CLAT PG Exam > CLAT PG Notes > Criminal Law > Cheat Sheet: Abetment
Cheat Sheet: Abetment
1. Definition and Scope
1.1 Basic Definition
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Abetment (Section 107 IPC) | A person abets the doing of a thing when he: (a) instigates any person to do that thing; or (b) engages in a conspiracy to do that thing; or (c) intentionally aids by any act or illegal omission the doing of that thing |
| Instigation | Active suggestion, support, stimulation, or encouragement to commit an offense by inciting another person's intention to do an act |
| Conspiracy | Agreement between two or more persons to do an illegal act or to do a legal act by illegal means |
| Aiding | Intentionally facilitating the commission of an offense by an act or illegal omission |
1.2 Essential Elements
- Mens rea: Intention to aid or knowledge that the act abetted would be committed
- Actus reus: Act of instigation, conspiracy, or intentional aid
- Connection between abetment and the offense
- No requirement that the offense must actually be committed for abetment to be punishable (exception: Section 115 IPC)
2. Three Modes of Abetment
2.1 Abetment by Instigation (Section 107 Clause 1)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Nature | Active suggestion or encouragement to commit an offense; mere advice may not suffice unless it incites the will |
| Forms | Direct incitement, goading, urging, encouragement, insinuation, or arousing criminal intent |
| Requirement | Must show active suggestion leading to formation of intention in the instigated person's mind |
| Distinguished from advice | Instigation involves actively stimulating the commission of offense; mere advice without incitement is insufficient |
2.2 Abetment by Conspiracy (Section 107 Clause 2)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Requirements | Two or more persons must agree; agreement must relate to commission of an offense; meeting of minds required |
| Overt act | No overt act required beyond the agreement itself (unlike Section 120A IPC) |
| Scope | All conspirators are liable even if one person commits the offense; conspiracy continues until abandoned or completed |
| Punishment | Section 109 IPC: Abettor punished with same punishment as if he committed the offense |
2.3 Abetment by Aiding (Section 107 Clause 3)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Nature | Intentional assistance by an act or illegal omission to facilitate commission of offense |
| Forms of aid | Supplying instruments, tools, information; keeping watch; removing obstacles; providing shelter or means of escape |
| Illegal omission | Failure to perform a legal duty when such omission facilitates the offense (e.g., police officer failing to prevent crime) |
| Intention | Aid must be intentional with knowledge that it facilitates the offense; mere passive presence insufficient |
3. Punishment Provisions
3.1 General Punishment Scheme
| Section | Provision |
|---|---|
| Section 109 | If act abetted is committed: Abettor punished with same punishment as if he committed the offense himself |
| Section 110 | If abettor or person abetted is a public servant whose duty is to prevent offense: Punished with half of longest term of imprisonment or with fine or both |
| Section 111 | When act abetted is committed and no express provision for its punishment: Abettor punished with imprisonment up to 1/4th of longest term for offense or with fine or both |
| Section 113 | If offense not committed but another offense committed: Abettor liable for offense actually committed if consequence was probable result of abetment |
3.2 Abetment When Offense Not Committed
| Section | Provision |
|---|---|
| Section 115 | Abetment of offense punishable with death or life imprisonment if offense not committed: Imprisonment up to 7 years and fine |
| Section 116 | Abetment of offense punishable with imprisonment if offense not committed: Imprisonment up to 1/4th of longest term provided for offense or with fine or both |
| Section 117 | Abetting commission of offense by public or by more than 10 persons: Imprisonment up to 3 years or fine or both |
| Section 118 | Concealing design to commit offense punishable with death or life imprisonment: Imprisonment up to 7 years if offense committed; up to 3 years if not committed |
4. Special Cases and Situations
4.1 Different Offense Committed (Section 111)
- Abettor liable if effect caused was different from that intended by abettor
- When act abetted and act done differ but form same transaction
- Example: A instigates B to cause grievous hurt to Z, but B kills Z; A liable under Section 302 read with Section 109
- If act done was probable consequence of abetment, abettor liable under Section 113
4.2 Offence Committed by Different Person (Section 112)
| Situation | Liability |
|---|---|
| When abettor abets A to commit offense | If B commits offense in consequence of abetment, abettor liable in same manner as if A committed the offense |
