GS2/Governance
Parliamentary Panel Flags Poor Financial Planning by NITI Aayog
Why in News?
A Parliamentary Standing Committee has raised concerns about the financial planning effectiveness of NITI Aayog and the Ministry of Planning, specifically citing the ongoing issue of underutilisation of allocated budgets.
Key Takeaways
- The Parliamentary Committee criticized the Ministry for consistently low expenditure compared to budget estimates.
- Despite poor financial management, the Ministry has sought increased budget allocations for upcoming fiscal years.
Additional Details
- NITI Aayog:Established in 2015, it serves as India's primary policy think tank aimed at promoting cooperative federalism and evidence-based policymaking. Key functions include:
- Designing long-term policy frameworks
- Monitoring and evaluating government schemes
- Providing strategic and technical advice to both the Centre and States
- Facilitating innovation and development initiatives
- Parliamentary Committee's Findings: The Committee found that in the fiscal year 2023-24, actual expenditures were only about Rs. 290.81 crore against a Budget Estimate of Rs. 824.39 crore, indicating a mere 35% usage of allocated funds.
- The Committee also noted a concerning trend of requesting higher budgets despite low spending rates, with a proposed increase of 22% for 2026-27.
- Weak planning and implementation were highlighted, with significant delays in executing planned activities and a tendency to rush expenditures in the last quarter of the fiscal year.
- The Committee recommended realistic budgeting practices, enhanced monitoring mechanisms, and better fund utilisation strategies to address the identified issues.
The findings suggest deeper issues in public financial management, raising concerns about the impact on development outcomes, accountability, and fiscal discipline in India.
GS2/Polity
Why in News?
The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026, has been introduced in Parliament, proposing significant changes to the existing 2019 law governing transgender rights. The most controversial aspect of the Bill is the proposed removal of the right to self-identify one's gender, a right previously established by the Supreme Court in the landmark NALSA v. Union of India (2014) ruling. Instead, the Bill mandates medical certification for legal gender recognition, which has drawn widespread criticism from transgender and LGBTQ+ advocacy groups, who believe it undermines dignity, autonomy, and hard-won legal rights, effectively rolling back progressive jurisprudence in India.
Key Takeaways
- The Bill proposes to remove the right to self-identify gender.
- It introduces medical certification requirements for legal gender recognition.
- The changes have faced backlash from the transgender and LGBTQ+ communities.
- It marks a shift towards a more medicalized and restrictive definition of transgender identity.
Additional Details
- Definitions of Key Terms: The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, defines a transgender person as someone whose gender does not match their sex assigned at birth. This includes trans men, trans women, intersex individuals, and genderqueer people.
- Distinction Between Sex and Gender:
- Sex: Refers to biological characteristics determined by anatomy, chromosomes, and hormones, categorized as male or female.
- Gender: A social and cultural construct that defines roles, behaviors, and expectations, varying across societies and time.
- Gender Identity: A personal sense of one's gender, which may or may not align with the sex assigned at birth. This forms the basis of transgender identity.
- Impact of NALSA Judgment: The Supreme Court recognized transgender persons as a "third gender" entitled to all fundamental rights under the Constitution, emphasizing the right to self-identification without medical intervention.
- New Changes in the Amendment Bill:
- Recognition is restricted to specific socio-cultural identities, such as kinner, hijra, and aravani, and excludes broader definitions.
- The Bill introduces a medical board for identity certification, replacing the previous administrative process.
- It imposes stricter penalties for crimes against transgender individuals, expanding punishments significantly.
The proposed amendments have raised serious concerns regarding human rights violations, as activists argue that the removal of self-identification undermines dignity and autonomy. The burden of proof will now fall on individuals, requiring medical documentation to validate their identity, which many fear could lead to discrimination and further marginalization within healthcare systems. Overall, the Bill shifts from a rights-based approach to a more medicalized framework, significantly altering the progress made under the 2019 Act.
GS2/International Relations
India's West Asia Reset, More Sinned Against Than Sinning
Why in News?
