Passage Based Questions: Logical Reasoning - 15 | Passage Based Questions for CLAT Preparation PDF Download

According to the lines 6-7 author implies that America has maintained relationship with fellow countries in order to maintain its world supremacy. Other premises support this contention as unequal relationships have resulted in the countries to cry “God”. Therefore option A provides a better answer to the question. Option B is pointless and not mentioned anywhere in the passage. Option B and C are premises that inferentially support option A as the conclusion.
So option A is the clear answer to countries facing backlash maintaining relationship with the US.

According to the lines 22-25 the author argues about the intent of the US to see India as a global power. Somehow this contention supports India being underestimated by the US in terms of capabilities. The major reason that economic relationship has not boomed at their capability level. So it can be inferred that option B is the good answer to the question. Option A which tries to explain analogy is not a strong reason to question asked. Similarly option C and D are either beyond the scope of the passage or weakly inferential to the statement in question.
So option B is the answer.

The author provides two alternatives : either-or structure. Washington can take two actions accordingly either court a country or ignore a country. So if is not courting a country then obviously it is ignoring it .
So option A is the answer.

According to the  lines 17-18 of the passage which clearly mentions that more Indians left for America from India than any other country in pursuit of higher studies (around 200,000) and 4 million Indians residing in US. And companies such as Google, Microsoft and IBM are all major US tech giants. So its clearly possible that these companies will have Indians working who later became CEO’s of the company.
So option A is the clear answer. Other options can be rejected outrighty by method of elimination.

The two statements can be inferred from the statement, 1 : projection during the Obama -Biden-Kerry-Clinton years that trade could be bumped up to $500 billion  and 2: New Delhi’s hopes of ramping its GDP to $5 trillion by 2025.The author uses analogy between the statements to present its conclusion.
So option D is the answer. Other options can be rejected by method of elimination.