CLAT PG Exam  >  CLAT PG Notes  >  Law of Contracts  >  Cheat Sheet: Legality of Objects

Cheat Sheet: Legality of Objects

1.1 Definition and Scope

ElementDescription
Section 23Agreement void if consideration or object is unlawful
Void Ab InitioSuch agreements are void from the beginning and cannot be enforced
Burden of ProofParty alleging illegality must prove the unlawfulness

1.2 Grounds of Unlawfulness under Section 23

GroundExplanation
Forbidden by LawProhibited by any statute or legislation in force
Defeats Provisions of LawIndirectly circumvents or nullifies legal provisions
FraudulentInvolves fraud, deception, or misrepresentation
Injures Person or PropertyCauses harm to person or property of another
ImmoralAgainst accepted standards of morality and decency
Opposed to Public PolicyContrary to public interest and welfare

2. Agreements Forbidden by Law

2.1 Statutory Prohibitions

  • Agreements expressly prohibited by any statute are void
  • Examples: trafficking, smuggling, bribery, betting and gambling (where prohibited)
  • Includes agreements violating Foreign Exchange Management Act, Competition Act, etc.
  • Champertous agreements (maintenance and champerty) are forbidden

2.2 Key Case Law

CasePrinciple
Gherulal Parakh v. MahadeodasAgreement for purchase of goods without license when required by law is void
Nath v. Harnam SinghAgreement to obtain license through improper means is void

3. Agreements Defeating Provisions of Law

3.1 Concept

  • Agreements that indirectly defeat the purpose of law though not expressly forbidden
  • Distinguished from "forbidden by law" - more subtle circumvention
  • Achieves indirectly what law prohibits directly

3.2 Important Illustrations

TypeExample
Sale by InsolventAgreement by insolvent to sell property before vesting in official receiver
Tax EvasionAgreement to understate sale price to evade stamp duty
Insolvency LawsAgreement giving preference to one creditor defeating pari passu distribution

3.3 Leading Decisions

CaseHolding
Chinnasami Gounder v. ChinnakuttayiAgreement to withdraw criminal proceedings for consideration is void
Muthia v. KaruppanAgreement to suppress prosecution in compoundable offence for illegal consideration is void

4. Fraudulent Agreements

4.1 Nature of Fraudulent Objects

  • Agreements with intent to defraud third parties are void under Section 23
  • Fraud must be the object or consideration of agreement
  • Distinguished from fraud as grounds for voidability under Section 19

4.2 Examples

  • Agreement to conceal assets from creditors
  • Benami transactions to defraud revenue authorities
  • False representation of financial status to obtain credit
  • Conspiracy to deceive third parties

4.3 Landmark Case

CasePrinciple
M.K. Rangachari v. Secretary of StateAgreement fraudulent in itself cannot be enforced even against innocent party

5. Agreements to Injure Person or Property

5.1 Scope

  • Agreements causing injury to person, reputation, or property of others are void
  • Includes both physical and economic injury
  • Injury need not be to contracting parties

5.2 Categories

Type of InjuryIllustration
Physical HarmAgreement to commit assault, battery, or murder
Property DamageAgreement to destroy or damage property of another
Economic HarmConspiracy to cause financial loss to third party
Reputational HarmAgreement to defame or injure reputation

6. Immoral Agreements

6.1 Definition

  • Agreements opposed to morality as understood by prevailing standards
  • Test: whether agreement offends moral sense of community
  • Changes with evolving social norms

6.2 Categories of Immoral Agreements

CategoryDescription
Sexual ImmoralityAgreements for prostitution, concubinage, illicit cohabitation
Marriage BrokerageAgreements for procuring marriage for reward
Conjugal RightsAgreements in restraint of parental or conjugal rights
TraffickingAgreements for trafficking in persons

6.3 Important Case Law

CasePrinciple
Pearce v. BrooksAgreement to hire carriage to prostitute knowing purpose is void
Gokul Chand v. Hukam ChandAgreement for illicit cohabitation is void as immoral
Hamida Begum v. Zubeida BegumAgreement in consideration of future illicit cohabitation is void

7. Agreements Opposed to Public Policy

7.1 Definition and Scope

  • Public policy: what is beneficial for public good and public interest
  • Narrowly interpreted - courts cautious in extending this ground
  • Based on principles of law and judicial decisions, not individual opinion

7.2 Established Categories

7.2.1 Trading with Enemy

  • Agreements with enemy aliens during war are void
  • Based on national security and public safety
  • Suspended during hostilities, may revive after peace

7.2.2 Agreements Interfering with Administration of Justice

TypeDescription
Stifling ProsecutionAgreement to suppress prosecution of criminal offense for consideration
Maintenance and ChampertyAgreement to finance litigation without interest in return for share in proceeds
Interference with WitnessesAgreement to procure or prevent witness testimony
Sale of Public OfficesAgreement for purchase or sale of public positions

7.2.3 Agreements Interfering with Marital Duties

  • Marriage brokerage contracts are void
  • Agreements for future separation between spouses
  • Agreements in restraint of marriage (subject to reasonable restrictions)

7.2.4 Agreements in Restraint of Trade

  • Section 27: Every agreement in restraint of trade is void
  • Exception: Sale of goodwill - buyer can restrain seller from carrying on similar business within specified local limits
  • Exception: Partnership agreements during and after dissolution (Section 11, Partnership Act)
  • Reasonableness not relevant - absolute prohibition
CasePrinciple
Madhub Chunder v. RajcoomarAgreement not to carry on any trade is void under Section 27
Nordenfelt v. Maxim NordenfeltRestraint ancillary to sale of goodwill valid if reasonable
Niranjan Shankar Golikari v. Century SpinningNegative covenant in employment after termination is restraint of trade and void

