Practice Reading Comprehension - 1 | English Language for Grade 10 PDF Download

Throughout the passage, the author portrays Hooker as very confident. In paragraph 3, the author tells us that even though the Union army was weakened and demoralized, “Hooker proclaimed, ‘My plans are perfect. And when I start to carry them out, may God have mercy on Bobby Lee, for I shall have none.’” Then the author asks, “Why, aside from a propensity for narcissism, was Hooker so confident?” In paragraph 4, the author answers this question by explaining that Hooker’s confidence was based on the “vast amount of intelligence he had compiled on Lee’s army” as well as on his “superior numbers,” since he had over twice as many men as Lee did. Furthermore, Hooker had enacted a plan to “cut off the Confederate soldiers in front and behind” by dividing his troops.

Then the author notes, “Satisfied with his advantage, Hooker became convinced that Lee’s only option was to retreat to Richmond, thus assuring a Union victory.” Based on this information, we can conclude that Hooker became so confident that Lee would retreat and that the Union would win, he believed he could not lose. In the final paragraph, the author writes, “Union soldiers who tried to warn Hooker that Lee was on the offensive were dismissed as cowards. Having become convinced that Lee had no choice but to retreat, Hooker began to ignore reality.”

As a result of this, Hooker’s soldiers were caught “completely unprepared for battle” when Lee’s army attacked, so Hooker lost, despite having more men and an advantageous position. This tells us that Hooker was too confident. As a result of his belief that he could not lose, Hooker failed to prepare his soldiers for battle, and so they lost. This means that Hooker lost the Battle of Chancellorsville mostly because of his overconfidence. Therefore (C) is correct. In paragraph 2, the author writes, “Hooker was a blond, strapping young man whose vanity over his appearance was but one aspect of his egotism.” But Hooker’s “vanity over his appearance” is not what caused him to fail to prepare his men for battle.

This means (A) is incorrect. In paragraph 4, we learn that “Hooker began to ignore reality.” But this does not mean that he was ignorant or uninformed. In fact, the author tells us that “Union soldiers…tried to warn Hooker that Lee was on the offensive,” but he chose not to listen to them. This means that Hooker did not lose the battle because of his ignorance. This eliminates (B). In paragraph 4, we learn that “Union soldiers who tried to warn Hooker that Lee was on the offensive were dismissed as cowards.” This means that Hooker did not have faulty information. He had accurate information, but he chose to ignore it. This makes (D) incorrect. In paragraph 2, the author describes Hooker’s “rollicking enjoyment of both women and whiskey,” and these things could be considered vices, but these vices are not what caused Hooker to fail to prepare his men for battle. Therefore (E) is incorrect.

In paragraph 2, the author contrasts Lee and Hooker, claiming, “In appearance, personality, and lifestyle, these men were nearly perfect opposites.” Whereas the author portrays Lee as “somber,” “measured,” “devout,” and “principled,” the author describes Hooker as “blond” and “strapping,” full of “vanity” and “egotism,” and “known for his rollicking enjoyment of both women and whiskey.” Later in the passage, the author describes how the two men differed in their approach to the battle. In the final paragraph, the author writes that Hooker, supremely confident, became “convinced that Lee had no choice but to retreat” and “began to ignore reality.” On the other hand, Lee, “despite his disadvantages of both number and position,” attacked Hooker’s troops in such a way that took advantage of the Union army’s complacency. Most of the passage depicts the different ways that Lee and Hooker approached the Battle of Chancellorsville.

The contrast drawn in paragraph 2 adds background information that shows Lee and Hooker were also different in many other ways. This tells us that the contrast drawn between Lee and Hooker in paragraph 2 is most likely intended to imply that these men fundamentally differed in their approaches to nearly everything, including battle. Therefore (E) is correct. Although the contrast drawn in paragraph 2 highlights the “appearance, personality, and lifestyle” of these two men, it does not reveal anything about the men’s backgrounds or personal histories.

