ICAI Notes- Unit 1: Nature of Contracts - 1 | Business Laws for CA Foundation PDF Download

Overview

Contract Law before Indian Contract Act, 1872

To understand the Contract Law before the Indian Contract Act, 1872, we should understand the journey of contract law during different time periods. In the ancient and medieval time, there was no specific law for contracts. For this purpose, generally, different sources of Hindu law like; Vedas, Dharam shastras, Smritis, Shrutis etc. were referred which gave a vivid description of the law similar to contracts in those times. During the period of Mauryas, contracts were in the form of "bilateral transactions" which were based on free consent on all the terms and conditions involved. 

During the Mughal rule in India, contracts were governed by Mohammedan Law of Contract. In this law, the Arabic word ‘Aqd’ is known for contract which means a conjunction. In the same way, word ‘Ijab’ was used for proposal and ‘Qabul’ was used for acceptance. The formation of a contract according to Islamic law does not require any kind of formality; the only requirement is the express consent of both parties on the same thing in the same sense. 

Hindu law is basically different from that of English law. Hindu law is actually the compilation of numerous customs and works of Smritikaras, who interpreted and analysed Vedas to develop the various aspect of Hindu law. According to Hindu law, minor, intoxicated person, old man or handicapped cannot enter into a valid contract. According to Narada smriti, someone of age upto 8 years is considered as an infant. Age from 8 years to 16 years is considered as boyhood and after 16 years the person is competent to enter into a contract.

During British period; before the advent of the Indian Contract Act, the English Law was applied in the Presidency Towns of Madras, Bombay and Calcutta under the Charter of 1726 issued by king George to the East India Company. If one of the parties of contract is from either of the religion and other is from other religion then the law of the defendant is to be used. This was followed in the presidency towns, but in cities outside the presidency towns, the matters were solved on the basis of justice, equity and good conscience. This procedure was followed till the Indian Contract Act was implemented in India.

The Law of contract: Introduction

The Law of Contract constitutes the most important branch of mercantile or commercial law. It affects everybody, more so, trade, commerce and industry. It may be said that the contract is the foundation of the civilized world. The law relating to contract is governed by the Indian Contract Act, 1872. It was formed on April 25, 1872 and came into force on September 01, 1872. The preamble to the Act says that it is an Act "to define and amend certain parts of the law relating to contract". It extends to the whole of India including the state of Jammu and Kashmir after removal of Article – 370 of Indian Constitution. 

The Act mostly deals with the general principles and rules governing contracts. The Act is divisible into two parts. The first part (Section 1-75) deals with the general principles of the law of contract, and therefore applies to all contracts irrespective of their nature. The second part (Sections 124-238) deals with certain special kinds of contracts, e.g., Indemnity and guarantee, bailment, pledge, and agency. 

As a result of increasing complexities of business environment, innumerable contracts are entered into by the parties in the usual course of carrying on their business. ‘Contract’ is the most usual method of defining the rights and duties in a business transaction. This branch of law is different from other branches of law in a very important aspect. It does not prescribe so many rights and duties, which the law will protect or enforce; instead it contains a number of limiting principles subject to which the parties may create rights and duties for themselves. The Indian Contract Act, 1872 codifies the legal principles that govern ‘contracts’. The Act basically identifies the ingredients of a legally enforceable valid contract in addition to dealing with certain special type of contractual relationships like indemnity, guarantee, bailment, pledge, quasi contracts, contingent contracts etc. It basically defines the circumstances in which promises made by the parties to a contract shall be legally binding on them. 

This unit refers to the essentials of a legally enforceable agreement or contract. It sets out rules for the offer and acceptance and revocation thereof. It states the circumstances when an agreement is voidable or enforceable by one party only, and when the agreements are void, i.e. not enforceable at all.

What is a Contract?

The term contract is defined under section 2(h) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 as- “an agreement enforceable by law”. The contract consists of two essential elements:
(i) an agreement, and
(ii) its enforceability by law. 

