CLAT PG Exam  >  CLAT PG Notes  >  Public International Law  >  Cheat Sheet: State Under International Law

Cheat Sheet: State Under International Law

1. Concept and Elements of Statehood

1.1 Definition of State

SourceDefinition
Montevideo Convention 1933, Article 1A state possesses: (a) permanent population; (b) defined territory; (c) government; (d) capacity to enter into relations with other states
International Legal PersonalityState is the primary subject of international law with rights and obligations under international law

1.2 Essential Elements of Statehood

1.2.1 Permanent Population

  • No minimum number required; population must have intention of permanent residence
  • Nationality bonds link individuals to state; population need not be homogeneous
  • Nomadic populations can constitute permanent population if habitually residing in territory

1.2.2 Defined Territory

  • No minimum size requirement; territory must be reasonably consistent and identifiable
  • Precise boundaries need not be finally delimited; unsettled boundary disputes do not negate statehood (Israel example)
  • Territory includes land, internal waters, territorial sea, airspace above
  • State must exercise effective control over core territory

1.2.3 Government

  • Effective government with centralized administrative and legislative organs
  • Must exercise effective control and authority over territory and population
  • Temporary absence of government does not destroy statehood (Somalia situation)
  • Nature of government (democratic/authoritarian) irrelevant to statehood

1.2.4 Capacity to Enter into Relations

  • Sovereignty and independence in external affairs
  • Legal capacity to engage with other states and international organizations
  • Must not be subject to control of another state in international relations
  • Distinction from internal sovereignty (control over domestic affairs)

2. Recognition of States

2.1 Nature and Concept

TermMeaning
RecognitionAct by which existing states acknowledge that an entity possesses characteristics of statehood and is willing to treat it as a state
Express RecognitionFormal declaration or official communication acknowledging statehood
Implied RecognitionConduct evidencing intention to recognize (concluding bilateral treaty, establishing diplomatic relations)

2.2 Theories of Recognition

TheoryExplanation
Constitutive TheoryRecognition creates statehood; entity becomes state only when recognized by other states; statehood is relative
Declaratory TheoryRecognition merely acknowledges pre-existing fact; state exists when Montevideo criteria satisfied regardless of recognition
Prevailing ViewDeclaratory theory preferred; recognition is political act but statehood is legal status based on objective criteria

2.3 Modes of Recognition

2.3.1 De Jure Recognition

  • Full, complete, and final recognition of statehood or government
  • Implies permanence and legal validity; creates full diplomatic and legal relations
  • Cannot be withdrawn except in exceptional circumstances

2.3.2 De Facto Recognition

  • Provisional recognition acknowledging effective control without finality
  • Granted when situation uncertain or recognizing state wishes to maintain flexibility
  • Can be withdrawn; lesser degree of diplomatic relations
  • Example: Recognition of insurgent governments during civil wars

2.4 Legal Effects of Recognition

  • Capacity to bring claims in courts of recognizing state
  • Entitlement to state immunity and diplomatic privileges
  • Right to demand property and assets located in recognizing state
  • Non-recognition does not nullify statehood but limits practical legal relations

2.5 Collective Recognition and Non-Recognition

  • UN membership operates as collective recognition by member states
  • Stimson Doctrine: Non-recognition of situations created by illegal use of force
  • Duty not to recognize situations resulting from serious breaches of jus cogens (Article 41, ILC Articles on State Responsibility)
  • Example: Non-recognition of annexation of Crimea (2014)

3. State Sovereignty and Independence

3.1 Concept of Sovereignty

AspectDescription
Internal SovereigntySupreme authority within territorial boundaries; exclusive jurisdiction over persons, property, and events
External SovereigntyIndependence in international relations; freedom from subordination to other states
Legal SovereigntyAuthority recognized by international law; basis for sovereign equality under Article 2(1) UN Charter

