MCQs Test: Floor/ lift based puzzles - 1 - Banking Exams MCQ

Pulkit lives on first floor.
Option C, is hence the correct answer.
Final table:

Common explanation:
Reference:
Praveen is staying on the topmost floor with Anil Aggarwal.
Anil Kaalra is staying with Anurag on floor number sixth.
Inference:

Reference:
Dilip Shanghvi is staying on the fourth floor but Ravi is not staying with him.
Anand Malhotra is staying on the second floor.
Inference:

Reference:
Prashant is staying on the third floor.
Inference:

Reference:
Mahesh Kaalra is staying exactly between the floors of Dilip Shanghvi and Anand Malhotra but not on the fifth floor.
Inference:

Reference:
Sunil Mittal is staying on the floor exactly below the floor of Anil Kaalra but not with Pulkit.
George Ford and Mohit are not staying on the fifth floor.
Inference:

Reference:
Ravi is staying on an even – numbered floor and Ravi Bajaj is staying on the first floor.
Inference:

Note: The only left businessman - George Ford must be living on the seventh floor.

Reference:
Rahul is staying on an even numbered floor. Mohit is staying on an odd – numbered floor but not on the first floor.
Sunil Mittal is staying on the floor exactly below the floor of Anil Kaalra but not with Pulkit.
Inference:
So, Mohit must be living on the seventh floor and Pulkit on the first floor.

Final table:

Mahesh Kalra lives on 3rd foor and Mohit stays on 7th floor. Clearly, there are 3 floors in between the flats of these two.
Option C, is hence the correct answer.
Final table:

Common explanation:
Reference:
Praveen is staying on the topmost floor with Anil Aggarwal.
Anil Kaalra is staying with Anurag on floor number sixth.
Inference:

Reference:
Dilip Shanghvi is staying on the fourth floor but Ravi is not staying with him.
Anand Malhotra is staying on the second floor.
Inference:

Reference:
Prashant is staying on the third floor.
Inference:

Reference:
Mahesh Kaalra is staying exactly between the floors of Dilip Shanghvi and Anand Malhotra but not on the fifth floor.
Inference:

Reference:
Sunil Mittal is staying on the floor exactly below the floor of Anil Kaalra but not with Pulkit.
George Ford and Mohit are not staying on the fifth floor.
Inference:

Reference:
Ravi is staying on an even – numbered floor and Ravi Bajaj is staying on the first floor.
Inference:

Note: The only left businessman - George Ford must be living on the seventh floor.

Reference:
Rahul is staying on an even numbered floor. Mohit is staying on an odd – numbered floor but not on the first floor.
Sunil Mittal is staying on the floor exactly below the floor of Anil Kaalra but not with Pulkit.
Inference:
So, Mohit must be living on the seventh floor and Pulkit on the first floor.

Final table:

Except, Nishant - Anil Kaalra, all are correctly matched.
Option C, is hence the correct answer.
Final table:

Common explanation:
Reference:
Praveen is staying on the topmost floor with Anil Aggarwal.
Anil Kaalra is staying with Anurag on floor number sixth.
Inference:

Reference:
Dilip Shanghvi is staying on the fourth floor but Ravi is not staying with him.
Anand Malhotra is staying on the second floor.
Inference:

Reference:
Prashant is staying on the third floor.
Inference:

Reference:
Mahesh Kaalra is staying exactly between the floors of Dilip Shanghvi and Anand Malhotra but not on the fifth floor.
Inference:

Reference:
Sunil Mittal is staying on the floor exactly below the floor of Anil Kaalra but not with Pulkit.
George Ford and Mohit are not staying on the fifth floor.
Inference:

Reference:
Ravi is staying on an even – numbered floor and Ravi Bajaj is staying on the first floor.
Inference:

Note: The only left businessman - George Ford must be living on the seventh floor.

Reference:
Rahul is staying on an even numbered floor. Mohit is staying on an odd – numbered floor but not on the first floor.
Sunil Mittal is staying on the floor exactly below the floor of Anil Kaalra but not with Pulkit.
Inference:
So, Mohit must be living on the seventh floor and Pulkit on the first floor.