India's West Asia policy has ignited considerable domestic discussion, necessitating an objective evaluation of significant trends due to the country's crucial national interests in the region.
Key Takeaways
- India has enhanced its diplomatic engagement with West Asia, marked by numerous high-level visits and economic partnerships.
- The security dynamics in the Gulf are shifting, prompting a reevaluation of traditional alliances.
Additional Details
- Rising Diplomatic Engagement:In the last decade, India's involvement in West Asia has intensified, with Prime Minister Modi visiting Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) nations 15 times and engaging with Israel, Iran, and Palestine. Key outcomes include:
- Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreements (CEPA) with the UAE and Oman.
- A bilateral trade exceeding $160 billion and a diaspora of 10 million Indians in the region.
- Improved defence and security collaboration, showcasing India's status as a responsible power.
- Changing Security Dynamics: The Gulf monarchies are now prioritizing external partners based on their capability to ensure regime security and state stability. Recent conflicts have led them to seek alternative security partnerships, moving away from traditional U.S. reliance.
- India's Policy Reset:Recognizing the shift in regional dynamics, India is focusing on strategic alignments with key states, evident through:
- Direct outreach to GCC leaders amid escalating tensions.
- Engagements with Iran and other regional players.
- Domestic Criticism: Concerns include the timing of Modi's Israel visit, perceived compromises on Palestine, and the alignment with Western interests. However, the government defends the timing as pre-planned and not indicative of future military developments.
- Strategic Opportunities: The weakening of the U.S.-led "Oil-for-Security" model presents India with opportunities to enhance security partnerships and economic ties in West Asia.
As India's West Asia policy evolves, it is crucial for the country to maintain strategic flexibility and prioritize national interests, demonstrating a commitment to adapting to the changing geopolitical landscape.
GS2/Polity
Maternity Leave for Adoptive Mothers - Supreme Court Redefining Parenthood Rights
Why in News?
The Supreme Court of India has reinterpreted the provisions of the Code on Social Security, 2020, to grant 12 weeks of maternity leave to all adoptive mothers, regardless of the child's age. In parallel, the Court has urged the Union Government to recognize paternity leave as a social security benefit. This landmark judgment also connects to an ongoing constitutional challenge to Section 5(4) of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, which previously limited maternity benefits for adoptive mothers based on the age of the child.
Key Takeaways
- Adoptive mothers are now entitled to maternity leave irrespective of the child's age.
- The Court emphasized that maternity benefits should be linked to motherhood rather than childbirth.
- The judgment classified maternity protection as a basic human right.
- It highlighted the necessity of paternity leave for fathers' involvement in early childcare.
Additional Details
- Removal of Age Restriction: The Court read down Section 60(4) of the Code on Social Security, allowing all adoptive mothers 12 weeks of maternity leave, irrespective of whether the child is above or below three months old.
- Motherhood Beyond Biological Childbirth: The Court stated that maternity benefits should encompass caregiving roles of adoptive mothers, affirming that adoption is an exercise of reproductive and decisional autonomy under Article 21 of the Constitution.
- Maternity Leave as a Human Right: The judgment frames maternity protection as essential for economic security and workplace inclusion for women, highlighting the importance of supporting reproductive choices without employment penalties.
- Emphasis on Role of Fathers: The Court pointed out that caregiving should involve both parents, advocating for a paternity leave policy to prevent gender stereotypes and enhance fathers' roles in childcare.
The Supreme Court's ruling represents a significant shift towards a care-centric understanding of parenthood, recognizing adoptive motherhood on par with biological motherhood. It advocates for equitable treatment and calls for legislative action to ensure that parental rights translate into real social security for all families.
GS3/Economy
Global Energy Shock Threatens India's Goldilocks Era
Why in News?
Rising geopolitical tensions and energy disruptions, particularly due to conflicts such as the Russia-Ukraine war and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, are significantly impacting India's economy. These energy shocks are exerting pressure on the Indian rupee, inflation rates, and overall economic stability, thereby jeopardizing what has been termed India's "Goldilocks phase" of stable growth coupled with low inflation.
