Objectives
Introduction
A simple circuit as shown in fig.8.1 is considered to illustrate the concept of equivalent circuit and it is always possible to view even a very complicated circuit in terms of much simpler equivalent source and load circuits. Subsequently the reduction of computational complexity that involves in solving the current through a branch for different values of load resistance (RL) is also discussed. In many applications, a network may contain a variable component or element while other elements in the circuit are kept constant. If the solution for current (I) or voltage (V) or power (P) in any component of network is desired, in such cases the whole circuit need to be analyzed each time with the change in component value. In order to avoid such repeated computation, it is desirable to introduce a method that will not have to be repeated for each value of variable component. Such tedious computation burden can be avoided provided the fixed part of such networks could be converted into a very simple equivalent circuit that represents either in the form of practical voltage source known as Thevenin’s voltage source (VTh = magnitude of voltage source, RTh = internal reststance of the source) or in the form of practical current source known as Norton’s current source (IN = magnitude of current source , RN = int ernal rests tan ce of current source). In true sense, this conversion will considerably simplify the analysis while the load resistance changes. Although the conversion technique accomplishes the same goal, it has certain advantages over the techniques that we have learnt in earlier lessons. Let us consider the circuit shown in fig. 8.1(a). Our problem is to find a current through RL using different techniques; the following observations are made.
Find
Suppose, if the value of RL is changed then the three (mesh current method) or two equations (node voltage method) need to be solved again to find the new current in RL . Similarly, in case of superposition theorem each time the load resistance RL is changed, the entire circuit has to be analyzed all over again. Much of the tedious mathematical work can be avoided if the fixed part of circuit (fig. 8.1(a)) or in other words, the circuit contained inside the imaginary fence or black box with two terminals A & B , is replaced by the simple equivalent voltage source (as shown in fig. 8.1(b)) or current source (as shown in fig.8.1(c)).
Thevenin’s Theorem: Thevenin’s theorem states that any two output terminals (A & B , shown in fig. 8.2.(a)) of an active linear network containing independent sources (it includes voltage and current sources) can be replaced by a simple voltage source of magnitude VTh in series with a single resistor RTh (see fig. 8.2(d)) where RTh is the equivalent resistance of the network when looking from the output terminals A & B with all sources (voltage and current) removed and replaced by their internal resistances (see fig. 8.2(c)) and the magnitude of is equal to the open circuit voltage across the Th V
A & B terminals. (The proof of the theorem will be given in section- L8. 5).
The procedure for applying Thevenin’s theorem
To find a current IL through the load resistance RL (as shown in fig. 8.2(a)) using Thevenin’s theorem, the following steps are followed:
Step-1: Disconnect the load resistance (RL) from the circuit, as indicated in fig. 8.2(b).
Step-2: Calculate the open-circuit voltage (shown in fig.8.2(b)) at the load terminals (A & B) after disconnecting the load resistance (RL). In general, one can apply any of the techniques (mesh-current, node-voltage and superposition method) learnt in earlier lessons to compute VTh (experimentally just measure the voltage across the load terminals using a voltmeter).
Step-3: Redraw the circuit (fig. 8.2(b)) with each practical source replaced by its internal resistance as shown in fig.8.2(c). (note, voltage sources should be short-circuited (just remove them and replace with plain wire) and current sources should be open-circuited (just removed).
Step-4: Look backward into the resulting circuit from the load terminals (A & B) , as suggested by the eye in fig.L.8.2(c). Calculate the resistance that would exist between the load terminals (or equivalently one can think as if a voltage source is applied across the load terminals and then trace the current distribution through the circuit (fig.8.2 (c)) in order to calculate the resistance across the load terminals.) The resistance RTh is described in the statement of Thevenin’s theorem. Once again, calculating this resistance may be a difficult task but one can try to use the standard circuit reduction technique or Y - Δ Or Δ - Y transformation techniques.
Step-5: Place in series with VTh to form the Thevenin’s equivalent circuit (replacing the imaginary fencing portion or fixed part of the circuit with an equivalent practical voltage source) as shown in fig. 8.2(d).
Step-6: Reconnect the original load to the Thevenin voltage circuit as shown in fig.8.2(e); the load’s voltage, current and power may be calculated by a simple arithmetic operation only.
