CLAT PG Exam > CLAT PG Notes > Tax Law > Cheat Sheet: Landmark Judgments
Cheat Sheet: Landmark Judgments
1. Constitutional Validity of Tax Statutes
1.1 K.T. Moopil Nair v. State of Kerala (1961)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Validity of Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1950 |
| Holding | Agricultural income tax is within state legislative competence under Entry 46, List II |
| Principle | States have exclusive power to tax agricultural income; Union cannot encroach |
1.2 Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd. v. State of UP (1990)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Classification of goods for sales tax purposes |
| Holding | Classification must be based on popular meaning and common parlance test |
| Principle | Technical meaning rejected unless statute specifically adopts it |
1.3 State of West Bengal v. Kesoram Industries (2004)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Cess on lands containing minerals vs. royalty under MMDR Act |
| Holding | Cess on mineral-bearing lands is tax on land, not mineral rights; constitutionally valid |
| Principle | State can levy cess under Entry 49, List II if it is not a royalty or tax on mineral rights |
1.4 India Cement Ltd. v. State of Tamil Nadu (1990)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Levy of cess on forest produce and water consumed by industries |
| Holding | Cess on forest produce and water is constitutionally valid under state powers |
| Principle | States can impose cess for specific purposes related to state subjects |
2. Direct Tax Jurisprudence
2.1 CIT v. B.C. Srinivasa Setty (1981)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Distinction between capital gains and business profits |
| Holding | Transaction realizing investment is capital gains; transaction in course of business is business income |
| Principle | Nature of transaction determines tax treatment; intention of assessee crucial |
2.2 CIT v. S. Teja Singh (1959)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Taxability of compensation for termination of managing agency |
| Holding | Compensation for loss of source of income is capital receipt, not taxable |
| Principle | Compensation for loss of agency rights is capital; compensation from agency work is revenue |
2.3 McDowell & Co. v. CTO (1985)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Tax avoidance through colorable devices |
| Holding | Tax planning is legitimate; tax evasion is impermissible; colorable devices are ineffective |
| Principle | Substance over form doctrine; sham transactions can be disregarded for tax purposes |
2.4 Vodafone International Holdings BV v. Union of India (2012)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Tax liability on indirect transfer of Indian assets through offshore transaction |
| Holding | Transfer of shares in foreign company not taxable in India despite underlying Indian assets |
| Principle | "Look at" test rejected; "look through" approach not applied to pierce corporate veil |
| Parliament Response | Section 9(1)(i) amended retrospectively in 2012 to tax indirect transfers |
2.5 Union of India v. Azadi Bachao Andolan (2003)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Treaty shopping and Mauritius route for Foreign Institutional Investors |
| Holding | India-Mauritius DTAA valid; capital gains taxable only in Mauritius; Tax Residency Certificate conclusive |
| Principle | Treaty obligations prevail over domestic law; beneficial tax treaty provisions cannot be denied absent specific anti-avoidance provisions |
2.6 CIT v. Walchand & Co. (1967)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Scope of business expenditure under Section 37 |
| Holding | Expenditure incurred for business purposes is deductible even if not directly related to earning income in that year |
| Principle | Commercial expediency test; expenditure must be for business, not personal |
2.7 Explanation to Section 40(a)(ia): CIT v. Calcutta Knitwears (2014)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Disallowance for non-deduction of TDS on professional fees |
| Holding | 30% disallowance applies only if TDS not deducted/paid by year-end; not entire amount |
| Principle | Partial disallowance provision interpreted to mitigate harsh consequences |
3. Indirect Tax Jurisprudence
3.1 State of AP v. Rashtriya Ispat Nigam (2002)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Exigibility to sales tax on deemed sales under Article 366(29A) |
| Holding | Works contracts involving transfer of property in goods are sales; divisible into goods and services components |
| Principle | Constitutional amendment validated state taxation of works contracts |
3.2 Union of India v. Bombay Tyre International (1983)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Validity of exemption notifications under Central Excise Act |
| Holding | Exemption notifications must be interpreted strictly; burden on assessee to prove eligibility |
| Principle | Exemptions are concessions; conditions must be strictly complied with |
3.3 Collector of Central Excise v. Dai Ichi Karkaria (1999)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Scope of MODVAT/CENVAT credit scheme |
| Holding | Credit allowed for inputs used in manufacture even if final product exempt from duty |
| Principle | Liberal interpretation of MODVAT scheme to avoid cascading effect |
3.4 CCE v. Larsen & Toubro (2015)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | CENVAT credit on capital goods and input services for construction activities |
| Holding | Credit admissible on capital goods and input services used in executing works contracts |
| Principle | Nexus with manufacture or provision of taxable service sufficient for credit |
