The central character in the story is a young homoeopathic doctor whose personality is sketched through his thoughts, actions and humorous self-reflection. He is at once vain about his looks and qualifications, candid about his own faults, witty and able to laugh at himself. The episode with the snake brings out the contrast between his earlier vanity and the more modest, practical side of his nature. He tells the story in a light, conversational tone which helps the reader understand both his weaknesses and his strengths.
The doctor is introduced as an ordinary practitioner who is new to his profession and struggling with poverty and limited resources. His circumstances are humble: he rents a poor, rat-infested house and does not even have the facility of electricity. Despite these hardships he retains a comic outlook on life and a capacity for self-criticism that makes his manner engaging rather than merely pathetic.
The doctor's early practice is not successful; earnings are small and living conditions poor. These external difficulties influence his thoughts and ambitions. He admits, with humour, that he wished to marry a "fat and rich lady-doctor," partly as a practical measure so that if he made some foolish mistake he could escape without consequence. This remark reveals both his comic honesty and his tendency to fantasise as a coping mechanism for insecurity and professional inexperience.
The doctor is quite vain about his appearance and his professional standing. He often admires himself in the mirror and thinks of ways to look more handsome. He is a bachelor who wants to present himself well and to seem attractive. This trait is shown repeatedly in his behaviour before the incident with the snake.
He is strikingly candid and humorous about his own shortcomings. He can assess himself critically and make fun of his own foolish desires and mistakes. His willingness to admit that he could not earn much at first, and to joke about wanting a rich wife for comic escape, shows a reflective self-awareness that keeps his vanity from becoming intolerable. The story is narrated in a light vein, and the doctor's wit colours the entire account.
When the snake lands on him, the doctor does not panic. Instead he demonstrates admirable patience and presence of mind. He keeps his cool, prays briefly, and begins to think practically about the medicines and remedies he might need if he were bitten. He uses the snake's absorption in the mirror-reflection to his advantage rather than losing control; this shows an ability to act calmly and rationally under pressure.
Alongside his vanity, the doctor shows the instincts of a practitioner who thinks of remedies and consequences. His immediate thought, when faced with danger, is not theatrical flailing but a practical assessment: what to do if the snake bites, how to handle the situation. This reveals that, despite being inexperienced and insecure, he has professional common sense and an ability to apply knowledge in an emergency.
The snake episode produces a modest change in him. His earlier arrogance and concern for appearance are tempered by the experience of facing real danger. He realises that being alive and safe is far more important than looking handsome. The encounter humbles him and converts some of his vanity into a more grounded modesty.
The doctor's tone in narrating the incident is candid and jocular. Even when describing fear and danger, he keeps a lighter perspective and ends the story with a witty observation: the thief who stole from him did not take his dirty vest because the thief too had a "sense of cleanliness." This final remark reintroduces humour and self-mockery and confirms his ability to view himself with detachment and levity.
On balance, the doctor is an entertaining and believable character whose contradictions make him realistic. He is vain yet self-critical, inexperienced yet practical, frightened yet patient and composed. His qualities include witty self-awareness, presence of mind, professional instinct and a capacity for personal growth. These traits together make him a sympathetic and memorable protagonist in the story.
When writing a character sketch, focus on the following points: the doctor's background and living conditions; his vanity and concern for appearance; his humour and candid self-criticism; the qualities revealed during the snake incident-patience, presence of mind and practicality; the change in his nature from arrogance to modesty; and his overall likeability as a narrator. Support each point with a brief instance or observation from the narrative rather than long quotations. Keep language simple, clear and organised: introduce the character, describe key traits with examples, and summarise his overall nature.
The homoeopath doctor in "The Snake and the Mirror" is a rounded character whose comic honesty and human flaws make him relatable. His story combines humour with suspense and ends by reaffirming his warmth and capacity for self-reflection. He is not a hero in the conventional sense, but he is courageous, sensible and amusing-qualities that make the narrative both engaging and instructive.
| 1. What is the summary of the story "The Snake and the Mirror"? | ![]() |
| 2. Who is the author of the story "The Snake and the Mirror"? | ![]() |
| 3. What is the main theme of "The Snake and the Mirror"? | ![]() |
| 4. What is the significance of the mirror in the story "The Snake and the Mirror"? | ![]() |
| 5. How does the doctor's attitude towards snakes change throughout the story? | ![]() |