Aryan deity and has
origins. in the tribal society. This can be seen even in the
region of Goa. Mangesh is a regional deity of Goa and is an
aspect of Siva and Gavdas were associated with the origin of
Mangesh The other deities like N -agesh, Chandreshwar,
Bhutan-5th, Saptakoteshwar, Ramanath,. Ravalraith, Vetal, Paik
deva Dadd and ancestor worship are discussed in this chapter.
a) MANGESH
In Goa Mangesh is one of the epithets of Siva and is a
well known deity of Goa. The shrine of Mangesh was originally
in Kushasthali which was known as Kutthali in leonkani and it
became Cortalim after the Portuguese conquest. After the
destruction of Mangesh shrine of Kushasthali the LLI&I of
Mangcsh was reconstructed in Priol village in Ponda taluka.
In the list of the temple destroyed by the Portuguese the
name of this deity is not mentioned as Mangesh butManganath
and therefore is a deity of the Nath-Panthis.I The traces of
Na -th-Panthis found in Goa arc earlier to the period in which
Mangesh Mall'atmya (now onwards abbreviated as M.M.) was
compiled. 2 If the deity was known as ManganIth would have
definitely mentioned it . It seems that before the spread of
the NWth-Panthi, the worship of Mangesh was prevalent in Goa.
The Portuguese who were not familiar with the religious
traditions in Goa and might have mentioned the deity
incorrectly ManganIth.
In a section titled Shankarasya 4hrarupa dh7ranam which
.t ¦
forms part of MM we get the reference to the. origin of
Mangesh. Siva and P5rvati were playing dice. 3 PWrvati won the
game and revoked Siva harshly. He was annoyed and left
Himalayas. P-(irvati went in search of him and in course of
search she came to Kushasthali(Cortalim). She was excessively
charming with Vcena in her hand and she sang in praise of
Siva. She was on her way to AghanWsini (Zuari) for taking
bath. A ferocious mighty roaring tiger with wide opened mouth
stood in front of her. She was frightened. of the tiger and
uttered tr-ahi MA hi Girish (please protect me from tiger).
1)rvati surrendered to Siva. The kind hearted Siva now
appeared from the body of the tiger. Therefore it is believed
that Mangesh has its origin in Ma hi Girish. 4
YA
in Gomanchal Kshetra Mahatma ‘ of SKH there are references
to the consecration of Mangesh linga by Brahma. It is further
mentioned that ParasurWma brought it to Shup5rak and finally
installed it. in Kushasthali. 5 This Purani.c account had
influenced earlier writers like Saldana 6 and Kosamhi. 7 Hence
Page 3
MALE DEITIES
In the preceding chapter female deities have been dealt.
The male Saivite deities discussed in this chapter. It has
been already mentioned that Siva is a non-Aryan deity and has
origins. in the tribal society. This can be seen even in the
region of Goa. Mangesh is a regional deity of Goa and is an
aspect of Siva and Gavdas were associated with the origin of
Mangesh The other deities like N -agesh, Chandreshwar,
Bhutan-5th, Saptakoteshwar, Ramanath,. Ravalraith, Vetal, Paik
deva Dadd and ancestor worship are discussed in this chapter.
a) MANGESH
In Goa Mangesh is one of the epithets of Siva and is a
well known deity of Goa. The shrine of Mangesh was originally
in Kushasthali which was known as Kutthali in leonkani and it
became Cortalim after the Portuguese conquest. After the
destruction of Mangesh shrine of Kushasthali the LLI&I of
Mangcsh was reconstructed in Priol village in Ponda taluka.
In the list of the temple destroyed by the Portuguese the
name of this deity is not mentioned as Mangesh butManganath
and therefore is a deity of the Nath-Panthis.I The traces of
Na -th-Panthis found in Goa arc earlier to the period in which
Mangesh Mall'atmya (now onwards abbreviated as M.M.) was
compiled. 2 If the deity was known as ManganIth would have
definitely mentioned it . It seems that before the spread of
the NWth-Panthi, the worship of Mangesh was prevalent in Goa.
The Portuguese who were not familiar with the religious
traditions in Goa and might have mentioned the deity
incorrectly ManganIth.
In a section titled Shankarasya 4hrarupa dh7ranam which
.t ¦
forms part of MM we get the reference to the. origin of
Mangesh. Siva and P5rvati were playing dice. 3 PWrvati won the
game and revoked Siva harshly. He was annoyed and left
Himalayas. P-(irvati went in search of him and in course of
search she came to Kushasthali(Cortalim). She was excessively
charming with Vcena in her hand and she sang in praise of
Siva. She was on her way to AghanWsini (Zuari) for taking
bath. A ferocious mighty roaring tiger with wide opened mouth
stood in front of her. She was frightened. of the tiger and
uttered tr-ahi MA hi Girish (please protect me from tiger).