Key Takeaways
- India's dependency on imported energy makes it vulnerable to global price fluctuations.
- Recent crises have shown that external shocks can affect the entire economy, not just financial markets.
- Rising oil prices could lead to increased inflation and growth instability.
Additional Details
- Structural Energy Vulnerability: India remains heavily dependent on imported energy, exposing the economy to global price shocks.
- Pressure on the Rupee: The Indian rupee has been under pressure due to weak foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows and significant portfolio outflows, amounting to $11.8 billion in 2025 and $4 billion in 2026 thus far.
- Exchange Rate Trends: The rupee recently fell below ₹90-91 per dollar and has breached ₹92, with concerns that it could approach ₹100 if crude prices remain high.
- Impact of High Oil Prices: If oil prices exceed $120 per barrel, the oil trade deficit could soar to $220 billion, and the Current Account Deficit (CAD) may exceed 3.1% of GDP, risking sharp depreciation of the rupee and rising inflation.
- Recent Economic Performance: India has been experiencing a "Goldilocks" phase with GDP growth rates rising from 6.7% to as high as 8.4%, while inflation dropped to 2.75%, but this stability is threatened by rising crude oil prices.
- Domestic Impact: Government measures to manage gas shortages include prioritizing supply to key sectors and increasing LPG prices by ₹60 per cylinder.
- Inflation Risks: Nomura has adjusted its CPI inflation forecast for 2026-27 to 4.5%, with potential for inflation to exceed 5% if crude oil prices rise to $100 per barrel.
- Economic Growth Outlook: The RBI anticipates GDP growth between 6.9% and 7% for early 2026-27, with some economists predicting downward adjustments due to rising oil prices.
- Government Response: The government is considering the creation of an Economic Stabilisation Fund of ₹1 lakh crore to mitigate shocks from global volatility.
The current situation remains dynamic, and the economic impact will depend on the resolution of conflicts and stabilization of energy supply. The pressing need for energy diversification and macroeconomic resilience has never been clearer for India as it navigates these turbulent times.
GS3/Environment
A Bit of a Blur Over India's New Carbon Credit Plan
Why in News?
The Union Budget 2026 has ignited substantial debate following the announcement of a ₹20,000 crore allocation for a carbon credit program, leading to confusion regarding its intended purpose.
Key Takeaways
- The allocation is primarily aimed at supporting industrial carbon capture technologies.
- There is a growing narrative suggesting that it may also benefit farmers through carbon credits.
- The official framework explicitly excludes agriculture from CCUS strategies.
Additional Details
- CCUS (Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage): The Budget's focus lies in R&D for CCUS, targeting hard-to-abate sectors such as power, steel, cement, refineries, and chemicals, which are difficult to decarbonize through renewable energy alone.
- The ₹20,000 crore allocation is intended to support large-scale deployment of CCUS technologies that capture carbon dioxide emissions directly from industrial sources.
- Agriculture, despite being a source of greenhouse gas emissions, is explicitly excluded from CCUS strategies, as emissions from this sector are diffuse and biologically driven.
- There is a competing narrative suggesting that farmers could benefit from carbon credits through sustainable practices, supported by the voluntary carbon market, which rewards agricultural carbon sequestration efforts.
- The confusion arises from the broad term "carbon credit programme" used in the Budget, which lacks specificity and has blurred the lines between industrial carbon capture and agricultural carbon sequestration.
In conclusion, the controversies surrounding the Union Budget 2026 reflect both misunderstandings and opportunities. While the ₹20,000 crore allocation is aimed at industrial decarbonization through CCUS, the interest in agricultural carbon markets reveals a significant potential for enhancing farmer income and contributing to climate goals. The government must clarify its objectives to avoid misconceptions while fostering both industrial and agricultural carbon strategies.
GS1/ History and Culture
Sahitya Akademi Awards 2025

Why is it Newsworthy?
- The Sahitya Akademi has recently announced the Sahitya Akademi Awards for 2025, recognizing literary works across 24 languages.
- This year, the awards honor a diverse range of genres, including poetry, novels, short stories, essays, literary criticism, autobiographies, and memoirs.
