Q: 'Constitutional Morality' is rooted in the Constitution itself and is founded on its essential facets. Explain the doctrine of 'Constitutional Morality' with the help of relevant judicial decisions. (UPSC GS2 Mains)
Ans: Constitutional morality means fidelity to the core values, principles and procedures embodied in the Constitution. It goes beyond mere textual obedience and demands commitment to the spirit and purpose of the constitutional scheme - including dignity, equality, liberty, democracy, secularism and the rule of law. Constitutional morality functions on three inter-related levels: the normative (constitutional values and ideals), the institutional (roles and limits of state institutions) and the procedural (rules of democratic engagement and fair legal process). It requires public institutions, legislatures, executives and courts to act in ways that sustain the constitutional order and protect individual rights.
Why constitutional morality matters
- Preamble - Establishes foundational values such as justice, liberty, equality and fraternity that guide the entire constitutional scheme.
- Fundamental Rights - Secure individual liberties and protect persons against arbitrary State action; Article 32 enables judicial enforcement by the Supreme Court.
- Directive Principles - Provide policy guidance to the State for giving practical effect to constitutional ideals and social welfare goals.
- Fundamental Duties - Remind citizens that rights are accompanied by obligations towards the nation and constitutional values.
- Checks and Balances - Institutional mechanisms such as judicial review, legislative oversight and separation of powers ensure that no organ exceeds its constitutional limits.
Constitutional morality as reflected in key judicial decisions
- Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) - The Supreme Court propounded the basic structure doctrine, holding that Parliament cannot alter the Constitution's essential features. This decision protects core values (including constitutional morality) from majoritarian or legislative erosion.
- Government of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India (2018) - The Court emphasised that constitutional morality requires respect for constitutional roles and restraints; high-ranking officials and institutions must follow constitutional design and cannot act arbitrarily or undermine constitutional principles.
- Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018) - The Supreme Court read down Section 377 to decriminalise consensual same-sex relations. The judgment applied constitutional morality by placing dignity, liberty and equality at the forefront and rejecting penalisation based on prejudice.
- Naz Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (Delhi High Court, 2009) - The Delhi High Court contrasted constitutional morality with public morality, holding that constitutional morality must prevail where individual rights and dignity are at stake. This laid important groundwork for later Supreme Court rulings.
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) - The Court recognised the right to privacy as intrinsic to dignity and autonomy. The judgment illustrated how constitutional morality obliges courts to check State excesses and to protect fundamental rights against intrusive measures.
- Indian Young Lawyers' Association v. State of Kerala (Sabarimala, 2018) - The Court held that constitutional morality, comprising equality and non-discrimination, must prevail over customary practices that violate individual rights. It authorised entry of women to the Sabarimala temple irrespective of age, emphasising that tradition cannot supersede constitutional values.
In conclusion, constitutional morality is the practical commitment to constitutional values that animates judicial review, guides legislative and executive action, and protects minorities and vulnerable groups against majoritarian impulses. It ensures that the Constitution operates as a living instrument of justice, liberty and equality rather than as a collection of mere formal rules.