Final table:

Ravi is staying on second floor.
Option A, is hence the correct answer.
Final table:

Common explanation:
Reference:
Praveen is staying on the topmost floor with Anil Aggarwal.
Anil Kaalra is staying with Anurag on floor number sixth.
Inference:

Reference:
Dilip Shanghvi is staying on the fourth floor but Ravi is not staying with him.
Anand Malhotra is staying on the second floor.
Inference:

Reference:
Prashant is staying on the third floor.
Inference:

Reference:
Mahesh Kaalra is staying exactly between the floors of Dilip Shanghvi and Anand Malhotra but not on the fifth floor.
Inference:

Reference:
Sunil Mittal is staying on the floor exactly below the floor of Anil Kaalra but not with Pulkit.
George Ford and Mohit are not staying on the fifth floor.
Inference:

Reference:
Ravi is staying on an even – numbered floor and Ravi Bajaj is staying on the first floor.
Inference:

Note: The only left businessman - George Ford must be living on the seventh floor.

Reference:
Rahul is staying on an even numbered floor. Mohit is staying on an odd – numbered floor but not on the first floor.
Sunil Mittal is staying on the floor exactly below the floor of Anil Kaalra but not with Pulkit.
Inference:
So, Mohit must be living on the seventh floor and Pulkit on the first floor.

Final table:

In the following common exlanation it is clear that Nishant and Sunil Mittal live on 5th floor.
Hence, option D is correct.
Final table:

Common explanation:
Reference:
Praveen is staying on the topmost floor with Anil Aggarwal.
Anil Kaalra is staying with Anurag on floor number sixth.
Inference:

Reference:
Dilip Shanghvi is staying on the fourth floor but Ravi is not staying with him.
Anand Malhotra is staying on the second floor.
Inference:

Reference:
Prashant is staying on the third floor.
Inference:

Reference:
Mahesh Kaalra is staying exactly between the floors of Dilip Shanghvi and Anand Malhotra but not on the fifth floor.
Inference:

Reference:
Sunil Mittal is staying on the floor exactly below the floor of Anil Kaalra but not with Pulkit.
George Ford and Mohit are not staying on the fifth floor.
Inference:

Reference:
Ravi is staying on an even – numbered floor and Ravi Bajaj is staying on the first floor.
Inference:

Note: The only left businessman - George Ford must be living on the seventh floor.

Reference:
Rahul is staying on an even numbered floor. Mohit is staying on an odd – numbered floor but not on the first floor.
Sunil Mittal is staying on the floor exactly below the floor of Anil Kaalra but not with Pulkit.
Inference:
So, Mohit must be living on the seventh floor and Pulkit on the first floor.

Final table:

Following the common explanation, we observe that the Charlie opt for Logistics.
Option D is the correct answer. 

Common Explanation:
References:
Delta joined SP JAIN and did not take up Marketing or Logistics and is not a B. Tech.
Inference:

References:
Foxtrot is a C.A and has taken Finance management.
Inference:

References:
Alex joined IIMB, Charlie is B.A graduate and Bravo took up HR.
The person who joined IIMA opted for HR and is not a C.A or B.Sc.
Inference:

References:
The person, who is a B.A graduate, joined JBIMS and took Logistics.
Inference:

References:
The person, who is a B. Tech graduate, has taken Operations Management and did not join UBS or DAVIET.
Inference:
Thus Alex is a B. Tech graduate.
Now as Delta has not opted for Marketing, Marketing must be opted by Echo, thus Delta opts General Management.

References:
The person, who is a  B . Com  graduate, took up General Management.
Inference:
Thus Delta is  B . Com  graduate.
Now is Bravo has not done B.Sc. he must have done BBM and thus Echo has done B.Sc.

Following the common explanation we observe that Delta has opted for B.Com and General management.
Option C is hence the correct answer.