Remarks: (i) One great advantage of Thevenin’s theorem over the normal circuit reduction technique or any other technique is this: once the Thevenin equivalent circuit has been formed, it can be reused in calculating load current (IL), load voltage (VL) and load power (PL) for different loads using the equations (8.1)-(8.3).
(ii) Fortunately, with help of this theorem one can find the choice of load resistance RL that results in the maximum power transfer to the load. On the other hand, the effort necessary to solve this problem-using node or mesh analysis methods can be quite complex and tedious from computational point of view.
Application of Thevenin’s theorem
Example: For the circuit shown in fig.8.3(a), find the current through RL = R2 = 1Ω resistor (Ia-b branch) using Thevenin’s theorem & hence calculate the voltage across the current source (Vcg).
Solution:
Step-1: Disconnect the load resistance RL and redraw the circuit as shown in fig.8.3(b).
Step-2: Apply any method (say node-voltage method) to calculate VTh .
At node C:
Now, the currents I1 & I2 can easily be computed using the following expressions.
(note, current I1 is flowing from ‘c’ to ‘a’)
(note, current I2 is flowing from ‘c’ to ‘g’)
Step-3: Redraw the circuit (fig.8.3(b) indicating the direction of currents in different branches. One can find the Thevenin’s voltage VTh using KVL around the closed path ‘gabg’ (see fig.8.3.(c).
VTh =Vag−Vbg = 3 −2 =1volt
Step-4: Replace all sources by their internal resistances. In this problem, voltage source has an internal resistance zero (0) (ideal voltage source) and it is short-circuited with a wire. On the other hand, the current source has an infinite internal resistance (ideal current source) and it is open-circuited (just remove the current source). Thevenin’s resistance of the fixed part of the circuit can be computed by looking at the load terminals ‘a’- ‘b’ (see fig.8.3(d)).
RTh = (R1+ R3) ║ R4 = (3 + 4)║2 =1.555 Ω
Step-5: Place RTh in series with VTh to form the Thevenin’s equivalent circuit (a simple practical voltage source). Reconnect the original load resistance RL = R2 = 1Ω to the Thevenin’s equivalent circuit (note the polarity of ‘a’ and ‘b’ is to be considered carefully) as shown in fig.8.3(e).
Step-6: The circuit shown in fig.8.3 (a) is redrawn to indicate different branch currents. Referring to fig.8.3 (f), one can calculate the voltage Vbg and voltage across the current source (Vcg) using the following equations.
Example- For the circuit shown in fig.8.4 (a), find the current IL through 6 Ω resistor using Thevenin’s theorem.
Solution:
Step-1: Disconnect 6Ω from the terminals ‘a’ and ‘b’ and the corresponding circuit diagram is shown in fig.L.8.4 (b). Consider point ‘g’ as ground potential and other voltages are measured with respect to this point.
Step-2: Apply any suitable method to find the Thevenin’s voltage (VTh) (or potential between the terminals ‘a’ and ‘b’). KVL is applied around the closed path ‘gcag’ to compute Thevenin’s voltage.
VTh =Vab=Vag − Vbg = 34 − 6 = 28 volt (note ‘a’ is higher potential than ‘b’)
Step-3: Thevenin’s resistance RTh can be found by replacing all sources by their internal resistances (all voltage sources are short-circuited and current sources are just removed or open circuited) as shown in fig.8.4 (c).
Step-4: Thevenin’s equivalent circuit as shown in fig.8.4 (d) is now equivalently represents the original circuit (fig.L.8.4(a).
Example-The box shown in fig.8.5 (a) consists of independent dc sources and resistances. Measurements are taken by connecting an ammeter in series with the resistor R and the results are shown in table.
Table
R | I |
10 Ω | 2 A |
20 Ω | 1.5 A |
? | 0.6 A |
Solution: The circuit shown in fig.8.5(a) can be replaced by an equivalent Thevenin’s voltage source as shown in fig.8.5(b). The current flowing through the resistor R is expressed as
The following two equations are written from measurements recorded in table.
Solving equations (8.5) and (8.6) we get,
VTh = 60volt; RTh = 20 Ω
The choice of R that yields current flowing the resistor is 0.6 A can be obtained using the equation (8.4).
