Imagine you're an ancient Indian architect around 800 BCE, tasked with building a grand fire altar. You need to create a square platform that's exactly double the size of an existing square. How would you do it? Would you simply double each side? Let's find out!
This chapter takes us on a fascinating journey through one of mathematics' most beautiful and useful theorems, discovered by the Indian mathematician Baudhāyana around 800 BCE in his work called the Śulba-Sūtra.
Q: How can we construct a square that has double the area of a given square?
You might think: "Just double each side!" Let's check:
Oh no! We got 4 times the area, not double!

Baudhāyana's Discovery (Śulba-Sūtra, Verse 1.9):
"The diagonal of a square produces a square of double the area of the original square."
What does this mean?
Simply draw a square using the diagonal of your original square as the side!

Let's understand this step by step:

We can keep going! Each new square has double the area of the previous one:

What you need: 2 identical square papers, scissors
Steps:

Now the opposite challenge: Given a square, how do we create a square with half the area?
Sol: Simple! Just reverse what we did before:

When we add horizontal and vertical lines:
Steps:
Q: Will a square with half the side-length have half the area?


Q: Find the hypotenuse of an isosceles right triangle with equal sides of length 1 unit.
Sol:

If hypotenuse = c, then:

We want to find where the number $\sqrt{2}$ lies on the number line.
By definition, $\sqrt{2}$ is the number whose square is 2.
So,
$\sqrt{2}$ × $\sqrt{2}$ = 2
Step 1: Compare $\sqrt{2}$ with 1
Square of 1:
1² = 1
Square of $\sqrt{2}$:
($\sqrt{2}$)² = 2
Since 1 is less than 2, we get:
1² < ($\sqrt{2}$)²
So,
1 < $\sqrt{2}$
This means $\sqrt{2}$ is greater than 1.
Step 2: Compare $\sqrt{2}$ with 2
Square of 2:
2² = 4
Square of $\sqrt{2}$:
($\sqrt{2}$)² = 2
Since 2 is less than 4, we get:
($\sqrt{2}$)² < 2²
So,
$\sqrt{2}$ < 2
This means $\sqrt{2}$ is less than 2.
Step 3: Combine both results
We found:
1 < $\sqrt{2}$
and
$\sqrt{2}$ < 2
Therefore,
1 < $\sqrt{2}$ < 2
So $\sqrt{2}$ lies between 1 and 2.
A lower bound is a number smaller than $\sqrt{2}$.
An upper bound is a number larger than $\sqrt{2}$.
Here,
1 is the lower bound
2 is the upper bound
So $\sqrt{2}$ lies between 1 and 2.
We want to know whether $\sqrt{2}$ can be written as a fraction of two counting numbers, that is, in the form
m / n.
Let us assume that it is possible.
So, suppose:
where m and n are counting numbers and have no common factor other than 1.
Squaring both sides:
Multiplying both sides by n²: 2n2 = m2
Important fact about square numbers
In the prime factorisation of a square number, every prime factor appears an even number of times.
For example:
All exponents are even.
So, m² must have every prime factor an even number of times.
Now look at the equation 2n² = m²
The left side is 2 × n².
Since n² is a square, all its prime factors occur an even number of times.
Multiplying by 2 adds one extra factor of 2.
So on the left side, the prime factor 2 appears an odd number of times.
But on the right side, m² is a square number, so every prime factor (including 2) must appear an even number of times.
This is impossible because the same number cannot have an odd and an even number of factors of 2 at the same time.
Our assumption that $\sqrt{2}$ can be written as m / n is wrong.
Therefore,
$\sqrt{2}$ cannot be expressed as a fraction of two counting numbers.
So $\sqrt{2}$ is not a rational number.
It is an irrational number.
Its decimal form goes on forever without repeating:
The relation between the areas of a square and the square on its diagonal can be used to find a general relation between the hypotenuse and the other two sides of an isosceles right triangle.
Let a be the length of the equal sides and c the length of the hypotenuse.
Area of SQVU = 2 × Area of PQRS
So, c2 = 2a2 .
This formula can be used to find c when a is known, or to find a when c is known.
We learned to combine two identical squares.

