Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions as follows:
Passage
Archaeologists working in two recently discovered limestone caves in Sarawak, Malaysia have found a surprising collection of 51 paintings estimated to be 6,000 to 12,000 years old. The paintings are unusual in their medium, manner of display, and subject matter. These are not simply wall or ceiling paintings. Stones—some as small as notebooks, some as large as doors—have been chipped and otherwise shaped to form rough canvases on which are painted individual works. Some of the pieces are stacked, while others are arranged upright in an overlapping pattern so that one can “flip through” the smaller pieces in the collection with relative ease. Hunters, warriors, and hunted animals, the typical subjects of cave art, are largely absent from these works. Instead, domestic scenes are represented, including food preparations, family meals, and recreational activities.
Though no tools have been found in the area, the fineness of the lines suggests the use of sophisticated animal-hair brushes. Gypsum, manganese, malachite, and other minerals were painstakingly ground and mixed with binding materials such as vegetable and animal oils to form the paints. In some cases, the artist or artists (Dr. Linus Mendoza of the International Speleologist Association has studied the paintings and believes that stylistic similarities and differences point to the work of three artists) have removed the patina surrounding the intended figures, producing a negative image. One probable reason for the high level of artistry is that the paintings may have been produced in the open air, where the light was good, and then brought into the cave.
However, it is the purpose of the paintings that is the most curious. Conventional wisdom holds that the hunting scenes found in cave art were meant to provide super-natural aid during actual hunts, or that figures and designs were painted by prehistoric shamans as a way of drawing power from the cave itself. It may also be that the scenes of domestic life are, like representations of hunting, meant to ensure good luck. Though facial features are rarely distinct, the paintings do suggest contentedness, or at least an absence of conflict. Most tantalizingly, it may be that the collection represents a sort of family tree. A number of the paintings appear to feature some of the same people, and it is tempting to think of these works as family portraits. Indeed, one figure, seen as a child with a mark on its forehead—the stone has actually been chipped away to represent the mark—is shown in other paintings as a young person and as an adult with the same mark.
Question for Practice Test: Reading Comprehension - 38
Try yourself:The primary purpose of the passage is to _______.
Explanation
The first two sentences of the passage describe the collection of stone art as "surprising" and "unusual.* Most of the first and third paragraphs give details that show why these paintings are so unusual and thus of considerable interest.
(A): The passage does not provide an overview; the emphasis is on this one collection.
(B); Though the possibility that the paintings represent a family tree is of much interest to the author, this is too specific to be the primary purpose of the entire passage. It is not mentioned until the last paragraph.
(D); Though the author does allude to the high level of skill shown by the artists, this is only mentioned in the second paragraph.
(E): This is too general. The Scope of the passage concerns only one particular collection of stone art
Report a problem
Question for Practice Test: Reading Comprehension - 38
Try yourself:Which of the following is mentioned in the passage as an unusual feature of the stone paintings?
Explanation
We are told in the first paragraph that the paintings are unusual in their "manner of display." This display (presentation) is then described, including the overlapping stone pieces.
(A) : Though the level of artistry is described as high, we are not told that this is unusual.
(B) : We are never told that the age of the paintings is unusual.
(C): The size of the figures in the paintings was never said to be unusual.
(D): At no point is the indistinctiveness of facial features said to be unusual.
Report a problem
Question for Practice Test: Reading Comprehension - 38
Try yourself:Which of the following, if true, would most undermine a possibility mentioned by the author of the passage?
Explanation
If a chipped head signifies that a person died at the approximate age shown in a painting, then the figures who have this mark could not be the same, as suggested in the last sentence of the passage.
(A): According to the author, these paintings may have been made 6,000 to 12,000 years ago, so this does not weaken anything the author has mentioned.
(B): What is found in nearby caves is irrelevant to any opinion put forth by the author of this passage.
(C): The author mentions that "other minerals” may have been used besides gypsum, manganese, and malachite, so this choice does not undermine the author's observations.
(E): The fact that the paintings were created over a period of many years does not contradict anything mentioned in the passage.
Report a problem
Question for Practice Test: Reading Comprehension - 38
Try yourself:The author of the passage is especially interested in _______.
Explanation
In the final paragraph, the author states, "Most tantalizingly, it may be that the collection represents a sort of family tree." Therefore, we can say that the author is especially interested in this possibility.
(B): Though the manner in which the paints were made is discussed, it is not given emphasis.
(C): Stylistic differences are referred to in the parenthetical note in the second paragraph, but the author never expresses a particular interest in this topic.
(D): The location of the caves is only mentioned in passing.
(E): The creation of negative images is not given any particular emphasis.
Report a problem