Civil Engineering (CE) Exam  >  Civil Engineering (CE) Notes  >  Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE) PDF Download

Instruction Objectives: At the end of this lesson, the student should be able to:

  • identify the beams and frames subjected to torsion,
  • name  and explain the two types of torsion,
  • state the basis of approach of design for combined bending, shear and torsion as per IS 456,
  • select the critical section for the design,
  • determine the equivalent shear and moment from the given factored bending moment, shear and torsional moment,
  • define equivalent nominal shear stress,  
  • state when do we provide minimum shear reinforcement in beams subjected to combined bending moment, shear and torsional moment,
  • state when do we provide both longitudinal and transverse reinforcement in beams subjected to combined bending moment, shear and torsional moment,
  • state when do we provide tensile, compressive and side face reinforcement, respectively, in beams subjected to combined bending shear and torsional moment,
  • design the beams subjected to combined bending, shear and torsional moment as per IS 456. 


6.16.1   Introduction  

This lesson explains the presence of torsional moment along with bending moment and shear in reinforced concrete members with specific examples. The approach of design of such beams has been explained mentioning the critical section to be designed. Expressing the equivalent shear and bending moment, this lesson illustrates the step by step design procedure of beam under combined bending, shear and torsion. The requirements of IS 456 regarding the design are also explained. Numerical problems have been solved to explain the design of beams under combined bending, shear and torsion. 

 

6.16.2  Torsion in Reinforced Concrete Members 

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)

On several situations beams and slabs are subjected to torsion in addition to bending moment and shear force. Loads acting normal to the plane of bending will cause bending moment and shear force. However, loads away from the plane of bending will induce torsional moment along with bending moment and shear. Space frames (Fig.6.16.1a), inverted L-beams as in supporting sunshades and canopies (Fig.6.16.1b), beams curved in plan (Fig.6.16.1c), edge beams of slabs (Fig.6.16.1d) are some of the examples where torsional moments are also present.  

Skew bending theory, space-truss analogy are some of the theories developed to understand the behaviour of reinforced concrete under torsion combined with bending moment and shear. These torsional moments are of two types: 

(i) Primary or e qu ilibrium torsion, and
(ii) Secondary or compatibility torsion.

The primary torsion is required for the basic static equilibrium of most of the statically determinate structures. Accordingly, this torsional moment must be considered in the design as it is a major component.  

The secondary torsion is required to satisfy the compatibility condition between members. However, statically indeterminate structures may have any of the two types of torsions. Minor torsional effects may be ignored in statically indeterminate structures due to the advantage of having more than one load path for the distribution of loads to maintain the equilibrium. This may produce minor cracks without causing failure. However, torsional moments should be taken into account in the statically indeterminate structures if they are of equilibrium type and where the torsional stiffness of the members has been considered in the structural analysis. It is worth  mentioning that torsion must be considered in structures subjected to unsymmetrical loadings about axes.

 Clause 41 of  IS 456  stipulates the above stating that, "In structures, where torsion is required to maintain equilibrium, members shall be designed for torsion in accordance with 41.2, 41.3 and 41.4. However, for such indeterminate structures where torsion can be eliminated by releasing redundant restraints, no specific design for torsion is necessary, provided torsional stiffness is neglected in the calculation of internal forces. Adequate control of any torsional cracking is provided by the shear reinforcement as per cl. 40". 


6.16.3  Analysis for Torsional Moment in a Member  

The behaviour of members under the effects of combined bending, shear and torsion is still a subject of extensive research.  

We know that the bending moments are distributed among the sharing members with the corresponding distribution factors proportional to their bending stiffness EI/L where E is the elastic constant,  I  is the moment of inertia and  L is the effective span of the respective members. In a similar manner, the torsional moments are also distributed among the sharing members with the corresponding distribution factors proportional to their torsional stiffness  GJ/L, where  G  is the elastic shear modulus,  J  is polar moment of inertia and  L  is the effective span (or length) of the respective members.  

The exact analysis of reinforced concrete members subjected to torsional moments combined with bending moments and shear forces is beyond the scope here. However, the codal provisions of designing such members are discussed below. 