(i) Agreement - The term ‘agreement’ given in Section 2(e) of the Act is defined as- “every promise and every set of promises, forming the consideration for each other”. To have an insight into the definition of agreement, we need to understand promise. Section 2 (b) defines promise as- “when the person to whom the proposal is made signifies his assent there to, the proposal is said to be accepted. Proposal when accepted, becomes a promise”.
The following points emerge from the above definition: 

1. when the person to whom the proposal is made 
2. signifies his assent on that proposal which is made to him 
3. the proposal becomes accepted 
4. accepted proposal becomes promise
   Thus, we say that an agreement is the result of the proposal made by one party to the other party and that other party gives his acceptance thereto of course for mutual consideration.
   Agreement = Offer/Proposal + Acceptance + Consideration 

(ii) Enforceability by law – An agreement to become a contract must give rise to a legal obligation which means a duly enforceable by law. Thus, from above definitions it can be concluded that – Contract = Agreement + Enforceability by law On elaborating the above two concepts, it is obvious that contract comprises of an agreement which is a promise or a set of reciprocal promises, that a promise is the acceptance of a proposal giving rise to a binding contract. Further, section 2(h) requires an agreement capable of being enforceable by law before it is called ‘contract’. Where parties have made a binding contract, they created rights and obligations between themselves.

Example 1: A agrees with B to sell car for ₹ 2 lacs to B. Here A is under an obligation to give car to B and B has the right to receive the car on payment of ₹ 2 lacs and also B is under an obligation to pay ₹ 2 lacs to A and A has a right to receive ₹ 2 lacs. 

Example 2: Father promises his son to pay him pocket allowance of Rs. 500 every month. But he refuses to pay later. The son cannot recover the same in court of law as this is a social agreement. This is not created with an intention to create legal relationship and hence it is not a contract.
So, Law of Contract deals with only such legal obligations which has resulted from agreements. Such obligation must be contractual in nature. However, some obligations are outside the purview of the law of contract.

Example 3: An obligation to maintain wife and children, an order of the court of law etc. These are status obligations and so out of the scope of the Contract Act.

Difference between Agreement and Contract

Essentials of a Valid Contract

In terms of Section 10 of the Act, “all agreements are contracts if they are made by the free consent of the parties competent to contract, for a lawful consideration and with a lawful object and are not expressly declared to be void”.
Since section 10 is not complete and exhaustive, so there are certain other sections which also contains requirements for an agreement to be enforceable. Thus, in order to create a valid contract, the following elements should be present: 

1. Two Parties: One cannot contract with himself. A contract involves at least two partiesone party making the offer and the other party accepting it. A contract may be made by natural persons and by other persons having legal existence e.g. companies, universities etc. It is necessary to remember that identity of the parties be ascertainable.
   Example 4: To constitute a contract of sale, there must be two parties- seller and buyer. The seller and buyer must be two different persons, because a person cannot buy his own goods.
   In State of Gujarat vs. Ramanlal S & Co. when on dissolution of a partnership, the assets of the firm were divided among the partners, the sales tax officer wanted to tax this transaction. It was held that it was not a sale. The partners being joint owner of those assets cannot be both buyer and seller. 
2. Parties must intend to create legal obligations: There must be an intention on the part of the parties to create legal relationship between them. Social or domestic type of agreements are not enforceable in court of law and hence they do not result into contracts.
   Example 5: A husband agreed to pay to his wife certain amount as maintenance every month while he was abroad. Husband failed to pay the promised amount. Wife sued him for the recovery of the amount. Here, in this case, wife could not recover as it was a social agreement and the parties did not intend to create any legal relations. (Balfour v. Balfour)
   Example 6: Mr. Lekhpal promises to pay ₹ 5 lakhs to his son if the son passes the CA exams. On passing the exams, the son claims the money. Here, the son could not recover as it was a social agreement.
   Example 7: A sold goods to B on a condition that he must pay for the amount of goods within 30 days. Here A intended to create legal relationship with B. Hence the same is contract. On failure by B for making a payment on due date, A can sue him in the court of law. 
3. Other Formalities to be complied with in certain cases: A contract may be written or spoken. As to legal effects, there is no difference between a written contract and contract made by word of mouth. But in the interest of the parties the contract must be written. In case of certain contracts some other formalities have to be complied with to make an agreement legally enforceable.
   For e.g. Contract of Insurance is not valid except as a written contract. Further, in case of certain contracts, registration of contract under the laws which is in force at the time, is essential for it to be valid, e.g. in the case of immovable property. Thus, where there is any statutory requirement that any contract is to be made in writing or in the presence of witness, or any law relating to the registration of documents must be complied with. 
4. Certainty of meaning: The agreement must be certain and not vague or indefinite. Example 8: A agrees to sell to B a hundred tons of oil. There is nothing certain in order to show what kind of oil was intended for. Example 9: XYZ Ltd. agreed to lease the land to Mr. A for indefinite years. The contract is not valid as the period of lease is not mentioned. 
5. Possibility of performance of an agreement: The terms of agreement should be capable of performance. An agreement to do an act impossible in itself cannot be enforced.
   Example 10: A agrees with B to discover treasure by magic. The agreement cannot be enforced as it is not possible to be performed 

