Read each passage carefully and then answer the questions about it. For each question, decide on the basis of the passage which one of the choices best answers the question.
The following passage is adapted from a work of narrative fiction.
The midday sun beat down on the corrugated metal roof of the workshop, turning the air inside thick and stifling. Manuel wiped his forehead with the back of his hand, leaving a streak of grease across his brow. He had been working on the old tractor since dawn, and still the engine refused to turn over. His father (5) would have known what to do. His father could diagnose any problem just by listening to the cough and sputter of a failing motor. But his father had been gone three years now, and Manuel was left to puzzle through the repair manuals alone. Outside, he could hear his younger sister Rosa calling the chickens (10) back to their coop. The farm had fallen to him after the funeral, though he had been only seventeen at the time. Rosa had just turned twelve. Their mother had died when Rosa was born, so it had always been the three of them against the world. Now it was two. Manuel picked up the wrench again and returned to the carburetor. (15) The harvest would begin in two weeks, and without the tractor, they would lose half the crop. He thought of the bank letter sitting on the kitchen table, the one with the red stamp across the top. Perhaps if he could fix this machine, if he could bring in a strong harvest, they might (20) keep the land after all.
1. The primary purpose of this passage is to
2. As used in line 8, the word "puzzle" most nearly means
3. According to the passage, Manuel’s father had which of the following abilities?
4. It can be inferred from the passage that the "red stamp" mentioned in line 19 most likely indicates
5. The tone of the passage can best be described as
6. The passage suggests that Manuel feels which of the following about his current situation?
7. The detail about Rosa calling the chickens (lines 9-10) primarily serves to
The following passage is adapted from a general-audience anthropology article.
The discovery of fire-cracked rocks in a South African cave has prompted archaeologists to reconsider long-held assumptions about early human cooking practices. Until recently, most scholars believed that controlled use of fire for cooking emerged approximately 400,000 years ago. However, evidence from Wonderwerk Cave suggests that hominins may have been (5) deliberately heating food as early as one million years ago, pushing back the timeline by more than half a million years. The implications of this finding extend far beyond the kitchen. Cooking fundamentally altered human evolution. Heat breaks down the tough cellular walls of plants and the connective tissues in meat, making nutrients more accessible (10) to the digestive system. This increased caloric efficiency likely contributed to the expansion of brain size in early Homo species, as the brain is an extraordinarily energy-demanding organ. A cooked diet would have freed early humans from spending countless hours chewing raw food, allowing time for tool-making, social interaction, and exploration. Moreover, cooking may have (15) facilitated the development of complex social structures. The need to maintain and share fire would have encouraged cooperation and communication. Groups that could preserve fire through the night or across seasons would have possessed a significant survival advantage. Some researchers argue that evening gatherings around (20) hearths became the crucible for language development, as extended face-to-face interaction in the flickering light created ideal conditions for the exchange of increasingly sophisticated vocalizations.
8. The main idea of this passage is that
9. According to the passage, what specific evidence led archaeologists to reconsider the timeline of human cooking?
10. As used in line 9, the word "accessible" most nearly means
11. The passage indicates that cooking freed early humans from spending excessive time chewing in order to
12. It can be inferred from the passage that groups able to preserve fire had a survival advantage because
13. The author’s purpose in the final paragraph (lines 14-23) is primarily to
14. The relationship between cooking and brain expansion, as described in the passage, is best characterized as
The following passage is adapted from Elizabeth Cady Stanton’s address to the New York State Legislature in 1854.
We ask no better laws than those you have made for yourselves. We need no other protection than that which your present laws secure to you. If you can trust yourselves in the courts of justice, in the conduct of business, in the management of your own property, then we demand the (5) same confidence. We ask nothing as a favor, but simply claim our rights as citizens of a republic founded upon the great principle of individual sovereignty. Would to God you could know the burning indignation that fills a woman’s soul when she turns over the pages of your statute books and sees there how (10) like feudal barons you freemen hold your women. In marriage she loses everything. Her person, her property, her labor, and her children all belong in law to her husband. The contract of marriage is the most unequal ever conceived. Man emerges from it the same independent being he was before, (15) while woman wakes as from a dream to find herself legally dead, stripped of all the rights she possessed as a single woman. And for what crime is this penalty inflicted? For loving unwisely? No. For seeking in marriage that companionship and protection which our common (20) nature demands? If this be a crime, then it is one which carries its own most severe punishment.