6.16.4  Approach of Design for Combined Bending, Shear and Torsion as per IS 456 

As per the stipulations of IS 456, the longitudinal and transverse reinforcements are determined taking into account the combined effects of bending moment, shear force and torsional moment. Two impirical relations of equivalent shear and equivalent bending moment are given. These fictitious shear force and bending moment, designated as equivalent shear and equivalent bending moment, are separate functions of actual shear and torsion, and actual bending moment and torsion, respectively. The total vertical reinforcement is designed to resist the equivalent shear Ve  and the longitudinal reinforcement is designed to resist the equivalent bending moment  Me1 and  Me2,  as explained in secs. 6.16.6 and 6.16.7, respectively. These design rules are applicable to beams of solid rectangular cross-section. However, they may be applied to flanged beams by substituting  bw for   b.  IS 456 further suggests to refer to specialist literature for the flanged beams as the design adopting the code procedure is generally conservative. 


6.16.5  Critical Section (cl. 41.2 of IS 456)  As per cl. 41.2 of IS 456, sections located less than a distance  d  from the face of the support is to be designed for the same torsion as computed at a distance  d,  where  d  is the effective depth of the beam. 


6.16.6  Shear and Torsion  

(a) The equivalent shear, a function of the actual shear and torsional moment is determined from the following impirical relation: Ve  =  Vu +  1.6(Tu/b)          (6.22) 

where Ve  =  equivalent shear,

Vu  =  actual shear,

Tu  =  actual torsional moment,

b   =  breadth of beam.

(b) The equivalent nominal shear stress  τve  is determined from:   Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE) = (6.23) 

However, τ ve  shall not exceed  τc max given in Table 20 of IS 456 and Table 6.2 of Lesson 13.  

(c)  Minimum shear reinforcement is to be provided as per cl. 26.5.1.6 of IS 456, if the equivalent nominal shear stress  τve  obtained from

Eq.6.23 does not exceed  τc given in Table 19 of IS 456 and Table 6.1 of Lesson 13.  

(d)  Both longitudinal and transverse reinforcement shall be provided as per cl. 41.4 and explained below in sec. 6.16.7, if τve exceeds τ given in Table 19 of IS 456 and Table 6.1 of Lesson 13 and is less than τc max , as mentioned in (b) above.   


6.16.7  Reinforcement in Members subjected to Torsion  

(a) Reinforcement for torsion shall consist of longitudinal and transverse reinforcement  as mentioned in sec. 6.16.6(d).  

(b)   The longitudinal flexural tension reinforcement shall be determined to resist an equivalent bending moment  Me1  as given below:

Me1  =  Mu  +  Mt         (6.24) 
where   Mu  =  bending moment at the cross-section, and Mt  =  (Tu/1.7) {1 + (D/b)}         (6.25) 
where   Tu  =  torsional moment,
D   =  overall depth of the beam, and
b    =  breadth of the beam.  

(c)  The longitudinal flexural compression reinforcement shall be provided if the numerical value of   Mt  as defined above in Eq.6.25 exceeds the numerical value of  Mu. Such compression reinforcement should be able to resist an equivalent bending moment  Me2  as given below:
Me2  =  Mt  -  M(6.26) 

The  Me2  will be considered as acting in the opposite sense to the moment  Mu

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)

(d) The transverse reinforcement consisting of two legged closed loops (Fig.6.16.2) enclosing the corner longitudinal bars shall be provided having an area of cross-section  Asv  given below: 

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)(6.27) 

However, the total transverse reinforcement shall not be less than the following: 

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)(6.28) 

where  Tu  =  torsional moment,

Vu  =  shear force,

sv  =  spacing of the stirrup reinforcement,

b1  =  centre to centre distance between corner bars in the direction of the width, 

d1  =  centre to centre distance between corner bars, 

b   =  breadth of the member,

f =  characteristic strength of the stirrup reinforcement, 

τve =  equivalent shear stress as specified in Eqs.6.22 and 6.23, and 

τc =  shear strength of concrete as per Table 19 of IS 456 and Table 6.1 of Lesson 13.


