Answer all 20 questions in this section. Each question has four answer choices (A, B, C, D). Select the one best answer for each question. Questions may be based on data tables, statistics, maps, and other stimulus materials. Each correct answer is worth 1 point.
The table below shows economic data for four countries in 2020.

Based on Rostow's stages of economic development model, which country is most likely in the traditional society stage?
A transnational corporation relocates its manufacturing facilities from Germany to Vietnam primarily to take advantage of lower labor costs. This practice is best described as an example of which geographic concept?
Data Table: Manufacturing Employment Changes (2000-2020)

The data above best illustrate which economic process?
Weber's least cost theory of industrial location emphasizes which three main factors in determining the optimal location for manufacturing facilities?
A technology company establishes its headquarters in Silicon Valley, California, specifically because of the presence of venture capital firms, research universities, and a large pool of specialized engineers. This location decision best exemplifies which concept?
Human Development Index (HDI) Components for Selected Countries (2020)

Which statement best explains why the Human Development Index (HDI) is considered a more comprehensive measure of development than Gross Domestic Product (GDP) alone?
The Gender Inequality Index (GII) measures disparities between men and women in which three dimensions?
Special Economic Zones (SEZs) in countries such as China and India are designed to promote economic development by
Energy Consumption by Sector (2020)

The data in the table above best support which conclusion about patterns of economic development?
Rostow's modernization model has been criticized for which of the following reasons?
Dependency theory argues that less developed countries remain poor primarily because
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Flows in Billions USD (2019)

Based on the data, which region's FDI pattern most strongly reflects characteristics of extractive economies associated with dependency theory?
Microfinance initiatives, which provide small loans to entrepreneurs in developing countries, are examples of which approach to economic development?
A country implements policies to protect its domestic automobile industry by imposing high tariffs on imported vehicles and restricting foreign ownership of manufacturing plants. This strategy is best classified as
Economic Sectors and Employment Distribution
Country A has undergone significant economic transformation over the past 30 years. In 1990, 65% of the workforce was employed in agriculture, 20% in manufacturing, and 15% in services. By 2020, the distribution had shifted to 18% in agriculture, 28% in manufacturing, and 54% in services. During this period, GDP per capita increased from $2,400 to $23,600.
The pattern described above best illustrates which economic development process?
Which statement best explains why break-of-bulk points, such as ports and rail terminals, often become favorable locations for manufacturing?
The establishment of the maquiladora zone along the United States-Mexico border primarily benefits manufacturers by providing
Women's Economic Participation Data (2020)

The data illustrate that gender equality in economic development
Just-in-time delivery systems used by automobile manufacturers reduce inventory costs but require which geographic condition?
A "footloose" industry is characterized by
Answer both questions in this section. Each question has three sub-parts (A, B, C). Use complete sentences for all responses. Where questions require examples, provide specific, real-world cases. Make sure to address all components of each sub-part. Suggested time: 25 minutes per question.
Map Reference: Global Distribution of Export Processing Zones
The map (not shown) depicts the locations of Export Processing Zones (EPZs) worldwide. Concentrations of EPZs are visible in coastal regions of Mexico, Central America, Southeast Asia, South Asia, and North Africa. Very few EPZs appear in North America, Western Europe, or Australia. The highest density of EPZs is found along coastal areas with access to major shipping routes.
The concept of comparative advantage is central to international trade theory and influences patterns of global economic specialization.

