CLAT PG Exam  >  CLAT PG Notes  >  Law of Contracts  >  Cheat Sheet: Quasi Contract

Cheat Sheet: Quasi Contract

1. Basic Concepts

1.1 Definition and Nature

AspectDescription
Quasi ContractNot a contract in the true sense; obligations arising by law to prevent unjust enrichment
Legal BasisSections 68-72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Latin MaximNemo debet locupletari ex aliena jactura (no one should be enriched at another's expense)
Essential FeatureAbsence of actual contract but obligation imposed by law based on equity and justice

1.2 Distinction from Actual Contract

Actual ContractQuasi Contract
Created by agreement between partiesCreated by law irrespective of agreement
Based on mutual consentBased on equity and unjust enrichment principle
Rights and obligations arise from parties' intentionRights and obligations imposed by law
Privity of contract requiredNo privity required

2. Types of Quasi-Contractual Relations

2.1 Section 68: Necessaries Supplied to Person Incapable of Contracting

ElementDetails
ProvisionPerson supplying necessaries to one incompetent to contract is entitled to reimbursement from property of such person
Incompetent PersonsMinor, person of unsound mind, person disqualified by law
NecessariesGoods or services necessary for maintenance according to person's standard of living
Right to ClaimFrom property of incompetent person only, not personally liable
QuantumReasonable price, not necessarily agreed price
  • Supply must be suited to condition in life of incompetent person
  • Includes food, clothing, lodging, medical treatment, education
  • Luxuries are not covered under necessaries

2.2 Section 69: Reimbursement of Person Paying Money Due by Another

ElementDetails
ProvisionPerson paying money on behalf of another who is bound to pay is entitled to reimbursement
Payment ConditionPayer must be interested in payment or bound to protect the interest
Payment Must BeLegally due from the other person
Right to ClaimFrom person on whose behalf payment made
  • Example: Co-owner paying full property tax entitled to recover proportionate share from other co-owners
  • Payment must not be voluntary but under legal compulsion or interest
  • Payer must have interest in making payment

2.3 Section 70: Obligation of Person Enjoying Benefit of Non-Gratuitous Act

ElementDetails
ProvisionPerson lawfully doing something for another or delivering something to another, not gratuitously, can claim compensation
ConditionsAct must be lawful; done non-gratuitously; other person enjoys benefit
CompensationFor thing done or thing delivered
Quantum MeruitReasonable remuneration for work done or services rendered
  • Leading case: State of West Bengal v. B.K. Mondal & Sons - contractor entitled to compensation for work done though contract unenforceable
  • Not applicable if act done gratuitously or without lawful authority
  • Benefit must be actually enjoyed by other person

2.4 Section 71: Responsibility of Finder of Goods

ElementDetails
ProvisionFinder of goods has same responsibility as bailee
Duties of FinderTake reasonable care; not appropriate goods; return to true owner
Rights of FinderLien for expenses; may sell in certain circumstances
Right to RetainUntil lawful charges for preservation or improvement are paid
  • Finder cannot sue for reward unless offered
  • If goods are perishable or owner cannot be found with reasonable diligence, finder may sell
  • Before sale, reasonable notice must be given when practicable
  • Finder entitled to retain out of proceeds: expenses + cost of sale

2.5 Section 72: Liability for Money or Goods Received by Mistake or Coercion

ElementDetails
ProvisionMoney paid or goods delivered by mistake or coercion must be repaid or returned
MistakeMistake of fact or law (after amendment)
CoercionPayment made under threat or undue influence
ObligationRecipient must restore benefit received
  • Originally covered only mistake of fact; now includes mistake of law post-amendment
  • Leading case: Shankarlal Naranlal v. Chimanlal Nihalchand - payment under mistake of law recoverable
  • Burden to prove mistake lies on person seeking recovery
  • Money paid voluntarily with full knowledge cannot be recovered

3. Key Principles and Elements

3.1 Unjust Enrichment

PrincipleApplication
Core ConceptNo person should enrich themselves at expense of another without legal justification
Application in Quasi ContractForms foundation for all quasi-contractual obligations under Sections 68-72
Elements RequiredBenefit conferred; recipient retained benefit; retention without payment unjust

3.2 Quantum Meruit

AspectDetails
Meaning"As much as earned" or "as much as deserved" - reasonable remuneration
ApplicationWhere contract becomes void or not enforceable but work has been performed
Basis of CalculationReasonable value of services rendered or work done, not contract price
Relevant ProvisionSection 70 read with principles of equity

3.3 Essential Conditions for Quasi Contract

  • No actual contract exists between parties
  • One party confers benefit on another or prevents loss
  • Benefit retention without compensation would be unjust
  • Recipient knows or should reasonably know about the benefit
  • Law implies obligation to restore or compensate

4. Remedies and Enforcement

4.1 Available Remedies

RemedyApplication
ReimbursementRecovery of money paid on behalf of another (Section 69)
RestitutionReturn of money or goods received by mistake or coercion (Section 72)
CompensationFor non-gratuitous acts or services rendered (Section 70)
LienFinder's right to retain goods until expenses paid (Section 71)