6.16.8  Requirements of Reinforcement  

Beams subjected to bending moment, shear and torsional moment should satisfy the following requirements:


(a)  Tension reinforcement (cl. 26.5.1.1 of IS 456)  

The minimum area of tension reinforcement should be governed by 

As /(bd)  =  0.85/fy               (6.29) 
where   A =  minimum area of tension reinforcement,

b   =  breadth of rectangular beam or breadth of web of T-beam,

d   =  effective depth of beam,

f =  characteristic strength of reinforcement in N/mm2.  

The maximum area of tension reinforcement shall not exceed 0.04 bD, where  D  is the overall depth of the beam.


(b)  Compression reinforcement (cl. 26.5.1.2 of IS 456)        

The maximum area of compression reinforcement shall not exceed 0.04 bD. They shall be enclosed by stirrups for effective lateral restraint.


(c)  Side face reinforcement (cls. 26.5.1.3 and 26.5.1.7b)  

Beams exceeding the depth of 750 mm and subjected to bending moment and shear shall have side face reinforcement. However, if the beams are having torsional moment also, the side face reinforcement shall be provided for the overall depth exceeding 450 mm. The total area of side face reinforcement shall be at least 0.1 per cent of the web area and shall be distributed equally on two faces at a spacing not exceeding 300 mm or web thickness, whichever is less. 

(d)  Transverse reinforcement (cl. 26.5.1.4 of IS 456)  

The transverse reinforcement shall be placed around the outer-most tension and compression bars. They should pass around longitudinal bars located close to the outer face of the flange in T- and I-beams.

(e)  Maximum spacing of shear reinforcement (cl. 26.5.1.5 of IS 456) 

The centre to centre spacing of shear reinforcement shall not be more than 0.75 d  for vertical stirrups and  d  for inclined stirrups at 45o, but not exceeding 300 mm, where  d  is the effective depth of the section.

(f)  Minimum shear reinforcement (cl. 26.5.1.6 of IS 456)  

This has been discussed in sec. 6.13.7 of Lesson 13 and the governing equation is Eq.6.3 of Lesson 13.

(g)  Distribution of torsion reinforcement (cl. 26.5.1.7 of IS 456)

 The transverse reinforcement shall consist of rectangular close stirrups placed perpendicular to the axis of the member. The spacing of stirrups shall not be more than the least of  x1, (x1 + y1)/4 and 300 mm, where  x and  y1  are the short and long dimensions of the stirrups (Fig.6.16.2).  Longitudinal reinforcements should be placed as close as possible to the corners of the cross-section.

(h)  Reinforcement in flanges of  T- and  L-beams (cl. 26.5.1.8 of IS 456)  

For flanges in tension, a part of the main tensile reinforcement shall be distributed over the effective flange width or a width equal to one-tenth of the span, whichever is smaller. For effective flange width greater than one-tenth of the span, nominal longitudinal reinforcement shall be provided to the outer portion of the flange. 

 

6.16.9  Numerical Problems 

Problem 1

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)

Determine the reinforcement required of a ring beam (Fig.6.16.3) of  b = 400 mm,  d = 650 mm,  D = 700 mm and subjected to factored  Mu = 200 kNm, factored  Tu = 50 kNm and factored  Vu = 100 kN. Use M 20 and Fe 415 for the design.

Solution 1 

The solution of the problem is illustrated in seven steps below.

Step 1:  Check for the depth of the beam 

 From Eq.6.22, we have the equivalent shear Ve  =  Vu +  1.6(Tu/b)  =  100 + 1.6(50/0.4)  =  300 kN

From Eq.6.2.3, the equivalent shear stress     ( Ve / bd )
τve =  =  300/(0.4)(0.65)  =  1.154 N/mm2

From Table 6.2 of Lesson 13 (Table 20 of IS 456),  τc max = 2.8 N/mm2.

Hence, the section does not need any revision.

Step 2:  Check if shear reinforcement shall be required.

Assuming perce ntage of te nsil e steel as 0.5, Table 6.1 of Lesson 13 (Table 19 of IS 456) gives  τ c = 0.48 N/mm2  Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE) .  So, both longitudinal and transverse reinforcement shall be required. 


Step 3:  Longitudinal tension reinforcement 

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)

From Eqs.6.24 and 6.25, we have,

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)

From Table 2 of SP-16, corresponding to Mu/bd2  =  1.66 N/mm2, we have by linear interpolation  pt = 0.5156. So, Ast  =  0.5156(400)(650)/100  =  1340.56  mm2.