- Among the distinguished winners are former diplomat Navtej Sarna for his English novel "Crimson Spring," Hindi writer Mamta Kalia for her memoir "Jeete Jee Allahabad," and Tamil author Sa Tamilselvan for his literary criticism work "Thamiz Sirukathaiyin Thadangal."
- The backdrop for these awards includes a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed in July 2025 between the Ministry of Culture and its four autonomous institutions-the National School of Drama, Sangeet Natak Akademi, Lalit Kala Akademi, and Sahitya Akademi. This MoU called for a restructuring of awards in consultation with the Ministry, leading to the current recognition of outstanding literary contributions.
Sahitya Akademi Awards
- Overview: The Sahitya Akademi Award, established in 1954, is India's second-highest literary honor, aimed at recognizing exceptional literary talent and promoting the country's rich multilingual heritage. It is conferred annually by the Sahitya Akademi, an autonomous body under the Ministry of Culture.
- Linguistic Coverage: The award is presented in 24 languages, including the 22 languages listed in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution, as well as English and Rajasthani.
- Eligibility: To be eligible for the award, the work must be an original contribution published within five years preceding the award year, and the author must be an Indian citizen.
- Nature of the Award: Each year, one award is given per language for the most outstanding original book in recognized genres, such as poetry, novels, drama, or essays, published in the preceding five years. The recipient receives a copper plaque, a shawl, a citation, and a cash prize of Rs 1,00,000, which has increased from its original value of Rs 5,000 in 1955.
- Other Notable Sahitya Akademi Honors: In addition to the main award, the Sahitya Akademi also offers honors such as the Yuva Puraskar for young writers, the Bal Sahitya Puraskar for children's literature, the Sahitya Akademi Fellowship, and the Bhasha Samman.
GS2/Polity and Governance
Menstrual Leave in India
Why is it in the News?- The Supreme Court of India expressed concerns during a hearing regarding the potential impact of making paid menstrual pain leave a legal right on women's employment opportunities.
- The court was considering a petition that advocated for a uniform national policy on menstrual leave for working women and students.
- The petition argued that menstrual leave is part of the right to dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution and highlighted India's commitment to international conventions on women's rights.
What are the Supreme Court's Observations on Menstrual Leave Policies?
- Menstrual leave (or Period leave): It refers to workplace or academic policies allowing employees or students to take time off during menstruation due to pain or discomfort (dysmenorrhea).
- The leave may be paid, unpaid, or include rest breaks during the menstrual cycle.
- Medical studies suggest that over 50% of menstruating individuals experience menstrual pain for a few days every month.
- Around 15-25% experience moderate to severe pain, which can affect daily productivity.
Supreme Court Observations:
- The Chief Justice of India noted that making menstrual leave a mandatory statutory right could lead to unintended workplace discrimination.
- The Court cautioned that mandatory menstrual leave may discourage employers from hiring women, as they may perceive them as a costlier workforce.
- The Court feared women might be denied leadership roles, promotions, or major responsibilities due to assumptions about frequent absences.
- The Court supported voluntary menstrual leave initiatives by states and companies, rather than a compulsory legal mandate.
- The Court stated that framing such a policy falls under the executive and legislature, advising the government to examine the issue after stakeholder consultation.
Judicial Pronouncements Regarding Menstruation
- Shailendra Mani Tripathi v. Union of India (2023): The Supreme Court declined to mandate a nationwide menstrual leave policy, citing complex policy implications, and advised the petitioner to approach the Ministry of Women and Child Development.
- The Court noted that while female labour force participation has risen significantly, many women, especially in informal and insecure employment, cannot afford to lose workdays, suggesting that support measures like free sanitary products and flexible leave provisions may be more practical.
- Dr Jaya Thakur v. Government of India & Ors. (2026): The Supreme Court of India recognised Menstrual Health and Hygiene (MHH) as a fundamental right under Article 21 (Right to Life and Dignity).