3.2 Sovereign Equality of States

  • Article 2(1) UN Charter: Organization based on sovereign equality of all members
  • Each state has one vote in UN General Assembly regardless of size or power
  • Equal juridical personality; no state subject to jurisdiction of another without consent
  • Equality before international law; same rights and obligations apply to all states

3.3 Limitations on Sovereignty

3.3.1 Consensual Limitations

  • Treaties and international agreements voluntarily undertaken
  • Membership in international organizations (UN, WTO, regional bodies)
  • Customary international law accepted by state practice

3.3.2 Peremptory Norms (Jus Cogens)

  • Prohibition of use of force (Article 2(4) UN Charter)
  • Prohibition of genocide, slavery, torture
  • Principle of self-determination
  • No derogation permitted; treaties violating jus cogens void (Article 53, Vienna Convention)

3.4 Non-Intervention Principle

  • Corollary of sovereignty; states must not intervene in internal/external affairs of other states
  • ICJ Nicaragua case (1986): Intervention prohibited when directed at matters of domestic jurisdiction
  • Exceptions: Consent, UN Security Council authorization under Chapter VII, self-defense (Article 51)

4. State Jurisdiction

4.1 Types of Jurisdiction

TypeDescription
Prescriptive JurisdictionLegislative competence to make laws applicable to persons, property, or conduct
Enforcement JurisdictionExecutive power to enforce laws through police, administrative, or judicial action
Adjudicative JurisdictionJudicial authority to try and decide cases

4.2 Principles of Jurisdiction

4.2.1 Territorial Principle

  • State has jurisdiction over all persons and events within its territory
  • Subjective territoriality: Offense commenced in state's territory
  • Objective territoriality: Offense completed or produced effects in state's territory
  • Lotus case (PCIJ 1927): Effects doctrine for territorial jurisdiction

4.2.2 Nationality Principle

  • Active nationality: Jurisdiction over nationals wherever located
  • Passive personality: Jurisdiction when national is victim of offense abroad (limited acceptance)
  • Nottebohm case (ICJ 1955): Genuine link required between state and national

4.2.3 Protective Principle

  • Jurisdiction over acts abroad threatening state security or vital interests
  • Covers offenses like counterfeiting currency, espionage, immigration violations
  • Must involve serious threats to fundamental state interests

4.2.4 Universal Jurisdiction

  • Any state may exercise jurisdiction regardless of territorial or national link
  • Applies to crimes of universal concern: Piracy, war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, torture
  • Eichmann case (Israel 1961): Universal jurisdiction for crimes against humanity
  • Belgium v. Senegal (ICJ 2012): Obligation to prosecute or extradite (aut dedere aut judicare)

4.3 Immunities from Jurisdiction

4.3.1 State Immunity

  • Principle: Par in parem non habet imperium (equal has no authority over equal)
  • Absolute immunity theory: Complete immunity from foreign jurisdiction (historical view)
  • Restrictive immunity theory: Immunity only for sovereign acts (acta jure imperii), not commercial acts (acta jure gestionis)
  • UN Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States 2004 codifies restrictive approach

4.3.2 Diplomatic Immunity

  • Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961
  • Complete immunity from criminal jurisdiction for diplomatic agents
  • Immunity from civil jurisdiction except private immovable property, succession, and professional/commercial activity cases
  • Inviolability of diplomatic premises, archives, correspondence

4.3.3 Sovereign/Head of State Immunity

  • Absolute immunity ratione personae for sitting heads of state, foreign ministers
  • Arrest Warrant case (ICJ 2002): Foreign minister enjoys full immunity during tenure
  • Immunity ratione materiae for official acts continues after leaving office
  • Exception: International criminal tribunals can prosecute heads of state (Article 27, Rome Statute)

5. State Responsibility

5.1 Basis of State Responsibility

ElementRequirement
Conduct Attributable to StateAct or omission by state organ or person/entity exercising governmental authority
Breach of International ObligationConduct constitutes violation of obligation under treaty, custom, or general principle