Provide 2-25T and 2-16T  =  981 + 402  =  1383 mm2.  

This gives percentage of tensile reinforcement = 0.532, for which  τ c  from Table 6.1 of Lesson 13 is 0.488 N/mm2

 From Eq.6.29, minimum percentage of tension reinforcement = (0.85/fy)(100) = 0.205 and from sec.6.16.8, the maximum percentage of tension reinforcement is 4.0. So, 2-25T and 2-16T bars satisfy the requirements (Fig. 6.16.4). 


Step 4:  Longitudinal compression reinforcement  Here, in this problem, the numerical value of  M(= 80.88 kNm) is less than that of  Mu (200 kNm). So, as per sec. 6.16.7c, longitudinal compression reinforcement shall  not be required.

Step 5:  Longitudinal side face reinforcement  Side face reinforcement shall be provided as the depth of the beam exceeds 450 mm. Providing 2-10 mm diameter bars (area = 157 mm2) at the mid-depth of the beam and one on each face (Fig.6.16.4), the total area required as per sec.6.16.8c, 0.1(400)(300)/100 = 120 mm2 < 157 mm2. Hence o.k.

Step 6:  Transverse reinforcement 

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)

Providing two legged, 10 mm diameter stirrups (area = 157 mm2), we have (Fig.6.16.5) d =  700 - 50 - 50  =  600  mm b1  =  400 - 2(25 + 10 + 12.5)  =  305  mm From Eq.6.27, we have 

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)

Using the numerical values of  Tu, b1, d1 and  Vu, we have 

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)

Again from Eq.6.28, we have 

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)

So, Eq.(1) is governing and we get for 2 legged 10 mm stirrups (Asv = 157 mm2), sv  =  0.87(415)(157)/339.89  =  166.77 mm 

Step 7:  Check for  sv

 Figure 6.16.4 shows the two legged 10 mm diameter stirrups for which  x1= 340 mm and  y1 = 628.5 mm.

The maximum spacing  sv  should be the least of  x1, (x1 + y1)/4  and 300 mm (Figs. 6.16.4 and 5).  

Here, x =   340 mm,  (x1 + y1)/4  =  242.12 mm. So, provide 2 legged 10 mm T stirrups @ 160 mm c/c. 

 

6.16.10 Practice Questions and Problems with Answers

Q.1: Explain the situations when torsional moments remain present in beams and frames.
 A.1: 
   The first paragraph of sec. 6.16.2.

Q.2:   Explain and differentiate between primary and secondary types of torsion.
 A.2:  
 Third, fourth and fifth paragraphs of sec. 6.16.2.

Q.3:    Write expressions of equivalent shear and equivalent bending moment.
 A.3: 
    Eqs.6.22, 24 and 25.

Q.4:  When do you  provide minimum shear reinforcement in  beam subjected to bending moment, shear and torsional moment?
 A.4: 
    Sec. 6.16.6(c) 

Q.5:  Explain the situations when do you provide longitudinal tension, compression and side face reinforcement in beam subjected to bending moment, shear and torsional moment.
 A.5:
    Sec. 6.16.7a, b and c parts.

Q.6:  Illustrate the steps of designing transverse reinforcement in beams subjected to bending moment, shear and torsional moment.
 A.6:
   Sec. 6.16.7d. 

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)

Q.7:   A reinforced concrete rectangular beam (Fig.6.16.6) of  b = 300 mm,  d = 600 mm and D = 650 mm is subjected to factored shear force  Vu = 70 kN in one section. Assuming the percentage of tensile reinforcement as 0.5 in that section, determine the factored torsional moment that the section can resist if (a) no additional reinforcement for torsion is provided, (b) maximum steel for torsion is provided in that section, and (c) determine the reinforcement needed for the case (b). Assume M 30 concrete, Fe 500 for longitudinal and Fe 415 for transverse reinforcing steel bars.  
 A.7:

 

(a) When no additional reinforcement for torsion is provided in that section
 For M 30 concrete with 0.5 per cent tensile reinforcement, Table 6.1 of Lesson 13 (Table 19 of IS 456) gives  τ = 0.5 N/mmand Table 6.2 of Lesson 13 (Table 20 of IS 456 gives  τc max = 3.5 N/mm2

Since no additional reinforcement for torsion will be provided, we will take τ vec = = 0.5 N/mm2.