Common Explanation:
References:
Delta joined SP JAIN and did not take up Marketing or Logistics and is not a B. Tech.
Inference:

References:
Foxtrot is a C.A and has taken Finance management.
Inference:

References:
Alex joined IIMB, Charlie is B.A graduate and Bravo took up HR.
The person who joined IIMA opted for HR and is not a C.A or B.Sc.
Inference:

References:
The person, who is a B.A graduate, joined JBIMS and took Logistics.
Inference:

References:
The person, who is a B. Tech graduate, has taken Operations Management and did not join UBS or DAVIET.
Inference:
Thus Alex is a B. Tech graduate.
Now as Delta has not opted for Marketing, Marketing must be opted by Echo, thus Delta opts General Management.

References:
The person, who is a  B . Com  graduate, took up General Management.
Inference:
Thus Delta is  B . Com  graduate.
Now is Bravo has not done B.Sc. he must have done BBM and thus Echo has done B.Sc.

Following the common explanation, if Echo joined DAVIET then Foxtrot will join UBS and opted for finance.
Option A is hence the correct answer.

Common Explanation:
References:
Delta joined SP JAIN and did not take up Marketing or Logistics and is not a B. Tech.
Inference:

References:
Foxtrot is a C.A and has taken Finance management.
Inference:

References:
Alex joined IIMB, Charlie is B.A graduate and Bravo took up HR.
The person who joined IIMA opted for HR and is not a C.A or B.Sc.
Inference:

References:
The person, who is a B.A graduate, joined JBIMS and took Logistics.
Inference:

References:
The person, who is a B. Tech graduate, has taken Operations Management and did not join UBS or DAVIET.
Inference:
Thus Alex is a B. Tech graduate.
Now as Delta has not opted for Marketing, Marketing must be opted by Echo, thus Delta opts General Management.

References:
The person, who is a  B . Com  graduate, took up General Management.
Inference:
Thus Delta is  B . Co m  graduate.
Now is Bravo has not done B.Sc. he must have done BBM and thus Echo has done B.Sc.

In the Following common explanation it is clear that Bravo joined IIMA.
Option A is hence the correct answer.

Common Explanation:
References:
Delta joined SP JAIN and did not take up Marketing or Logistics and is not a B. Tech.
Inference:

References:
Foxtrot is a C.A and has taken Finance management.
Inference:

References:
Alex joined IIMB, Charlie is B.A graduate and Bravo took up HR.
The person who joined IIMA opted for HR and is not a C.A or B.Sc.
Inference:

References:
The person, who is a B.A graduate, joined JBIMS and took Logistics.
Inference:

References:
The person, who is a B. Tech graduate, has taken Operations Management and did not join UBS or DAVIET.
Inference:
Thus Alex is a B. Tech graduate.
Now as Delta has not opted for Marketing, Marketing must be opted by Echo, thus Delta opts General Management.

References:
The person, who is a  B . Com  graduate, took up General Management.
Inference:
Thus Delta is  B .Com  graduate.
Now is Bravo has not done B.Sc. he must have done BBM and thus Echo has done B.Sc.

In the following common explanation it is clear that JBIMS collage is joined by one who is B.A graduate.
Option B is hence the correct answer.

Common Explanation:
References:
Delta joined SP JAIN and did not take up Marketing or Logistics and is not a B. Tech.
Inference:

References:
Foxtrot is a C.A and has taken Finance management.
Inference:

References:
Alex joined IIMB, Charlie is B.A graduate and Bravo took up HR.
The person who joined IIMA opted for HR and is not a C.A or B.Sc.
Inference:

References:
The person, who is a B.A graduate, joined JBIMS and took Logistics.
Inference:

References:
The person, who is a B. Tech graduate, has taken Operations Management and did not join UBS or DAVIET.
Inference:
Thus Alex is a B. Tech graduate.
Now as Delta has not opted for Marketing, Marketing must be opted by Echo, thus Delta opts General Management.

References:
The person, who is a  B . Com  graduate, took up General Management.
Inference:
Thus Delta is  B . Com  graduate.
Now is Bravo has not done B.Sc. he must have done BBM and thus Echo has done B.Sc.

