CLAT PG Exam  >  CLAT PG Notes  >  Criminal Law  >  Cheat Sheet: Indian Evidence Act, 1872 : An Overview

Cheat Sheet: Indian Evidence Act, 1872 : An Overview

1. Preliminary Provisions

1.1 Short Title, Extent and Commencement

  • Short Title: Indian Evidence Act, 1872
  • Extent: Whole of India except Jammu & Kashmir (applicable post-reorganization)
  • Commencement: 1st September 1872
  • Comprises 167 sections divided into 3 Parts and 11 Chapters

1.2 Key Definitions (Section 3)

TermDefinition
CourtIncludes all judges and magistrates exercising judicial functions, but excludes arbitrators
FactIncludes (1) any thing, state of things, or relation of things capable of being perceived by senses; (2) any mental condition of which any person is conscious
Fact in IssueAny fact from which the existence, non-existence, nature or extent of any right, liability, or disability asserted or denied in any suit or proceeding necessarily follows
RelevantOne fact is relevant to another when one is connected with the other in any of the ways referred to in the Act
DocumentAny matter expressed or described upon any substance by means of letters, figures or marks intended to be used for recording that matter
EvidenceIncludes (1) oral evidence; (2) documentary evidence. All statements permitted/required by court to be made before it by witnesses and all documents including electronic records produced for court inspection
ProvedA fact is proved when the court believes it to exist beyond reasonable doubt (criminal) or after considering matters before it (civil)
DisprovedA fact is disproved when the court believes it does not exist after considering matters before it
Not ProvedA fact is not proved when it is neither proved nor disproved

2. Relevancy of Facts

2.1 General Principles (Sections 5-11)

SectionPrinciple
5Evidence may be given only of relevant facts, except as otherwise provided
6Res Gestae: Facts forming part of same transaction are relevant
7Facts which are occasion, cause or effect of facts in issue are relevant
8Motive, preparation and previous/subsequent conduct are relevant
9Facts necessary to explain or introduce relevant facts are relevant
10Things said or done by conspirator in reference to common design are relevant
11Facts inconsistent with facts in issue or relevant facts are relevant

2.2 Admissions (Sections 17-23)

ProvisionContent
Section 17Admission is a statement suggesting inference as to any fact in issue or relevant fact
Section 18Admissions by party to proceeding or his agent, by suitor in representative character, by co-parties, by person whose position must be proved as against party are relevant
Section 19Admissions by persons expressly referenced by party are relevant
Section 20Admissions by persons whose position must be proved are relevant
Section 21Admissions by persons who cannot be called as witnesses (deceased, insane, unfit) are relevant
Section 22Oral admissions as to contents of documents are not relevant unless genuineness is in question
Section 23Admissions in civil cases are conclusive as against maker but not conclusive proof, but in criminal cases not conclusive even against maker

2.3 Confessions (Sections 24-30)

SectionRule
24Confession caused by inducement, threat or promise is irrelevant (must relate to charge and come from person in authority)
25Confession to police officer is inadmissible
26Confession by accused in police custody to person other than magistrate is inadmissible
27Information leading to discovery of fact is admissible when given to police officer (only that portion which distinctly relates to discovered fact)
28Confession made after removal of impression caused by inducement/threat/promise is relevant if voluntarily made
29Confession otherwise relevant does not become irrelevant because accused was not warned he was not bound to make it
30Confession of co-accused may be taken into consideration against another accused (not substantive evidence but can be used for corroboration)

2.4 Statements by Persons Who Cannot Be Called as Witnesses (Sections 32-33)

2.4.1 Section 32 - Dying Declaration and Other Statements

  • When person making statement is dead/cannot be found/incapable/attendance cannot be procured without unreasonable delay
  • Statement made by deceased: (1) as to cause of death (dying declaration); (2) in ordinary course of business; (3) against pecuniary interest; (4) as to public right or custom; (5) as to relationship; (6) in will or deed about family affairs; (7) in document about fact of public or general interest; (8) stating existence of relationship
  • Dying declaration must relate to circumstances of transaction resulting in death

2.4.2 Section 33 - Evidence in Former Proceeding

  • Evidence given in former judicial proceeding is relevant when witness is dead/cannot be found/incapable/attendance cannot be procured/adverse party prevented attendance
  • Same parties and their representatives must be involved, and adverse party must have had opportunity to cross-examine