| Example | X abets Y to murder Z; instead, W murders Z in furtherance of common intention; X liable for abetment |
4.3 Present When Offense Committed (Section 114)
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Rule | Person present when offense committed and found to have concealed design is deemed to have abetted if offense committed in consequence thereof |
| Requirements | Presence at scene; concealment of design to commit offense; offense committed in consequence |
| Presumption | Raises rebuttable presumption of abetment from mere presence with knowledge |
4.4 Abetment in India of Offenses Outside India
- Section 108: Abettor in India of offense committed outside India punishable under IPC if act abetted is an offense under IPC
- Extraterritorial application of abetment provisions
- Requirements: Act of abetment in India; offense committed outside India; act must be offense under IPC
5. Distinguished Concepts
5.1 Abetment vs. Conspiracy
| Abetment (Section 107) | Conspiracy (Section 120A) |
|---|---|
| Broader concept including instigation, conspiracy, and aiding | Specific offense requiring agreement to commit illegal act |
| No overt act required for abetment by conspiracy mode | Overt act required for conspiracy to commit offense punishable with imprisonment less than 2 years |
| Abettor punished when offense committed (Section 109) | Criminal conspiracy itself is a substantive offense (Section 120B) |
| Conspiracy is one mode of abetment | Conspiracy can exist independent of abetment |
5.2 Abetment vs. Criminal Conspiracy
- Criminal conspiracy (Sections 120A-120B) is a substantive offense; abetment is inchoate offense
- Conspiracy punishable even if no act done pursuant to agreement (except minor offenses)
- Abetment by conspiracy requires commission or attempt of offense for punishment under Section 109
- If offense not committed, Section 115-116 apply to abetment
5.3 Abetment vs. Attempt
| Abetment | Attempt (Section 511) |
|---|---|
| Involves participation of another person | Single person directly tries to commit offense |
| Abettor facilitates commission by principal offender | Offender himself does acts towards commission |
| No proximate act by abettor towards offense required | Requires act proximate to completion of offense |
| Punished under Sections 109-118 | Punished under Section 511: imprisonment up to half of longest term or fine or both |
6. Liability Principles
6.1 Joint Liability
- All abettors equally liable for offense abetted if committed in furtherance of common intention
- Section 34 IPC: Common intention - Act done by several persons in furtherance of common intention makes each liable
- Section 109 read with Section 34: Each abettor liable as if he committed the offense himself
- Distinction: Section 34 requires physical presence; abetment does not require presence at scene
6.2 Vicarious Liability
| Principle | Application |
|---|---|
| Abettor liable for consequences | Even if principal offender acquitted, abettor can be convicted if abetment proved |
| Independent liability | Abettor's guilt independent of principal offender's conviction; separate trial possible |
| Knowledge requirement | Abettor must know nature of offense; ignorance of specific details may not exonerate |
6.3 Withdrawal from Abetment
- No specific provision for withdrawal in IPC
- Judicial interpretation: Timely and effective communication of withdrawal before commission may exonerate
- Must take active steps to prevent offense after withdrawal
- Mere change of mind without communication insufficient
- Burden on accused to prove effective withdrawal
7. Defenses and Exceptions
7.1 Statutory Exceptions
| Exception | Provision |
|---|---|
| Abetment of suicide of minor, insane, intoxicated person (Section 305) | If person lacks capacity to understand consequences, abettor liable for culpable homicide |
| Exception 1 to Section 300 | Abetment of suicide not murder if person commits suicide in heat of passion upon grave and sudden provocation |
| Public servant exceeding jurisdiction | Section 110: Enhanced punishment for public servant abetting offense he is duty-bound to prevent |
7.2 General Defenses
- Lack of mens rea: No intention or knowledge that offense would be committed
- Impossibility: If commission of offense was impossible, no abetment (but conspiracy may still exist)
- Protected relationship: Abetment of certain acts by spouse may attract different provisions
- Legal obligation: Acts done in discharge of legal duty not abetment
- Consent of victim: Not a defense to abetment of serious offenses
7.3 Illustrations from Section 107
- Illustration (a): A instigates B to murder C; B refuses; A is liable for abetment under Section 109
- Illustration (b): A instigates B to murder D; B commits murder in consequence; A is guilty of abetting murder
- Illustration (c): A and B agree to poison C; act not done; both liable under Section 115 for abetment
