UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Notes  >  Indian Polity CSE  >  GS2 PYQ (Mains Answer Writing): Constitutional Morality

GS2 PYQ (Mains Answer Writing) Constitutional Morality - Indian Polity

Q: 'Constitutional Morality' is rooted in the Constitution itself and is founded on its essential facets. Explain the doctrine of 'Constitutional Morality' with the help of relevant judicial decisions. (UPSC GS2 Mains)

Ans: Constitutional morality means fidelity to the core values, principles and procedures embodied in the Constitution. It goes beyond mere textual obedience and demands commitment to the spirit and purpose of the constitutional scheme - including dignity, equality, liberty, democracy, secularism and the rule of law. Constitutional morality functions on three inter-related levels: the normative (constitutional values and ideals), the institutional (roles and limits of state institutions) and the procedural (rules of democratic engagement and fair legal process). It requires public institutions, legislatures, executives and courts to act in ways that sustain the constitutional order and protect individual rights.

Why constitutional morality matters

  • Preamble - Establishes foundational values such as justice, liberty, equality and fraternity that guide the entire constitutional scheme.
  • Fundamental Rights - Secure individual liberties and protect persons against arbitrary State action; Article 32 enables judicial enforcement by the Supreme Court.
  • Directive Principles - Provide policy guidance to the State for giving practical effect to constitutional ideals and social welfare goals.
  • Fundamental Duties - Remind citizens that rights are accompanied by obligations towards the nation and constitutional values.
  • Checks and Balances - Institutional mechanisms such as judicial review, legislative oversight and separation of powers ensure that no organ exceeds its constitutional limits.

Constitutional morality as reflected in key judicial decisions

  • Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) - The Supreme Court propounded the basic structure doctrine, holding that Parliament cannot alter the Constitution's essential features. This decision protects core values (including constitutional morality) from majoritarian or legislative erosion.
  • Government of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India (2018) - The Court emphasised that constitutional morality requires respect for constitutional roles and restraints; high-ranking officials and institutions must follow constitutional design and cannot act arbitrarily or undermine constitutional principles.
  • Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018) - The Supreme Court read down Section 377 to decriminalise consensual same-sex relations. The judgment applied constitutional morality by placing dignity, liberty and equality at the forefront and rejecting penalisation based on prejudice.
  • Naz Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (Delhi High Court, 2009) - The Delhi High Court contrasted constitutional morality with public morality, holding that constitutional morality must prevail where individual rights and dignity are at stake. This laid important groundwork for later Supreme Court rulings.
  • Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) - The Court recognised the right to privacy as intrinsic to dignity and autonomy. The judgment illustrated how constitutional morality obliges courts to check State excesses and to protect fundamental rights against intrusive measures.
  • Indian Young Lawyers' Association v. State of Kerala (Sabarimala, 2018) - The Court held that constitutional morality, comprising equality and non-discrimination, must prevail over customary practices that violate individual rights. It authorised entry of women to the Sabarimala temple irrespective of age, emphasising that tradition cannot supersede constitutional values.

In conclusion, constitutional morality is the practical commitment to constitutional values that animates judicial review, guides legislative and executive action, and protects minorities and vulnerable groups against majoritarian impulses. It ensures that the Constitution operates as a living instrument of justice, liberty and equality rather than as a collection of mere formal rules.

The document GS2 PYQ (Mains Answer Writing): Constitutional Morality is a part of the UPSC Course Indian Polity for UPSC CSE.
All you need of UPSC at this link: UPSC

FAQs on GS2 PYQ (Mains Answer Writing): Constitutional Morality

1. What exactly is constitutional morality and how does it differ from the Constitution itself?
Ans. Constitutional morality refers to the spirit, values, and ethical principles underlying the Constitution that guide interpretation beyond its literal text. While the Constitution is the written legal document, constitutional morality embodies the foundational ideals of justice, equality, and human dignity that inform judicial decisions. It acts as a living framework ensuring constitutional provisions remain relevant to contemporary society and governance challenges.
2. How do judges use constitutional morality in mains answer writing for UPSC exams?
Ans. When answering UPSC mains questions on constitutional morality, candidates should explain how courts invoke constitutional ethos to strike down unconstitutional laws or practices. Illustrate this with landmark judgments like Navtej Singh Johar (decriminalising homosexuality) or Puttaswamy (right to privacy). Emphasise how judges balance literal constitutional text with underlying moral principles to deliver justice-oriented verdicts aligned with modern social values.
3. Why does constitutional morality matter in interpreting fundamental rights and duties?
Ans. Constitutional morality provides the ethical foundation for interpreting fundamental rights expansively and protecting citizens' dignity beyond explicit textual language. It enables courts to recognise unenumerated rights like privacy and freedom of sexual orientation as implicit in Articles 14, 19, and 21. This principle ensures fundamental duties reflect citizens' moral obligations to society, making the rights-duties framework dynamically responsive to evolving constitutional consciousness and human dignity standards.
4. What are the main criticisms of relying on constitutional morality in judicial decisions?
Ans. Critics argue constitutional morality lacks objective definition, risks judicial overreach, and allows judges to impose personal moral beliefs rather than constitutional text. Concerns include inconsistent application across benches, undermining parliamentary sovereignty, and difficulty distinguishing between legitimate constitutional principles and subjective judicial moralism. Opponents worry it destabilises legal certainty by making constitutional meaning fluid, potentially compromising the rule of law if judges prioritise moral philosophy over constitutional grammar.
5. How should students structure answers on constitutional morality for UPSC PYQ-based responses?
Ans. Begin with a clear definition of constitutional morality grounded in Indian constitutional values. Support arguments using relevant Supreme Court judgments and constitutional provisions (especially Part III and IV). Address the tension between constitutional text and judicial interpretation through concrete examples. Conclude by analysing whether constitutional morality strengthens or weakens constitutional governance. Use mind maps and flashcards available on EduRev to memorise landmark cases and their constitutional moral principles for confident exam performance.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
Get EduRev Notes directly in your Google search
Related Searches
study material, practice quizzes, Sample Paper, Previous Year Questions with Solutions, GS2 PYQ (Mains Answer Writing): Constitutional Morality, video lectures, Free, past year papers, GS2 PYQ (Mains Answer Writing): Constitutional Morality, GS2 PYQ (Mains Answer Writing): Constitutional Morality, pdf , Viva Questions, ppt, Objective type Questions, MCQs, shortcuts and tricks, Exam, Extra Questions, mock tests for examination, Summary, Important questions, Semester Notes;