The Competition Act, 2002: Objectives & Main Provisions | UGC NET Commerce Preparation Course PDF Download

What is Competition Act, 2002 ?

The Competition Act of 2002 is a key law in India that governs business competition, replacing the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (MRTP) Act of 1969. Its main goal is to prevent actions that harm competition in the market, addressing issues like the concentration of wealth and monopolies. The act established the Competition Commission of India (CCI) and the Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT) to enforce its provisions. Its focus is on promoting fair competition, protecting consumer rights, and preventing practices that could disrupt a competitive market. By regulating mergers and acquisitions and empowering the CCI, the act seeks to create a balance between encouraging competition and ensuring consumer protection.

Geeky Takeaways:

• Overview: The Competition Act, 2002 is the primary law regulating commercial competition in India, taking over from the 1969 Act.
• Objective: The main goal is to prevent actions that could harm competition and tackle issues like wealth concentration and monopolistic practices.
• Provisions: This law prohibits agreements that are anti-competitive, the abuse of dominant positions, and combinations that harm competition.
• Goals: Its objectives include fostering fair competition, safeguarding consumers, and preventing anti-competitive market behaviors.

Main Components of the Competition Act

• The Competition Act, 2002 serves as pivotal legislation with the overarching goal of safeguarding consumer interests, fostering and sustaining healthy market competition, protecting consumer rights, and ensuring the freedom of trade for all market participants.
• This comprehensive law replaces the earlier MRTP Act, which was confined to India and primarily addressed monopolies and restrictive trade practices.
• The framework of the Competition Act rests on three key components: the Competition Commission of India (CCI), the Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT), and the National Competition Policy (NCP). By employing these components, the act aims to guarantee that market competition operates as intended, promoting a diverse array of goods at fair prices and reinforcing consumer access to a broad spectrum of choices.
• This legislation reflects a contemporary approach to addressing the dynamics of competition and trade, ensuring a fair and competitive market environment.

Key Aspects of Competition Act

• Prohibition of Anti-Competitive Agreements: The Act strictly prohibits anti-competitive agreements to uphold fair competition. This ensures that businesses compete based on merit, promoting innovation and providing consumers with diverse options.
• Regulation of Combinations: The Act focuses on overseeing mergers, acquisitions, and amalgamations to maintain a competitive market. It intervenes in cases where combinations could harm competition, aiming to prevent the accumulation of market power and maintain a level playing field.
• Consumer Welfare: The Act prioritizes consumer welfare in all competition-related decisions. This emphasis on consumer well-being leads to enhanced product quality, competitive pricing, and a wider range of choices, benefiting society as a whole.
• Establishment of the Competition Commission of India (CCI): The creation of the CCI as an independent statutory body is a crucial component of the Act. The CCI, as an autonomous entity, enforces competition-related regulations impartially, fostering an environment conducive to fair competition and preventing anti-competitive behaviors.
• Power to Investigate and Penalize: Granting the CCI the authority to investigate and penalize entities involved in anti-competitive behaviors strengthens its regulatory power, acting as a deterrent against violations.
  The investigative capabilities aid in identifying and preventing activities that could harm fair competition.
• Leniency Policy: The introduction of a leniency policy encourages cooperation from businesses during investigations, promoting transparency and information disclosure.
  This approach facilitates more effective and thorough investigations into anti-competitive practices.
• Appeal Process: The provision for an appeal process enhances accountability in the regulatory structure.
  Allowing dissatisfied entities to appeal decisions to the Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT) ensures fairness and checks for procedural errors, contributing to transparency and legitimacy.
• Types of Anti-Competitive Practices: The act explicitly prohibits various anti-competitive practices to maintain fair competition.It  addresses issues like abuse of dominant position, price fixing, market allocation, and collusive bidding.By casting a wide net, the act prevents activities that could distort the competitive landscape.
• Competition Advocacy: CCI is mandated to promote and advocate for competition, shaping market culture proactively. Through education and outreach programs, the act aims to enhance understanding of competition benefits. Encourages businesses to engage in fair and competitive practices.
• Penalties: The act imposes penalties, including fines linked to an enterprise's turnover, for anti-competitive behavior. Penalties serve as a deterrent and emphasize the seriousness of regulatory framework violations.
• Compensation for Damages: Including a provision for civil remedies and compensation underlines a comprehensive approach to addressing the repercussions of anti-competitive behavior. By offering a means for affected parties to seek redress, this provision aids in safeguarding market participants from unjust practices.
• Suo Moto Investigations: Granting the CCI's Director General the authority to initiate investigations independently introduces a proactive element to the regulatory framework. This proactive approach enables swift responses to emerging issues and allows for the prompt handling of firms that negatively impact the market, reinforcing the regulator's role as a vigilant guardian of fair competition.
• Limitation Period for Complaints: Introducing a limitation period for filing complaints adds a time dimension to the regulatory process. By setting a three-year timeframe, the system encourages timely reporting and resolution of competition-related issues, facilitating the prompt administration of justice within the regulatory framework.