This means (A) is incorrect. While the author suggests that Lee was more virtuous than Hooker in his private life, he or she does not imply that this virtue made Lee a better military commander. This means that the contrast drawn in paragraph 2 is not intended to support this idea. This eliminates (B). Although it does appear from the details of paragraph 2 that Lee and Hooker had very different values, the author is not concerned with how two men with very different values could end up in similar positions of power.

Since this topic is not discussed in the passage, it is unlikely that the contrast drawn in paragraph 2 is intended to prove this point. This makes (C) incorrect. While the author suggests that Lee is more “devout and principled” than Hooker, the passage does not provide information to suggest that the author believes that if Hooker had been more devout and principled he might not have been outwitted by Lee. This means (D) is incorrect.

In paragraph 3, the author quotes Hooker as saying, “My plans are perfect. And when I start to carry them out, may God have mercy on Bobby Lee, for I shall have none.” To understand why the author most likely includes this quote, we need to look at the context of the quote. In the beginning of paragraph 3, the author notes that Hooker says his plans are perfect in spite of the fact that his troops are “famished, exhausted, and demoralized.” This means that Hooker is confident that his plans will be successful even though his army is very weak. In the final sentence of paragraph 3, the author asks, “Why, aside from a propensity for narcissism, was Hooker so confident?”

This tells us that the quote is intended to show how confident Hooker was in his belief that he would win. This means the author most likely includes this quote in order to demonstrate Hooker’s belief in his own infallibility. Therefore (A) is correct. The author does not discuss how language has changed since 1863. This eliminates (B). Although in this quote Hooker mentions God, this does not necessarily reveal that Hooker was a deeply religious man. This makes (C) incorrect. While this quote is an ironic contrast to Hooker’s defeat at the hands of Lee’s army, it does not necessarily foreshadow this defeat. This means (D) is incorrect.
Although Hooker claims that he will have no mercy on Lee, this does not necessarily mean that he is a merciless general who was compelled by his hatred of Lee. In general, the author portrays Hooker as egotistical, not merciless. This makes (E) incorrect.

propensity (noun): an inclination or natural tendency to behave in a particular way.
In paragraph 3, the author writes, “Why, aside from a propensity for narcissism, was Hooker so confident?” In order to understand the meaning of propensity, it is helpful to consider the context of the previous paragraph. In paragraph 2, the author describes Hooker as a “man whose vanity over his appearance was but one aspect of his egotism,” so we can understand that Hooker had a tendency to be vain and egotistical. Since vanity, egotism, and narcissism all have a similar meaning, we can understand that Hooker was a man who had a predisposition for narcissism or who was inclined toward narcissism.

This tendency to be narcissistic partly explains why Hooker was so confident, because he had a very high opinion of himself. This means that propensity belongs to the word group tendency, inclination, predisposition. Therefore (D) is correct. While Hooker may have a tendency toward narcissism, this does not mean that he had a fondness for it. Since narcissism is a personality trait, it is unlikely that someone would have a fondness or affection for it, as people do not usually choose their personality traits. It is more likely that a person would have a predisposition for it. This means propensity does not belong to the word group fondness, partiality, affection. This eliminates (A).
Though some many consider narcissism a flaw or fault, the author does not explicitly judge Hooker for being narcissistic. Throughout the passage, the author describes Hooker’s personality rather than judges it. Also, some people may consider narcissism to be a strength, especially in a military commander.

This means it is unlikely that the author would write that Hooker had a flaw of narcissism. The author would be more likely to choose a more neutral word like tendency. This tells us propensity does not belong to the word group flaw, fault, shortcoming. This makes (B)incorrect. Based on information in paragraph 2, we can conclude that Hooker had a predisposition for narcissism, not an aversion to it. This means propensity does not belong to the word group distaste, aversion, dissatisfaction. Therefore (C) is incorrect. The author suggests that “a propensity for narcissism” might be one reason why Hooker was “so confident,” and it does not make sense to say that a confidence of narcissism might be one reason why Hooker was “so confident.” This means propensity does not belong to the word group confidence, self-assurance, certitude. This makes (E) incorrect.