1)rvati surrendered to Siva. The kind hearted Siva now
appeared from the body of the tiger. Therefore it is believed
that Mangesh has its origin in Ma hi Girish. 4
YA
in Gomanchal Kshetra Mahatma ‘ of SKH there are references
to the consecration of Mangesh linga by Brahma. It is further
mentioned that ParasurWma brought it to Shup5rak and finally
installed it. in Kushasthali. 5 This Purani.c account had
influenced earlier writers like Saldana 6 and Kosamhi. 7 Hence
these scholars trace the origin of the worship of Mangesh to
MOngher in Bihar. Both of them believed that Goud SAraswats
brought the worship of Mangesh to Goa.
Mgngirish Puja Mah-itmya is a section of MM and this
furnishes the tradition of Kanoji Brahmin and his association
with Mangesh. Devasharma, on his return journey from Rameshwar
stayed at Kushasthali. He used to take bath in Aghanasini
river and go to the other side. On the three consecutive days
he saw a cow entering into the river and again returning. He
inquired the people what was in the river ? People agreed to
join him in finding the cause of the disappearance of the cow
in the river. By holding the tail of the cow he went into the
river and saw the cow pouring milk over the lustrous linga and
Parvati saha Parameshwara. As per the desire of Siva, the the
linga was brought out of the river Aghanasini and consecrated
in Kushasthali. 8
Finally KapilW mahatmya which is also section of M M a
different legend regarding linga is mentioned. A cow was
stranded in a marshy place . A Brahmin named Dcvadatta rescued
the cow with the assistance of a shudra boy from the marshy
place. This cow was pouring milk over the linga. From the
legends furnished in M M as well as KapilamahStmya it is
evident that there is no unanimity in the legcnds. 9 The
verses 22 should have been last verse of KapilE mhgtmya. The
next five verses are redundant and seems to be later a
Page 4
MALE DEITIES
In the preceding chapter female deities have been dealt.
The male Saivite deities discussed in this chapter. It has
been already mentioned that Siva is a non-Aryan deity and has
origins. in the tribal society. This can be seen even in the
region of Goa. Mangesh is a regional deity of Goa and is an
aspect of Siva and Gavdas were associated with the origin of
Mangesh The other deities like N -agesh, Chandreshwar,
Bhutan-5th, Saptakoteshwar, Ramanath,. Ravalraith, Vetal, Paik
deva Dadd and ancestor worship are discussed in this chapter.
a) MANGESH
In Goa Mangesh is one of the epithets of Siva and is a
well known deity of Goa. The shrine of Mangesh was originally
in Kushasthali which was known as Kutthali in leonkani and it
became Cortalim after the Portuguese conquest. After the
destruction of Mangesh shrine of Kushasthali the LLI&I of
Mangcsh was reconstructed in Priol village in Ponda taluka.
In the list of the temple destroyed by the Portuguese the
name of this deity is not mentioned as Mangesh butManganath
and therefore is a deity of the Nath-Panthis.I The traces of
Na -th-Panthis found in Goa arc earlier to the period in which
Mangesh Mall'atmya (now onwards abbreviated as M.M.) was
compiled. 2 If the deity was known as ManganIth would have
definitely mentioned it . It seems that before the spread of
the NWth-Panthi, the worship of Mangesh was prevalent in Goa.
The Portuguese who were not familiar with the religious
traditions in Goa and might have mentioned the deity
incorrectly ManganIth.
In a section titled Shankarasya 4hrarupa dh7ranam which
.t ¦
forms part of MM we get the reference to the. origin of
Mangesh. Siva and P5rvati were playing dice. 3 PWrvati won the
game and revoked Siva harshly. He was annoyed and left
Himalayas. P-(irvati went in search of him and in course of
search she came to Kushasthali(Cortalim). She was excessively
charming with Vcena in her hand and she sang in praise of
Siva. She was on her way to AghanWsini (Zuari) for taking
bath. A ferocious mighty roaring tiger with wide opened mouth
stood in front of her. She was frightened. of the tiger and
uttered tr-ahi MA hi Girish (please protect me from tiger).
1)rvati surrendered to Siva. The kind hearted Siva now
appeared from the body of the tiger. Therefore it is believed
that Mangesh has its origin in Ma hi Girish. 4
YA
in Gomanchal Kshetra Mahatma ‘ of SKH there are references
to the consecration of Mangesh linga by Brahma. It is further
mentioned that ParasurWma brought it to Shup5rak and finally
installed it. in Kushasthali. 5 This Purani.c account had
influenced earlier writers like Saldana 6 and Kosamhi. 7 Hence
these scholars trace the origin of the worship of Mangesh to
MOngher in Bihar. Both of them believed that Goud SAraswats
brought the worship of Mangesh to Goa.