Following the final solution we can say that three boxes were placed above the box which contained 25 Kg of Sugar.
Hence, the correct answer is option D.
Final Solution:

Common Explanation:
Reference:
Eight boxes – P, Q, R, S, T, U, V and W are placed in an almirah of eight shelves. The bottom shelf is numbered one and the topmost shelf is numbered 8. Each of these boxes contain different amount of Sugar – 25 kg, 20 kg, 17 kg, 10 kg, 8 kg, 5 kg, 2 kg and 1 kg but not necessarily in the same order.
Inference:
We will keep this information in mind while solving the puzzle.
Reference:
The box which was placed on 6th shelf contained 10 kg of Sugar.
Inference:
Using the above hints, we have:

Reference:
Box R was not the lightest and Box U, was the heaviest.
There are three boxes between Box U and Box S and Box S was placed below the shelf on which Box U was placed.
T was placed immediately above the box which was heaviest.
Inference:
Here, we have two possible scenarios in which we can use the above hints accordingly.
Case 1:

Case 2:

Here, we will make a mental note of information that Box R was not the lightest.
Reference:
Box R was placed above the shelf on which Box U was placed but not on the even numbered shelf.
Box P, contained 20 kg of Sugar, and was placed either at the top or bottom shelf. 
Inference:
At this point we cannot use the above hints in case 2 so we can say that case 2 is an invalid case.
Case 1:

Reference:
Box Q was placed immediately below the box which contained 8 kg of Sugar and immediately above the box which contained 2 kg of Sugar. 
Inference:
Here, we have two possible scenarios in which we can use the above hints in case 1 accordingly.
Case 1-A:

Case 1-B:

Reference:
Box V was placed at one of the even numbered shelves and contained 17 kg of Sugar.
Inference:
At this point we cannot fix the position of box V according to the above hints in case 1-B so we can say that case 1-B is an invalid case.
Case 1-A:

As we have already figured out that box R was not the lightest so we can say that box R contained 5 Kg of Sugar and box Q contained 1 Kg of Sugar.
Case 1-A:

Following the final solution we can say that box Q contained 1 Kg of Sugar.
Hence, the correct answer is option B.
Final Solution:

Common Explanation:
Reference:
Eight boxes – P, Q, R, S, T, U, V and W are placed in an almirah of eight shelves. The bottom shelf is numbered one and the topmost shelf is numbered 8. Each of these boxes contain different amount of Sugar – 25 kg, 20 kg, 17 kg, 10 kg, 8 kg, 5 kg, 2 kg and 1 kg but not necessarily in the same order.
Inference:
We will keep this information in mind while solving the puzzle.
Reference:
The box which was placed on 6th shelf contained 10 kg of Sugar.
Inference:
Using the above hints, we have:

Reference:
Box R was not the lightest and Box U, was the heaviest.
There are three boxes between Box U and Box S and Box S was placed below the shelf on which Box U was placed.
T was placed immediately above the box which was heaviest.
Inference:
Here, we have two possible scenarios in which we can use the above hints accordingly.
Case 1:

Case 2:

Here, we will make a mental note of information that Box R was not the lightest.
Reference:
Box R was placed above the shelf on which Box U was placed but not on the even numbered shelf.
Box P, contained 20 kg of Sugar, and was placed either at the top or bottom shelf. 
Inference:
At this point we cannot use the above hints in case 2 so we can say that case 2 is an invalid case.
Case 1:

Reference:
Box Q was placed immediately below the box which contained 8 kg of Sugar and immediately above the box which contained 2 kg of Sugar. 
Inference:
Here, we have two possible scenarios in which we can use the above hints in case 1 accordingly.
Case 1-A:

Case 1-B:

Reference:
Box V was placed at one of the even numbered shelves and contained 17 kg of Sugar.
Inference:
At this point we cannot fix the position of box V according to the above hints in case 1-B so we can say that case 1-B is an invalid case.
Case 1-A:

As we have already figured out that box R was not the lightest so we can say that box R contained 5 Kg of Sugar and box Q contained 1 Kg of Sugar.
Case 1-A:

Following the final solution we can say that four boxes were placed between the box which contained 5 kg of Sugar and the box which contained 1 kg of Sugar.
Hence, the correct answer is option A.
Final Solution:

