Understanding the organisation’s risk appetite and attitudes is critical context to financial decision making ...
... where risk capital corresponds to agreed points on the aggregate loss distribution
* Economic capital confidence interval is generally a function of the organisation’s target debt rating
A risk assessment will assess the potential risks associated with a decision across relevant risk classes, and time horizon
Base cash flows should reference the “mean”, not mode, and be suitably adjusted for implementation risk
Cost of Capital should be recognised:
* primarily through a risk-based Economic Capital lens
* by forecasting an explicit annual “Capital Charge”
Some “secondary” capital lenses through which to consider the financial decision might include:
Example: same cash flow but different risk adjusted value
Where cash flows are adjusted for risk, then the appropriate RDR for these cash flows would be the risk free rate
Where cash flows are adjusted for risk, then the appropriate RDR for these cash flows would be the risk free rate
Communicating results of the financial assessment of initiative(s) should provide transparency around the manner in which adjustments for risk have been made
CONCLUSION - The 7 Deadly Sins
1. rigidly applying a fixed discount rate irrespective of risk to decide on “yes/no” investment decisions
2. undisciplined ad hoc adjustments to get to the NPV that “feels right”
3. over reliance on recent history to define future losses
4. over aggressive revenue forecasts
5. an “ad hoc” risk assessment process
6. ignoring implementation risk
7. inconsistent application of time horizon and terminal values to financial assessment
71 videos|80 docs|23 tests
|
|
Explore Courses for B Com exam
|