5.2 Attribution of Conduct

5.2.1 ILC Articles on State Responsibility (2001)

  • Article 4: Conduct of state organs (legislative, executive, judicial) attributable regardless of position in hierarchy
  • Article 5: Conduct of persons/entities exercising governmental authority
  • Article 8: Conduct directed or controlled by state
  • Article 9: Conduct in absence of official authorities (revolutionary movements seizing power)
  • Article 11: Conduct acknowledged and adopted by state as its own

5.2.2 Acts of Non-State Actors

  • Not attributable unless state exercises effective control (Nicaragua case standard)
  • Overall control test insufficient (ICJ rejected in Genocide case 2007)
  • State responsible for failing to prevent/punish private acts violating international obligations
  • Due diligence standard: Corfu Channel case (ICJ 1949) - obligation to prevent use of territory for harmful acts

5.3 Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness

CircumstanceConditions
Consent (Article 20)Valid consent by injured state to specific act; consent must not violate jus cogens
Self-Defense (Article 21)Lawful measure under Article 51 UN Charter; must be necessary and proportionate
Countermeasures (Article 22)Response to prior wrongful act; must be proportionate and aimed at inducing compliance
Force Majeure (Article 23)Irresistible force or unforeseen event beyond control making compliance materially impossible
Distress (Article 24)No reasonable means to save lives in emergency; limited to life-saving situations
Necessity (Article 25)Only way to safeguard essential interest against grave/imminent peril; strict conditions; not if state contributed to situation

5.4 Content of Responsibility

5.4.1 Primary Obligations

  • Article 30: Cessation of wrongful act if continuing; assurances of non-repetition
  • Article 31: Full reparation for injury caused (material and moral damage)

5.4.2 Forms of Reparation

FormDescription
Restitution (Article 35)Re-establishment of situation before wrongful act; if not materially impossible or disproportionate burden
Compensation (Article 36)Financial payment for damage not made good by restitution; covers actual loss and lost profits
Satisfaction (Article 37)Acknowledgment of breach, expression of regret, formal apology; for non-material injury

5.5 Serious Breaches of Peremptory Norms

  • Article 40: Gross or systematic failure to fulfill peremptory obligation
  • Article 41: All states must cooperate to end breach; no recognition as lawful; no aid/assistance
  • Examples: Aggression, genocide, apartheid, systematic racial discrimination

6. State Succession

6.1 Concept and Definition

TermDefinition
State SuccessionReplacement of one state by another in responsibility for international relations of territory
Predecessor StateState replaced by successor state on occurrence of succession
Successor StateState which has replaced predecessor state in responsibility for territory
Date of SuccessionDate on which successor state replaced predecessor state

6.2 Vienna Convention on Succession of States (1978 - Treaties; 1983 - Property/Archives/Debts)

6.3 Succession to Treaties

6.3.1 Newly Independent States

  • Clean slate doctrine: Not bound by treaties of predecessor (Article 16)
  • May opt to continue treaties by notification
  • Multilateral treaties: Succession by notification or conduct showing intent

6.3.2 Uniting of States

  • Treaties of predecessor states continue for respective territories unless successor decides otherwise
  • Other states may object if application would be incompatible with treaty object/purpose

6.3.3 Separation of States

  • Continuity principle: Treaties continue for each successor state in respective territory
  • Exception: Treaty incompatible with new status or radically changed circumstances

6.3.4 Dissolution of States

  • Treaties continue for successor states unless incompatible or modified by agreement
  • Yugoslavia dissolution: Complex succession issues; selective approach by successor states

6.4 Succession to Property, Archives, and Debts

6.4.1 State Property

  • Passes to successor state in newly independent states cases
  • Immovable property in territory passes to successor state
  • Movable property connected with activity in territory passes to successor
  • Equitable proportion principle for uniting/separation cases

6.4.2 State Archives

  • Archives relating to territory pass to successor state
  • Necessary for administration of territory must be transferred
  • Reproducing archives for both states when indispensable to each