Common Explanation:
Reference:
Eight boxes – P, Q, R, S, T, U, V and W are placed in an almirah of eight shelves. The bottom shelf is numbered one and the topmost shelf is numbered 8. Each of these boxes contain different amount of Sugar – 25 kg, 20 kg, 17 kg, 10 kg, 8 kg, 5 kg, 2 kg and 1 kg but not necessarily in the same order.
Inference:
We will keep this information in mind while solving the puzzle.
Reference:
The box which was placed on 6th shelf contained 10 kg of Sugar.
Inference:
Using the above hints, we have:

Reference:
Box R was not the lightest and Box U, was the heaviest.
There are three boxes between Box U and Box S and Box S was placed below the shelf on which Box U was placed.
T was placed immediately above the box which was heaviest.
Inference:
Here, we have two possible scenarios in which we can use the above hints accordingly.
Case 1:

Case 2:

Here, we will make a mental note of information that Box R was not the lightest.
Reference:
Box R was placed above the shelf on which Box U was placed but not on the even numbered shelf.
Box P, contained 20 kg of Sugar, and was placed either at the top or bottom shelf. 
Inference:
At this point we cannot use the above hints in case 2 so we can say that case 2 is an invalid case.
Case 1:

Reference:
Box Q was placed immediately below the box which contained 8 kg of Sugar and immediately above the box which contained 2 kg of Sugar. 
Inference:
Here, we have two possible scenarios in which we can use the above hints in case 1 accordingly.
Case 1-A:

Case 1-B:

Reference:
Box V was placed at one of the even numbered shelves and contained 17 kg of Sugar.
Inference:
At this point we cannot fix the position of box V according to the above hints in case 1-B so we can say that case 1-B is an invalid case.
Case 1-A:

As we have already figured out that box R was not the lightest so we can say that box R contained 5 Kg of Sugar and box Q contained 1 Kg of Sugar.
Case 1-A:

Following the final solution we can say that four boxes 2 – Q – 1 Kg is the correct combination.
Hence, the correct answer is option C.
Final Solution:

Common Explanation:
Reference:
Eight boxes – P, Q, R, S, T, U, V and W are placed in an almirah of eight shelves. The bottom shelf is numbered one and the topmost shelf is numbered 8. Each of these boxes contain different amount of Sugar – 25 kg, 20 kg, 17 kg, 10 kg, 8 kg, 5 kg, 2 kg and 1 kg but not necessarily in the same order.
Inference:
We will keep this information in mind while solving the puzzle.
Reference:
The box which was placed on 6th shelf contained 10 kg of Sugar.
Inference:
Using the above hints, we have:

Reference:
Box R was not the lightest and Box U, was the heaviest.
There are three boxes between Box U and Box S and Box S was placed below the shelf on which Box U was placed.
T was placed immediately above the box which was heaviest.
Inference:
Here, we have two possible scenarios in which we can use the above hints accordingly.
Case 1:

Case 2:

Here, we will make a mental note of information that Box R was not the lightest.
Reference:
Box R was placed above the shelf on which Box U was placed but not on the even numbered shelf.
Box P, contained 20 kg of Sugar, and was placed either at the top or bottom shelf. 
Inference:
At this point we cannot use the above hints in case 2 so we can say that case 2 is an invalid case.
Case 1:

Reference:
Box Q was placed immediately below the box which contained 8 kg of Sugar and immediately above the box which contained 2 kg of Sugar. 
Inference:
Here, we have two possible scenarios in which we can use the above hints in case 1 accordingly.
Case 1-A:

Case 1-B:

Reference:
Box V was placed at one of the even numbered shelves and contained 17 kg of Sugar.
Inference:
At this point we cannot fix the position of box V according to the above hints in case 1-B so we can say that case 1-B is an invalid case.
Case 1-A:

As we have already figured out that box R was not the lightest so we can say that box R contained 5 Kg of Sugar and box Q contained 1 Kg of Sugar.
Case 1-A:

Following the final solution we can say that Box T is the one that does not belong to the group because of all the boxers given in the options Box T is the only one which contained even (10 kg) amount of Sugar.
Hence, the correct answer is option E.
Final Solution:

