Table of contents | |
Modern Classification of Accounts | |
Journal | |
Advantages of Journal | |
Accounting For GST |
Let us solve the same example with the modern approach now:-
The latter is used when there are many repetitive transactions of the same nature. The form of the journal is given below:
The columns are numbered solely for clarity, but they are not to be numbered otherwise. The following points should be emphasized:
An entry in the journal may appear as follows:
We will now consider some individual transactions.
(i) Mohan commences business with ₹ 50,00,000 in his bank account. This means that the firm has ₹ 50,00,000 in bank. According to the rules given above, the increase in an asset has to be debited. The firm also now owes ₹ 50,00,000 to the proprietor, Mohan as capital. The rule given above also shows that the increase in capital should be credited. Therefore, the journal entry will be:
(ii) Out of the above, ₹ 25,000 is withdrawn from the bank. By this transaction the bank balance is reduced by ₹ 25,000 and another asset, cash account, comes into existence. Since increase in assets is debited and decrease is credited, the journal entry will be:
(iii) Furniture is purchased for ₹ 12,00,000. Applying the same reasoning as above the entry will be:
(iv) Purchased goods for ₹ 4,00,000. The student can see that the required entry is:
(v) Purchased goods for ₹ 10,00,000 on credit from M/s Ram Narain Bros. Purchase of merchandise is an expense item so it is to be debited. ₹ 10,00,000 is now owing to the supplier; his account should therefore be credited, since the amount of liabilities has increased. The entry will be:
(vi) Sold goods to M/s Ram & Co. for ₹ 6,00,000. Amount is received in cheque. The amount of bank increases and therefore, the bank amount should be debited; sale of merchandise is revenue item so it is to be credited. The entry will be:
(vii) Sold goods to Ramesh on credit for ₹ 13,00,000. The Inventories of goods has decreased and therefore, the goods account has to be credited. Ramesh now owes ₹ 13,00,000; that is an asset and therefore, Ramesh should be debited. The entry is:
(viii) Received cheque from Ramesh ₹ 13,00,000. The amount of bank increased therefore the bank account has to be debited. Ramesh’s liability towards firm has decreased in fact in this case he no longer owes any amount to the firm now, i.e., this particular form of assets has disappeared; therefore, the account of Ramesh should be credited. The entry is:
(x) Paid rent ₹ 1,00,000. The bank balance has decreased and therefore, the bank account should be credited. No asset has come into existence because the payment is for services enjoyed and is an expense. Expenses are debited. Therefore, the entry should be:
(xi) Paid ₹ 22,000 to the clerk as salary. Applying the reasons given in (x) above, the required entry is:
(xii) Received ₹ 2,20,000 interest. The bank account should be debited since there is an increase in the bank balance. There is no increase in any liability; since the amount is not returnable to any one, the amount is an income, incomes are credited. The entry is:
When transactions of similar nature take place on the same date, they may be combined while they are journalised. For example, entries (x) and (xi) may be combined as follows:
When journal entry for two or more transactions are combined, it is called composite journal entry. Usually, the transactions in a firm are so numerous that to record the transactions for a month will require many pages in the journal. At the bottom of one page the totals of the two columns are written together with the words “Carried forward” in the particulars column. The next page is started with the respective totals in the two columns with the words “Brought forward” in the particulars column.
Illustration 4: Analyse transactions of M/s Sahil & Co. for the month of March, 2022 on the basis of double entry system by adopting the following approaches:
(A) Accounting Equation Approach.
(B) Traditional Approach. Transactions for the month of March, 2022 were as follows (figures are in ‘000):
Required
What conclusions one can draw from the above analysis?
Sol:
(A) Analysis of Business Transaction: Accounting Equation Approach
The accounting equation is
Assets = Liabilities + Capital
(B) Analysis of Business Transactions: Traditional Approach
Conclusion:
It is clear from the analysis that the methods for analyzing transactions, classifying accounts, and applying rules for recording business transactions differ between the accounting equation approach and the traditional approach. However, the accounts impacted and the entries made remain identical in both methods. Therefore, the recording of transactions in the corresponding accounts according to the double entry system is not reliant on the analysis method used by a business entity. In other words, the accounts that need to be debited and credited to document the dual aspect are consistent across both approaches.
Illustration 5: Journalise the following transactions. Also state the nature of each account involved in the Journal entry.