6.4.3 State Debts

  • No automatic succession for newly independent states (colonial context)
  • Equitable proportion for uniting/separation (agreement between states)
  • Consideration of property, archives, and state interests passing to successor

6.5 Succession to Membership in International Organizations

  • No automatic succession; must apply for membership (UN practice)
  • Exception: Russia continued USSR seat in UN Security Council (1991)
  • Dissolution cases: Each successor state applies separately (Czechoslovakia split 1993)

6.6 Nationality Issues in Succession

  • Individuals acquire nationality of successor state
  • Right to opt for nationality of predecessor or successor (option of nationality)
  • Prevention of statelessness - primary consideration
  • European Convention on Nationality 1997: Addresses succession context

7. Special Categories

7.1 Federal States

  • Federation responsible for international obligations, not constituent units
  • Constituent states lack capacity to enter international relations independently
  • Exception: Swiss cantons, German Länder have limited treaty-making power in specific areas
  • Federal state cannot invoke federal structure to avoid international obligations

7.2 Confederations

  • Union of sovereign states for specific purposes (defense, foreign policy)
  • Member states retain sovereignty and international personality
  • Confederation itself may/may not have international legal personality
  • Historical examples: Switzerland (1291-1848), United Arab Republic (1958-1961)

7.3 Dependent and Autonomous Territories

CategoryStatus
Protected StatesForeign relations conducted by protecting state; internal autonomy retained; rare in modern practice
Mandates/Trust TerritoriesLeague of Nations/UN system; administered for inhabitants' benefit; all trust territories now independent
Associated StatesFree association with larger state; control foreign relations; internal self-government (Cook Islands, Niue with New Zealand)
Non-Self-Governing TerritoriesUN Charter Chapter XI; administering state reports to UN; right to self-determination applies

7.4 Micro-States

  • Very small states with limited population/territory (Vatican, Monaco, Liechtenstein, San Marino)
  • Full international legal personality despite size
  • Often rely on larger states for defense and foreign relations by agreement
  • UN membership: Some are members (Liechtenstein, Monaco, San Marino), Vatican has observer status

7.5 Contested Entities

7.5.1 Taiwan

  • Meets Montevideo criteria but limited recognition
  • One-China policy: Most states recognize PRC, not ROC (Taiwan)
  • Not UN member; participates in some international organizations as "Chinese Taipei"

7.5.2 Kosovo

  • Declared independence from Serbia (2008); recognized by over 100 states
  • ICJ Advisory Opinion (2010): Declaration of independence did not violate international law
  • Not UN member; Serbia opposes independence

7.5.3 Palestine

  • Observer state status at UN (2011); recognized by over 130 states
  • International recognition increasing; ICC and treaty participation
  • Final status subject to Israeli-Palestinian negotiations

8. Extinction and Dismemberment of States

8.1 Modes of State Extinction

ModeDescription
Merger/AbsorptionState absorbed into another; personality of absorbed state ceases (German unification 1990: GDR absorbed into FRG)
DissolutionState breaks up into multiple successor states; original state ceases to exist (USSR 1991, Yugoslavia 1992)
SecessionPart of territory becomes independent; predecessor state continues (Bangladesh from Pakistan 1971, South Sudan from Sudan 2011)
AnnexationForcible acquisition by another state; illegal under modern international law

8.2 Legal Consequences

  • Loss of international legal personality for extinct state
  • Succession issues arise for treaties, property, debts, archives
  • Rights and obligations transferred according to succession rules
  • Population acquires nationality of successor state(s)

8.3 Illegal Extinction

  • Annexation by force prohibited (Article 2(4) UN Charter)
  • No recognition of territorial acquisition by force (Stimson Doctrine)
  • Duty of non-recognition for all states (Article 41, ILC Articles)
  • Examples: Kuwait invasion by Iraq (1990) - reversed; Tibet annexation disputed

