Civil Engineering (CE) Exam  >  Civil Engineering (CE) Notes  >  Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE) PDF Download

Instructional Objectives: 

At the end of this lesson, the student should be able to: 

  • solve specific numerical problems of rectangular and T-beams for the complete design of shear reinforcement as per the stipulations of IS 456. 


6.14.1  Introduction  

Lesson 13 explains the three failure modes due to shear force in beams and defines different shear stresses needed to design the beams for shear. The critical sections for shear and the minimum shear reinforcement to be provided in beams are mentioned as per IS 456. In this lesson, the design of shear reinforcement has been illustrated through several numerical problems including the curtailment of tension reinforcement in flexural members. 


6.14.2  Numerical Problems 

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

Problem 1: 
 Determine the shear reinforcement of the simply supported beam of effective span 8 m whose cross-section is shown in Fig. 6.14.1. Factored shear force is 250 kN. Use M 20 and Fe 415.  

Solution 1: 
Here,   Ast =  2-25T + 2-20T gives the percentage of tensile reinforcement

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

From Table 6.1 of Lesson 13, τc = 0.67 + 0.036 = 0.706 N/mm2 (by linear interpolation).

Employing Eq. 6.1 of Lesson 13, 

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE) and  τcmax = 2.8 N/mm(from Table 6.2 of Lesson 13).

Hence,  τc  <  τv  <  τcmax.

So, shear reinforcement is needed for the shear force (Eq. 6.4).  

Vus  =  V– τc b

d  =  250 – 0.706 (250) (450) (10-3)  =  170.575  kN

Providing 8 mm, 2 legged vertical stirrups, we have Asv  =  2 (50)  =  100  mm2 Hence, spacing of the stirrups as obtained from Eq. 6.5 : 

  Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)    = 95.25  mm,   say  95 mm. 

For 10 mm, 2 legged vertical stirrups, (Asv  =  157 mm2), spacing  

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE) = 149.54  mm

According to cl. 26.5.1.5 of IS 456, the maximum spacing of the stirrups  =  0.75 d  =  0.75 (450)  =  337.5 mm  =  300 mm (say).

Minimum shear reinforcement (cl. 26.5.1.6 of  IS 456) is obtained from (Eq.6.3 of sec. 6.13.7 of Lesson 13):

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

From the above, Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

So, we select 10 mm, 2 legged stirrups @ 145 mm c/c.

Problem 2: 

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

Design the bending and shear reinforcement of the tapered cantilever beam of width  b = 300 mm and as shown in Fig. 6.14.2 using M 20 and Fe 415 (i) without any curtailment of bending reinforcement and (ii) redesign the bending and shear reinforcement if some of the bars are curtailed at section 2-2 of the beam. Use SP-16 for the design of bending reinforcement.

Solution 2:

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

Solution 1: 

Here,   Ast =  2-25T + 2-20T gives the percentage of tensile reinforcement

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

From Table 6.1 of Lesson 13, τc = 0.67 + 0.036 = 0.706 N/mm2 (by linear interpolation).

Employing Eq. 6.1 of Lesson 13, 

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE) and  τcmax = 2.8 N/mm2 (from Table 6.2 ).

Hence,  τc  <  τv  <  τcmax.

So, shear reinforcement is needed for the shear force (Eq. 6.4 ).

 Vus  =  Vu – τb

d  =  250 – 0.706 (250) (450) (10-3)  =  170.575  kN

Providing 8 mm, 2 legged vertical stirrups, we have Asv  =  2 (50)  =  100  mm2

Hence, spacing of the stirrups as obtained from Eq. 6.5: 

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)= 95.25  mm,   say  95 mm. 

For 10 mm, 2 legged vertical stirrups, (Asv  =  157 mm2), spacing  

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

According to cl. 26.5.1.5 of IS 456, the maximum spacing of the stirrups  =  0.75 d  =  0.75 (450)  =  337.5 mm  =  300 mm (say).

Minimum shear reinforcement (cl. 26.5.1.6 of  IS 456) is obtained from (Eq.6.3 of sec. 6.13.7 of Lesson 13): 

Reinforcing bars of 3-28T + 1-16T give 2048 mm2.  Asc at section 2-2 = (0.686) (400) (300)/100  =  823.2 mm2.  