An Export Processing Zone (EPZ) is a designated industrial area within a country, typically near ports or border regions, where foreign and domestic companies can import raw materials or components duty-free, manufacture goods using local labor, and then export finished products with reduced taxes and tariffs. EPZs are created by governments to attract foreign direct investment, create employment opportunities, and stimulate manufacturing for global markets. Companies operating in EPZs often benefit from relaxed labor and environmental regulations compared to the rest of the country.
Export Processing Zones are predominantly located in less developed or newly industrializing countries rather than more developed countries because these nations offer significantly lower labor costs, which attract foreign manufacturers seeking to reduce production expenses. For example, textile and electronics companies from Japan, the United States, and Europe establish factories in EPZs in Bangladesh, Vietnam, or Mexico because workers in these countries earn a fraction of what workers in developed countries command, sometimes as little as $2-5 per day compared to $15-25 per hour in developed nations. This wage differential allows companies to manufacture products at much lower costs while still accessing global markets through export-oriented production. More developed countries, with their higher wages and stronger labor protections, do not offer the same cost advantages, making them less attractive locations for EPZs focused on labor-intensive manufacturing.
The establishment of Export Processing Zones in Bangladesh, particularly in the garment manufacturing sector, illustrates both significant economic benefits and serious social and environmental challenges. On the economic benefit side, EPZs in Bangladesh have created approximately 4 million jobs, primarily for women who previously had limited formal employment opportunities. The garment industry accounts for over 80% of Bangladesh's export earnings, contributing substantially to GDP growth and poverty reduction. Foreign direct investment through EPZs has helped Bangladesh transition from an agriculture-based economy toward industrialization, lifting millions out of extreme poverty.
However, these economic gains come with considerable social and environmental costs. Social challenges include poor working conditions, including extremely low wages (often $100-150 per month), excessive working hours (60-80 hours per week), and dangerous factory conditions that have resulted in tragedies such as the 2013 Rana Plaza building collapse that killed over 1,100 garment workers. Workers, predominantly young women, often face harassment, lack job security, and have limited ability to organize unions due to weak labor law enforcement in EPZs. Environmental challenges include severe water pollution from textile dyeing processes that discharge untreated chemical waste into rivers, air pollution from factories operating with minimal environmental controls, and contribution to Bangladesh's growing solid waste problem from fabric scraps and packaging materials.
This example demonstrates the complex trade-offs inherent in EPZ development: while they can generate much-needed employment and export revenue for developing countries, they often do so at the expense of worker welfare and environmental sustainability, raising questions about the long-term desirability of this development pathway.
Comparative advantage is an economic principle stating that countries or regions should specialize in producing goods and services they can produce at a lower opportunity cost relative to other goods, even if they are not the most efficient producer in absolute terms. When countries specialize according to their comparative advantages and engage in trade, total global production increases and all trading partners can benefit. Comparative advantage is determined by factors such as labor costs, natural resource availability, technological capabilities, climate conditions, and accumulated expertise in particular industries.
Comparative advantage influences the spatial distribution of manufacturing industries at the global scale by encouraging geographic specialization based on regional production advantages. Countries and regions concentrate on manufacturing products where they have relative cost or quality advantages, leading to distinct global patterns of industrial location. For example, labor-intensive manufacturing such as textiles and apparel has concentrated in countries like Bangladesh, Vietnam, and Cambodia where low wages provide a comparative advantage in cost-sensitive production. In contrast, high-technology manufacturing such as semiconductors and precision electronics concentrates in locations like Taiwan, South Korea, and Singapore, where advanced technical education systems, established supply chains, and accumulated engineering expertise provide comparative advantage in skill-intensive production.
This specialization creates global production networks where different stages of manufacturing occur in different countries based on their comparative advantages: raw materials might be extracted in resource-rich African or South American countries, processed into components in middle-income Asian countries with moderate labor costs and developing industrial capacity, assembled into finished products in low-wage countries like Vietnam or Bangladesh, and finally designed and marketed by corporations headquartered in high-income countries like the United States or Germany. Transportation and communication technologies enable this spatial fragmentation of production, allowing companies to locate each production stage in the location with the greatest comparative advantage for that specific activity, resulting in complex global supply chains that span multiple continents.
Reliance on comparative advantage in primary commodities can significantly limit long-term economic development, as illustrated by the experience of Zambia and its dependence on copper exports. Zambia possesses abundant copper deposits and low extraction costs, giving it a clear comparative advantage in copper production. Copper mining accounts for approximately 70% of Zambia's export earnings and contributes substantially to government revenue through mining taxes and royalties. This specialization follows the logic of comparative advantage-Zambia produces what it can produce most efficiently relative to other goods.
However, this specialization has created several development limitations. First, price volatility: global copper prices fluctuate dramatically based on demand cycles in manufacturing countries, causing Zambia's export revenues and government budgets to swing unpredictably. When copper prices collapsed in the 1970s and again in the 2000s, Zambia experienced severe economic crises, demonstrating the vulnerability of commodity-dependent economies. Second, limited value addition: Zambia exports raw or minimally processed copper rather than higher-value manufactured products. This means that most of the value chain-refining, manufacturing copper wire, producing electrical components, and final product assembly-occurs in other countries, limiting the employment, technological learning, and economic multiplier effects that remain in Zambia. Third, Dutch disease effects: the dominance of copper mining has attracted investment and skilled labor away from other potentially productive sectors, preventing economic diversification. The mining sector employs relatively few workers despite its large economic output, limiting employment generation.
Furthermore, primary commodity dependence perpetuates unequal trade relationships described by dependency theory. Zambia has limited bargaining power with multinational mining corporations and copper purchasers because it lacks alternative export sectors. Manufacturing countries that purchase Zambian copper benefit from stable raw material supplies at competitive prices, then add substantial value through manufacturing, capturing most of the economic benefits from the final products.
This example demonstrates that while comparative advantage in primary commodities may appear economically rational in the short term, it can trap countries in low-value positions within global production networks, limit technological advancement, create economic vulnerability to price shocks, and ultimately constrain long-term development prospects. Successful development often requires strategic policies that move beyond initial comparative advantages toward building new capabilities in higher-value manufacturing and services, even if this requires temporary protection or support for emerging industries-a lesson learned by countries like South Korea that transformed from commodity exporters to manufacturing powerhouses.