| Step | Description |
|---|---|
| 1. Trip Generation | Estimates total number of trips produced by and attracted to each zone |
| 2. Trip Distribution | Distributes trips between origin and destination zones |
| 3. Mode Choice | Determines transportation mode for each trip |
| 4. Trip Assignment | Assigns trips to specific routes in the network |
| Method | Application |
|---|---|
| Cross-Classification | Uses household characteristics (income, size, auto ownership) to predict trip rates |
| Regression Analysis | Linear equations relating trips to socioeconomic variables |
| Trip Rates | Average trips per household or per capita by zone type |
Tij = Pi × Aj × Fij × Kij / Σ(Aj × Fij × Kij)
| Variable | Definition |
|---|---|
| Tij | Trips from zone i to zone j |
| Pi | Productions in zone i |
| Aj | Attractions in zone j |
| Fij | Friction factor (function of travel time or distance) |
| Kij | Socioeconomic adjustment factor |
Pn(i) = eUin / ΣeUjn
| Method | Description |
|---|---|
| All-or-Nothing | All trips assigned to shortest path; ignores congestion |
| Incremental | Trips assigned in increments with link times updated between iterations |
| Capacity Restraint | Iterative process updating travel times based on volume-to-capacity ratios |
| User Equilibrium | No driver can reduce travel time by switching routes (Wardrop's first principle) |
| System Optimal | Minimizes total system travel time (Wardrop's second principle) |
t = t0[1 + α(v/c)β]
| Study Type | Purpose and Application |
|---|---|
| Average Daily Traffic (ADT) | Total volume during year divided by 365 days |
| Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) | Average 24-hour volume over full year; used for planning and design |
| Average Weekday Traffic (AWDT) | Average for Monday through Friday |
| Peak Hour Volume (PHV) | Maximum hourly volume; used for capacity analysis |
| Design Hour Volume (DHV) | 30th highest hourly volume of year (K30) |
PHF = Hourly Volume / (Peak 15-min volume × 4)
| Method | Application |
|---|---|
| License Plate Survey | Record plates at cordon line stations; match origins and destinations |
| Roadside Interview | Direct questioning of drivers at roadside locations |
| Home Interview | Household survey of trip patterns; most comprehensive but expensive |
| Postcard Survey | Distributed to drivers; returned by mail |
| GPS/Mobile Phone Data | Automated tracking of vehicle movements |
| Vehicle Class | FHWA Classification |
|---|---|
| Motorcycles | Class 1 |
| Passenger Cars | Class 2 |
| Pickup/Van | Class 3 |
| Buses | Class 4 |
| Single-Unit Trucks (2-axle) | Class 5 |
| Single-Unit Trucks (3+ axle) | Class 6-7 |
| Tractor-Trailers | Class 8-13 |
| LOS | Description |
|---|---|
| A | Free flow; unrestricted operations; minimal delays |
| B | Stable flow; slight delays; good operating conditions |
| C | Stable flow; acceptable delays; satisfactory operations |
| D | Approaching unstable flow; tolerable delays; declining service |
| E | Unstable flow; significant delays; at or near capacity |
| F | Forced flow; extreme delays; breakdown conditions |
vp = V / (PHF × N × fHV × fp)
| Variable | Definition |
|---|---|
| vp | Flow rate in pc/h/ln |
| V | Demand volume (veh/h) |
| PHF | Peak hour factor |
| N | Number of lanes |
| fHV | Heavy vehicle adjustment factor |
| fp | Driver population factor |
fHV = 1 / [1 + PT(ET - 1) + PR(ER - 1)]
s = s0 × fw × fHV × fg × fp × fbb × fa × fLU × fRT × fLT
c = s × (g/C)
X = v/c
d = d1(PF) + d2 + d3
| LOS | Control Delay (sec/veh) |
|---|---|
| A | ≤ 10 |
| B | > 10-20 |
| C | > 20-35 |
| D | > 35-55 |
| E | > 55-80 |
| F | > 80 |
| Phase | Activities |
|---|---|
| 1. Goal Setting | Define objectives, performance measures, and evaluation criteria |
| 2. Data Collection | Traffic counts, socioeconomic data, land use, travel surveys |
| 3. Analysis | Travel demand forecasting, capacity analysis, deficiency identification |
| 4. Alternative Development | Generate potential solutions and improvement strategies |
| 5. Evaluation | Compare alternatives using benefit-cost analysis and multi-criteria methods |
| 6. Implementation | Programming, funding, design, construction |
| 7. Monitoring | Post-implementation evaluation and performance tracking |
| Act | Key Provisions |
|---|---|
| ISTEA (1991) | Intermodal emphasis; flexible funding; enhanced planning requirements |
| TEA-21 (1998) | Continued ISTEA policies; increased funding |
| SAFETEA-LU (2005) | Safety emphasis; environmental streamlining; planning factors |
| MAP-21 (2012) | Performance-based planning; consolidated programs |
| FAST Act (2015) | Long-term funding stability; continued performance measures |
| IIJA/BIL (2021) | Major infrastructure investment; resilience and sustainability focus |