Reinforcing bars of  2-20T + 2-12T give 854 mm2.

Though it is better to use 4-28T as Ast  and 2-20T + 2-16 as Asc with proper curtailment from the practical aspects of construction, here the bars are selected to have areas close to the requirements for the academic interest only.  

Figure 6.14.4 shows the reinforcement at sec. 2-2.

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

Case (i): No curtailment (all bars of bending reinforcement are continued):  

Bending moment  Mu at section 2-2  =  234.375  kNm  

Shear force  Vu  at section 2-2  =  187.5  kN  

Effective depth  d at section 2-2  =  450 – 50  =  400  mm, and  

Width b  =  300  mm

 tanβ  =  (550 – 200)/3500  =  0.1

Clause 40.1.1 of IS 456 gives (Eq.6.2 of sec.  6.13.3 ): 

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

(Here, the negative sign is used as the bending moment increases numerically in the same direction as the effective depth increases.)  

Continuing 4-28T and 3-16T bars (= 3066 mm2), we get p  =  3066 (100)/300 (400)  =  2.555 % Table 6.1 of Lesson 13 gives  τc = 0.82  N/mm2  <  τv  (= 1.074  N/mm2).

Hence, shear reinforcement is needed for shear force obtained from Eq. 6.4 of Lesson 13: 

Vus  =  Vu - τv b

d = 1.875 – 0.82 (300) (400) (10-3)  kN  =  89.1  kN

From cl.40.4 of IS 456, we have (Eq.6.5 of sec. 6.13.8 of Lesson 13), 

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

where  Asv = 100 mm2 for 8 mm, 2 legged vertical stirrups. This gives  sv = 162.087 mm  (f y = 415 N/mm2). IS 456, cl. 26.5.1.6 gives the spacing considering minimum shear reinforcement (Eq.6.3 of sec. 6.13.7 of Lesson 13): 

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

or s≤  300.875  mm

Hence, provide 8 mm, 2 legged vertical stirrups @ 150 mm c/c, as shown in Fig. 6.14.3.


Case (ii):  With curtailment of bars:  

Clause 26.2.3.2 of IS 456 stipulates that any one of the three conditions is to be satisfied for the termination of flexural reinforcement in tension zone (see sec. 6.13.10 of Lesson 13). Here, two of the conditions are discussed.

(a)  Condition (i): 

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)  which gives Eq. 6.9 of Lesson 13 as 

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

After the curtailment, at section 2-2  Ast =  2048 mm2 (3-28T + 1-16T bars), gives  p = 2048 (100)/300 (400) ≅ 1.71 %. Table 6.1 of Lesson 13 gives τc = 0.7452 N/mm2 when  p = 1.71% (making liner interpolation).

Now from Eq. 6.2 of Lesson 13: 

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

So, Vus  =  {1.5 (1.074) – 0.7452} (300) (400) (10-3)  kN  =  103.896  kN

which gives the spacing of stirrups (Eq. 6.5):  

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

Using  8 mm, 2 legged vertical stirrups (Asv = 100 mm2),

we have:  sv  =  0.87 (415) (100) (400)/(103.896) (103)  =  139.005  mm

Hence, provide 8 mm, 2 legged vertical stirrups @ 130 mm c/c, as shown in Fig. 6.14.4.

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

(b) Condition (ii):   Additional stirrup area for a distance of 0.75 d {= 0.75 (400) = 300 mm} = 0.4 b s/fy, where spacing  s  is not greater than  (d/8βb), where  βb = cut off bar area/total bar area = 2048/3066 = 0.67. Since, additional stirrups are of lower diameter, mild steel bars are preferred with  fy = 250 N/mm2.

Maximum spacing  s = d/8βb = 400/8 (0.67) = 75 mm.

Excess area = 0.4 b s/fy = 0.4 (300) (75)/250 = 36 mm2

Provide 6 mm, 2 legged mild steel vertical stirrups (56 mm2) @ 75 mm c/c for a distance of 300 mm, i.e., five numbers of stirrups (additional), as shown in Fig. 6.14.5.