Arguments in Favour of Menstrual Leave
- Substantive Equality: Recognises that true workplace equality requires acknowledging biological realities such as menstrual pain (dysmenorrhea), which can affect productivity.
- Constitutional Basis: Menstrual leave can be justified under Article 21 (Right to Life and Dignity) and Article 42 of the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP), which call for humane working conditions and protection of health. Additionally, Article 15(3) empowers the State to make special provisions for women and children, providing a constitutional basis for such measures.
- Breaking Social Taboos: Formal recognition of menstrual leave can help destigmatise menstruation and normalise it as a natural biological process.
- Improved Health and Productivity: Allowing rest during severe menstrual pain can improve overall productivity and well-being by reducing stress and health complications.
- Gender-Sensitive Workplace Policies: Menstrual leave can make workplaces more inclusive and supportive for women, promoting gender-sensitive labour practices.
- Reduced Presenteeism: It helps address presenteeism (working while unwell), which often leads to lower efficiency and long-term health issues.
Current Status of Menstrual Leave in India and Globally
- No National Law: India currently does not have a central law mandating menstrual leave for women employees or students.
- State-Level Initiatives: Bihar allows two days of menstrual leave per month for women government employees (since 1992). Kerala provides menstrual leave and attendance relaxation for female students in universities.
- Private Sector Policies: Some companies such as Zomato, Swiggy, and Byju's have introduced voluntary menstrual leave policies for their employees.
- Legislative Attempts: Private members' bills such as the Menstruation Benefits Bill (2017) and the Right of Women to Menstrual Leave and Free Access to Menstrual Health Products Bill, 2022 have been proposed but none have been enacted into law.
- Global Practices: European nations like Spain and Sweden introduced state-funded paid period leave. Asian countries like Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, Philippines, Taiwan and Indonesia have menstrual leave laws.
However, data shows that the actual utilization rate by women in these countries (especially Japan and South Korea) is extremely low, often under 1%, due to deep-seated cultural stigma and the fear of career repercussions.
Various Schemes to Promote Menstrual Hygiene Management
- The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act (RTE), 2009
- Menstrual hygiene scheme launched by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
- Rashtriya Kishore Swasthya Karyakram
- SABLA programme of Ministry of Women and Child Development
- National Rural Livelihood Mission of the Ministry of Rural Development
- Swachh Bharat Mission and Swachh Bharat: Swachh Vidyalaya (SB:SV)
- Guidelines for Gender Issues in Sanitation, 2017
- The National Guidelines on Menstrual Hygiene Management
- Scheme for Promotion of Menstrual Hygiene among adolescent girls in the age group of 10-19 years (supported by the National Health Mission)
Measures to Strengthen Menstrual Health Support Without Undermining Workplace Equality
- Adopt a "Health Leave" Framework: Introduce gender-neutral short-term health leave (2 days/month) applicable to conditions like severe migraines, dysmenorrhea, or endometriosis. This avoids hiring bias against women while still addressing menstrual health needs.
- Workplace Accommodation Model: Mandate reasonable workplace accommodations such as flexible hours, remote work, rest rooms, and lighter assignments during severe menstrual pain.
- Menstrual Health in Occupational Safety Standards: Integrate menstrual health into labour welfare and workplace health guidelines under labour codes and Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020.
- Evidence-Based Policy Making: Commission national studies on menstrual health, productivity loss, and workplace discrimination, enabling policy decisions grounded in data rather than assumptions.
- Targeted Support in Education Sector: Universities can adopt attendance relaxation policies and optional leave for students, similar to the Kerala model, to reduce dropouts linked to menstrual health issues.
- Corporate ESG Incentives: Encourage companies to adopt menstrual health policies as part of ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) standards, linking gender-sensitive workplace practices with corporate ratings.
Conclusion
The debate on menstrual leave highlights the need to find a balance between women's health and dignity and workplace equality. While it is important to continue the conversation on menstrual equity, any policy should be based on legal principles, social sensitivity, and practical enforceability, keeping in mind potential unintended consequences. Until then, the idea of "liberty to bleed" may remain more of a hopeful aspiration than a reality.