Maximum Power Transfer Theorem
In an electric circuit, the load receives electric energy via the supply sources and converts that energy into a useful form. The maximum allowable power receives by the load is always limited either by the heating effect (incase of resistive load) or by the other power conversion taking place in the load. The Thevenin and Norton models imply that the internal circuits within the source will necessarily dissipate some of power generated by the source. A logical question will arise in mind, how much power can be transferred to the load from the source under the most practical conditions? In other words, what is the value of load resistance that will absorbs the maximum power from the source? This is an important issue in many practical problems and it is discussed with a suitable example.
Let us consider an electric network as shown in fig.8.6(a), the problem is to find the choice of the resistance RL so that the network delivers maximum power to the load or in other words what value of load resistance RL will absorb the maximum amount of power from the network. This problem can be solved using nodal or mesh current analysis to obtain an expression for the power absorbed by RL , then the derivative of this expression with respect to RL will establish the condition under what circumstances the maximum power transfer occurs. The effort required for such an approach can be quite tedious and complex. Fortunately, the network shown in fig.L.8.6(a) can be represented by an equivalent Thevenin’s voltage source as shown in fig.L.8.6(b).
In fig.8.6(b) a variable load resistance RL is connected to an equivalent Thevenin circuit of original circuit(fig.8.6(a)). The current for any value of load resistance is
Then, the power delivered to the load is
The load power depends on both RTh and RL; however, is constant for the equivalent Thevenin network. So power delivered by the equivalent Thevenin network to the load resistor is entirely depends on the value of RL. To find the value of RL that absorbs a maximum power from the Thevenin circuit, we differentiate PL with respect to RL .
For maximum power dissipation in the load, the condition given below must be satisfied
This result is known as “Matching the load” or maximum power transfer occurs when the load resistance RL matches the Thevenin’s resistance RTh of a given systems. Also, notice that under the condition of maximum power transfer, the load voltage is, by voltage division, one-half of the Thevenin voltage. The expression for maximum power dissipated to the load resistance is given by
The total power delivered by the source
This means that the Thevenin voltage source itself dissipates as much power in its internal resistance RTh as the power absorbed by the load RL . Efficiency under maximum
power transfer condition is given by
For a given circuit, VTh and RTh are fixed. By varying the load resistance RL , the power delivered to the load varies as shown in fig.8.6(c).
Remarks: The Thevenin equivalent circuit is useful in finding the maximum power that a linear circuit can deliver to a load.
Example-L.8.4 For the circuit shown in fig.8.7(a), find the value of RL that absorbs maximum power from the circuit and the corresponding power under this condition.
Solution: Load resistance RL is disconnected from the terminals ‘a’ and ‘b’ and the corresponding circuit diagram is drawn (see fig.8.7(b)).
The above circuit is equivalently represented by a Thevenin circuit and the corresponding Thevenin voltage VTh and Thevenin resistance RTh are calculated by following the steps given below:
Now applying ‘Super position theorem’, one can find VTh (voltage across the ‘a’ and ‘b’ terminals, refer fig. 8.7(b)). Note any method (node or mesh analysis) can be applied to find VTh. Considering only 20v source only
From the above circuit the current through ‘b-c’ branch = 20/20 = 1A (from ‘b’ to ‘a’) whereas the voltage across the ‘b-a’ branch vba =1×10 =10 volt . (’b’ is higher potential than ‘a’). ∴ vab =−10 volt
Considering only 10v source only
Note: No current is flowing through ‘cb’-branch.
∴ Vab = 5v (‘a’ is higher potential than ‘b’)
Consider only 2A current source only
Note that the current flowing the ‘c-a’ branch is zero
∴ Vab =10 v (‘a’ is higher potential than ‘b’ point).
The voltage across the ‘a’ and ‘b’ terminals due to the all sources = VTh = Vab (due to 20v) + Vab (due to 10v) + Vab (due to 2A source) = - 10 + 5 + 10 = 5v (a is higher potential than the point ‘b’).
To computute RTh:
Replace all voltage and current sources by their internal resistance of the circuit shown in fig.8.7(b).
RTh = Rab = ((5+5) || 10) + (10 || 10)
= 5 + 5 = 10 Ω
The choice of RL that absorbs maximum power from the circuit is equal to the value of Thevenin resistance RTh
RL = RTh = 10Ω
Under this condition, the maximum power dissipated to RL is
Proof of Thevenin Theorem
The basic concept of this theorem and its proof are based on the principle of superposition theorem. Let us consider a linear system in fig.L.8.8(a).