Mgngirish Puja Mah-itmya is a section of MM and this
furnishes the tradition of Kanoji Brahmin and his association
with Mangesh. Devasharma, on his return journey from Rameshwar
stayed at Kushasthali. He used to take bath in Aghanasini
river and go to the other side. On the three consecutive days
he saw a cow entering into the river and again returning. He
inquired the people what was in the river ? People agreed to
join him in finding the cause of the disappearance of the cow
in the river. By holding the tail of the cow he went into the
river and saw the cow pouring milk over the lustrous linga and
Parvati saha Parameshwara. As per the desire of Siva, the the
linga was brought out of the river Aghanasini and consecrated
in Kushasthali. 8
Finally KapilW mahatmya which is also section of M M a
different legend regarding linga is mentioned. A cow was
stranded in a marshy place . A Brahmin named Dcvadatta rescued
the cow with the assistance of a shudra boy from the marshy
place. This cow was pouring milk over the linga. From the
legends furnished in M M as well as KapilamahStmya it is
evident that there is no unanimity in the legcnds. 9 The
verses 22 should have been last verse of KapilE mhgtmya. The
next five verses are redundant and seems to be later a
interpolation. In the earlier section, the consecration of
Mangesh linga at Shuparak is ascribed to ParasurWma and later
he brought it to Kushasthali. Therefore, there is no unanimity
about the consecration of the linga of Mangesh.
seAtleirs
The carlyLyavdas of Goa were the worshippers of Mangesh.
Incidentally the earliest linga from Consua cave is ascribed
to c. 400 A.D. and the cave of Consua is hardly 4 kms from the
ancient site of Mangesh temple." No Puranic sanctity was
attached to the linga of Mangesh till about c . 1400 A. D. 11
Therefore, attaching Puranic sanctity , the assistance of
Shudra boy and his salvation are referred to in the
KapilamaliStmya. Even at present the Gavdas have certain
privilege in Mangesh temple. It seems that during the c. 1400
A. D. Mangesh Mahatmya was added to SKH . This is an appendix
of SKH. 12 From the above discussion it is evident that
Mangesh is an epithet of Siva and had origins in Goa and was
not brought from Tirhut or Shuparaka as mentioned in SKH.
b) INIXGESH
The temple of lagesh is at Bandivade in Fonda taluka.
This is an epithet of Siva. The word Nag is Prefixed to Ishl-
(Siva). It is one of the twelve jyotirlinga -s and is located
near Ahmednagar in Maharashtra . Tree and serpent worship arc
closely related with phallus worship in many areas of the
world. In Ynjur and Atharva veda's specially in the latter. Ved-6
Page 5
MALE DEITIES
In the preceding chapter female deities have been dealt.
The male Saivite deities discussed in this chapter. It has
been already mentioned that Siva is a non-Aryan deity and has
origins. in the tribal society. This can be seen even in the
region of Goa. Mangesh is a regional deity of Goa and is an
aspect of Siva and Gavdas were associated with the origin of
Mangesh The other deities like N -agesh, Chandreshwar,
Bhutan-5th, Saptakoteshwar, Ramanath,. Ravalraith, Vetal, Paik
deva Dadd and ancestor worship are discussed in this chapter.
a) MANGESH
In Goa Mangesh is one of the epithets of Siva and is a
well known deity of Goa. The shrine of Mangesh was originally
in Kushasthali which was known as Kutthali in leonkani and it
became Cortalim after the Portuguese conquest. After the
destruction of Mangesh shrine of Kushasthali the LLI&I of
Mangcsh was reconstructed in Priol village in Ponda taluka.
In the list of the temple destroyed by the Portuguese the
name of this deity is not mentioned as Mangesh butManganath
and therefore is a deity of the Nath-Panthis.I The traces of
Na -th-Panthis found in Goa arc earlier to the period in which
Mangesh Mall'atmya (now onwards abbreviated as M.M.) was
compiled. 2 If the deity was known as ManganIth would have
definitely mentioned it . It seems that before the spread of
the NWth-Panthi, the worship of Mangesh was prevalent in Goa.
The Portuguese who were not familiar with the religious
traditions in Goa and might have mentioned the deity
incorrectly ManganIth.
In a section titled Shankarasya 4hrarupa dh7ranam which
.t ¦
forms part of MM we get the reference to the. origin of
Mangesh. Siva and P5rvati were playing dice. 3 PWrvati won the
game and revoked Siva harshly. He was annoyed and left
Himalayas. P-(irvati went in search of him and in course of
search she came to Kushasthali(Cortalim). She was excessively
charming with Vcena in her hand and she sang in praise of
Siva. She was on her way to AghanWsini (Zuari) for taking
bath. A ferocious mighty roaring tiger with wide opened mouth
stood in front of her. She was frightened. of the tiger and
uttered tr-ahi MA hi Girish (please protect me from tiger).