15. The primary purpose of this passage is to
16. As used in line 6, the word "claim" most nearly means
17. According to the passage, upon marriage a woman loses all of the following EXCEPT
18. The comparison to "feudal barons" in lines 9-10 serves to suggest that
19. The tone of the passage can best be described as
20. It can be inferred from the passage that Stanton believes the greatest injustice of marriage law is that
1. Ans: (B) – establish a character facing significant pressure and responsibility
Explanation: This is a Main Idea/Author’s Purpose question. The passage introduces Manuel as a young man who has inherited a farm at seventeen, must care for his younger sister, faces potential loss of the land due to debt (lines 18-20), and struggles to repair essential equipment before harvest. Choice (A) is too narrow, focusing only on the repair process rather than the larger situation. Choice (D) is a detail mentioned but not the primary purpose of the passage.
2. Ans: (A) – struggle
Explanation: This is a Vocabulary in Context question. In line 8, Manuel must "puzzle through the repair manuals alone," meaning he struggles to understand them without his father’s expertise. Choice (B) represents a different meaning of puzzle, but Manuel is the one working to understand, not being confused by something. Choice (C) is unrelated to the context of difficult mechanical work.
3. Ans: (B) – He could identify mechanical problems by sound
Explanation: This is a Detail/Fact question. Lines 5-7 state that Manuel’s father "could diagnose any problem just by listening to the cough and sputter of a failing motor." Choice (A) uses words from the passage (repair, tractors, mechanic) but makes a comparison never stated in the text. Choice (C) is not mentioned anywhere in the passage.
4. Ans: (C) – an urgent or final notice
Explanation: This is an Inference question. The red stamp on the bank letter (line 19), combined with Manuel’s worry about keeping the land (lines 19-20), suggests the letter is a serious warning, likely about foreclosure or overdue payments. Choice (A) reverses the situation-this is clearly bad news, not approval. Choice (D) contradicts the passage since the harvest has not yet occurred (line 17).
5. Ans: (B) – tense and uncertain
Explanation: This is a Tone/Mood question. The passage conveys tension through details like the stifling heat (lines 1-2), the broken tractor with harvest approaching (lines 15-17), and the threatening bank letter (lines 18-20), all creating uncertainty about Manuel’s ability to save the farm. Choice (C) contradicts the difficult circumstances and pressure described throughout. Choice (D) is incorrect because Manuel shows determination rather than bitterness.
6. Ans: (C) – Overwhelmed by responsibilities thrust upon him early
Explanation: This is an Inference question. The passage indicates Manuel inherited the farm at only seventeen (line 12), must care for his twelve-year-old sister (line 11), and struggles with repairs his father would have easily handled (lines 5-8), suggesting he feels burdened by premature responsibilities. Choice (A) contradicts his struggle with the tractor repair throughout the passage. Choice (B) is not supported-Manuel shows protectiveness, not resentment, toward Rosa.
7. Ans: (B) – contrast the simplicity of her task with the complexity of Manuel’s
Explanation: This is a Structure/Organization question. The detail about Rosa calling chickens (lines 9-10) is placed immediately after the description of Manuel’s difficult struggle with complex machinery and repair manuals (lines 1-8), highlighting the difference in their responsibilities. Choice (C) is too broad and not supported-one simple task does not indicate overall farm health. Choice (D) reverses the situation-Manuel is working hard, not neglecting duties.
8. Ans: (B) – cooking with fire may have originated much earlier than previously thought and had profound effects on human development
Explanation: This is a Main Idea question. The passage discusses new evidence pushing cooking back to one million years ago (lines 4-6) and then explores multiple impacts on evolution, brain development, and social structures (lines 6-23). Choice (A) is too narrow, focusing only on one detail from the final paragraph. Choice (C) incorrectly attributes brain growth to hunting rather than cooking (lines 10-13).
9. Ans: (B) – Fire-cracked rocks discovered in a South African cave
Explanation: This is a Detail/Fact question. Lines 1-2 explicitly state that "fire-cracked rocks in a South African cave" prompted archaeologists to reconsider assumptions about early cooking. Choice (A) is not mentioned in the passage. Choice (C) sounds plausible but is not the evidence cited in the passage.
10. Ans: (A) – available
Explanation: This is a Vocabulary in Context question. In lines 8-10, cooking makes nutrients "more accessible to the digestive system," meaning more available for the body to absorb and use. Choice (B) represents another meaning of accessible but does not fit the scientific context of nutrient absorption. Choice (D) is unrelated to the meaning in this context.