Now, according to Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the following are the essential elements of a Valid Contract: 

I. Offer and Acceptance or an agreement: An agreement is the first essential element of a valid contract. According to Section 2(e) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, “Every promise and every set of promises, forming consideration for each other, is an agreement” and according to Section 2(b) “A proposal when accepted, becomes a promise”. An agreement is an outcome of offer and acceptance for consideration.

II. Free Consent: Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense. This can also be understood as identity of minds in understanding the terms viz consensus ad idem. Further such consent must be free.
Consent would be considered as free consent if it is not caused by coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation or mistake.
Example 11: A, who owns two cars is selling red car to B. B thinks he is purchasing the black car. There is no consensus ad idem and hence no contract. To determine consensus ad idem the language of the contract should be clearly drafted. Thus, if A says B “Will you buy my red car for ₹ 3,00,000?“. B says “yes” to it. There is said to be consensus ad idem i.e. the meaning is taken in same sense by both the parties.
Example 12: A threatened to shoot B if he (B) does not lend him ₹ 2,00,000 and B agreed to it. Here the agreement is entered into under coercion and hence not a valid contract. (Students may note that the terms coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation, mistake are explained in the Unit-3) 

III. Capacity of the parties: Capacity to contract means the legal ability of a person to enter into a valid contract. Section 11 of the Indian Contract Act specifies that every person is competent to contract who
(a) is of the age of majority according to the law to which he is subject and
(b) is of sound mind and
(c) is not otherwise disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is subject.
A person for being competent to contract must fulfil all the above three qualifications.
Qualification (a) refers to the age of the contracting person i.e. the person entering into contract must be of 18 years of age. Persons below 18 years of age are considered minor, therefore, incompetent to contract.
Qualification (b) requires a person to be of sound mind i.e. he should be in his senses so that he understands the implications of the contract at the time of entering into a contract. A lunatic, an idiot, a drunken person or under the influence of some intoxicant is not supposed to be a person of sound mind.
Qualification (c) requires that a person entering into a contract should not be disqualified by his status, in entering into such contracts. Such persons are an alien enemy, foreign sovereigns, convicts etc. They are disqualified unless they fulfil certain formalities required by law. Contracts entered by persons not competent to contract are not valid. 

IV. Consideration: It is referred to as ‘quid pro quo’ i.e. ‘something in return’. A valuable consideration in the sense of law may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss or responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other.
Example 13: A agrees to sell his books to B for ₹ 100. B’s promise to pay ₹ 100 is the consideration for A’s promise to sell his books. A’s promise to sell the books is the consideration for B’s promise to pay ₹ 100. 

V. Lawful Consideration and Object: The consideration and object of the agreement must be lawful.
Section 23 states that consideration or object is not lawful if it is prohibited by law, or it is such as would defeat the provisions of law, if it is fraudulent or involves injury to the person or property of another or court regards it as immoral or opposed to public policy.
Example 14: ‘A’ promises to drop prosecution instituted against ‘B’ for robbery and ‘B’ promises to restore the value of the things taken. The agreement is void, as its object is unlawful.
Example 15: A agrees to sell his house to B against 100 kgs of cocaine (drugs). Such agreement is illegal as the consideration is unlawful. 