The sidelength of the larger square is the length of the diagonal of either of the smaller squares.
But what if we want to combine two different-sized squares?
Baudhāyana's Discovery:
"The area of the square produced by the diagonal is the sum of the areas of the squares produced by the two sides."
In Simple Words:

Baudhāyana gave us another verse (Verse 2.1) to explain:
Step-by-Step Visual Proof:
Step 1: Join the two squares

Step 2: Mark a rectangle in the larger square using the smaller square's side, then draw its diagonal.

Step 3: Draw three more identical right triangles around this diagonal to form a 4-sided figure 

Step 4: This 4-sided figure is actually a square!
Why is it a square?
Why does it have the right area?
The new square consists of the same triangular pieces that made up our two original squares, just rearranged!
What you need: Two different-sized square papers, scissors
Steps:





Baudhāyana's Theorem (c. 800 BCE):
For any right-angled triangle with sides a, b, and hypotenuse c:
a² + b² = c²

This theorem is also called:
Baudhāyana was the first person in history to state this theorem in this general and modern form!
Q: Draw a right triangle with shorter sides 3 cm and 4 cm. What's the hypotenuse?
Sol:
Verify by measuring! Your hypotenuse should be exactly 5 cm!

Definition: A set of three positive integers (a, b, c) that satisfy a² + b² = c² is called a Baudhāyana triple (also called Pythagorean triple).
Baudhāyana listed these integer triples:
Let's list all triples where all numbers are ≤ 20:
Notice a pattern? Some are just multiples of others!
Discovery: If (a, b, c) is a Baudhāyana triple, then (ka, kb, kc) is also a Baudhāyana triple for any positive integer k.
Example:
Proof:
Conclusion: There are infinitely many Baudhāyana triples!
Primitive Triple: A Baudhāyana triple where the three numbers have no common factor greater than 1.
Examples:
Key Idea: Find all primitive triples, then scale them to get all triples!
Remember: Sum of first n odd numbers = n²
Algebraically: 1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2n - 1) = n²
Rearranging: (n - 1)² + (2n - 1) = n²
The Trick: If (2n - 1) is a perfect square, we get a Baudhāyana triple!
The French mathematician Pierre de Fermat (17th century) was fascinated by Baudhāyana triples. He wondered:
Fermat's Question:
Fermat's Claim (Fermat's Last Theorem)
The equation xⁿ + yⁿ = zⁿ has NO solution in positive integers when n > 2.
Fermat wrote in the margin of a book:
"I have found a truly marvellous proof of this statement, but the margin is too small to contain it."
The Mystery: No one ever found Fermat's proof! Did he really have one?
After Fermat's death, mathematicians tried for over 300 years to prove this theorem. Many brilliant mathematicians failed!
1963: A 10-year-old boy named Andrew Wiles read a book about Fermat's Last Theorem
His Dream: Despite reading about centuries of failures, young Andrew decided he would prove it!
1994: After dedicating years to the problem, Andrew Wiles succeeded! He proved Fermat's Last Theorem at age 41.
[IMAGE: Timeline showing 1963-1994 with key points]
Lesson: Never give up on your dreams, no matter how impossible they seem!
The Baudhāyana-Pythagoras theorem is one of the most useful theorems in mathematics! Let's see some applications.
Bhāskarāchārya (Bhāskara II) was a great Indian mathematician who lived around 1150 CE. His book Līlāvatī contains many beautiful problems. Here's one:
The Lotus Problem:
"In a lake surrounded by chakra and krauñcha birds, there is a lotus flower peeping out of the water, with the tip of its stem 1 unit above the water. On being swayed by a gentle breeze, the tip touches the water 3 units away from its original position. Quickly tell the depth of the lake."

Step 1: Understand the Situation
Step 2: Set Up Variables
Step 3: Form a Right Triangle When the lotus bends:
Step 4: Apply Baudhāyana's Theorem
Answer: The depth of the lake is 4 units!
| 1. What is the Baudhāyana-Pythagoras Theorem? | ![]() |
| 2. How can a square be doubled according to the article? | ![]() |
| 3. What does it mean to halve a square? | ![]() |
| 4. What is the significance of the equation xⁿ + yⁿ = zⁿ when n > 2? | ![]() |
| 5. How are right triangles with integer side lengths related to the Baudhāyana-Pythagoras Theorem? | ![]() |