It is assumed that the dc resistive network is excited by the independent voltage and current sources. In general, there will be certain potential difference (Voc = VTh) between the terminals ‘a’ and ‘b’ when the load resistance RL is disconnected from the terminals. Fig.8.8(b) shows an additional voltage source E (ideal) is connected in series with the load resistance RL in such a way (polarity of external voltage source E in opposition the open-circuit voltage Voc across ‘a’ and ‘b’ terminals) so that the combined effect of all internal and external sources results zero current through the load resistance RL .
According to the principle of superposition, zero current flowing through RL can be considered as a algebraic sum (considering direction of currents through RL) of (i) current through RL due to the external source E only while all other internal sources are replaced by their internal resistances (all voltage sources are short-circuited and all current sources are open circuited), and (ii) current through RL due to the combined effect of all internal sources while the external source E is shorted with a wire. For the first case, assume the current (due to external source E only) is flowing through RL from right to left direction(←) as shown in fig.8.8(c).
For the second case, the current I2 (due to combined effect of all internal sources only) is flowing through RL with same magnitude of I1 but in opposite direction (left to right). Note that the resultant current I through the resistor RL is zero due to the combination of internal and external sources (see fig.8.8(b)). This situation will arise provided the voltage (Vab) across the ‘a’ and ‘b’ terminals is exactly same (with same polarity) as that of external voltage E and this further implies that the voltage across Vab is nothing but an open-circuit voltage (VTh) while the load resistance RL is disconnected from the terminals ‘a’ and ‘b’. With the logics as stated above, one can find the current expression for the circuit (fig.8.8(b)) when the external source E is shortcircuited with a wire. In other words, the original circuit (fig.8.8(a)) can be replaced by an equivalent circuit that delivers the same amount of current IL through RL . Fig.8.8(d) shows the equivalent Thevenin circuit of the original network (fig.8.8(a)).
Norton’s theorem
Norton’s theorem states that any two terminals A & B of a network composed of linear resistances (see fig.8.9(a)) and independent sources (voltage or current, combination of voltage and current sources) may be replaced by an equivalent current source and a parallel resistance. The magnitude of current source is the current measured in the short circuit placed across the terminal pair A & B . The parallel resistance is the equivalent resistance looking into the terminal pair A & B with all independent sources has been replaced by their internal resistances.
Any linear dc circuit, no matter how complicated, can also be replaced by an equivalent circuit consisting of one dc current source in parallel with one resistance. Precisely, Norton’s theorem is a dual of Thevenin’s theorem. To find a current IL through the load resistance RL (as shown in fig.8.9(a)) using Norton’s theorem, the following steps are followed:
Step-1: Short the output terminal after disconnecting the load resistance (RL) from the terminals A & B and then calculate the short circuit current IN (as shown in fig.8.9(b)). In general, one can apply any of the techniques (mesh-current, node-voltage and superposition method) learnt in earlier lessons to compute IN (experimentally just measure the short-circuit current using an ammeter).
Step-2: Redraw the circuit with each practical sources replaced by its internal resistance while the short–circuit across the output terminals removed (note: voltage sources should be short-circuited (just replace with plain wire) and current sources should be open circuited (just removed)). Look backward into the resulting circuit from the load terminals (A& B), as suggested by the eye in fig.8.9(c).
Step-3: Calculate the resistance that would exist between the load terminals A & B (or equivalently one can think as if a voltage source is applied across the load terminals and then trace the current distribution through the circuit (fig.8.9(c)) in order to calculate the resistance across the load terminals). This resistance is denoted as RN, is shown in fig.8.9
(d). Once again, calculating this resistance may be a difficult task but one can try to use the standard circuit reduction technique or Y - Δ or Δ - Y transformation techniques. It may be noted that the value of Norton’s resistance RN is is truly same as that of Thevenin’s resistance RTh in a circuit.
Step-4: Place RN in parallel with current IN to form the Norton’s equivalent circuit (replacing the imaginary fencing portion or fixed part of the circuit with an equivalent practical current source) as shown in fig.8.8 (d).
Step-5: Reconnect the original load to the Norton current circuit; the load’s voltage, current and power may be calculated by a simple arithmetic operation only.
Power absorbed by the load
Remarks: (i) Similar to the Thevenin’s theorem, Norton’s theorem has also a similar advantage over the normal circuit reduction technique or any other technique when it is used to calculate load current (IL), load voltage (VL) and load power (PL) for different loads.