VI. Not expressly declared to be void: The agreement entered into must not be which the law declares to be either illegal or void. An illegal agreement is an agreement expressly or impliedly prohibited by law. A void agreement is one without any legal effects.
Example 16: Threat to commit murder or making/publishing defamatory statements or entering into agreements which are opposed to public policy are illegal in nature. Similarly, any agreement in restraint of trade, marriage, legal proceedings, etc. are classic examples of void agreements.

Types of Contracts

Now let us discuss various types of contracts.

I. On the basis of the validity 

1. Valid Contract: An agreement which is binding and enforceable is a valid contract. It contains all the essential elements of a valid contract.
   Example 17: A ask B if he wants to buy his bike for ₹ 50,000. B agrees to buy bike. It is agreement which is enforceable by law. Hence, it is a valid contract. 
2. Void Contract: Section 2 (j) states as follows: “A contract which ceases to be enforceable by law becomes void when it ceases to be enforceable”. Thus, a void contract is one which cannot be enforced by a court of law.
   Example 18: Mr. X agrees to write a book with a publisher. Such contract is valid. But after few days, X dies in an accident. Here the contract becomes void due to the impossibility of performance of the contract. Thus, a valid contract when cannot be performed because of some uncalled happening becomes void.
   Example 19: A contracts with B (owner of the factory) for the supply of 10 tons of sugar, but before the supply is effected, the fire caught in the factory and everything was destroyed. Here the contract becomes void. It may be added by way of clarification here that when a contract is void, it is not a contract at all but for the purpose of identifying it, it has to be called a [void] contract. 
3. Voidable Contract: Section 2(i) defines that “an agreement which is enforceable by law at the option of one or more parties thereto, but not at the option of the other or others is a voidable contract”. This in fact means where one of the parties to the agreement is in a position or is legally entitled or authorized to avoid performing his part, then the agreement is treated and becomes voidable.
   Following are the situations where a contract is voidable: 
   (i) When the consent of party is not free is caused by coercion, undue influence, misrepresentation or fraud.
   Example 20: X promise to sell his scooter to Y for ₹ 1 Lac. However, the consent of X has been procured by Y at a gun point. X is an aggrieved party, and the contract is voidable at his option but not on the option of Y. It means if X accepts the contract, the contract becomes a valid contract then Y has no option of rescinding the contract.
   (ii) When a person promises to do something for another person, but the other person prevents him from performing his promise, the contract becomes voidable at the option of first person.
   Example 21: There is a contact between A and B to sell car of A to B for ₹ 2,00,000. On due date of performance, A asks B that he does not want to sell his car. Here contract is voidable at the option of B.
   (iii) When a party to a contract promise to perform a work within a specified time, could not perform with in that time, the contract is voidable at the option of promisee.
   Example 22: A agrees to construct a house for B upto 31-3-2022 but A could not complete the house on that date. Here contract is voidable at the option of B. At this juncture it would be desirable to know the distinction between a Void Contract and a Voidable Contract. These are elaborated hereunder:
   
4. Illegal Contract: It is a contract which the law forbids to be made. The court will not enforce such a contract but also the connected contracts. All illegal agreements are void but all void agreements are not necessarily illegal. Despite this, there is similarity between them is that in both cases they are void ab initio and cannot be enforced by law.
   Example 23: Contract that is immoral or opposed to public policy are illegal in nature. Similarly, if R agrees with S, to purchase brown sugar, it is an illegal agreement.
   According to Section 2(g) of the Indian Contract Act, “an agreement not enforceable by law is void”. The Act has specified various factors due to which an agreement may be considered as void agreement. One of these factors is unlawfulness of object and consideration of the contract i.e. illegality of the contract which makes it void. The illegal and void agreement differ from each other in the following respects:
   
5. Unenforceable Contract: Where a contract is good in substance but because of some technical defect i.e. absence in writing, barred by limitation etc. one or both the parties cannot sue upon it, it is described as an unenforceable contract.
   Example 24: A bought goods from B in 2018. But no payment was made till 2022. B cannot sue A for the payment in 2022 as it has crossed three years and barred by Limitation Act. A good debt becomes unenforceable after the period of three years as barred by Limitation Act.
   Similarly, an agreement for transfer of immovable property should be written for being enforceable.