Common Explanation:
Reference:
Eight boxes – P, Q, R, S, T, U, V and W are placed in an almirah of eight shelves. The bottom shelf is numbered one and the topmost shelf is numbered 8. Each of these boxes contain different amount of Sugar – 25 kg, 20 kg, 17 kg, 10 kg, 8 kg, 5 kg, 2 kg and 1 kg but not necessarily in the same order.
Inference:
We will keep this information in mind while solving the puzzle.
Reference:
The box which was placed on 6th shelf contained 10 kg of Sugar.
Inference:
Using the above hints, we have:

Reference:
Box R was not the lightest and Box U, was the heaviest.
There are three boxes between Box U and Box S and Box S was placed below the shelf on which Box U was placed.
T was placed immediately above the box which was heaviest.
Inference:
Here, we have two possible scenarios in which we can use the above hints accordingly.
Case 1:

Case 2:

Here, we will make a mental note of information that Box R was not the lightest.
Reference:
Box R was placed above the shelf on which Box U was placed but not on the even numbered shelf.
Box P, contained 20 kg of Sugar, and was placed either at the top or bottom shelf. 
Inference:
At this point we cannot use the above hints in case 2 so we can say that case 2 is an invalid case.
Case 1:

Reference:
Box Q was placed immediately below the box which contained 8 kg of Sugar and immediately above the box which contained 2 kg of Sugar. 
Inference:
Here, we have two possible scenarios in which we can use the above hints in case 1 accordingly.
Case 1-A:

Case 1-B:

Reference:
Box V was placed at one of the even numbered shelves and contained 17 kg of Sugar.
Inference:
At this point we cannot fix the position of box V according to the above hints in case 1-B so we can say that case 1-B is an invalid case.
Case 1-A:

As we have already figured out that box R was not the lightest so we can say that box R contained 5 Kg of Sugar and box Q contained 1 Kg of Sugar.
Case 1-A:

The following common explanation, we get "Jawahar-November".
Hence, option C is correct.

Common Explanation
References:
Kathir belongs to Kolkata.
Laxman belongs to Bangalore and born in the month having 31 days but not in March.
Farhad belongs to Noida and born in April month.
Ranjan was born in July and he belongs to Chennai.
Jawahar belongs to Goa and Niranjan doesn’t belong to Delhi.
Inference:
From above statements,
All above information were given directly; by using we get the initial table as follows,

References:
Persons belong to Goa and Delhi were born in November.
Prathap and Niranjan were born in same month.
Inference:
From above statements,
Given, three persons were born in same month.
Persons belong to Goa and Delhi were born in November. 
By using this statement, it is understood that the 3 persons were born in November month.
Note: Total six months given in statement.
Prathap and Niranjan were born in same month.
Therefore, we conclude that both Prathap and Niranjan were born in November month.
As per table, Prathap belongs to Delhi. Note: Given, Niranjan doesn’t belong to Delhi.
By using this information, we get the following table,

References:
The one who belongs to Kolkata was born in the month having 30 days after July but before November.
The one who belongs to Hyderabad was born in month having 31 days before April.
The one who belongs to Punjab was born in the month having less than 31 days.
Inference:
From above statements,
Among given months January(31 days), March(31 days), April(30 days), July(31 days), September(30 days) and November(30 days).
The one who belongs to Kolkata was born in the month having 30 days after July but before November.
Kathir belongs to Kolkata and he was born in September (30 days, only possibility as per condition)
Given, Laxman was born in 31 days month but not in March. Then Laxman was born in January month (31 days month, only possibility)
Note: Ranjan was born in July month (31 days)
Finally, Hirthik was born in March month (only month is left among given)
The one who belongs to Hyderabad was born in month having 31 days before April.
Hirthik was born in March month (31 days & before April) and he belongs to Hyderabad.
The one who belongs to Punjab was born in the month having less than 31 days.
Finally, Niranjan belongs to Punjab and born in November (30 days)
Thus we get the completed table as shown

The following common explanation, we get "Hirthik-March-31 days month".
Hence, option C is correct.