Problem 3: 

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

Design the flexural and shear reinforcement of the simply supported Tbeam (Fig. 6.14.6) of effective span 8 m placed @ 4.2 m c/c and subjected to a total factored load of 150 kN/m. Use M 30, Fe 415 and SP-16 tables for the design of flexural reinforcement.


Solution 3:

Design of flexural reinforcement with SP-16:

Effective width of flange bf = lo/6 + bw + 6 Df   = 8000/6 + 300 + 6(120) = 2353 mm > 2100 mm (breadth of the web plus half the sum of the clear distance to the  adjacent beams on either side).

So, bf  =  2100  mm.  (Mu)factored  =  150 (8) (8)/(8)  =  1200  kNm,  at the mid-span.

(Vu)factored  =  150 (8)/(2)  =  600  kN,  at the support. 

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

The bending moment and shear force diagrams are shown in Fig. 6.14.7. At the mid-span

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

Df /d  =  120/600  =  0.2  and   bf /bw  =  2100/300  =  7 Table 58 of SP-16 (fy = 415 N/mm2) gives: 

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE) (when  bf /bw  =  7.0  and  Df /d  =  0.2)  >  0.37 in this case. Hence, o.k. 

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

Provide 7-32T + 1-28T (= 6245 mm2) bars at mid-span and up to section 5-5 (Fig. 6.14.8, sec. 5-5). The flexural reinforcement is cranked up and the reinforcement diagrams are shown at five sections in Fig. 6.14.8.  

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)


Design of shear reinforcement:

The details of calculations are shown below for the section 1-1 in six steps. Results of all four sections are presented in Table 6.3.  
Step 1: 
Ast  at  section 1-1 is determined (= 3217 mm2 = 4-32T) from Fig. 6.14.7 to calculate  p = Ast (100)/bw d = 3217 (100)/300 (600) = 1.79%. From Table 6.1 of Lesson 13,  τc is determined for  p = 1.79% as 0.81 N/mm2. Table 6.2 of Lesson 13 gives  τc,max for M 30 = 3.5 N/mm2.

Step 2: 
Vu is 600 kN at section 1-1 from Fig.6.14.7 to get τv from Eq.6.1 of Lesson 13 as: 

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

Here,  τv is less than  τcmax


Step 3: 
 The magnitude of shear force for which shear reinforcement is needed (say, Vreinf.) is determined from Fig. 6.14.7. For section 1-1, from Eq. 6.4 of Lesson 13,

 Vreinf = Vu – τc b d = 600 – 0.81 (300) (600) = 454.2 kN.

 The magnitude of shear force taken by bent up bar(s) is obtained from Eq. 6.7 of Lesson 13,  

Vbent = 0.87 fy Asv sinα = 0.87 (415) (804) (1/√2) (10-3) = 206.5 kN.

This force should not be greater than 0.5 (Vreinf), which, at this section, is 227.1 kN (vide sec. 6.13.8 of Lesson 13).

 The magnitude of the shear force for the design of vertical stirrup =  Vus  =  Vreinf – Vbent = 454.2 – 206.5 = 247.7 kN. 


Step 4: 
 Assume the diameter of vertical stirrup bars as 10 mm, 2 legged (Asv = 157 mm2). The spacing of vertical stirrups  sv = 0.87 fy Asv d/Vus = 0.87 (415) (157) (600)/247.7 (103) = 137.3 mm c/c. Please refer to Eq.6.5 of Lesson 13. 


Step 5: 
 Check sv co n sidering minimum shear reinforcement from cl. 26.5.1.6 of IS 456 as (see Eq.6.3 of Lesson 13): sv ≤  0.87 fy Asv /0.4 bw ≤  0.87 (415) (157) /0.4 (300)  ≤  472 mm Further, cl. 26.5.1.5 stipulates the maximum spacing = 0.75 d on 300 mm. Here, the maximum spacing = 300 mm.