II. On the basis of the formation of contract 

1. Express Contracts: A contract would be an express contract if the terms are expressed by words or in writing. Section 9 of the Act provides that if a proposal or acceptance of any promise is made in words, the promise is said to be express.
   Example 25: A tells B on telephone that he offers to sell his house for ₹ 20 lacs and B in reply informs A that he accepts the offer, this is an express contract. 
2. Implied Contracts: Implied contracts in contrast come into existence by implication. Most often the implication is by action or conduct of parties or course of dealings between them. Section 9 of the Act contemplates such implied contracts when it lays down that in so far as such proposal or acceptance is made otherwise than in words, the promise is said to be implied.
   Example 26: Where a coolie in uniform picks up the luggage of A to be carried out of the railway station without being asked by A and A allows him to do so, it is an implied contract and A must pay for the services of the coolie detailed by him.
   Example 27: A drinks a coffee in restaurant. There is an implied contract that he should pay for the price of coffee.
   Tacit Contracts: The word Tacit means silent. Tacit contracts are those that are inferred through the conduct of parties without any words spoken or written. A classic example of tacit contract would be when cash is withdrawn by a customer of a bank from the automatic teller machine [ATM]. Another example of tacit contract is where a contract is assumed to have been entered when a sale is given effect to at the fall of hammer in an auction sale. It is not a separate form of contract but falls within the scope of implied contracts. 
3. Quasi-Contract: A quasi-contract is not an actual contract, but it resembles a contract. It is created by law under certain circumstances. The law creates and enforces legal rights and obligations when no real contract exists. Such obligations are known as quasi-contracts. In other words, it is a contract in which there is no intention on part of either party to make a contract but law imposes a contract upon the parties.
   Example 28: Obligation of finder of lost goods to return them to the true owner or liability of person to whom money is paid under mistake to repay it back cannot be said to arise out of a contract even in its remotest sense, as there is neither offer and acceptance nor consent. These are said to be quasi-contracts.
   Example 29: T, a tradesman, leaves goods at C’s house by mistake. C treats the goods as his own. C is bound to pay for the goods. 
4. E-Contracts: When a contract is entered into by two or more parties using electronics means, such as e-mails is known as e-commerce contracts. In electronic commerce, different parties/persons create networks which are linked to other networks through ED1 - Electronic Data Inter change. This helps in doing business transactions using electronic mode. These are known as EDI contracts or Cyber contracts or mouse click contracts.

III. On the basis of the performance of the contract 

1. 1. Executed Contract: The consideration in a given contract could be an act or forbearance. When the act is done or executed or the forbearance is brought on record, then the contract is an executed contract.
   Example 30: When a grocer sells a sugar on cash payment it is an executed contract because both the parties have done what they were to do under the contract. 
2. Executory Contract: In an executory contract the consideration is reciprocal promise or obligation. Such consideration is to be performed in future only and therefore these contracts are described as executory contracts.
   Example 31: Where G agrees to take the tuition of H, a pre-engineering student, from the next month and H in consideration promises to pay G ₹ 1,000 per month, the contract is executory because it is yet to be carried out.
   Unilateral or Bilateral are kinds of Executory Contracts and are not separate kinds.
   (a) Unilateral Contract: Unilateral contract is a one sided contract in which one party has performed his duty or obligation and the other party’s obligation is outstanding.
   Example 32: M advertises payment of award of ₹ 50,000 to any one who finds his missing boy and brings him. As soon as B traces the boy, there comes into existence an executed contract because B has performed his share of obligation and it remains for M to pay the amount of reward to B. This type of Executory contract is also called unilateral contract.
   (b) Bilateral Contract: A Bilateral contract is one where the obligation or promise is outstanding on the part of both the parties.
   Example 33: A promises to sell his plot to B for ₹10 lacs cash down, but B pays only ₹ 2,50,000 as earnest money and promises to pay the balance on next Sunday. On the other hand, A gives the possession of plot to B and promises to execute a sale deed on the receipt of the whole amount. The contract between the A and B is executory because there remains something to be done on both sides. Such Executory contracts are also known as Bilateral contracts.

