Table of contents | |
Historical Background of Partition | |
Why and How Did Partition Happen? | |
The Withdrawal of Law and Order | |
Help, Humanity, and Harmony |
The provincial elections of 1937 were a significant political event in British India. The Congress Party, led by leaders such as Jawaharlal Nehru and Subhas Chandra Bose, won the majority in five provinces and formed the government in seven out of eleven provinces. This marked a significant shift in Indian politics as Congress took charge of several key regions.
In the reserved constituencies, which were set aside for marginalized groups, both Congress and the Muslim League faced challenges. The Muslim League performed poorly in these areas, leading to a sense of disillusionment among its members.
In the United Province (present-day Uttar Pradesh), the Muslim League expressed interest in forming a coalition government with Congress. However, Congress, having an absolute majority, rejected the proposal. This rejection fueled a perception among Muslim League members that they would be politically marginalized as a minority.
Provincial election of 1937
The 1930s saw the Muslim League actively working to expand its social base, recognizing its limited support. The League aimed to strengthen its presence in Muslim-dominated areas to become a more influential political force.
Congress and its ministries, despite their dominance, failed to effectively counter the propaganda and divisive tactics employed by the Muslim League. The failure to win over the Muslim masses contributed to the deepening divide between Hindus and Muslims.
The emergence and growth of organizations like the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and the Hindu Mahasabha played a role in exacerbating religious differences. These groups focused on Hindu nationalist ideologies, further polarizing communities along religious lines.
Veer Savarkar of Hindu Mahasabha
On March 23, 1940, the Muslim League, led by Muhammad Ali Jinnah, passed the Lahore Resolution, often referred to as the 'Pakistan' Resolution. This resolution demanded autonomy for Muslim-majority areas within the subcontinent.
Notably, the resolution did not explicitly mention the creation of a separate nation or partition. Instead, it emphasized the idea of Muslim-majority regions having a measure of self-rule.
The demand for Pakistan, as articulated in the 1940 resolution, did not initially represent a clear and unequivocal call for a separate nation. Some leaders, including Jinnah, may have seen it as a negotiating tool to secure political concessions for Muslims.
The swift transition from the demand for autonomy to the actual partition within seven years was surprising. The factors contributing to this abrupt shift include changing political dynamics, communal tensions, and the failure of negotiations between different parties.
Muhammad Ali Jinnah
After World War II, discussions between the British, Congress, and the Muslim League took place to determine the future political structure of India. However, these negotiations faced challenges due to Jinnah's steadfast demands regarding representation and communal issues.
In the 1946 provincial elections, Congress performed well in general constituencies, while the Muslim League secured a significant majority of Muslim votes. This electoral success strengthened the League's position as the primary political representative of Muslims.
The League's dominance in the reserved Muslim constituencies further solidified its claim as the leader of Muslim interests.
The Cabinet Mission, comprising British officials, proposed a political framework for India in 1946. The plan suggested a united India with a three-tier confederation, categorizing provinces into sections based on religious majority.
Although initially agreed upon, disagreements arose over the compulsory nature of grouping and the right to secede. The Muslim League insisted on the right to secede, while Congress favored giving provinces the choice to join the groups voluntarily.
These disagreements eventually led to the breakdown of talks, leaving the issue of a united India unresolved.
After the withdrawal of the Cabinet Mission, the Muslim League, under Jinnah's leadership, decided to resort to direct action to press for its demand for Pakistan. August 16, 1946, was declared "direct action day," leading to widespread riots, particularly in Calcutta and other parts of Northern India.
The communal violence during this period heightened tensions between Hindus and Muslims, making the prospect of a united India more challenging.
In March 1947, Congress reluctantly accepted the division of Punjab and Bengal along religious lines, marking a significant step towards the eventual partition.
Calcutta riots of 1946
While Congress leaders sensed the inevitability of partition after the failed negotiations, figures like Mahatma Gandhi and Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan continued to oppose the idea. They viewed partition as tragic but avoidable, emphasizing the need for communal harmony and a united India.
Despite their opposition, the communal violence and political circumstances eventually led to the partition of British India into the independent nations of India and Pakistan in 1947.
Except for Mahatma Gandhi, top leaders were engaged in negotiations regarding Independence.
Indian Civil Servants in affected areas were concerned for their safety.
Gandhi took bold efforts to restore peace by touring violence-stricken areas, including Noakhali in East Bengal, riot-torn Calcutta, and Delhi.
He encouraged mutual trust and protection among different religious communities, urging Hindus and Sikhs in Delhi to safeguard Muslims and assuring the safety of Hindus in East Bengal.
Gandhi embarked on a fast to bring about a change in people's hearts and end communal violence.
The fast had a profound impact, leading people to reflect on the harm done to other communities.
Unfortunately, the massacre only ended with the martyrdom of Gandhi.
Last rites of Gandhiji
Women suffered immensely during the partition, facing atrocities such as rape, abduction, and forced settlement in unfamiliar circumstances.
Government responses lacked understanding of emotional trauma, and women were sometimes forcefully separated from their new relatives without consultation, undermining their rights.
Notions of honor were tied to masculinity, often defined by ownership of women and land. The belief was that virility lay in the ability to protect these possessions from outsiders.
Men, fearing for the safety of their women, sometimes resorted to killing them to prevent violation by the enemy.
Instances, such as 90 Sikh women voluntarily jumping into a well in Rawalpindi to protect themselves, were seen as acts of martyrdom.
The notion that men had to courageously accept women's decisions, and in some cases even persuade them to sacrifice themselves, prevailed during that time.
The partition led to mass displacement and loss of lives, particularly in Punjab, where Hindu and Sikh populations moved from Pakistani to Indian territories, and Punjabi Muslims migrated to Pakistan from Indian regions.
Punjab witnessed agonizing events such as looting, killings, abductions, and rapes, resulting in large-scale massacres.
Bengal, in contrast, experienced less concentrated suffering as people moved across porous borders, and there was not a total displacement of Hindu and Muslim populations.
In Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, and Hyderabad, some Muslim families migrated to Pakistan during the 1950s and early 1960s.
32 videos|171 docs|31 tests
|
1. What was the historical background of the Partition? |
2. Why did the Partition happen? |
3. How did the Partition happen? |
4. What role did the withdrawal of law and order play in the Partition? |
5. How did the concepts of help, humanity, and harmony relate to the Partition? |
|
Explore Courses for Grade 12 exam
|