Syllogism questions consist of a major premise and a minor premise, leading to a conclusion. Your task is to determine the conclusion based on the relationship between the premises.
Let us see an example of syllogism:
Statements:
(a) All cats are dogs.
(b) All dogs are birds.
Conclusion: All cats are birds.
The conclusion logically follows from the premises. But to solve complex problems, we have some standard methods.
A premise is something assumed or taken for granted.
Premise is:
Reactions:
Some Bs are As- This is a definite conclusion.
Some Bs are not As- This is a probable conclusion.
The premise is:
Valid Reactions: Some As are Bs - This is a definite conclusion (Although the above image also shows that some Bs are not As, this cannot be taken as a definite conclusion.)
The premise is as follows:
The conclusion No B is A is a valid conclusion.

The first component has similarities with the second component.
Premise: 
Only a small portion of a group possesses a particular characteristic, not all of them.
Important Keywords to note:
1. Each, Every, Only, 100% → All
2. Almost, Little, Few, At most, At least, Many, Mostly, 1-99% → Some
3. None, 0% → No
The following are the four major types of statements generally asked:

When drawing conclusions from syllogistic statements, keep the following points in mind:
Key Points Regarding Conclusions from Single Statements:
There are two statements provided, followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the two given statements as true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Decide which conclusion logically follows from the given statement.
Q: Statements:
All roses are flowers.
Some flowers are red.
Conclusion:
I. Some roses are red.
II. All red things are roses.
Select the correct conclusion(s):
A) Only conclusion I
B) Only conclusion II
C) Both conclusions I and II
D) Neither conclusion I nor II
Ans: D) Neither Conclusion I nor Conclusion II follows
Explanation: From the two statements (All roses are flowers, and some flowers are red), neither of the conclusions can be inferred. Some roses may or may not be red, and all things red don't necessarily need to be roses.
Type 2
There are three statements provided, followed by four conclusions numbered I,II, III, IV. You have to take the two given statements as true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Decide which conclusion logically follows from the given statement.
Select the correct conclusion(s):
A) Only conclusions I and II
B) Only conclusion II
C) Only I and IV
D) Only II and IV
E) None
Q: Statements:
(a) Some apples are fruits
(b) All vegetables are fruits
(c) All fruits are vegetables
Conclusions
I. Some apples are vegetables
II. All vegetables are fruits
III. All fruits are apples
IV. All vegetables are apples.
Ans: (a)
Type 3
There are six statements followed by four options of combinations of any three of the given sentences. Choose the option in which the combinations are logically related.
A. All falcons fly high.
B. All falcons are blind.
C. All falcons are birds.
D. All birds are yellow.
E. All birds are thirsty.
F. All falcons are yellow.
Select the correct code:
(A) ABC
(B) CDF
(C) DEF
(D) BCA
Ans: (B)
Select the correct option:
(A) A only
(B) B only
(C) C only
(D) D only
Ans: Option (A) is the correct answer.
Example 1: Which of the two conclusions can be drawn on the basis of the given statements?
Statements:
Conclusions:
I. Some scissors are parrots.
II. Some combs are parrots.
Now, in this case, the possible conclusion is: Some scissors are parrots (I to I), as the universal principle no. 4 says, that with two particular statements only I to I is possible. Therefore, only 1 conclusion is possible. Nothing else is possible.
Venn diagram
Try yourself: Statements:
- Some actors are singers.
- All the singers are dancers.
Conclusions:
1. Some actors are dancers.
2. No singer is an actor.
Example 2: Which of the two conclusions can be drawn on the basis of the given statements?
Statements:
Conclusions:
I. Some flowers are lanterns.
II. Some candles are lanterns.
Three possible diagrams are shown above for the given statements.
Conclusion I follows from the last two possible solutions but does not follow from the first possible solution. Therefore, this conclusion is false.
Conclusion II follows from all the three possible solutions.
Therefore, conclusion II is true.
Try yourself: Statements:
- No door is a dog.
- All the dogs are cats.
Conclusions:
(A) No door is a cat.
(B) No cat is a door.
(C) Some cats are dogs.
(D) All the cats are dogs.
Example 3: Which of the two conclusions can be drawn on the basis of the given statements?
Statements:
Conclusions:
I. All prisoners are uneducated.
II. Some men are prisoners.
Two possible diagrams are shown below for the given statements.
Conclusion I follow from both the possibilities, so the conclusion I am true.
Conclusion II also follows from both the possibilities, so conclusion II is also true.
Therefore, both conclusions are true.
Example 4: Which of the two conclusions can be drawn on the basis of the given statements?
Statements:
Conclusions:
I. All lengths are sides.
II. No breadth is a side.
Two possible diagrams are shown below for the given statements.
Conclusion I: False (conclusion follows from the second possibility but doesn't follow from the first possibility)
Conclusion II: True (conclusion follows from both the Venn diagram possibilities.)Therefore, only conclusion II is true.
Example 5:
Statements:
Conclusions:
On the basis of both statements, the following one diagram is possible.
From the diagram it is clear that (2) and (4) conclusions logically follow.
Example 6:
Statements:
Conclusions:
From these given statements the following diagrams are possible

From the diagram neither (1) nor (2) conclusions follow.
Directions to Solve: In each of the following questions, two statements are given, and these statements are followed by two conclusions numbered (1) and (2). You have to take the given two statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Give answer:
Example 7:
Statements:
Conclusions:
A. Neither I nor II follow
B. Only II follows
C. Only I follows
D. Both I and II follow
E. Not Attempted
Correct Answer is Option (d)
The least possible Venn diagram is:
Conclusions:
I. Some books are chairs - Follows (As all books are chairs than some books will be chairs)
II. Some chairs are goats - Follows (As we know some goats are books and all books are chairs than some chairs will be goats)
Hence, the correct answer is "option (D)".
Example 8:
Statements: All the harmoniums are instruments. All the instruments are flutes.
Conclusions:
A. Only (1) conclusion follows
B. Only (2) conclusion follows
C. Either (1) or (2) follows
D. Neither (1) nor (2) follows
E. Both (1) and (2) follow
Correct Answer is Option (b)
Example 9:
Statements: Some mangoes are yellow. Some tixo are mangoes.
Conclusions:
A. Only (1) conclusion follows
B. Only (2) conclusion follows
C. Either (1) or (2) follows
D. Neither (1) nor (2) follows
E. Both (1) and (2) follow
Correct Answer is Option (d)
Example 10:
Statements: Only a few apples are red. Some red things are big.
Conclusions:
A. Only (1) conclusion follows
B. Only (2) conclusion follows
C. Either (1) or (2) follows
D. Neither (1) nor (2) follows
E. Both (1) and (2) follow
Answer: D. Neither (1) nor (2) follows
Explanation: Neither of the conclusions follow universally. The statements do not confirm interection of apples being big.
| 1. What exactly is a syllogism and how does it work in logical reasoning? | ![]() |
| 2. How do I identify valid and invalid syllogisms quickly during the exam? | ![]() |
| 3. What's the difference between categorical and hypothetical syllogisms? | ![]() |
| 4. Why do some syllogisms seem logical but are actually invalid? | ![]() |
| 5. How should I approach syllogism questions in GATE to avoid common mistakes? | ![]() |