Proposal / Offer [Section 2(a) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872]

Definition of Offer/Proposal: 

According to Section 2(a) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, “when one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal”. 

Essentials of a proposal/offer are-

1. The person making the proposal or offer is called the ‘promisor’ or ‘offeror’: The person to whom the offer is made is called the ‘offeree’ and the person accepting the offer is called the ‘promisee’ or ‘acceptor’. 
2. For a valid offer, the party making it must express his willingness ‘to do’ or ‘not to do’ something: There must be an expression of willingness to do or not to do some act by the offeror.
   Example 34: A willing to sell his good at certain price to B.
   Example 35: A is willing to not to dance in a competition if B pays him certain sum of money. 
3. The willingness must be expressed with a view to obtain the assent of the other party to whom the offer is made. 
   Example 36: Where ‘A’ tells ‘B’ that he desires to marry by the end of 2022, it does not constitute an offer of marriage by ‘A’ to ‘B’. Therefore, to constitute a valid offer expression of willingness must be made to obtain the assent (acceptance) of the other. Thus, if in the above example, ‘A’ further adds, ‘Will you marry me’, it will constitute an offer. 
4. An offer can be positive as well as negative: Thus “doing” is a positive act and “not doing”, or “abstinence” is a negative act; nonetheless both these acts have the same effect in the eyes of law. Example 37: A offers to sell his car to B for ₹ 3 lacs is an act of doing. So in this case, A is making an offer to B.
   Example 38: When A ask B after his car meets with an accident with B’s scooter not to go to Court and he will pay the repair charges to B for the damage to B’s scooter; it is an act of not doing or abstinence.

Classification of offer 
An offer can be classified as general offer, special/specific offer, cross offer, counter offer, standing/ open/ continuing offer.

Now let us examine each one of them.
(a) General offer: It is an offer made to public at large and hence anyone can accept and do the desired act (Carlill Vs. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.). In terms of Section 8 of the Act, anyone performing the conditions of the offer can be considered to have accepted the offer. Until the general offer is retracted or withdrawn, it can be accepted by anyone at any time as it is a continuing offer.
Case Law: Carlill Vs. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (1893) 
Facts: In this famous case, Carbolic smoke Ball Co. advertised in several newspapers that a reward of £100 would be given to any person who contracted influenza after using the smoke balls produced by the Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. according to printed directions. One lady, Mrs. Carlill, used the smoke balls as per the directions of company and even then, suffered from influenza. Held, she could recover the amount as by using the smoke balls she had accepted the offer. 

(b) Special/specific offer: When the offer is made to a specific or an ascertained person, it is known as a specific offer. Specific offer can be accepted only by that specified person to whom the offer has been made. [Boulton Vs. Jones] 
Example 39: ‘A’ offers to sell his car to ‘B’ at a certain cost. This is a specific offer. 

(c) Cross offer: When two parties exchange identical offers in ignorance at the time of each other’s offer, the offers are called cross offers. There is no binding contract in such a case because offer made by a person cannot be construed as acceptance of the another’s offer.
Example 40: If A makes a proposal to B to sell his car for ₹ 2 lacs and B, without knowing the proposal of A, makes an offer to purchase the same car at ₹ 2 lacs from A, it is not an acceptance, as B was not aware of proposal made by A. It is only cross proposal (cross offer). And when two persons make offer to each other, it cannot be treated as mutual acceptance. There is no binding contract in such a case. 