2.5 Statements Under Special Circumstances (Sections 34-39)

SectionType of Statement
34Entries in books of account regularly kept in course of business are relevant
35Entries in public records made by public servants in performance of duty are relevant
36Statements in maps, charts, plans made under authority of Government are relevant
37Statements in laws, legal opinions, law books as to law are relevant
38Statements as to custom or right when made ante litem motam (before dispute) are relevant
39Statements in recognized genealogies, pedigree tables, family traditions are relevant

2.6 Judgments (Sections 40-43)

SectionRule
40Previous judgments relevant to bar second suit (res judicata)
41Final judgment of competent court on existence of right/custom is relevant when question about same right/custom arises between same parties or their representatives
42Judgments in rem are relevant when relevant fact is existence of such judgment
43Judgments other than above are irrelevant unless existence of judgment is relevant fact

2.7 Character (Sections 52-55)

  • Section 52: In civil cases, character is irrelevant except when it is itself a fact in issue
  • Section 53: In criminal cases, accused's good character is relevant; prosecution cannot prove bad character unless accused puts his character in issue or gives evidence of good character
  • Section 54: Previous bad character relevant when it is fact in issue or relevant under Sections 14-15
  • Section 55: Character of victim is irrelevant except in defamation cases and where victim's character is fact in issue

3. Doctrine of Estoppel (Sections 115-117)

3.1 Estoppel (Section 115)

  • When person by declaration, act or omission intentionally causes another person to believe a thing to be true and to act upon that belief, neither he nor his representative shall be allowed to deny truth of that thing in any suit or proceeding
  • Essentials: (1) representation/declaration/act/omission; (2) made intentionally; (3) other party believed it and acted on it; (4) that party would suffer if first person is allowed to deny

3.2 Estoppel Against Tenant and Licensee (Sections 116-117)

SectionRule
116Tenant/licensee estopped from denying landlord's title at beginning of tenancy, but may prove that title has since terminated
117Acceptor of bill of exchange cannot deny drawer's signature or capacity; drawer cannot deny payee's capacity; endorser cannot deny genuineness of drawer's/prior endorsers' signatures

4. Witnesses

4.1 Competency and Compellability (Sections 118-120)

SectionRule
118All persons competent to testify unless court considers them incapable of understanding questions or giving rational answers due to tender age, extreme old age, disease of body/mind
119Dumb/deaf witnesses competent if they can express themselves and understand questions
120Parties to suit and their spouses are competent witnesses; spouse can be compelled to disclose communication during marriage only in specific cases (suits between married persons, proceedings where one married person is prosecuted for offence against another, offences under Sections 494-498 IPC)

4.2 Number of Witnesses (Section 134)

  • No particular number of witnesses required in any case
  • Single witness may suffice if credible and reliable

4.3 Examination of Witnesses (Sections 135-166)

4.3.1 Order of Examination

StageDescription
Examination-in-ChiefExamination of witness by party who calls him (Section 137)
Cross-ExaminationExamination by adverse party (Section 137)
Re-ExaminationExamination by party who called witness after cross-examination (Section 137)

4.3.2 Leading Questions (Section 141-143)

  • Section 141: Leading question is one that suggests answer
  • Section 142: Leading questions not allowed in examination-in-chief or re-examination except with court permission or on introductory matters or undisputed facts
  • Section 143: Leading questions allowed in cross-examination

4.3.3 Impeachment of Witness (Section 155)

  • Credit of witness may be impeached by adverse party by: (1) proof of former inconsistent statement; (2) proof of bias; (3) shaking credit by cross-examination
  • Witness cannot be asked questions tending to criminate him except to test veracity

4.3.4 Hostile Witness (Section 154)

  • Court may permit party who calls witness to put any question to witness as in cross-examination if witness appears hostile

5. Documentary Evidence

5.1 Primary and Secondary Evidence (Sections 60-65)

TypeDefinition and Rules
Primary Evidence (Section 62)Document itself produced for inspection of court. Best evidence. Includes electronic records under Section 65A-65B
Secondary Evidence (Section 63)(1) Certified copies; (2) Copies made from original by mechanical processes; (3) Copies made by comparing with original; (4) Counterparts of documents; (5) Oral accounts of contents by person who has seen it
Section 64Documents must be proved by primary evidence except in cases mentioned in Section 65