Competition Regulations Overview

• Anti-Competitive Agreements: These agreements, defined in Section 2(b) of the Competition Act, can undermine fair competition or show undue favoritism. They encompass arrangements, whether written or informal, that significantly reduce competition within India as outlined in Section 3 of the act. Cartels, often secretive, are considered one form of anti-competitive agreement, and any violation of Section 3 renders such agreements void.
• Abuse of Dominant Position: Entities or individuals exploiting strong market positions to the detriment of fair competition are addressed in this section. Dominant positions are determined based on impact on the relevant market. Instances of abuse include unfair pricing practices, limiting production, hindering market access, and leveraging dominance across markets. Unlike anti-competitive agreements, proving an appreciable adverse effect on competition is not necessary.
• Regulation of Combinations: The act regulates three types of combinations: acquisition of stock or assets, gaining control over an enterprise, and mergers. Section 5 sets specific thresholds to prevent undue concentration of economic power. Agreements with governmental financial institutions have exemptions for strategic financial arrangements. Section 6 outlines the notification process requiring entities to inform the Competition Commission of India (CCI) within 30 days of execution. The combination comes into effect 210 days after notice or the CCI's order, whichever is earlier.
• Limitations under Section 5: Section 5 imposes limitations on combinations based on assets and turnover to ensure larger combinations undergo scrutiny. Specific criteria for acquisitions include asset and turnover thresholds for both acquiring and target entities. Mergers or amalgamations must meet prescribed thresholds for assets and turnover. The limitations aim to allow smaller combinations that may not significantly harm competition while subjecting larger combinations to thorough evaluation.

Key Points on Competition Act, 2002 and CCI

• Establishment of CCI: The Competition Commission of India (CCI) was founded on October 14, 2003, with a focus on regulating competition in the Indian market.
• Legal Challenges: Initially, the full implementation of the Competition Act was hindered by legal challenges, with a writ petition filed before the Supreme Court.
• Court Recommendations: The Supreme Court suggested the formation of two distinct bodies within the government to handle advisory, regulatory, and adjudicatory functions separately, in line with the doctrine of separation of powers.
• CCI Composition: The CCI comprises a chairperson and six members appointed by the central government, ensuring a balanced decision-making process.

Legislative Mandate and Administrative Setup

• The Raghavan Committee's Influence: The Raghavan Committee significantly influenced the development of India's competition regime, particularly through the establishment of the Competition Commission of India (CCI).
• Creation of CCI: The Raghavan Committee proposed the formation of the CCI as a specialized agency with a multi-member structure to ensure independence and effectiveness in addressing anti-competitive practices.
• 2006 Amendment: Following the Committee's recommendations, the Competition Act was amended in 2006 to empower the CCI, enhancing its role as a vigilant guardian of fair competition.

Evolution and Establishment of CCI

• Founding of CCI: The CCI was established on October 14, 2003, with a mandate to combat anti-competitive behaviors and promote fair competition in the Indian market.
• Structural Changes: Significant amendments in 2007 realigned the CCI's structure and functions with the recommendations of the Raghavan Committee, strengthening its regulatory capabilities.
• Repeal of MRTP Act: The repeal of the MRTP Act in 2009 consolidated the CCI's authority as the primary national body responsible for addressing competition-related issues.

Purpose and Objectives of CCI

• Legal Obligations: Section 18 of the Competition Act delineates the legal obligations of the CCI, highlighting its role in preventing activities that could harm competition, consumer welfare, and market participants' rights.
• Central Authority for Complaints: The CCI functions as the central authority for receiving complaints related to violations of competition laws, ensuring a comprehensive approach to addressing diverse competition concerns.

CCI's Efforts Towards Consumer Welfare:

• The CCI actively works to benefit consumers, promote economic growth, and foster fair competition.
• Engages in competition advocacy, educates stakeholders about the benefits of competition, and maintains effective relationships with sectoral regulators.
• Commitment to ensuring consumer welfare and facilitating economic development through a multifaceted approach.

Jurisdiction and Authorities Under CCI:

• Section 61 of the Competition Act restricts civil courts from adjudicating matters within CCI's purview.
• Collaborates with various entities including the Director General, civil courts, and sectoral regulators to maintain checks and balances.
• Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT) and the Supreme Court provide additional oversight for addressing competition-related issues.

Powers and Duties of CCI:

• Primary responsibility is to enforce the Competition Act, 2002, focusing on anti-competitive agreements and abuses of dominant positions.
• Sections 19 to 40 of the act detail CCI's investigative, adjudicative, and executive functions.
• Ensures fair play in the market and intervenes in cases that may harm competition.

Investigative Process and Suo Motu Powers:

• Investigative Authority: The CCI, under Sections 19, and 26 to 28, investigates anti-competitive agreements and dominant position abuses, triggered by complaints or suo motu actions.
• Collaborative Process: The CCI works with the Director General during investigations and can issue temporary injunctions if needed, as seen in cases like the DLF case.

Duties for Advancing Consumer Welfare:

• Consumer Focus: Competition law, as per Section 18, emphasizes advancing consumer welfare by eliminating market distortions.
• CCI's Mandate: The CCI aims to establish a fair competitive system in line with consumer interests and economic efficiency, guided by Section 18 of the Competition Act.

Procedural Requirements and Locus to File Information:

• Filing Regulations: The Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations, 2009, detail procedural requirements for submitting information.
• Information Submission: Regulations 10 to 49 of the Competition Act provide a structured framework for submitting information to the CCI, emphasizing inclusivity without prerequisites for individuals filing under Section 19(1)(a).
• Identity Protection: The CCI ensures informant identity confidentiality to encourage reporting without fear of reprisal.

International Cooperation by CCI

• Engagement with Foreign Agencies: Section 18 of the Competition Act, 2002 allows the CCI to enter agreements with foreign agencies, facilitating international cooperation.
• Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs): The CCI has signed MOUs with competition authorities of various countries like the USA, EU, Russia, Australia, and BRICS nations, showing a dedication to global collaboration.

Conclusion