Step 6: 
 So, provide 10 mm, 2 legged stirrups @ 135 mm c/c.  The results of all the sections are given below:


Table 6.3  Design of  stirrups using 10 mm 2 legged vertical stirrups, (τcmax = 3.5 N/mm2

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

*   diameter of bent up bar  =  32 mm

** diameter of bent up bar  =  28 mm

To avoid several spacings for the practical consideration, provide stirrups @ 130 mm c/c for first 1 m, @ 230 mm for next 1 m and then @ 300 mm up to the midspan in a symmetric manner (Fig. 6.14.8, secs. 1-1 to 5-5). 


6.14.3  Practice Questions and Problems with Answers 

Q.1: Check if shear reinforcement is needed for the beam shown in Fig. 6.14.9. If so, design the shear reinforcement using M 20 and mild steel (Fe 250). The tensile reinforcement is of Fe 415. Factored shear force = 300 kN. 
A.1:

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

Ast  =  4-25T  =  1963 mm2 p  
=  1963/300(500)  =  1.31% τc from

Table 6.1 of sec. 6.13.4.1 of Lesson 13  =  0.68  N/mm2  

From Table 6.2 of sec. 6.13.4.2 of Lesson 13  

τcmax = 2.8 N/mm2τv = Vu /b d (Eq.6.1 of Lesson 13)  

=  300000/300(500)  =  2.0 N/mm2

Since  τ <  τv  <  τcmax,  shear reinforcement is needed. From Eq.6.4 of Lesson 13: 
Vus  =  Vu – τc b d  =  300 – 0.68(300)(500)(10-3)  =  198  kN

Alternative 1: Providing 10 mm, 2 legged stirrups (Asv = 157 mm2), the spacing  s= 0.87(250)(157)(500)/198000 = 86.23 mm. Provide 10 mm, 2 legged stirrups @ 85 mm c/c.  Please refer to Eq.6.5 of Lesson 13.

The required area of stirrups spaced @ 85 mm c/c to satisfy the minimum shear reinforcement (cl.26.5.1.6 of IS 456) is obtained from Eq. 6.3 of Lesson 13 as:  Asv  =  0.4(300)(85)/0.87(250)  =  46.89 mm2  <  157  mm

 

Alternative 2: Providing 12 mm, 2 legged stirrups (Asv = 226 mm2), the spacing  sv = 0.87(250)(226)(500)/198000 = 124.13 mm. Provide 12 mm, 2 legged stirrups @ 120 mm c/c. The required area of stirrups spaced @ 120 mm c/c to satisfy the minimum shear reinforcement (cl. 26.5.1.6 of IS 456) is obtained from Eq. 6.3 of Lesson 13 as:  Asv  =  0.4(300)(120)/0.87(250)  =  66.21 mm2  <  226  mm2 

Further, the maximum spacing (cl. 26.5.1.5 of IS 456 and sec. 6.13.7 of Lesson 13) = 0.75 d = 0.75(500)  =  375 mm.  

Hence, both are possible, though 12 mm @ 120 mm c/c is desirable since the other spacing of 85 mm c/c is very close (Fig. 6.14.9). 

 

6.14.4  Test 14 with Solutions 

Maximum Marks = 50,    
 Maximum Time = 30 minutes
 Answer all questions. 

TQ. 1:   The T-beam of Fig. 6.14.10 has a factored shear force of 400 kN. Determine the diameter and spacing of vertical stirrups at a section where two 25 mm diameter bent up bears are also available for the shear resistance. Use M 20 and Fe 415.        (50 marks) 
 A.TQ. 1:

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)
 

Ast  =  4-25φ  =  1963 mm2

p    =  1963(100)/300(550)  =  1.19%

τc   =   0.658  N/mm2  (Table 6.1 of Lesson 13)

V =   400  kN 

τv (Eq.6.1 of Lesson 13)  =   400/165  =  2.43 N/mm2  <   τcmax  of 2.8  N/mm2.   

  Hence, o.k.