(d) Counter offer: When the offeree offers to qualified acceptance of the offer subject to modifications and variations in the terms of original offer, he is said to have made a counter offer. Counter-offer amounts to rejection of the original offer. It is also called as Conditional Acceptance.
Example 41: ‘A’ offers to sell his plot to ‘B’ for ₹10 lakhs. ’B’ agrees to buy it for ₹ 8 lakhs. It amounts to counter offer. It will result in the termination of the offer of ’A’. If later on ‘B’ agrees to buy the plot for ₹ 10 lakhs, ’A’ may refuse.

(e) Standing or continuing or open offer: An offer which is allowed to remain open for acceptance over a period of time is known as standing or continuing or open offer. Tenders that are invited for supply of goods is a kind of standing offer. 

Essential of a valid offer 

1. It must be capable of creating legal relations: Offer must be such as in law is capable of being accepted and giving rise to legal relationship. If the offer does not intend to give rise to legal consequences and creating legal relations, it is not considered as a valid offer in the eye of law. A social invitation, even if it is accepted, does not create legal relations because it is not so intended. Example 42: A invited B on his birthday party. B accepted the proposal but when B reached the venue, he (B) found that A was not there. He filed the suit against A for recovery of travelling expenses incurred by him to join the birthday party. Held, such an invitation did not create a legal relationship. It is a social activity. Hence, B could not succeed. 
2. It must be certain, definite and not vague: If the terms of an offer are vague or indefinite, its acceptance cannot create any contractual relationship.
   Example 43: A offers to sell B 100 quintals of oil, there is nothing whatever to show what kind of oil was intended. The offer is not capable of being accepted for want of certainty. If in the above example, A is a dealer in mustard oil only, it shall constitute a valid offer. 
3. It must be communicated to the offeree: An offer, to be complete, must be communicated to the person to whom it is made, otherwise there can be no acceptance of it. Unless an offer is communicated, there can be no acceptance by it. An acceptance of an offer, in ignorance of the offer, is not acceptance and does not confer any right on the acceptor.
   This can be illustrated by the landmark case of Lalman Shukla v. GauriDutt
   Facts: G (Gauridutt) sent his servant L (Lalman) to trace his missing nephew. He then announced that anybody who traced his nephew would be entitled to a certain reward. L traced the boy in ignorance of this announcement. Subsequently when he came to know of the reward, he claimed it. Held, he was not entitled to the reward, as he did not know the offer. 
4. It must be made with a view to obtaining the assent of the other party: Offer must be made with a view to obtaining the assent of the other party addressed and not merely with a view to disclosing the intention of making an offer.
5. It may be conditional: An offer can be made subject to any terms and conditions by the offeror.
   Example 44: Offeror may ask for payment by RTGS, NEFT etc. The offeree will have to accept all the terms of the offer otherwise the contract will be treated as invalid. 
6. Offer should not contain a term the non-compliance of which would amount to acceptance: Thus, one cannot say that if acceptance is not communicated by a certain time the offer would be considered as accepted.
   Example 45: A proposes B to purchase his android mobile for ₹5000 and if no reply by him in a week, it would be assumed that B had accepted the proposal. This would not result into contract. 
7. The offer may be either specific or general: Any offer can be made to either public at large or to the any specific person. (Already explained in the heading-types of the offer) 8
8. The offer may be express or implied: An offer may be made either by words or by conduct. Example 46: A boy starts cleaning the car as it stops on the traffic signal without being asked to do so, in such circumstances any reasonable man could guess that he expects to be paid for this, here boy makes an implied offer. 
9. Offer is Different from a mere statement of intention, an invitation to offer, a mere communication of information, A prospectus and Advertisement. 
   (i) A statement of intention and announcement. 
   Example 47: A father wrote his son about his wish of making him the owner of all his property is mere a statement of intention.
   Example 48: An announcement to give scholarships to children scoring more than 95% in 12th board is not an offer.
   (ii) Offer must be distinguished from an answer to a question.
   Case Law: Harvey vs. Facie [1893] AC 552 
   In this case, Privy Council succinctly explained the distinction between an offer and an invitation to offer. In the given case, the plaintiffs through a telegram asked the defendants two questions namely,
   (i) Will you sell us Bumper Hall Pen? and
   (ii) Telegraph lowest cash price.