From Eq.6.23, we have V =  ( τve ) bd   =  0.5(300)(600) N  =  90 kN 

From Eq.6.22, we have Tu  =  (Ve - Vu) (b/1.6)  =  (90 - 70) (0.3/1.6)  =  3.75  kNm

So, that section of the beam can resist factored torsional moment of 3.75 kNm if no additional reinforcement is provided. 

 

(b) When maximum steel is provided for torsion in that section.  In this case, τ vecmax = 3.5 N/mm2.  

Using this value in Eq.6.23, we get V =  ( τve ) bd =  (3.5)(300)(600) N  =  630 kN 

From Eq.6.22, we get Tu  =  (V- Vu) (b/1.6)  =  (630 - 70) (0.3/1.6)  =  105  kNm

This section, therefore, can resist a factored torsional moment of 105 kNm when maximum torsional reinforcement is provided.

 

(c) Determination of maximum torsional reinforcement for case (b) 

Step 1:  Determination of the  M when 0.5 per cent tensile reinforcement is assumed.

 From Table 4 of SP-16, for Fe 500 and M 30 with  pt = 0.5 per cent, we have  Mu = (1.993)(300)(600)2 Nmm = 215.244 kNm (using linear interpolation). 


Step 2:  Tension and compression reinforcement 

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)

 From Eqs.6.24 and 6.25, we get 

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE).

  =  215.244 + (105/1.7){1 + (650/300)}=  215.244 + 195.588  =  410.832 kNm

Here, the numerical value of  Mt (= 195.588 kNm) is less than that of  Mu (= 215.244 kNm).

So, no compression reinforcement is needed.  

Table 4 of SP-16 is used to determine tension reinforcement with  Mu/bd2= 410.832/(0.3)(0.6)(0.6) = 3.804 N/mm.

From Table 4, we get  p= 1.064 by linear interpolation, which gives  Ast  =  1.064(300)(600)/100  =  1915.2  mm2.

Provide 4-25T (1963 mm2) as shown in Fig.6.16.7.

Now,  p= 1963(100)/(300)(600) = 1.09, for which τc  =  0.678  N/mm2 (Table 6.1 of Lesson 13). 


Step 3:  Side face reinforcement  

Since the depth of the beam exceeds 450 mm, we provide side face reinforcement with two 10 mm bars (area = 157 mm2) near the mid-depth of the beam, one on each side to get the spacing of the bar 280 mm (Fig.6.16.7). Area required to satisfy = 0.1(300)(280)/(100) = 84 mm2 < 157 mm2, hence, o.k. 


Step 4:  Transverse reinforcement

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)

Assuming 2 legged 12 mm dia stirrup (area = 226 mm2) of Fe 415, we have from Fig.6.16.8,  d= 557 mm  and  b1 = 201 mm. From Eq.6.27, 

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)

=  {105(106)/(201)(557)} + {70(103)/(2.5)(557)} 
=  988.13  N/mm

From Eq.6.28 the least value of the above is (τ ve - τ c ) b =  (3.5 - 0.678)(300) = 846.6 Nm2. So, from 0.87 fy Asv/sv = 988.13 N/mm, we get sv  =  0.87(415)(226)/988.13  =  82.57 mm 


Step 5:  Check for  sv 

Figure 6.16.8 shows the stirrups of 12 mm diameter two legged for which  x1 = 238 mm and  y1 = 587.5 mm. The maximum spacing should be the least of  x1, (x1 + y1)/4  and 300 mm.  

Here, x1  =   238 mm,  (x+ y1)/4  =  206.375 mm and 300 mm. So, the spacing of 80 mm c/c is o.k. Provide 12 mm, 2 legged stirrups @ 80 mm c/c, as shown in Fig.6.16.8. 

 

6.16.11 Test 16 with Solutions 

Maximum Marks  =  50,    
 Maximum Time  =  30 minutes
 Answer all questions.  
 Each question carries five marks. 