1)rvati surrendered to Siva. The kind hearted Siva now
appeared from the body of the tiger. Therefore it is believed
that Mangesh has its origin in Ma hi Girish. 4
YA
in Gomanchal Kshetra Mahatma ‘ of SKH there are references
to the consecration of Mangesh linga by Brahma. It is further
mentioned that ParasurWma brought it to Shup5rak and finally
installed it. in Kushasthali. 5 This Purani.c account had
influenced earlier writers like Saldana 6 and Kosamhi. 7 Hence
these scholars trace the origin of the worship of Mangesh to
MOngher in Bihar. Both of them believed that Goud SAraswats
brought the worship of Mangesh to Goa.
Mgngirish Puja Mah-itmya is a section of MM and this
furnishes the tradition of Kanoji Brahmin and his association
with Mangesh. Devasharma, on his return journey from Rameshwar
stayed at Kushasthali. He used to take bath in Aghanasini
river and go to the other side. On the three consecutive days
he saw a cow entering into the river and again returning. He
inquired the people what was in the river ? People agreed to
join him in finding the cause of the disappearance of the cow
in the river. By holding the tail of the cow he went into the
river and saw the cow pouring milk over the lustrous linga and
Parvati saha Parameshwara. As per the desire of Siva, the the
linga was brought out of the river Aghanasini and consecrated
in Kushasthali. 8
Finally KapilW mahatmya which is also section of M M a
different legend regarding linga is mentioned. A cow was
stranded in a marshy place . A Brahmin named Dcvadatta rescued
the cow with the assistance of a shudra boy from the marshy
place. This cow was pouring milk over the linga. From the
legends furnished in M M as well as KapilamahStmya it is
evident that there is no unanimity in the legcnds. 9 The
verses 22 should have been last verse of KapilE mhgtmya. The
next five verses are redundant and seems to be later a
interpolation. In the earlier section, the consecration of
Mangesh linga at Shuparak is ascribed to ParasurWma and later
he brought it to Kushasthali. Therefore, there is no unanimity
about the consecration of the linga of Mangesh.
seAtleirs
The carlyLyavdas of Goa were the worshippers of Mangesh.
Incidentally the earliest linga from Consua cave is ascribed
to c. 400 A.D. and the cave of Consua is hardly 4 kms from the
ancient site of Mangesh temple." No Puranic sanctity was
attached to the linga of Mangesh till about c . 1400 A. D. 11
Therefore, attaching Puranic sanctity , the assistance of
Shudra boy and his salvation are referred to in the
KapilamaliStmya. Even at present the Gavdas have certain
privilege in Mangesh temple. It seems that during the c. 1400
A. D. Mangesh Mahatmya was added to SKH . This is an appendix
of SKH. 12 From the above discussion it is evident that
Mangesh is an epithet of Siva and had origins in Goa and was
not brought from Tirhut or Shuparaka as mentioned in SKH.
b) INIXGESH
The temple of lagesh is at Bandivade in Fonda taluka.
This is an epithet of Siva. The word Nag is Prefixed to Ishl-
(Siva). It is one of the twelve jyotirlinga -s and is located
near Ahmednagar in Maharashtra . Tree and serpent worship arc
closely related with phallus worship in many areas of the
world. In Ynjur and Atharva veda's specially in the latter. Ved-6
serpents are mentioned as a class of semi-divine beings along
with Gandharvgs and other celestial beings. Prayers (sutrgs)
prescribe offering to them. Zoomorphic divinities are known to
the Vedic Aryans only to a limited extent. The worship of
serpent deities in India would appear to have come from
Austric world. 13 This independent of cult of Naga -s, was
incorporated into Hinduism between c. 600 B.C. to 400B.C. 14
The influence of the Naga cult in Goa and the adjoining
regions could be traced from the copper plate of Siroda
belonging to the Bhoja ruler. One of the ministers mentioned
in this copper plate had the name Prabhu:igga Bhogikgmaya.
This clearly indicates that the Hindu society by c. 400 A.D.
in this region had worshipped Nggas. 15 The stone sculpture of
Naga (c. 400-500 A.D.) which has been reported from Peddem
(Canacona) also bears testimony to the worship of N5-g5s.16
(Plate No. V;13 and Pp There are place names in KOnkan and on
the Deccan plateau indicating the spread of Nggg cult for e.g.
NNgasthan in Sindhudurga district. In Goa there are two
villages bearing the name Nagoa, one in Bardcz taluka and the
second one is in Salcete. Before the spread of Vedic culture
in Goa region the linga of Nggesh may have been consecrated by
the Gavdas and worshipped in NEgeshi shrine of. Ponda taluka. 17
In addition to the above mentioned facts in SKH these is
a section called Vigavya mahamya and in this section Siva is
closely associated with NEgEs. vs. No.5 mentions that Siva was
Read More