- Illustration (d): A instigates B to instigate C to murder Z; B accordingly instigates C who commits murder; both A and B liable
8. Specific Offenses Related to Abetment
8.1 Abetment of Suicide (Section 306)
| Element | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Actus reus | Abetment by instigation, conspiracy, or aiding the commission of suicide |
| Mens rea | Intention to instigate or aid suicide; mere harassment insufficient without direct nexus |
| Causation | Proximate connection between abetment and suicide; suicide must be committed in consequence |
| Punishment | Imprisonment up to 10 years and fine |
| Key requirement | Person must have committed suicide; if only attempted, Section 309 not applicable (attempt to commit suicide decriminalized) |
8.2 Abetment of Minor/Insane Person (Section 305)
- If minor, insane, intoxicated person commits suicide: Abettor liable as if caused death
- Punishment: Death or life imprisonment or imprisonment up to 10 years and fine
- Rationale: Victim lacked capacity to form independent judgment
- Age of majority: 18 years under Indian Majority Act, 1875
8.3 Abetment of Mutiny (Section 131)
- Abetting mutiny or attempting to seduce officer, soldier, sailor, or airman from duty: Punishment with life imprisonment or imprisonment up to 10 years and fine
- Enhanced punishment reflects gravity of threat to military discipline
8.4 Other Specific Abetment Offenses
| Section | Offense |
|---|---|
| Section 132 | Abetment of mutiny if mutiny committed: Death or life imprisonment or imprisonment up to 10 years and fine |
| Section 135 | Abetment of desertion of officer, soldier, sailor, or airman: Imprisonment up to 2 years or fine or both |
| Section 136 | Harbouring deserter: Imprisonment up to 2 years or fine or both |
| Section 138 | Abetment of act of insubordination by officer, soldier, sailor, or airman: Imprisonment up to 6 months or fine or both |
9. Evidentiary Aspects
9.1 Proof of Abetment
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Burden of proof | Prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt: act of abetment, mens rea, and commission of offense (or attempt) |
| Direct evidence | Eyewitness testimony, confessions, recorded communications showing instigation or aid |
| Circumstantial evidence | Conduct before, during, and after offense; motive; opportunity; presence at scene |
| Standard of proof | Beyond reasonable doubt for criminal conviction; preponderance of probabilities insufficient |
9.2 Presumptions and Inferences
- Section 114: Presence when offense committed with knowledge of design raises presumption of abetment
- Inference from conduct: Failure to prevent crime when under duty to do so may establish abetment by omission
- Common intention inferred from acts done in furtherance of common object
- Presumption rebuttable by showing lack of knowledge or intention
9.3 Relevant Evidence
- Prior and subsequent conduct of parties showing common intention
- Communications between abettor and principal offender
- Financial transactions, supply of instruments, or other preparatory acts
- Motive and opportunity to abet
- Expert testimony on handwriting, forensic evidence linking abettor to offense
10. Judicial Interpretations and Landmark Principles
10.1 Key Judicial Tests
| Principle | Application |
|---|---|
| Active suggestion test | Instigation requires active suggestion or stimulation, not mere passive acquiescence |
| Proximate nexus test | Direct and proximate connection must exist between abetment and commission of offense |
| Knowledge test | Abettor must have knowledge of nature of offense being abetted; general knowledge sufficient |
| Probable consequence test | Abettor liable for offense committed if it was probable consequence of abetment (Section 113) |
10.2 Interpretation of Instigation
- Must involve more than mere advice; requires goading, urging, encouraging, or inciting
- Can be by words, gestures, or conduct creating intention in instigated person's mind
- Need not be express; may be implied from circumstances
- Test: Whether instigation played active role in formation of criminal intent
10.3 Intentional Aid Interpretation
- Aid must be intentional; inadvertent assistance does not constitute abetment
- Knowledge that aid facilitates offense essential
- Aid may be by act or illegal omission when under legal duty to prevent
- Passive presence without encouragement or aid insufficient for abetment
10.4 Conspiracy as Abetment
- Meeting of minds essential; mere knowledge of conspiracy without participation insufficient
- Once conspiracy established, acts of one conspirator attributable to all
- Conspiracy may be inferred from circumstances; direct evidence not always necessary
- Overt act not required for abetment by conspiracy under Section 107
11. Practical Distinctions and Exam Tips
11.1 Problem-Solving Approach
- Identify whether act of abetment occurred (instigation, conspiracy, or aiding)
- Determine mens rea: Did abettor intend or have knowledge of offense?