 TQ.1:    Explain and differentiate between primary and secondary types of torsion.                 (10 marks) 
 A.TQ.1
: Third, fourth and fifth paragraphs of sec. 6.16.2.

TQ.2:   Explain the situations when do you provide longitudinal tension, compression and side face reinforcement in beam subjected to bending moment, shear and torsional moment.             (10 marks)
 A.TQ.2:
Sec. 6.16.7a, b and c parts.

TQ.3:    Illustrate the steps of designing transverse reinforcement in beams subjected to bending moment, shear and torsional moment.         (10 marks)
 A.TQ.3: 
Sec. 6.16.7d 

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)

TQ.4:  The beam of Fig.6.16.9 has factored bending moment  Mu = 70 kNm, factored shear force  Vu = 100 kN and factored torsional moment  Tu = 60 kNm at one section. Design the reinforcement of that section assuming that the torsion is fully taken by the web. Assume M 30 concrete, Fe 500 for longitudinal and Fe 415 for transverse reinforcing steel bars.           (20 marks) 
 A.TQ.4:


Step 1:  Checking of depth of the beam From Eq.6.22, the equivalent shear Ve  =  Vu +  1.6(Tu/b)  =  100 + 1.6(60/0.3)  =  420 kN

From Eq.6.23, we get      ( Ve / bd )τve  =  =  420/(0.3)(0.5) kN/m2  =  2.8 N/mmTable 6.2 of Lesson 13 gives

  τ c max = 3.5 N/mm2 >   τ ve , So the depth is satisfying.


Step 2:  Check if shear reinforcement is required

 Assuming percentage of tensile steel as 0.5, Table 6.1 of Lesson 13 gives c τ = 0.5 N/mm2. Hence, both longitudinal and transverse reinforcements shall be provided.


Step 3:  Longitudinal tension reinforcement 

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)

 

From Eqs.6.24 and 6.25, we have, 

Me1  =  Mu  +  Mt  =  Mu  +  (Tu/1.7) {1 + (D/b)}

 =  70 + (60/1.7) {1 + (550/300)}  =  70 + 100  =  170  kNm. Me1/bd2  =  170(106)/(300)(500)(500)  =  2.267 N/mm2

Table 4 of SP-16 or M 30, Fe 500 and  Mu/bd2  =  2.267 N/mm2, we have by linear interpolation  pt = 0.577.

 Ast  =  0.577(300)(500)/100  =  865.5  mm2.  

Minimum Ast (E  q.6.29) = 0.85 bd/fy  =  0.85(300)(500)/(500)  =  255  mm2.  

Maximum Ast  =   0.04 bD  =  0.04(300)(550)  =  6600  mm2.  

So, Ast  =    865.5  mm2 is acceptable.  

Provide 3-20T (area = 942  mm2) giving  pt = (942)(100)/(300)(500) = 0.628% (Fig. 6.16.10).

Table 6.1 of Lesson 13 gives τ c = 0.546 N/mm2 (for  pt =  0.628%). 


Step 4:  Longitudinal compression reinforcement  Here, the numerical value of  M(= 100 kNm) is greater than that of  Mu (= 70 kNm), as computed in

Step 3. So, compression reinforcement shall be provided for Me2  =  Mt  -  Mu  =  100 - 70  =  30  kNm. Me2/bd2  =  30(106)/(300)(500)(500)  =  0.4 N/mm.

Table 4 of SP-16 gives  pc = 0.093 to have compression steel reinforcement  Asc  =  0.093(300)(500)/100  =  139.5  mm2.

Maximum area compression steel = 0.04 bD  =  0.04(300)(550)  =  6600  mm2.

Hence,  Asc  =  139.5 mm2 is satisfying. Provide 2-12T (area = 226  mm2) as compression steel (Fig. 6.16.10). 


Step 5:  Side face reinforcement  

Since the depth of the beam exceeds 450 mm, provide 2-10 mm T (area = 157 mm2) near the mid-depth, one on each side of the beam with maximum spacing = 230 mm (Fig.6.16.9). Area required =  0.1(300)(230)/100 = 69 mm< 157 mm2. Hence, two 10 mmT bars as shown in Fig.6.16.10 is o.k.