5.2 Cases When Secondary Evidence Admissible (Section 65)

  • When original shown/appears to be in possession of adverse party who fails to produce after notice
  • When original in possession of person not legally bound to produce and who cannot be compelled
  • When original has been destroyed or lost (party seeking to give secondary evidence must prove search)
  • When original is of such nature as not to be easily movable
  • When original is a public document
  • When original is certified copy with right to give secondary evidence
  • When originals consist of numerous documents which cannot conveniently be examined

5.3 Electronic Records (Sections 65A-65B)

SectionProvision
65AElectronic records admissible as evidence without production of original if conditions in Section 65B are satisfied
65BConditions for admissibility: (1) computer output must be from computer used regularly; (2) information must have been fed in ordinary course; (3) computer functioning properly; (4) certificate identifying electronic record required

5.4 Public Documents (Sections 74-78)

SectionRule
74Public documents are: (1) documents of sovereign authority; (2) official records; (3) public records of private documents
76Certified copies of public documents admissible in evidence
77Certified copies of foreign public documents admissible if certified by officer with seal
78Certified copies of laws and judicial records admissible with proper attestation

5.5 Proof of Documents (Sections 67-73)

  • Section 67: Proof of signature and handwriting - by person who saw it written, expert opinion, comparison with admitted writings
  • Section 68: Proof of execution of attested documents - at least one attesting witness must be called if alive, subject to jurisdiction and capable
  • Section 69: Proof where no attesting witness found - execution must be proved by other evidence
  • Section 73: Court may compare disputed writing with admitted/proved writing to determine genuineness

6. Burden of Proof and Presumptions

6.1 Burden of Proof (Sections 101-104)

SectionPrinciple
101Burden of proof lies on person who would fail if no evidence were produced. Maxim: Ei qui affirmat non ei qui negat incumbit probatio
102In civil cases, burden is on party who asserts affirmative of issue
103Burden of proof as to particular fact lies on person who wishes court to believe in its existence (unless law places burden on other person)
104Burden of proving fact necessary to be proved for entitlement to judgment lies on person who asserts it

6.2 Presumptions

6.2.1 May Presume (Sections 86-88)

SectionPresumption
86Court may presume certified copies of foreign judicial records are genuine
87Court may presume books and maps produced under Government authority are genuine
88Court may presume electronic messages sent by secure electronic method are what they purport to be

6.2.2 Shall Presume (Sections 79-85)

SectionPresumption
79Court shall presume genuineness of certified copies of public documents
80Court shall presume genuineness of Gazette copies, legislative acts, Government notifications
81Court shall presume judicial and official acts have been regularly performed
82Court shall presume document purporting to be power of attorney executed before notary is genuine
83Court shall presume that maps/plans made by Government authority are accurate
84Court shall presume document 30 years old is genuine if from proper custody and free from suspicion
85Court shall presume electronic agreements executed through secure electronic signature/channel are authentic

6.2.3 Conclusive Proof (Sections 41, 112-113)

SectionPresumption
41Final judgment of competent court is conclusive proof on questions directly and substantially at issue in former suit between same parties
112Child born during valid marriage or within 280 days after dissolution with mother having access to husband is conclusive proof of legitimacy
113Court shall presume existence of certain facts when certified by diplomatic/consular agents regarding foreign law

7. Privilege and Protection

7.1 Professional Communications (Sections 126-129)

SectionProtection
126Advocate-client privilege: No barrister/attorney/pleader/vakil permitted to disclose communication made in professional employment unless client expressly waives privilege
127Interpreter privilege extends to interpreters and clerks/servants of advocates
128Privilege not applicable to: (1) communication made to facilitate illegal purpose; (2) facts observed showing crime being committed
129Client holds privilege; advocate cannot disclose without express consent

7.2 Official Communications (Sections 123-125)

SectionPrivilege
123Privilege for unpublished official records relating to affairs of State - public officer cannot be compelled to disclose without permission of head of department
124Official communications privilege extends to all official communications unless public interest requires disclosure
125Magistrate privilege: No magistrate/police officer required to disclose source of information as to commission of offence

7.3 Protection from Self-Incrimination (Section 132)

  • Witness not excused from answering question on ground that answer will incriminate him, except no such answer can be used against him in criminal proceeding (other than for giving false evidence)
  • Based on Article 20(3) Constitutional protection

8. Examination and Cross-Examination Rules

8.1 Cross-Examination Scope (Section 146)

  • Witness may be cross-examined as to previous statements in writing or reduced to writing relevant to matters in question without such writing being shown
  • If witness denies making statement, writing may be proved before witness can be contradicted

