# Metrics Notes | Study Computer Networks - Computer Science Engineering (CSE)

## Computer Science Engineering (CSE): Metrics Notes | Study Computer Networks - Computer Science Engineering (CSE)

The document Metrics Notes | Study Computer Networks - Computer Science Engineering (CSE) is a part of the Computer Science Engineering (CSE) Course Computer Networks.
All you need of Computer Science Engineering (CSE) at this link: Computer Science Engineering (CSE)

Metrics

The ARPANET was the testing ground for a number of different approaches to link-cost calculation. (It was also the place where the superior stability of link-state over distance-vector routing was demonstrated; the original mechanism used distance vector while the later version used link state.) The following discussion traces the evolution of the ARPANET routing metric and, in so doing, explores the subtle aspects of the problem.

The original ARPANET routing metric measured the number of packets that were queued waiting to be transmitted on each link, meaning that a link with 10 packets queued waiting to be transmitted was assigned a larger cost weight than a link with 5 packets queued for transmission. Using queue length as a routing metric did not work well, however, since queue length is an artificial measure of load—it moves packets toward the shortest queue rather than toward the destination, a situation all too familiar to those of us who hop from line to line at the grocery store. Stated more precisely, the original ARPANET routing mechanism suffered from the fact that it did not take either the bandwidth or the latency of the link into consideration.

A second version of the ARPANET routing algorithm, sometimes called the “new routing mechanism,” took both link bandwidth and latency into consideration and used delay, rather than just queue length, as a measure of load. This was done as follows. First, each incoming packet was timestamped with its time of arrival at the router (ArrivalTime); its departure time from the router (DepartTime) was also recorded. Second, when the link-level ACK was received from the other side, the node computed the delay for that packet as

Delay = (DepartTime− ArrivalTime) +TransmissionTime +Latency

where TransmissionTime and Latency were statically defined for the link and captured the link’s bandwidth and latency, respectively. Notice that in this case, DepartTime − ArrivalTime represents the amount of time the packet was delayed (queued) in the node due to load. If the ACK did not arrive, but instead the packet timed out, then DepartTime was reset to the time the packet was retransmitted. In this case, DepartTime − ArrivalTime captures the reliability of the link—the more frequent the retransmission of packets, the less reliable the link, and the more we want to avoid it. Finally, the weight assigned to each link was derived from the average delay experienced by the packets recently sent over that link.

• A highly loaded link never shows a cost of more than three times its cost when idle;
• The most expensive link is only seven times the cost of the least expensive;
• A high-speed satellite link is more attractive than a low-speed terrestrial link;
• Cost is a function of link utilization only at moderate to high loads.

The document Metrics Notes | Study Computer Networks - Computer Science Engineering (CSE) is a part of the Computer Science Engineering (CSE) Course Computer Networks.
All you need of Computer Science Engineering (CSE) at this link: Computer Science Engineering (CSE)
 Use Code STAYHOME200 and get INR 200 additional OFF

## Computer Networks

12 videos|72 docs|53 tests

### Top Courses for Computer Science Engineering (CSE)

Track your progress, build streaks, highlight & save important lessons and more!

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

;