- Check if offense was committed, attempted, or not committed at all
- Apply appropriate section: Section 109 if committed; Section 115-116 if not committed; Section 113 if different offense committed
- Consider special circumstances: public servant, presence at scene, withdrawal
- Identify applicable defenses or exceptions
11.2 Common Pitfalls
- Confusing abetment with attempt: Abetment involves another person; attempt is solo act
- Assuming mere presence equals abetment: Presence alone insufficient without knowledge and encouragement
- Overlooking Section 113: Different offense committed but probable consequence of abetment
- Ignoring withdrawal defense: Timely withdrawal may exonerate if effectively communicated
- Mistaking conspiracy (Section 120A) for abetment by conspiracy (Section 107 clause 2)
11.3 Section Summary Table
| Section | Quick Summary |
|---|---|
| 107 | Definition: Instigation, conspiracy, or aiding |
| 108 | Abettor in India of offenses outside India |
| 109 | Punishment if act abetted is committed: Same as principal offender |
| 110 | Public servant abetting offense he is duty-bound to prevent: Enhanced punishment |
| 111 | Liability when different act done from that intended |
| 112 | Abettor liable when different person commits offense |
| 113 | Liability for effect caused different from intended if probable consequence |
| 114 | Present when offense committed: Presumption of abetment |
| 115 | Abetment of death/life imprisonment offense not committed: 7 years imprisonment |
| 116 | Abetment of imprisonment offense not committed: 1/4th of term |
| 117 | Abetting commission by public or more than 10 persons: 3 years |
| 118 | Concealing design to commit serious offense: 7 years if committed; 3 years if not |
The document Cheat Sheet: Abetment is a part of the CLAT PG Course Criminal Law.
All you need of CLAT PG at this link: CLAT PG
About this Document
4.78/5 Rating
Apr 20, 2026 Last updated
Related Exams
Document Description: Cheat Sheet: Abetment for CLAT PG 2026 is part of Criminal Law preparation. The notes and questions for Cheat Sheet: Abetment have been prepared according to the CLAT PG exam syllabus. Information about Cheat Sheet: Abetment covers topics like and Cheat Sheet: Abetment Example, for CLAT PG 2026 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Cheat Sheet: Abetment.
Introduction of Cheat Sheet: Abetment in English is available as part of our Criminal Law for CLAT PG & Cheat Sheet: Abetment in Hindi for Criminal Law course. Download more important topics related with notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT PG Exam by signing up for free. CLAT PG: Cheat Sheet: Abetment
Description
Cheat Sheet: Abetment of Criminal Law to help you remember important concepts with short tricks. Start learning for CLAT PG exam & improve retention with EduRev.
Information about Cheat Sheet: Abetment
In this doc you can find the meaning of Cheat Sheet: Abetment defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides explaining types of Cheat Sheet: Abetment theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Cheat Sheet: Abetment tests, examples and also practice CLAT PG tests
Related Searches
Summary, ppt, pdf , past year papers, Previous Year Questions with Solutions, video lectures, practice quizzes, Semester Notes, Free, Sample Paper, study material, Objective type Questions, Cheat Sheet: Abetment, mock tests for examination, MCQs, Extra Questions, shortcuts and tricks, Important questions, Cheat Sheet: Abetment, Exam, Cheat Sheet: Abetment, Viva Questions;