| Land Use | Typical Daily Trip Rate |
|---|---|
| Single-Family Residential | 9-10 trips/dwelling unit |
| Apartment/Condo | 5-7 trips/dwelling unit |
| Shopping Center | 40-50 trips/1000 sq ft GFA |
| Office | 10-15 trips/1000 sq ft GFA |
| Restaurant | 100-130 trips/1000 sq ft GFA |
| Category | Example Measures |
|---|---|
| Mobility | Average speed, travel time index, congestion duration |
| Accessibility | Jobs within 30 minutes, transit access to essential services |
| Safety | Crash rate, fatalities per 100 million VMT, serious injuries |
| Reliability | Planning time index, travel time variability |
| Economic | Benefit-cost ratio, return on investment, freight delay costs |
| Environmental | Emissions (CO2, NOx, PM), noise levels, water quality impacts |
| Asset Condition | Pavement condition index (PCI), bridge condition rating |
B/C Ratio = PW(Benefits) / PW(Costs)
Net Present Value (NPV) = PW(Benefits) - PW(Costs)
PW = Σ[At / (1 + i)t]
| Benefit Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Travel Time Savings | Reduced delay × value of time × annual volume |
| Vehicle Operating Cost | Reduced fuel, maintenance, depreciation |
| Safety | Crash reduction × crash costs by severity |
| Environmental | Reduced emissions, noise, runoff treatment |
| Reliability | Reduced travel time variability |
| Severity | Comprehensive Cost (2020 dollars) |
|---|---|
| Fatal (K) | $11.3 million |
| Incapacitating Injury (A) | $650,000 |
| Non-Incapacitating Injury (B) | $180,000 |
| Possible Injury (C) | $90,000 |
| Property Damage Only (O) | $11,000 |
EUAC = (P × CRF) + A
CRF = [i(1 + i)n] / [(1 + i)n - 1]
| Mode | Characteristics |
|---|---|
| Local Bus | Frequent stops (every 2-4 blocks); speeds 8-15 mph |
| Express Bus | Limited stops; freeway operation; speeds 25-45 mph |
| Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) | Dedicated lanes, station platforms, signal priority; speeds 15-25 mph |
| Light Rail Transit (LRT) | Electric rail; street or dedicated right-of-way; capacity 200-400/vehicle |
| Heavy Rail/Subway | Grade-separated; high capacity 600-1,500/vehicle; speeds 30-40 mph |
| Commuter Rail | Regional service; shared freight corridors; peak period focus |
| Measure | Definition |
|---|---|
| Passengers per Hour | Productivity measure; linked trips per vehicle-hour |
| Passengers per Mile | Ridership per vehicle-mile traveled |
| Farebox Recovery Ratio | Fare revenue / operating cost; target 0.20-0.50 |
| Operating Cost per Hour | Total operating expenses / revenue vehicle-hours |
| Service Coverage | Percent of population within 0.25-0.50 mile of transit |
| On-Time Performance | Percent of trips within 5 minutes of schedule |
Capacity = (3600 / Headway) × Load Factor × Vehicle Capacity
Walk Interval = 7 seconds (minimum)
Pedestrian Clearance = L / (3.5 ft/sec)
| Facility | Description |
|---|---|
| Shared Lane | No dedicated space; shared with motor vehicles; sharrows for guidance |
| Bike Lane | Striped lane on roadway; 5-6 ft width; one-way operation |
| Buffered Bike Lane | Bike lane with painted buffer (2-3 ft) separating from traffic |
| Protected Bike Lane | Physical barrier separation; 5-7 ft width; parked cars or bollards |
| Shared-Use Path | Two-way off-street facility; 10-14 ft width; shared with pedestrians |
| Document Type | Application |
|---|---|
| Categorical Exclusion (CE) | Minimal environmental impact; no significant effects |
| Environmental Assessment (EA) | Uncertain impacts; determines if EIS required; results in FONSI or EIS |
| Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) | Significant impacts; detailed analysis of alternatives and mitigation |
| Pollutant | Source |
|---|---|
| Carbon Monoxide (CO) | Incomplete combustion; hot-spot analysis at intersections |
| Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) | High-temperature combustion; ozone precursor |
| Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) | Fuel evaporation and combustion; ozone precursor |
| Particulate Matter (PM2.5, PM10) | Exhaust, tire/brake wear, road dust |
| Greenhouse Gases (CO2, CH4) | Fuel combustion; climate impact |
Intersection Crash Rate = (C × 1,000,000) / (365 × ADT × N)
Roadway Segment Crash Rate = (C × 100,000,000) / (365 × ADT × L × N)
Npredicted = Nspf × CMF1 × CMF2 × ... × CMFn × C
Nexpected = w × Npredicted + (1 - w) × Nobserved
| Countermeasure | CMF Range |
|---|---|
| Convert to Roundabout | 0.20-0.50 (injury crashes) |
| Add Left-Turn Lane | 0.60-0.80 |
| Add Right-Turn Lane | 0.70-0.90 |
| Install Lighting | 0.60-0.75 (night crashes) |
| Rumble Strips (centerline) | 0.55-0.75 (head-on/opposite crashes) |
| High-Friction Surface Treatment | 0.60-0.85 (wet crashes) |