3.5 Tata Consultancy Services v. State of AP (2004)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Whether software on medium is goods liable to sales tax |
| Holding | Canned/standardized software on CD/floppy is goods; customized software is service |
| Principle | Goods must have attributes of movability, marketability, and utility |
3.6 CST v. Parson Tools & Plants (1975)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Interstate sale vs. intrastate sale with interstate movement |
| Holding | Interstate sale occurs when movement occasioned by covenant/incident of sale contract |
| Principle | Sale and movement must be inter-connected; movement must be pursuant to sale contract |
3.7 K. Damodarasamy Naidu v. State of TN (1976)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Declared goods under Section 14 of CST Act |
| Holding | Tax rate on declared goods cannot exceed 4%; uniformity required across states |
| Principle | Constitutional mandate for uniform treatment of goods of special importance |
4. Principles of Taxation and Interpretation
4.1 CIT v. Vegetable Products (1973)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Interpretation of taxing statutes |
| Holding | Taxing statutes must be strictly construed; ambiguity resolved in favor of assessee |
| Principle | No tax can be imposed without clear authority of law; equity and presumptions do not apply |
4.2 Cape Brandy Syndicate v. IRC (1921)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Form vs. substance in tax matters |
| Holding | Courts must look at legal effect of transactions, not economic effect |
| Principle | Westminster principle: taxpayer entitled to arrange affairs to minimize tax within law |
4.3 Mathuram Agrawal v. State of MP (1999)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Penalty for tax evasion requires mens rea |
| Holding | Penalty provisions are quasi-criminal; reasonable cause is defense; wilful default required |
| Principle | Penalty cannot be imposed for mere technical breach without culpable mental state |
4.4 Dilip Kumar v. CIT (2018)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Initiation of penalty proceedings |
| Holding | Satisfaction note for penalty must be recorded in assessment order; mandatory requirement |
| Principle | Penalty proceedings cannot be automatic; AO must apply mind to whether penalty warranted |
5. Residence and Taxation
5.1 CIT v. R.D. Agarwal (1965)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Determination of residential status for HUF |
| Holding | HUF residence determined by place where control and management of affairs situated |
| Principle | Control and management test applied; physical presence of all members not required |
5.2 E-Funds IT Solution v. ITO (2017)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Permanent Establishment under DTAA |
| Holding | PE requires fixed place of business with sufficient degree of permanence and activity |
| Principle | Subsidiary's premises do not automatically constitute parent company's PE |
5.3 Morgan Stanley v. DIT (2007)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Business connection and agency PE |
| Holding | Seconded employees performing core functions can create agency PE; attribution of profits required |
| Principle | Transfer pricing principles apply to attribute income to PE; arm's length remuneration considered |
6. Exemptions and Deductions
6.1 Sole Trustee, Loka Shikshana Trust v. CIT (1975)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Charitable purpose under Section 2(15) |
| Holding | Education and medical relief are charitable; advancement of general public utility is charitable if not for profit |
| Principle | Wide interpretation to charitable purpose; dominant purpose test applied |
6.2 DIT (Exemptions) v. Society for Worldwide Interbank (2008)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Mutuality principle and taxation |
| Holding | Income from mutual activities not taxable; complete identity between contributors and participators required |
| Principle | Person cannot trade with oneself; surplus from mutual dealings is not income |
6.3 Institute of Chartered Accountants v. DIT (1994)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Applicability of mutuality to professional bodies |
| Holding | Income from members on mutual basis not taxable; income from non-members taxable |
| Principle | Professional regulatory bodies can claim mutuality for member transactions |
6.4 Escorts Ltd. v. Union of India (1993)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Weighted deduction for scientific research |
| Holding | Capital expenditure on scientific research eligible for weighted deduction under Section 35 |
| Principle | Legislative intent to promote R&D; liberal construction of benefit provisions |
7. Assessment and Reassessment
7.1 CIT v. Kelvinator of India (2010)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Reassessment under Section 147/148 |
| Holding | Reasons must be recorded; mere change of opinion insufficient for reassessment beyond 4 years |
| Principle | Tangible material indicating income escapement required; not review of original assessment |
7.2 GKN Driveshafts v. ITO (2003)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Validity of reassessment based on audit objection |
| Holding | Audit objection alone insufficient to reopen; AO must independently apply mind to material |
| Principle | Reassessment cannot be mechanical; reasons to believe must be based on objective material |
7.3 Phool Chand Bajrang Lal v. ITO (1993)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Validity of notice under Section 148 |