Common Explanation
References:
Kathir belongs to Kolkata.
Laxman belongs to Bangalore and born in the month having 31 days but not in March.
Farhad belongs to Noida and born in April month.
Ranjan was born in July and he belongs to Chennai.
Jawahar belongs to Goa and Niranjan doesn’t belong to Delhi.
Inference:
From above statements,
All above information were given directly; by using we get the initial table as follows,

References:
Persons belong to Goa and Delhi were born in November.
Prathap and Niranjan were born in same month.
Inference:
From above statements,
Given, three persons were born in same month.
Persons belong to Goa and Delhi were born in November. 
By using this statement, it is understood that the 3 persons were born in November month.
Note: Total six months given in statement.
Prathap and Niranjan were born in same month.
Therefore, we conclude that both Prathap and Niranjan were born in November month.
As per table, Prathap belongs to Delhi. Note: Given, Niranjan doesn’t belong to Delhi.
By using this information, we get the following table,

References:
The one who belongs to Kolkata was born in the month having 30 days after July but before November.
The one who belongs to Hyderabad was born in month having 31 days before April.
The one who belongs to Punjab was born in the month having less than 31 days.
Inference:
From above statements,
Among given months January(31 days), March(31 days), April(30 days), July(31 days), September(30 days) and November(30 days).
The one who belongs to Kolkata was born in the month having 30 days after July but before November.
Kathir belongs to Kolkata and he was born in September (30 days, only possibility as per condition)
Given, Laxman was born in 31 days month but not in March. Then Laxman was born in January month (31 days month, only possibility)
Note: Ranjan was born in July month (31 days)
Finally, Hirthik was born in March month (only month is left among given)
The one who belongs to Hyderabad was born in month having 31 days before April.
Hirthik was born in March month (31 days & before April) and he belongs to Hyderabad.
The one who belongs to Punjab was born in the month having less than 31 days.
Finally, Niranjan belongs to Punjab and born in November (30 days)
Thus we get the completed table as shown

The following common explanation, we get "Hirthik-March-Hyderabad".
Hence, option C is correct.

Common Explanation
References:
Kathir belongs to Kolkata.
Laxman belongs to Bangalore and born in the month having 31 days but not in March.
Farhad belongs to Noida and born in April month.
Ranjan was born in July and he belongs to Chennai.
Jawahar belongs to Goa and Niranjan doesn’t belong to Delhi.
Inference:
From above statements,
All above information were given directly; by using we get the initial table as follows,

References:
Persons belong to Goa and Delhi were born in November.
Prathap and Niranjan were born in same month.
Inference:
From above statements,
Given, three persons were born in same month.
Persons belong to Goa and Delhi were born in November. 
By using this statement, it is understood that the 3 persons were born in November month.
Note: Total six months given in statement.
Prathap and Niranjan were born in same month.
Therefore, we conclude that both Prathap and Niranjan were born in November month.
As per table, Prathap belongs to Delhi. Note: Given, Niranjan doesn’t belong to Delhi.
By using this information, we get the following table,

References:
The one who belongs to Kolkata was born in the month having 30 days after July but before November.
The one who belongs to Hyderabad was born in month having 31 days before April.
The one who belongs to Punjab was born in the month having less than 31 days.
Inference:
From above statements,
Among given months January(31 days), March(31 days), April(30 days), July(31 days), September(30 days) and November(30 days).
The one who belongs to Kolkata was born in the month having 30 days after July but before November.
Kathir belongs to Kolkata and he was born in September (30 days, only possibility as per condition)
Given, Laxman was born in 31 days month but not in March. Then Laxman was born in January month (31 days month, only possibility)
Note: Ranjan was born in July month (31 days)
Finally, Hirthik was born in March month (only month is left among given)
The one who belongs to Hyderabad was born in month having 31 days before April.
Hirthik was born in March month (31 days & before April) and he belongs to Hyderabad.
The one who belongs to Punjab was born in the month having less than 31 days.
Finally, Niranjan belongs to Punjab and born in November (30 days)
Thus we get the completed table as shown

The following common explanation, we get "None of these".
All statements are false.
Hence, option E is correct.