To answer this detail question correctly, we need to find where the author discusses Hooker’s plans for the battle in the passage. A good way to do this is to scan the topic sentence of each paragraph, since this sentence will likely tell us what information can be found in the rest of that paragraph. The topic sentence of paragraph 4 reads: “Hooker had used spies, analysts, and even hot air balloons to compile a vast amount of intelligence about Lee’s army.” This lets us know that the details we are looking for can likely be found in paragraph 4.

In paragraph 4, the author writes, “Buoyed by his superior numbers, Hooker covertly moved 70,000 of his men fifteen miles up and across the river, and then ordered them to sneak back down to position themselves behind Lee’s army.” This means that Hooker positioned 70,000 men behind Lee’s army. Therefore (B) is correct. The passage does not provide information to support choices (A), (C), (D), and (E). Therefore they are incorrect.

buoy (verb): to raise the spirits of; hearten; bolster; support.
In paragraph 4, the author writes, “Buoyed by his superior numbers, Hooker covertly moved 70,000 of his men fifteen miles up and across the river, and then ordered them to sneak back down to position themselves behind Lee’s army.” To understand the meaning of the word buoyed, it is helpful to look at the context of the previous sentence. In it, the author writes, “He had discerned, for example, that Lee had only 61,000 men to Hooker’s own 134,000.” This tells us that Hooker was “buoyed by his superior numbers” because he had learned he had over twice as many men as Lee. Hooker was heartened by the fact that he had so many more men than Lee, since this information gave him the confidence to move 70,000 of his men into position behind Lee’s army. From this we can understand that in this context buoyed most nearly means heartened. Therefore (E) is correct.

Hooker was not physically strengthened “by his superior numbers.” Instead, his spirits were raised, because these numbers gave him the confidence to divide his men. This means (A) is not the best choice. Hooker was not anchored or weighed down “by his superior numbers,” because his spirits were raised. This makes (B) incorrect. Although in another context buoyed could mean floated, in this case Hooker was not literally floating. Instead, his spirits were raised, meaning he was heartened. Therefore (C) is incorrect. Hooker was not sharpened “by his superior numbers,” but rather his spirits were raised. This eliminates (D).

To answer this detail question correctly, we need to find where the author discusses Hooker’s plans and advantages going into battle in the passage. A good way to do this is to scan the topic sentence of each paragraph, since this sentence will likely tell us what information can be found in the rest of that paragraph. The topic sentence of paragraph 4 reads: “Hooker had used spies, analysts, and even hot air balloons to compile a vast amount of intelligence about Lee’s army.” This lets us know that the details we are looking for can likely be found in paragraph 4. In paragraph 4, the author writes that Hooker “had discerned…that Lee had only 61,000 men to Hooker’s own 134,000” and that Hooker was “buoyed by his superior numbers.” Since Hooker had over twice as many men as Lee, this tells us that Hooker’s advantages going into battle included numbers.

This supports option (I). In paragraph 4, we learn that “Hooker covertly moved 70,000 of his men fifteen miles up and across the river, and then ordered them to sneak back down to position themselves behind Lee’s army. In effect, Hooker had cut off the Confederate soldiers in front and behind. They were trapped.” The author also tells us that once Hooker had moved his men into this position, he was “satisfied with his advantage.” This means that Hooker’s advantages going into battle included position. This supports option (II). The author does not mention any advantages Hooker had in terms of strategy in paragraph 4. In paragraph 5, the author writes, “Yet Lee, despite his disadvantages of both numbers and position, did not retreat. Instead, he moved his troops into position to attack.