8.2 Questions About Prior Convictions (Section 145)

  • Witness may be asked whether he has been previously convicted of any offence
  • If denied, opposite party may prove conviction

8.3 Refreshing Memory (Sections 159-161)

SectionRule
159Witness may refresh memory by referring to any writing made by himself at time of transaction or shortly after
160Witness may testify to facts mentioned in such document even if he has no recollection of facts themselves but knows document was correctly recorded
161Expert may refresh memory by reference to professional treatises

8.4 Corroboration (Section 157)

  • Former consistent statements of witness may be proved to corroborate later testimony if witness is impeached
  • Mere consistency does not make earlier statement relevant unless credit has been impeached

9. Opinion Evidence (Sections 45-51)

9.1 Expert Opinion (Section 45)

  • When court has to form opinion on foreign law, science, art, handwriting identity, finger impressions, opinions of experts are relevant
  • Expert defined as person with special skill in that field
  • Expert opinion is opinion evidence, not conclusive; court not bound to accept

9.2 Specific Expert Opinions

SectionType
45AExpert opinion on electronic evidence admissible regarding secure electronic signature/record
46Relevancy of opinion as to handwriting when expert has special knowledge
47Opinion of person acquainted with handwriting is relevant
48Opinion as to existence of right/custom when person has special knowledge is relevant
49Opinion as to usages, tenets, customs of persons when person has special knowledge is relevant
50Opinion on relationship when person has special means of knowledge is relevant

9.3 Non-Expert Opinion (Section 51)

  • Grounds of opinion when relevant: When opinion expressed by person not expert, grounds on which opinion based are relevant

10. Improper Admission and Rejection of Evidence (Sections 167)

10.1 Section 167 Provisions

  • No judgment shall be reversed or substantially varied on account of improper admission/rejection of evidence unless such improper admission/rejection has occasioned failure of justice
  • Court must examine whether error has caused prejudice
  • Mere irregularity without prejudice does not vitiate judgment

11. Key Judicial Interpretations and Principles

11.1 Evidence Classification

TypeDescription
Direct EvidenceEvidence of fact in issue perceived by witness through own senses
Circumstantial EvidenceEvidence of relevant facts from which fact in issue may be inferred
Oral EvidenceStatements made by witnesses before court
Documentary EvidenceDocuments produced for inspection including electronic records
Real EvidenceMaterial objects produced for inspection

11.2 Standard of Proof

Type of CaseStandard
Criminal CasesBeyond reasonable doubt
Civil CasesPreponderance of probabilities/balance of probabilities

11.3 Important Maxims

  • Ei qui affirmat non ei qui negat incumbit probatio: Burden of proof on person who affirms, not who denies
  • Res gestae: Facts forming part of same transaction
  • Res judicata: Matter already judged cannot be relitigated
  • Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus: False in one thing, false in everything (not absolute rule)

12. Special Provisions for Criminal Cases

12.1 Accused as Witness (Section 315 CrPC read with Evidence Act)

  • Accused competent witness for defense but cannot be compelled
  • If accused gives evidence, can be cross-examined
  • Failure to enter witness box cannot be used as evidence against accused

12.2 Similar Fact Evidence (Sections 14-15)

SectionRule
14Facts showing system or course of conduct are relevant when fact in issue is part of same system
15Facts bearing on question whether act was accidental or intentional are relevant when existence of course of business, system, or habit is relevant

12.3 Prosecution's Duty

  • Prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt
  • Benefit of doubt goes to accused
  • Each circumstance in chain of circumstances must be proved beyond reasonable doubt
The document Cheat Sheet: Indian Evidence Act, 1872 : An Overview is a part of the CLAT PG Course Criminal Law.
All you need of CLAT PG at this link: CLAT PG
Explore Courses for CLAT PG exam
Get EduRev Notes directly in your Google search
Related Searches
pdf , Important questions, Free, 1872 : An Overview, mock tests for examination, Objective type Questions, Viva Questions, Summary, Semester Notes, 1872 : An Overview, Cheat Sheet: Indian Evidence Act, ppt, Sample Paper, Previous Year Questions with Solutions, video lectures, Exam, Cheat Sheet: Indian Evidence Act, 1872 : An Overview, past year papers, study material, Extra Questions, shortcuts and tricks, practice quizzes, MCQs, Cheat Sheet: Indian Evidence Act;