9. Key Doctrines and Principles

9.1 Self-Determination

  • Common Article 1, ICCPR and ICESCR: All peoples have right to self-determination
  • UN Declaration on Friendly Relations (1970): Elaborates self-determination principle
  • Colonial context: Right to independence from colonial rule (established)
  • Non-colonial context: Right to representative government; secession limited
  • East Timor case (ICJ 1995): Self-determination is erga omnes right
  • Remedial secession: Possible in cases of serious human rights violations (debated)

9.2 Uti Possidetis

  • Colonial boundaries become international boundaries on independence
  • Prevents territorial disputes by freezing colonial administrative boundaries
  • Frontier Dispute case (ICJ 1986): Applied in Burkina Faso/Mali border
  • Extended beyond decolonization to state dissolution (Yugoslavia, USSR)

9.3 Territorial Integrity

  • Article 2(4) UN Charter: Prohibition of threat/use of force against territorial integrity
  • Right of state to preserve its territory from external interference
  • Tension with self-determination in secession contexts
  • Generally prevails over secessionist claims absent colonial context or extreme oppression

9.4 Effective Control

  • State must exercise actual authority over territory to maintain sovereignty
  • Island of Palmas case (1928): Continuous and peaceful display of sovereignty required
  • Temporary loss of control does not extinguish title (occupation, invasion)
  • Relevant to territorial disputes and boundary determinations

9.5 Continuity and Identity of States

  • State identity continues despite governmental changes, revolutions, or constitutional amendments
  • Tinoco Arbitration (1923): Changes of government do not affect state identity
  • State remains bound by international obligations despite internal changes
  • Exception: Total dissolution creating entirely new entities

10. Important Cases

CaseKey Principle
North Sea Continental Shelf (ICJ 1969)Delimitation based on equitable principles; sovereignty over continental shelf inherent right
Western Sahara Advisory Opinion (ICJ 1975)Self-determination applies; terra nullius concept rejected for inhabited territories
Nicaragua v. USA (ICJ 1986)Use of force and intervention principles; effective control test for attribution; customary law independent of treaty law
Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (ICJ 1997)State of necessity strictly construed; treaty obligations continue despite fundamental change circumstances
LaGrand (ICJ 2001)Consular notification obligations binding; provisional measures have binding effect
Arrest Warrant (DRC v. Belgium) (ICJ 2002)Sitting foreign ministers enjoy absolute immunity ratione personae from criminal jurisdiction
Avena (ICJ 2004)Vienna Convention on Consular Relations creates individual rights; US violated Mexican nationals' rights
Armed Activities (DRC v. Uganda) (ICJ 2005)Violation of sovereignty and territorial integrity; Uganda responsible for forces' conduct in DRC
Genocide (Bosnia v. Serbia) (ICJ 2007)Effective control test for attribution; duty to prevent genocide; Serbia violated obligation to punish
Kosovo Advisory Opinion (ICJ 2010)Declaration of independence not per se violation of international law; international law does not prohibit declarations
Belgium v. Senegal (ICJ 2012)Obligation to prosecute or extradite under torture convention; universal jurisdiction for torture
Jurisdictional Immunities (Germany v. Italy) (ICJ 2012)State immunity applies even for grave violations (war crimes); no jus cogens exception to immunity
The document Cheat Sheet: State Under International Law is a part of the CLAT PG Course Public International Law.
All you need of CLAT PG at this link: CLAT PG
Explore Courses for CLAT PG exam
Get EduRev Notes directly in your Google search
Related Searches
Important questions, Semester Notes, study material, past year papers, video lectures, Cheat Sheet: State Under International Law, Summary, Extra Questions, pdf , Viva Questions, Previous Year Questions with Solutions, shortcuts and tricks, practice quizzes, Cheat Sheet: State Under International Law, MCQs, Exam, Objective type Questions, Free, ppt, Cheat Sheet: State Under International Law, Sample Paper, mock tests for examination;