Step 6:  Transverse reinforcement  

Using 10 mm T, 2 legged stirrups, we have  d= 459 mm  and  b1 = 210 mm (Fig.6.16.10). From Eq.6.27, we have, 

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)

 =  60(106)/(210)(459)} + 100(103)/(2.5)(459)} 
=  709.61  N/mm2

However, Eq.6.28 gives the least value of  0.87 fy As/sv = (τ ve - τ c ) b   = (2.8 - 0.546)(300) = 676.2 N/mm. So, 0.87 fy Asv/sv = 709.61 gives sv  =  0.87 fy Asv/709.61 = 0.87(415)(157)/709.61  =  79.88 mm 
 

Step 7:  Checking of sv

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)

Figure 6.16.11 shows x= 300 - 2(25 + 5) = 240 mm and  y= 550 - 30 - 35 = 485 mm. Accordingly, the maximum spacing is the least of  x1, (x+ y1)/4  or 300 mm. Here,  the least value is 181.25 mm.

Hence  sv = 76 mm is acceptable (Fig.6.16.10). 


Summary of this Lesson  

This lesson explains the different situations when beams and frames are subjected to combined bending, shear and torsional moment. Briefly discussing about the analysis of such beams, design of beams as per IS 456 has been illustrated with numerical examples. The requirements of IS 456 have been specified. Solutions of practice and test problems will help the students in understanding the theory and designing the beams subjected to combined bending moment, shear and torsional moment.

The document Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE) is a part of Civil Engineering (CE) category.
All you need of Civil Engineering (CE) at this link: Civil Engineering (CE)

Top Courses for Civil Engineering (CE)

FAQs on Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)

1. What is torsion in beams and why is it important in civil engineering?
Ans. Torsion in beams refers to the twisting or rotational deformation of a beam when subjected to a twisting moment. It is important in civil engineering because it can significantly affect the structural integrity and stability of beams, especially in cases where the beam is subjected to both bending and torsional forces. Understanding and analyzing torsion in beams is crucial for designing safe and efficient structures.
2. How does torsion in beams lead to the limit state of collapse?
Ans. Torsion in beams can lead to the limit state of collapse when the applied twisting moment exceeds the beam's capacity to resist it. This can result in excessive twisting and deformation, ultimately leading to the failure of the beam. In the limit state of collapse, the beam may experience significant rotation, cracks, or even complete rupture, compromising the overall structural stability and safety.
3. What are the factors that influence the torsional behavior of beams?
Ans. Several factors influence the torsional behavior of beams. These include the beam's cross-sectional shape, material properties, length, boundary conditions, and the magnitude and distribution of the applied twisting moment. Additionally, the presence of any axial loads or shear forces can also influence the torsional behavior of beams.
4. How is the limit state of collapse determined for torsion in beams?
Ans. The limit state of collapse for torsion in beams is determined by analyzing the maximum torsional stress and torsional deformation that the beam can withstand without failure. This is usually done through mathematical models and structural analysis techniques, considering the beam's dimensions, material properties, and the applied loading conditions. The calculated values are then compared to the allowable limits specified in relevant design codes and standards.
5. What are the common methods used to mitigate the effects of torsion in beams?
Ans. Several methods are commonly used to mitigate the effects of torsion in beams. These include providing additional reinforcement, such as torsion bars or stirrups, to enhance the beam's torsional resistance. Additionally, modifying the beam's cross-sectional shape or using composite materials can also help in reducing torsional effects. Proper design and detailing, along with regular inspection and maintenance, are essential to ensure the structural integrity and safety of beams subjected to torsional forces.
Download as PDF
Explore Courses for Civil Engineering (CE) exam

Top Courses for Civil Engineering (CE)

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Related Searches

MCQs

,

Important questions

,

mock tests for examination

,

Extra Questions

,

Exam

,

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)

,

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)

,

practice quizzes

,

Torsion in Beams: Limit State of Collapse - Civil Engineering (CE)

,

pdf

,

past year papers

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

ppt

,

Sample Paper

,

Objective type Questions

,

Summary

,

Viva Questions

,

video lectures

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

Semester Notes

,

Free

,

study material

;