Passage
Barely a century ago, conventional wisdom held that our universe was static and eternal. Now, we can feel smug for having discovered the underlying expansion of the universe, the cosmic microwave background, dark matter and dark energy. But what will the future bring?
Poetry ... of a sort.
The domination of the expansion of our universe by dark energy was inferred from the fact that this expansion is speeding up. Our observable universe is at the threshold of expanding faster than the speed of light. And with time, because of the accelerated expansion, things will only get worse.
This means that, the longer we wait, the less we will be able to see. Galaxies that we can now see will one day in the future be receding away from us at faster-than lightspeed, which means that they will become invisible to us. The light they emit will not be able to make progress against the expansion of space, and it will never again reach us. These galaxies will have disappeared from our horizon.
The way this works is a little different than you might imagine. The galaxies will not suddenly disappear or twinkle out of existence in the night sky. Rather, as their recession speed approaches the speed of light, the light from these objects gets ever more redshifted. Eventually, all their visible light moves to infrared, microwave, radio wave, and so on, until the wavelength of light they emit ends up becoming larger than the size of the visible universe, at which point they become officially invisible.
We can calculate about how long this will take. Since the galaxies in our local cluster of galaxies are all bound together by their mutual gravitational attraction, they will not recede with the background expansion of the universe. Galaxies just outside our group are about 1/5000th the distance out to the point where the recession velocity of objects approaches the speed of light. By about 2 trillion years, their light will have become completely invisible, and the rest of the universe, from the perspective of our local cluster, will literally have disappeared.
Two trillion years may seem like a long time, and it is. In a cosmic sense, however, it is nowhere near an eternity. The longest living ‘main sequence’ stars have lifetimes far longer than our Sun and will still be shining in 2 trillion years (even as our own Sun dies out in about only 5 billion years). And so in the far future there may be civilizations on planets around those stars. And there may be astronomers with telescopes on those planets. But when they look out at the cosmos, essentially everything we can now see, all 400 billion galaxies currently inhabiting our visible universe, will have disappeared!
In any case, those astronomers in the far future would be in for a big surprise, if they had any idea what they were missing, which they won’t. Because not only will the rest of the universe have disappeared, but essentially all of the evidence that now tells us we live in an expanding universe that began in a Big Bang will also have disappeared, along with all evidence of the existence of the dark energy that will be responsible for this disappearance.
While less than a century ago conventional wisdom still held that the universe was static and eternal, in the far future, long after any remnants of our planet and civilization have likely receded into the dustbin of history, the illusion that sustained our civilization until1930 will be an illusion that will once again return, with a vengeance.
Question for 100 RCs for Practice Questions- 72
Try yourself:What does the author mean by ‘Poetry ... of a sort’, with respect to what the future will bring?
Explanation
‘Poetry ... of a sort’ is the author’s answer to the question ‘But what will the future bring?’ The author returns to this point in the last paragraph, where he states that our past view of the universe was that it was static and eternal. In the distant future (in about two trillion years), the galaxies beyond our local cluster will no longer be visible, and even the evidence that now tells us we live in an expanding universe will have disappeared. So the people of that time would once again mistakenly think that the universe is static and eternal. So [1] is incorrect: our past view will not become correct in the future. It is not that the scientific evidence in the future will support this mistaken view, but rather the lack of evidence will; so [2] is wrong. Option 3 says “current illusions” which is incorrect. The writer does not suggest that our view about the universe currently also is an illusion, so, [3] is not right. Only [4] correctly sums up why the author thinks this mistake will be ‘poetic’ in a sense.
Report a problem
Question for 100 RCs for Practice Questions- 72
Try yourself:Which of the following is true according to the passage?
Explanation
Since a major point made in the passage is that space is expanding faster than the speed of light, [1] is wrong. [3] contradicts the explanation of red shifting in paragraph 5: the phenomenon describes wavelengths getting larger not smaller. There is no basis for inferring [4] from the passage. Only [2] is inferable from the passage: according to paragraph 6, “Since the galaxies in our local cluster of galaxies are all bound together by their mutual gravitational attraction, they will not recede …Galaxies just outside our group are about 1/5000th the distance out to the point… etc”.
Report a problem
Question for 100 RCs for Practice Questions- 72
Try yourself:What is the main point of this passage?
Explanation
Option 1 is incorrect. The passage does not state or imply that the expansion will stop. Option 3 is incorrect because ‘ceased to exist’ is not supported. Option 4 is incorrect as the cyclic existence is not hinted at in the passage. Hence the correct answer is Option [2].
Report a problem
Question for 100 RCs for Practice Questions- 72
Try yourself:According to the passage, all these contribute to our understanding of a constantly expanding universe EXCEPT:
Explanation
Option 1, 2, and 3 contribute to our understanding of the universe as a constantly expanding and accelerating. Whereas the discovery of ‘main sequence’ stars has nothing to do with our concept of the universe. Hence [4].
Report a problem