   The defendants replied through telegram that the “lowest price for Bumper Hall Pen is £ 900”. The plaintiffs sent another telegram stating “we agree to buy Bumper Hall Pen at £ 900”. However, the defendants refused to sell the property at the price.
   The plaintiffs sued the defendants contending that they had made an offer to sell the property at £ 900 and therefore they are bound by the offer.
   However, the Privy Council did not agree with the plaintiffs on the ground that while plaintiffs had asked two questions, the defendant replied only to the second question by quoting the price but reserved their answer with regard to their willingness to sell. Thus, they made no offer at all. Their Lordships held that the mere statement of the lowest price at which the vendor would sell contained no implied contract to sell to the person who had enquired about the price.
   The above decision was followed in Mac Pherson vs Appanna [1951] A.S.C. 184 where the owner of the property had said that he would not accept less than £ 6000/- for it. This statement did not indicate any offer but indicated only an invitation to offer.
   (iii) A statement of price is not an offer: Quoting the price of a product does not constitute it as offer. (refer case of Harvey Vs. Facie as discussed above)
   Example 49: The price list of goods does not constitute an offer for sale of certain goods on the listed prices. It is an invitation to offer.
   (iv) An invitation to make an offer or do business. In case of “an invitation to make an offer”, the person making the invitation does not make an offer rather invites the other party to make an offer. His objective is to send out the invitation that he is willing to deal with any person who, on the basis of such invitation, is ready to enter into contract with him subject to final terms and conditions.
   Example 50: An advertisement for sale of goods by auction is an invitation to the offer. It merely invites offers/bids made at the auction.
   When goods are sold through auction, the auctioneer does not contract with anyone who attends the sale. The auction is only an advertisement to sell but the items are not put for sale though persons who have come to the auction may have the intention to purchase. Similar decision was given in the case of Harris vs. Nickerson (1873). Similarly, Prospectus issued by a company, is only an invitation to the public to make an offer to subscribe to the securities of the company.
10. A statement of price is not an offer
    What is invitation to offer?
    An offer should be distinguished from an invitation to offer. An offer is definite and capable of converting an intention into a contract. Whereas an invitation to an offer is only a circulation of an offer, it is an attempt to induce offers and precedes a definite offer. An invitation to offer is an act precedent to making an offer. Acceptance of an invitation to an offer does not result in the contract and only an offer emerges in the process of negotiation.
    When a person advertises that he has stock of books to sell or houses to let, there is no offer to be bound by any contract. Such advertisements are offers to negotiateoffers to receive offers. In order to ascertain whether a particular statement amounts to an ‘offer’ or an ‘invitation to offer’, the test would be intention with which such statement is made. Does the person who made the statement intend to be bound by it as soon as it is accepted by the other or he intends to do some further act, before he becomes bound by it. In the former case, it amounts to an offer and in the latter case, it is an invitation to offer.
    Difference between offer and invitation to make an offer: 
    In terms of Section 2(a) of the Act, an offer is the final expression of willingness by the offeror to be bound by the offer should the other party chooses to accept it. On the other hand, offers made with the intention to negotiate or offers to receive offers are known as invitation to offer. Thus, where a party without expressing his final willingness proposes certain terms on which he is willing to negotiate he does not make an offer, but only invites the other party to make an offer on those terms. Hence the only thing that is required is the willingness of the offeree to abide by the terms of offer.
    In order to ascertain whether a particular statement amounts to an offer or an invitation to offer, the test would be intention with which such statement is made. The mere statement of the lowest price which the vendor would sell contains no implied contract to sell at that price to the person making the inquiry.
    If a person who makes the statement has the intention to be bound by it as soon as the other accepts, he is making an offer. Thus, the intention to be bound is important factor to be considered in deciding whether a statement is an ‘offer’ or ‘invitation to offer.’
    Following are instances of invitation to offer to buy or sell:
    (i) A Prospectus by a company to the public to subscribe for its shares.
    (ii) Display of goods for sale in shop windows.
    (iii) Advertising auction sales and
    (iv) Quotation of prices sent in reply to a query regarding price