Following figures are given in (‘00)
Sol:
Illustration 6: Show the classification of the following Accounts under traditional and accounting equation approach:
(a) Building; (b) Purchases; (c) Sales; (d) Bank Fixed Deposit; (e) Rent; (f) Rent Outstanding; (g) Cash; (h) Adjusted Purchases; (i) Closing Inventory; (j) Investments; (k) Trade receivables; (l) Sales Tax Payable, (m) Discount Allowed; (n) Bad Debts; (o) Capital; (p) Drawings; (q) Interest Receivable account; (r) Rent received in advance account; (s) Prepaid salary account; (t) Bad debts recovered account; (u) Depreciation account, (v) Personal income-tax account.
Sol:
Illustration 7: Transactions of Ramesh for April are given below. Journalise them.
Sol:
Note: An indirect tax is one where the ultimate financial burden is borne by consumers, even though the immediate responsibility to pay the tax may rest on another party like a manufacturer or service provider. However, this tax is collected from the person purchasing the goods or services.
Since different authorities (central and state) levied these taxes, it was impossible to benefit from tax credits across various stages. For example, if a trader received goods worth ₹ 1,00,000 from a manufacturer with an excise duty of 18% (₹ 18,000), the trader could not claim credit for this excise duty when charging VAT on selling the goods to a consumer. Thus, the trader's effective cost for the goods became ₹ 1,00,000 + ₹ 18,000 = ₹ 1,18,000, increasing the final price to the consumer and causing a cascading tax effect (tax-on-tax), which ultimately raised product prices and unjustly enriched sellers at the consumer's expense.
With the implementation of GST, a single tax is levied at all stages of the supply chain, from manufacturing to final consumption, allowing for credit of taxes paid at previous stages. In the previous example, the GST (previously excise duty) of ₹ 18,000 paid by the trader can now be credited against the tax he charges to the consumer. Therefore, the cost of goods for the trader remains ₹ 1,00,000, as the ₹ 18,000 can be deducted from the GST charged to the consumer. The tax from the manufacturer to the trader is considered 'input tax,' while the tax charged by the trader to the consumer is 'output tax.' The 'input tax' is not added to the cost of goods or services, as it is offset against the 'output tax' liability. Consequently, only the value addition (i.e., the trader’s profit margin on the sale) is taxed, with the final tax burden resting on the ultimate consumer.
GST has a dual structure, with both the Centre and States levying taxes on a common base. The three main components of GST are:
GST is a “Consumption Based Tax“ i.e. the tax is received by the State in which the goods or services are consumed and not by the state in which the goods and services are manufactured.
The tax paid by the buyer on the acquisition of goods/services is referred to as Input Tax. At every stage, an entity is allowed to claim credit for GST paid on the purchase of goods and/or services, which can be offset against the GST due on the goods and/or services it supplies. Consequently, the ultimate consumer pays the GST levied throughout the supply chain, benefiting from set-off at all earlier stages. Therefore, tax is only imposed on the value added, effectively eliminating double taxation. For instance, if the tax owed by a manufacturer on the final product is ₹750 and he has already paid tax of ₹500 on inputs, he can claim an 'Input Credit' of ₹500, thus only needing to pay ₹250 in cash.
Output tax means the GST charged on supply of goods or services made by a supplier.
Input tax means the credit of Input tax already paid.
Utilisation of Input Tax Credit under GST
Tax credit of CGST, SGST and IGST can be utilized in the following manner:
Double entry book-keeping with GST
The Double entry book-keeping records need to show the GST values separately so that the purchases, expenses and sales are posted net i.e. without the addition of GST.
Journal entry in case of Sales of Goods or services
Journal entry in case of Purchase of Goods or services
Journal entry in case of Utilization of Input Tax Credit towards payment of Output Tax
Illustration 8: Journalise the following transactions in the books of Mr. Rohit:
(i) Purchased goods from Sahil for ₹ 50,000 plus CGST and SGST @ 9% each.
(ii) Purchased goods from Sam for ₹ 40,000 at a trade discount of 10% plus CGST and SGST @ 9% each. ₹ 20,000 was paid immediately and balance payable after 3 months.
(iii) Goods costing ₹ 20,000 withdrawn for personal use. Such goods were purchased by paying CGST and SGST @ 9% each.
(iv) Paid rent to Gagandeep for ₹ 20,000 plus CGST and SGST @ 6% each.
(v) Goods costing ₹ 5,000 (before trade discount of 10% ) returned to Sam. Such goods were purchased by paying CGST and SGST @ 9% each.