Common Explanation
References:
Kathir belongs to Kolkata.
Laxman belongs to Bangalore and born in the month having 31 days but not in March.
Farhad belongs to Noida and born in April month.
Ranjan was born in July and he belongs to Chennai.
Jawahar belongs to Goa and Niranjan doesn’t belong to Delhi.
Inference:
From above statements,
All above information were given directly; by using we get the initial table as follows,

References:
Persons belong to Goa and Delhi were born in November.
Prathap and Niranjan were born in same month.
Inference:
From above statements,
Given, three persons were born in same month.
Persons belong to Goa and Delhi were born in November. 
By using this statement, it is understood that the 3 persons were born in November month.
Note: Total six months given in statement.
Prathap and Niranjan were born in same month.
Therefore, we conclude that both Prathap and Niranjan were born in November month.
As per table, Prathap belongs to Delhi. Note: Given, Niranjan doesn’t belong to Delhi.
By using this information, we get the following table,

References:
The one who belongs to Kolkata was born in the month having 30 days after July but before November.
The one who belongs to Hyderabad was born in month having 31 days before April.
The one who belongs to Punjab was born in the month having less than 31 days.
Inference:
From above statements,
Among given months January(31 days), March(31 days), April(30 days), July(31 days), September(30 days) and November(30 days).
The one who belongs to Kolkata was born in the month having 30 days after July but before November.
Kathir belongs to Kolkata and he was born in September (30 days, only possibility as per condition)
Given, Laxman was born in 31 days month but not in March. Then Laxman was born in January month (31 days month, only possibility)
Note: Ranjan was born in July month (31 days)
Finally, Hirthik was born in March month (only month is left among given)
The one who belongs to Hyderabad was born in month having 31 days before April.
Hirthik was born in March month (31 days & before April) and he belongs to Hyderabad.
The one who belongs to Punjab was born in the month having less than 31 days.
Finally, Niranjan belongs to Punjab and born in November (30 days)
Thus we get the completed table as shown

Following the common explanation, we get "Only III".
[Niranjan-Punjab-November]
Hence, option B is correct.

Common Explanation
References:
Kathir belongs to Kolkata.
Laxman belongs to Bangalore and born in the month having 31 days but not in March.
Farhad belongs to Noida and born in April month.
Ranjan was born in July and he belongs to Chennai.
Jawahar belongs to Goa and Niranjan doesn’t belong to Delhi.
Inference:
From above statements,
All above information were given directly; by using we get the initial table as follows,

References:
Persons belong to Goa and Delhi were born in November.
Prathap and Niranjan were born in same month.
Inference:
From above statements,
Given, three persons were born in same month.
Persons belong to Goa and Delhi were born in November. 
By using this statement, it is understood that the 3 persons were born in November month.
Note: Total six months given in statement.
Prathap and Niranjan were born in same month.
Therefore, we conclude that both Prathap and Niranjan were born in November month.
As per table, Prathap belongs to Delhi. Note: Given, Niranjan doesn’t belong to Delhi.
By using this information, we get the following table,

References:
The one who belongs to Kolkata was born in the month having 30 days after July but before November.
The one who belongs to Hyderabad was born in month having 31 days before April.
The one who belongs to Punjab was born in the month having less than 31 days.
Inference:
From above statements,
Among given months January(31 days), March(31 days), April(30 days), July(31 days), September(30 days) and November(30 days).
The one who belongs to Kolkata was born in the month having 30 days after July but before November.
Kathir belongs to Kolkata and he was born in September (30 days, only possibility as per condition)
Given, Laxman was born in 31 days month but not in March. Then Laxman was born in January month (31 days month, only possibility)
Note: Ranjan was born in July month (31 days)
Finally, Hirthik was born in March month (only month is left among given)
The one who belongs to Hyderabad was born in month having 31 days before April.
Hirthik was born in March month (31 days & before April) and he belongs to Hyderabad.
The one who belongs to Punjab was born in the month having less than 31 days.
Finally, Niranjan belongs to Punjab and born in November (30 days)
Thus we get the completed table as shown