| Holding | Notice must be issued within limitation period; reasons must be supplied on request |
| Principle | Assessee entitled to know reasons for reopening to file effective objections |
7.4 Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers v. ACIT (2007)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Search and seizure assessment under Section 153A |
| Holding | Abatement of pending proceedings; fresh assessment for 6 years mandatory after search |
| Principle | Section 153A overrides normal assessment provisions for search cases |
8. Transfer Pricing and International Taxation
8.1 CIT v. EKL Appliances (2012)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Application of transfer pricing provisions |
| Holding | Section 92 applies to international transactions between associated enterprises; arm's length principle mandatory |
| Principle | TPO has power to determine ALP; best method to be applied based on facts |
8.2 Sony Ericsson Mobile v. CIT (2015)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Selection of comparables in transfer pricing |
| Holding | Functionally similar comparables required; filters for turnover, related party transactions mandatory |
| Principle | TNMM most appropriate for routine distributors; profit level indicators must be comparable |
8.3 DIT v. Cushman & Wakefield (2014)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Taxability of Fees for Technical Services under India-UK DTAA |
| Holding | "Make available" clause required for FTS taxation; knowledge transfer or technical know-how enabling recipient necessary |
| Principle | Mere rendering of service insufficient; technology or skill transfer to recipient essential |
9. Doctrine of Precedent in Tax Law
9.1 CIT v. Sun Engineering (1992)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Binding nature of jurisdictional High Court decisions |
| Holding | Revenue bound by jurisdictional High Court decision; cannot appeal unless conflicting decisions exist |
| Principle | Consistency in tax administration; revenue cannot pursue litigation contrary to settled position |
9.2 CIT v. Saraswati Industrial Syndicate (1990)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Effect of amendment on pending appeals |
| Holding | Substantive law at time of accrual applies unless retrospective amendment express |
| Principle | Procedural amendments apply to pending proceedings; substantive amendments prospective unless stated |
10. Recovery and Priority of Tax Debts
10.1 Official Liquidator v. CIT (1986)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Priority of tax dues in liquidation proceedings |
| Holding | Tax dues rank pari passu with other Crown debts; priority over unsecured creditors |
| Principle | Section 178 gives priority to Crown debts in insolvency; secured creditors' rights unaffected |
10.2 Dena Bank v. Bhikhabhai Prabhudas (2000)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Tax recovery vs. secured creditor rights |
| Holding | Secured creditors with prior charge have priority over tax dues; registration of charge crucial |
| Principle | First in time, first in right; tax dues subordinate to pre-existing secured charges |
11. Natural Justice in Tax Proceedings
11.1 Dhakeswari Cotton Mills v. CIT (1954)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Application of natural justice in tax assessments |
| Holding | Reasonable opportunity of being heard mandatory before adverse order; fair hearing essential |
| Principle | Audi alteram partem applies to quasi-judicial tax authorities; prejudice presumed from denial |
11.2 CIT v. Smt. P.K. Noorjahan (1999)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Issue | Additions based on third party statements |
| Holding | Cross-examination right arises when assessment based on third party evidence; denial violates natural justice |
| Principle | Confrontation right essential when statements form basis of adverse inference |
About this Document
4.96/5 Rating
Apr 19, 2026 Last updated
Related Exams
Document Description: Cheat Sheet: Landmark Judgments for CLAT PG 2026 is part of Tax Law preparation. The notes and questions for Cheat Sheet: Landmark Judgments have been prepared according to the CLAT PG exam syllabus. Information about Cheat Sheet: Landmark Judgments covers topics like and Cheat Sheet: Landmark Judgments Example, for CLAT PG 2026 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Cheat Sheet: Landmark Judgments.
Introduction of Cheat Sheet: Landmark Judgments in English is available as part of our Tax Law for CLAT PG & Cheat Sheet: Landmark Judgments in Hindi for Tax Law course. Download more important topics related with notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT PG Exam by signing up for free. CLAT PG: Cheat Sheet: Landmark Judgments
Description
Cheat Sheet: Landmark Judgments of Tax Law to help you remember important concepts with short tricks. Start learning for CLAT PG exam & improve retention with EduRev.
Information about Cheat Sheet: Landmark Judgments
In this doc you can find the meaning of Cheat Sheet: Landmark Judgments defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides explaining types of Cheat Sheet: Landmark Judgments theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Cheat Sheet: Landmark Judgments tests, examples and also practice CLAT PG tests
Related Searches
Semester Notes, Objective type Questions, practice quizzes, ppt, Cheat Sheet: Landmark Judgments, mock tests for examination, past year papers, pdf , Extra Questions, Cheat Sheet: Landmark Judgments, video lectures, shortcuts and tricks, study material, Exam, MCQs, Cheat Sheet: Landmark Judgments, Previous Year Questions with Solutions, Viva Questions, Summary, Free, Important questions, Sample Paper;