7.2.5 Agreements in Restraint of Legal Proceedings

  • Section 28: Agreement absolutely restraining legal proceedings is void
  • Exception: Arbitration agreements limiting time for enforcement
  • Agreement to shorten limitation period is void
  • Agreement to extend limitation period is valid

7.2.6 Wagering Agreements

  • Section 30: Agreements by way of wager are void
  • Characteristics: mutual chance of gain/loss, no control over event, no other interest in outcome
  • Collateral transactions to wagering agreements are void
  • Exception: Share market transactions, horse racing (in some jurisdictions)
CasePrinciple
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.Offer of reward is not wager - unilateral obligation
Gherulal Parakh v. MahadeodasContract of insurance distinguished from wager - insurable interest required

7.2.7 Agreements Creating Monopoly

  • Agreements restricting competition and creating monopoly are void
  • Violates Competition Act, 2002
  • Anti-competitive agreements affecting market dynamics

7.2.8 Agreements Corrupting Public Officials

  • Agreements involving bribery of public servants are void
  • Agreements to procure public contracts through corrupt means
  • Use of personal influence to obtain government contracts
CasePrinciple
Durga Prashad v. BaldeoAgreement to use personal influence with government officials is void

8. Doctrine of Severability

8.1 Section 24 - Void in Part

  • If part of single consideration or object is unlawful, entire agreement is void
  • Indivisible consideration: if any part illegal, whole contract void
  • Applies when illegal part cannot be separated from legal part

8.2 Section 57 - Divisibility

  • If contract consists of divisible promises, one illegal promise does not void entire contract
  • Legal parts can be enforced if severable from illegal parts

8.3 Tests for Severability

TestRequirement
Blue Pencil TestIllegal part can be removed by drawing line through it without rewriting
IndependenceLegal and illegal parts must be independent of each other
ConsiderationConsideration must be apportionable between legal and illegal parts

8.4 Leading Cases

CasePrinciple
Kores Manufacturing Co. v. Kolok Manufacturing Co.Invalid restraint clause severable if remainder enforceable independently
Suraj Lamp Industries v. State of HaryanaInvalid part severable if it does not go to root of contract

9. Consequences of Illegality

9.1 Effects of Void Agreement

  • No rights or obligations arise from void agreement
  • Money paid or property transferred not recoverable (in pari delicto potior est conditio defendentis)
  • No suit for enforcement or damages for breach
  • Collateral transactions also void if connected with illegal agreement

9.2 Exceptions to Non-Recovery

ExceptionDescription
Not Equally GuiltyParty less guilty or not in pari delicto can recover
Withdrawal Before PerformanceRecovery allowed if party repents before performance
Fraud or CoercionParty coerced or defrauded can recover
Illegal Purpose Not Carried OutIf illegal purpose not performed, money recoverable in some cases

9.3 Key Case Law on Recovery

CasePrinciple
Oomrawati Kuer v. Sheikh Ebadat AliMoney paid under immoral consideration cannot be recovered
Abdul Aziz v. Masum AliMoney lent for unlawful purpose not recoverable
Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas GhoseMinor's property transferred under void agreement not recoverable unless can prove coercion/fraud

10. Special Provisions

10.1 Section 25 - Agreement Without Consideration Valid in Certain Cases

  • Love and affection between near relatives (in writing and registered)
  • Compensation for past voluntary services
  • Promise to pay time-barred debt (in writing and signed)

10.2 Section 26 - Agreement in Restraint of Marriage

  • Agreement in restraint of marriage of any person (other than minor) is void
  • Absolute prohibition except for minors

10.3 Unlawful vs. Illegal Agreements

AspectUnlawful (Void)
DefinitionAgreement void under Sections 23, 24, 26-30
EffectVoid ab initio, unenforceable
Collateral TransactionsMay be void if tainted by illegality
Criminal LiabilityNot necessary but may exist in some cases

11. Practical Distinctions

11.1 Void vs. Voidable vs. Illegal Agreements

FeatureIllegal/Void (Section 23)
ValidityVoid ab initio, no legal effect from inception
EnforceabilityCannot be enforced by any party
Collateral TransactionsAlso void if connected to illegal object
RecoveryMoney/property not recoverable (subject to exceptions)
RatificationCannot be ratified

11.2 Burden of Proof

  • Party alleging illegality must prove unlawfulness of object or consideration
  • Court may take judicial notice of well-established illegalities
  • Once prima facie illegality shown, burden shifts to party asserting validity

11.3 Examination Tips

  • Identify specific ground of illegality under Section 23
  • Distinguish between "forbidden by law" and "defeats provisions of law"
  • Apply tests for severability when part of agreement is illegal
  • Consider exceptions to non-recovery in illegality cases
  • Cite relevant case law to support analysis
  • Analyze collateral transactions separately from main illegal agreement
The document Cheat Sheet: Legality of Objects is a part of the CLAT PG Course Law of Contracts.
All you need of CLAT PG at this link: CLAT PG
Explore Courses for CLAT PG exam
Get EduRev Notes directly in your Google search
Related Searches
study material, Extra Questions, Important questions, Previous Year Questions with Solutions, shortcuts and tricks, MCQs, Free, past year papers, video lectures, ppt, pdf , Exam, mock tests for examination, Cheat Sheet: Legality of Objects, Cheat Sheet: Legality of Objects, Semester Notes, Cheat Sheet: Legality of Objects, Viva Questions, practice quizzes, Sample Paper, Summary, Objective type Questions;