Union soldiers who tried to warn Hooker that Lee was on the offensive were dismissed as cowards. Having become convinced that Lee had no choice but to retreat, Hooker began to ignore reality. When Lee’s army attacked the Union soldiers at 5:00 p.m., they were eating supper, completely unprepared for battle.” This tells us that Hooker’s strategy left his soldiers “completely unprepared for battle,” whereas Lee’s strategy was to go “on the offensive.” This means that Hooker’s advantages going into battle did not include strategy. This eliminates option (III). Therefore (C) is correct.

Throughout the passage, the author uses vivid details to help us envision this historical account. For example, in paragraph 2 he or she describes Lee as “an older man in poor health with a gray beard” and “a somber, measured demeanor.” On the other hand, the author describes Hooker as “a blond, strapping young man.” In paragraph 3, the author includes a direct quote from Hooker to  illustrate his confidence. In paragraph 4, the author tells us that Hooker had even used “hot air balloons to compile a vast amount of intelligence about Lee’s army.” In paragraph 5, the author describes the battle with details that help us envision the scene, telling us that the Union soldiers were “eating supper” and so they “abandoned their rifles” when the Confederate soldiers “came shrieking out of the brush, bayonets drawn.” All of these vivid details help bring this historical account to life. Therefore (C) is correct. Although the author includes a quote in paragraph 3, this is not the same thing as dialogue between two or more people. This means (A) is incorrect. The author does not use any specific examples throughout the passage. Instead, he speaks in general terms about both leaders and their two armies. This means (B) is incorrect. While the author does use vivid details, most of these appeal to the sense of sight. The author does not include many details about how things smelled, tasted, felt, or sounded, so these details cannot necessarily be described as sensory words. This eliminates (D). The author does not use scenic descriptions to describe the landscape. Instead, he describes the men and the battle. This makes (E) incorrect.

Throughout the passage, the author focuses on the contrast between Hooker’s narcissistic overconfidence and Lee’s pragmatic determination. In paragraph 2, the author notes that Lee had “a somber, measured demeanor” and was “devout and principled.” Based on this information, we can infer that Lee was not likely one to celebrate his victory extensively or gloat over his success, but rather to keep working to prepare for the next battle. The sentence that most accurately reflects this characterization of Lee is “Not one to gloat over his success, Lee remarked that the victory had been the product of valiant fighting and god luck, as he began to map out strategies for their next move.” This means that if the passage were to continue, this sentence would most likely be the first sentence of the next paragraph. Therefore (E) is correct. Hooker was the leader of the Union army, not the Confederate army, so he would not have hobbled south, back to the center of Confederate operations. Instead, he would have retreated to the north.

This makes (A) incorrect. In paragraph 2, the author describes Hooker as “a blond, strapping young man whose vanity over his appearance was but one aspect of his egotism” and who was “known for his rollicking enjoyment of both women and whiskey.” Throughout the passage, Hooker is portrayed as overconfident and narcissistic, even to the point that he “ignore[s] reality.” The passage does not provide information to support the idea that Hooker was prone to contemplation or learning lessons from his errors. This means (B) is incorrect. It is possible that Hooker and his forces were wounded in both body and spirit, and that they retreated to higher ground where they proceeded to prepare for a counter attack. However, this information makes Hooker appear dutiful, determined, and hardworking. This is not in keeping with the information presented in the passage depicting Hooker as overconfident, leaving his forces “completely unprepared for battle.” Such an action is more in keeping with the characterization of Lee in the passage.

What is more, the author states that Hooker and his men were "completely unprepared for battle" and that, as a result, they "abandoned their rifles." This means that they would not be prepared enough to mount a counter attack. This means this sentence is not likely to be the first sentence of the next paragraph. This eliminates (C). Although Lee was victorious, the description of him in paragraph 2 as “somber,” “measured,” “devout,” and “principled” does not suggest that he would feel triumphant and enjoy a raucous victory celebration. Hooker, had he won instead of Lee, might have celebrated in such a manner, but the author suggests that Lee’s pragmatic determination would lead him to keep working to prepare for the next move. Therefore (D) is incorrect.