Vreinf.  =  Vu – τb d  =  400 – 0.658(300)(0.55)  =  291.43  kN (please refer to Eq.6.4 of Lesson 13) 

Vbent (2-25 mm diameter)  =  0.87 fy Asv sinα  =  0.87(415)(981)(1/√2)            

=  250.48  kN, 

 subjected to the maximum value of 0.5(Vreinf.)  =  145.71 kN (see sec. 6.13.8 of Lesson 13) 

Vus  =  145.72 kN 

Using 10 mm, 2 legged vertical stirrups (Asv = 157 mm2), the spacing, obtained from Eq.6.5 of Lesson 13, sv = 0.87 fy Asv d/Vus = 0.87 (415) (157) (550)/145720  =  213.95  mm c/c.

For the minimum shear of reinforcement as per cl. 26.5.1.6 of IS 456, using 10 mm, 2 legged vertical stirrups, the spacing as obtained from Eq.6.3 of Lesson 13: 

sv ≤  0.87 fAsv /0.4 bw ≤  0.87 (415) (157) /0.4 (300)  ≤  472 mm 

Again, cl. 26.5.1.5 of IS 456 stipulates the maximum spacing = 0.75 d = 0.75(550) = 412.5 mm (see sec. 6.13.7 of Lesson 13). 

Hence, provide 10 mm, 2 legged vertical stirrups @ 210 mm c/c (Fig. 6.14.10). 

 

Summary of this Lesson  

Learning the different failure modes, the shear stresses and the design procedure of beams subjected to shear in Lesson 13, this lesson explains the design through several numerical problems with special reference to curtailment of tension reinforcement in flexural members. Solution of problems given in the practice problems and test, students will be thoroughly conversant with the design of rectangular and T-beams subjected to shear following the limit state of collapse. 

The document Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE) is a part of Civil Engineering (CE) category.
All you need of Civil Engineering (CE) at this link: Civil Engineering (CE)

Top Courses for Civil Engineering (CE)

FAQs on Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

1. What is the limit state of collapse in shear?
Ans. The limit state of collapse in shear refers to the condition when a structural element, such as a beam or a column, fails due to excessive shear forces. It is the point at which the shear resistance of the element is no longer sufficient to resist the applied loads, leading to the collapse of the structure.
2. How is the limit state of collapse in shear determined?
Ans. The limit state of collapse in shear is determined by calculating the maximum shear force that a structural element can resist before it fails. This is done by considering the shear capacity of the element, which is determined using various design codes and standards. The shear capacity is compared to the applied shear forces to ensure that it is greater than or equal to the demand.
3. What are the common failure modes associated with the limit state of collapse in shear?
Ans. The common failure modes associated with the limit state of collapse in shear include shear compression failure, shear tension failure, and shear diagonal tension failure. Shear compression failure occurs when the concrete or the material in compression fails due to excessive shear forces. Shear tension failure occurs when the material in tension fails due to excessive shear forces. Shear diagonal tension failure occurs when the concrete or the material in diagonal tension fails due to excessive shear forces.
4. How can the limit state of collapse in shear be prevented or mitigated?
Ans. The limit state of collapse in shear can be prevented or mitigated by employing proper structural design and detailing techniques. This includes ensuring adequate shear reinforcement, providing sufficient concrete cover, using appropriate construction materials, and considering the effects of long-term loading and temperature variations. The use of shear walls, bracing, and other structural elements can also help in mitigating shear forces and preventing collapse.
5. What are the factors that affect the limit state of collapse in shear?
Ans. The limit state of collapse in shear is affected by several factors, including the type and strength of the material used, the geometry and dimensions of the structural element, the presence of shear reinforcement, the level and distribution of applied loads, and the overall structural system. These factors need to be carefully considered during the design and construction process to ensure that the limit state of collapse in shear is not reached.
Download as PDF
Explore Courses for Civil Engineering (CE) exam

Top Courses for Civil Engineering (CE)

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Related Searches

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

study material

,

Exam

,

practice quizzes

,

video lectures

,

pdf

,

Summary

,

Objective type Questions

,

Viva Questions

,

MCQs

,

Important questions

,

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

,

past year papers

,

Semester Notes

,

mock tests for examination

,

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

,

Sample Paper

,

Extra Questions

,

Free

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

ppt

,

Limit State of Collapse in Shear: Numerical Problems - Civil Engineering (CE)

;