11. Ans: (B) – permit activities such as tool-making and social interaction
Explanation: This is a Detail/Fact question. Lines 12-14 state that a cooked diet "freed early humans from spending countless hours chewing raw food, allowing time for tool-making, social interaction, and exploration." Choice (A) distorts information-the passage discusses making nutrients more accessible (line 9), not consuming more plant varieties. Choice (D) is not mentioned in the passage.
12. Ans: (C) – maintaining fire across time periods improved their chances of survival
Explanation: This is an Inference question. Lines 17-19 state that "groups that could preserve fire through the night or across seasons would have possessed a significant survival advantage," indicating that continuous access to fire was crucial. Choice (A) is too narrow and not the reason given in lines 17-19. Choice (B) is not mentioned in the passage as a survival advantage.
13. Ans: (B) – explore an additional dimension of how fire may have influenced human evolution
Explanation: This is an Author’s Purpose question. The final paragraph begins with "Moreover" (line 14), signaling an additional point, and discusses how cooking may have facilitated social structures and language development, extending beyond the nutritional and cognitive benefits discussed earlier. Choice (A) is too extreme-the author presents social development as one important factor, not necessarily more important. Choice (C) overstates the author’s claim-the passage says fire created "ideal conditions" (line 21), not that language was impossible without it.
14. Ans: (B) – increased caloric efficiency from cooked food likely supported the energy demands of larger brains
Explanation: This is an Extended Reasoning question. Lines 10-13 explain that cooking increased caloric efficiency, and "this increased caloric efficiency likely contributed to the expansion of brain size" because "the brain is an extraordinarily energy-demanding organ." Choice (A) misrepresents a correlation as direct causation. Choice (C) reverses the relationship described in lines 10-13.
15. Ans: (A) – persuade legislators to grant women the same legal rights that men possess
Explanation: This is a Main Idea/Author’s Purpose question. The opening lines (1-7) directly ask for the same laws and protections men have, and the entire speech is addressed to the New York State Legislature, arguing for legal equality. Choice (C) contradicts the passage-Stanton criticizes marriage laws but does not tell women to avoid marriage. Choice (D) is too strong-while Stanton is critical, her purpose is to change laws, not primarily to criticize men.
16. Ans: (A) – assert
Explanation: This is a Vocabulary in Context question. In line 6, "we demand the same confidence" and "claim our rights" means to assert or insist upon rights as something deserved, not requested as a favor (line 6). Choice (B) represents a different meaning of claim entirely. Choice (C) is partially related but does not capture the meaning of asserting a right in this context.
17. Ans: (C) – her citizenship
Explanation: This is a Detail/Fact question. Lines 11-13 state that in marriage a woman loses "her person, her property, her labor, and her children," but citizenship is never mentioned as something lost. Choice (A) is explicitly listed in line 12. Choice (B) is stated in line 13 when the passage says "her children all belong in law to her husband."
18. Ans: (A) – marriage laws in New York are outdated and oppressive
Explanation: This is an Extended Reasoning question. The comparison to feudal barons (lines 9-10) suggests that modern lawmakers are holding women in a condition reminiscent of feudalism, an outdated and hierarchical system, thus arguing the laws are both old-fashioned and unjust. Choice (B) takes the metaphor too literally-Stanton is making a comparison, not claiming men are imitating barons. Choice (D) misses the point of the comparison entirely.
19. Ans: (B) – passionate and indignant
Explanation: This is a Tone/Mood question. Phrases like "burning indignation" (line 7), the emotional exclamation "Would to God you could know" (line 6), and the emphatic questioning at the end (lines 17-21) all convey passionate anger at injustice. Choice (A) contradicts the forceful, demanding tone throughout-Stanton demands rights (line 6), not pleads for them. Choice (C) is incorrect because the highly emotional language contradicts a detached scholarly tone.
20. Ans: (A) – women are punished legally for an act that should bring happiness and partnership
Explanation: This is an Inference question. Lines 17-21 describe marriage as seeking "companionship and protection," then ask if this natural desire is a crime deserving punishment, emphasizing the irony that pursuing partnership results in legal death (line 16). Choice (B) is not mentioned anywhere in the passage. Choice (C) is too narrow and misses the point-the injustice is not about amounts of property but about losing all legal identity (lines 11-16).