4.2 Limitation Period

  • Claims under quasi contract: 3 years from date when right to sue accrues
  • Governed by Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963
  • Time begins when benefit conferred or money paid becomes known

4.3 Defenses Available

DefenseExplanation
Change of PositionRecipient changed position in good faith relying on receipt
EstoppelClaimant by conduct led recipient to believe payment was due
LimitationClaim barred by limitation period
Voluntary PaymentPayment made voluntarily with full knowledge cannot be recovered

5. Important Case Laws

5.1 Leading Judgments

CasePrinciple Established
State of West Bengal v. B.K. Mondal & SonsQuantum meruit applies even when contract unenforceable; work done must be compensated
Shankarlal Naranlal v. Chimanlal NihalchandMoney paid under mistake of law is recoverable under Section 72
Maula Bux v. Union of IndiaQuantum meruit claim maintainable when contract becomes void
Mulamchand v. State of M.P.Contractor entitled to reasonable compensation for work done before contract terminated
Chandra Bhan Gosain v. Girja NandiniCo-sharer paying more than their share entitled to contribution from others under Section 69

5.2 Application Principles from Precedents

  • Mere receipt of benefit not sufficient; recipient must have accepted benefit knowingly
  • Voluntary services without request not compensable unless necessity exists
  • Officious intermeddler cannot claim under quasi contract
  • Payment must be under legal compulsion or by person interested in payment
  • Mistake must be material and causative of payment

6. Distinctions and Comparisons

6.1 Quasi Contract vs. Bailment

Quasi Contract (Finder)Bailment
No agreement between partiesBased on agreement or acceptance
Obligation imposed by lawObligations arise from contract
Finder has limited rightsBailee has defined contractual rights

6.2 Quasi Contract vs. Tort

Quasi ContractTort
Based on unjust enrichment principleBased on violation of legal duty
Remedy is restitution or compensation for benefitRemedy is damages for harm caused
No wrongful act requiredWrongful act essential element
Focus on preventing unjust gainFocus on compensating loss

6.3 Quantum Meruit vs. Damages

Quantum MeruitDamages
Based on value of work doneBased on loss suffered
Remedy in quasi contract or restitutionRemedy for breach of contract
Awarded when contract void or unenforceableAwarded when contract breached
Measures benefit conferredMeasures detriment suffered

7. Special Situations and Applications

7.1 Government Contracts

  • Quantum meruit applies even when government contract void for want of authority
  • Work executed in good faith must be compensated
  • Constitutional provisions do not bar quasi-contractual claims
  • Reasonable value determined based on market rates and prevailing conditions

7.2 Partial Performance

  • Where contract partly performed and becomes void, party performing entitled to compensation
  • Applies under Section 70 for non-gratuitous acts
  • Must prove work done was lawful and other party enjoyed benefit
  • Compensation proportionate to work completed

7.3 Mistake of Law vs. Mistake of Fact

AspectTreatment
Before AmendmentOnly mistake of fact covered under Section 72
After AmendmentBoth mistake of fact and law covered
Current PositionMoney paid under any mistake recoverable if recipient not entitled
Burden of ProofOn person claiming money paid by mistake

8. Practical Points for Exam

8.1 Section-wise Quick Reference

SectionSubject Matter
68Necessaries to incompetent person - claim from property
69Payment on behalf of another - right to reimbursement
70Non-gratuitous act - compensation for benefit enjoyed
71Finder of goods - responsibility as bailee + rights
72Mistake or coercion - obligation to repay/return

8.2 Common Exam Scenarios

  • Minor purchasing necessaries: Section 68 applies, recovery from property only
  • Co-owner paying entire tax: Section 69 applies, entitled to proportionate contribution
  • Contractor performing work under void contract: Section 70 applies, quantum meruit claim available
  • Finding lost goods: Section 71 applies, duties as bailee + lien for expenses
  • Payment under mistake or coercion: Section 72 applies, entitled to restitution

8.3 Key Terms to Remember

  • Nemo debet locupletari ex aliena jactura - foundational maxim
  • Quantum meruit - reasonable remuneration for work done
  • Unjust enrichment - core principle underlying all quasi contracts
  • Non-gratuitous act - act done not as gift but expecting return
  • Necessaries - goods/services necessary according to person's station in life
  • Restitution - restoration of benefit wrongfully obtained
The document Cheat Sheet: Quasi Contract is a part of the CLAT PG Course Law of Contracts.
All you need of CLAT PG at this link: CLAT PG

Top Courses for CLAT PG

Related Searches
Exam, shortcuts and tricks, Cheat Sheet: Quasi Contract, study material, Free, Extra Questions, Important questions, Semester Notes, Viva Questions, past year papers, MCQs, Cheat Sheet: Quasi Contract, mock tests for examination, Summary, practice quizzes, Sample Paper, pdf , video lectures, Previous Year Questions with Solutions, Cheat Sheet: Quasi Contract, ppt, Objective type Questions;