(ii) Fortunately, with help of either Norton’s theorem or Thevenin’s theorem one can find the choice of load resistance RL that results in the maximum power transfer to the load.
(iii) Norton’s current source may be replaced by an equivalent Thevenin’s voltage source as shown in fig.L.8.1(b). The magnitude of voltage source (VTh) and its internal resistances (RTh) are expressed by the following relations
VTh = IN×RN ; RTh = RN (with proper polarities at the terminals)
In other words, a source transformation converts a Thevenin equivalent circuit into a Norton equivalent circuit or vice-verse.
Application of Norton’s Theorem
Example- For the circuit shown in fig.8.10(a), find the current through RL = R2 = 1Ω resistor (Ia-b branch) using Norton’s theorem & hence calculate the voltage across the current source (Vcg).
Solution:
Step-1: Remove the resistor through which the current is to be found and short the terminals ‘a’ and ‘b’ (see fig.8.10(b))
Step-2: Any method can be adopted to compute the current flowing through the a-b branch. Here, we apply ‘mesh – current’ method.
Loop-1
Step-3: To compute RN, all sources are replaced with their internal resistances. The equivalent resistance between ‘a’ and ‘b’ terminals is same as the value of Thevenin’s resistance of the circuit shown in fig.8.3(d).
In order to calculate the voltage across the current source the following procedures are adopted. Redraw the original circuit indicating the current direction in the load.
∴ Vcg = 2 ×1.305 + 4 × .915 = 6.26volt ('c' is higher potential than 'g')
Example-L.8.6 For the circuit shown in fig.8.11(a), the following measurements are taken and they are given in table.
Table
R | I | VR |
Open | 0 ma | 1.053 V |
Short | 0.222 ma | 0V |
? | 0.108 ma | ? |
25 k Ω | ? | ? |
Find the current following through the resistor when R = 25kΩ and voltage drop across the resistor.
Solution: First measurement implies the Thevenin’s voltage across the terminals ‘a’ and ‘b’ . (VTh) =1.053 V
Second measurement implies the Norton’s current (IN) through the shorted terminals ‘a’ and ‘b’ =0.222ma
With the above two measurements one can find out the Thevenin’s resistance RTh = (= RN) using the following relation
Third measurement shows that the current in resistor R is given by The voltage across the 5k Ω resistor is 5×0.108 = 0.54 volt
From the fourth measurement data, the current through 25kΩ resistor is = ma and the corresponding voltage across the resistor resistor VR = I x R = 0.0354 x 25 = 0.889 V .
Example-Applying Norton’s theorem, calculate the value of that results in maximum power transfer to the 6.2 R Ω resistor in fig.8.12(a). Find the maximum power dissipated by the resistor 6.2Ω under that situation
Solution:
Step-1: Short the terminals ‘a’ and ‘b’ after disconnecting the 6.2Ω resistor. The Norton’s current IN for the circuit shown in fig.8.12(b) is computed by using ‘meshcurrent’ method.
Solving equations (8.12) and (8.14), we get
(-ve sign implies that the current is flowing from ‘b’ to ‘a’) and Norton’s current
Norton’s resistance RN is computed by replacing all sources by their internal resistances while the short-circuit across the output terminal ‘a’ and ‘b’ is removed. From the circuit diagram fig.8.12(c), the Norton’s resistance is obtained between the terminals ‘a’ and ‘b’.
Note that the maximum power will dissipate in load resistance when load resistance = Norton’s resistance RN = RL = 6.2Ω. To satisfy this condition the value of the resistance R can be obtained from equation (8.15), we get R = 2Ω. The circuit shown in fig.8.12(a) is now replaced by an equivalent Norton’s current source (as shown in fig.L.8.12(d)) and the maximum power delivered by the given network to the load RL= 6.2Ω is thus given by
57 docs|62 tests
|
1. What is Thevenin's theorem and how is it used in the context of DC voltage and current sources acting in a resistive circuit? |
2. What is Norton's theorem and how is it used in the context of DC voltage and current sources acting in a resistive circuit? |
3. How do Thevenin's and Norton's theorems help in analyzing circuits with DC voltage and current sources? |
4. What are the advantages of using Thevenin's and Norton's theorems in circuit analysis? |
5. What are the limitations of Thevenin's and Norton's theorems in circuit analysis? |
|
Explore Courses for Electrical Engineering (EE) exam
|