(vi) Purchased furniture for ₹ 44,800 including IGST @ 12%.
(vii) Purchased machinery from M/s Symphony industries for ₹ 1,40,000 plus CGST and SGST @ 9% each. Paid ₹ 1,00,000 immediately and balance to be paid after two months.
Sol:
The input tax availed earlier is reversed, because these goods are ‘consumed’ by Mr. Rohit himself. Since he cannot ‘sell’ goods to himself and charged output tax, the input tax thereon is reversed, since in this case Mr. Rohit himself is the ultimate consumer of those goods.
Since goods are returned to the supplier, the input tax credit availed earlier on those goods is to be reversed, since these goods are no longer available to be sold. Working Note. 1. Furniture purchased is including IGST @ 12%. So, value of furniture excluding IGST = ₹ 44,800 × 100/112 = ₹ 40,000. IGST = ₹ 40,000 × 12% = ₹ 4,800.
Illustration 9: Journalise the following transactions in the books of Ms. Nidhi traders
July, 2022
3 Sold Goods for ₹ 50,000, charged CGST and SGST @ 6% each.
4 Sold goods to Surjeet for ₹ 28,000 including CGST and SGST @ 6% each.
5 Received ₹ 25,200 from Surjeet in full settlement of his account of ₹ 28,000.
6 Sold goods to Kapil for ₹ 30,000 charged IGST @ 12%. Received ₹ 12,000 immediately and balance to be received after one month.
10 Kapil was allowed rebate of ₹ 5,000 as goods supplied to him were defective. These goods were sold by charging IGST @ 12%.
12 Sold goods to Manpreet for ₹ 1,00,000 at trade discount of 20% and charged IGST @ 12%
13 Goods of list price ₹ 20,000 returned by Manpreet.
17 Received commission of ₹ 15,000, charged CGST and SGST @ 6% each.
Sol:
Since rebate is on account of defective goods which cannot be sold/utilized further by Kapil, the output GST charged thereon is also reversed. This treatment is like that of Sales Return. If rebate was on account of other reasons (such as prompt payment), Output IGST would not be reversed.
Working Note: Goods sold to Surjeet is including CGST and SGST @ 6% each. So, sales excluding CGST and SGST = ₹ 28,000 × 100/112 = ₹ 25,000. CGST and SGST = ₹ 25,000 × 6% = ₹ 1,500 each.
Illustration 10: Record the following transactions in a Journal, assuming CGST and SGST@ 6% each.
(i) Sold goods to Mukesh at the list price of ₹ 50,000 less 20% trade discount.
(ii) Sold goods to Mukesh at the list price of ₹ 1,00,000 less 20% trade discount and 5% cash discount.
(iii) Sold goods to Mukesh at the list price of ₹ 1,50,000 less 20% trade discount and 5% cash discount. Out of the amount due 60% is received out of which three-fourth is received by cheque.
Sol:
Note: After allowing cash discount of ₹ 4,000 (₹ 80,000 × 5%), the balance of ₹ 85,600 is received. Since discount is on account of prompt payment, output CGST and SGST is computed on value determine after deducting trade discount.
Working Note: After allowing cash discount of ₹ 6,000 on ₹ 1,20,000, 60% of the balance amount i.e. ₹ 1,28,400 (₹ 1,20,000 + 12% GST ₹ 14,400 – discount ₹ 6,000) is paid in cash and by cheque.
Hence, the amount paid in cash and cheque = ₹ 1,28,400 × 60% = 77,040.
Amount paid by cheque = ₹ 77,040 × 3/4 = ₹ 57,780
Amount paid in cash = ₹ 77,040 x ¼ = 19,260
Mukesh’s A/c = ( ₹ 1,20,000 + ₹ 14,400 – ₹ 6,000 – ₹ 57,780 – ₹ 19,260) = ₹ 51,360
The accounting process begins with the documentation of transactions as journal entries. This recording follows the double entry system. The journal, recognized as the book of first or original entry, serves this purpose. The subsequent step involves transferring these entries to the ledger, which will be addressed in the next unit.
68 videos|160 docs|83 tests
|
1. What is a journal in accounting? |
2. What are the advantages of using a journal in accounting? |
3. How do you record a journal entry for GST transactions? |
4. What is the difference between a journal and a ledger? |
5. How can proper journal entries benefit a business? |
|
Explore Courses for CA Foundation exam
|