Evaluating Inferences - 2 - SSC CGL GI & Reasoning Free MCQ Test with solutions

The statement mentions that the government has announced a ban on the use of single-use plastic bags in all stores across the country. From this, it can be inferred that people will have to start carrying their own reusable bags when they go shopping. This is the only logical inference from the given statement. Option II is incorrect as it is not mentioned that all stores will have to shut down as they will not be able to use plastic bags anymore. Option III is also incorrect as it is mentioned that the ban on single-use plastic bags is to have a positive impact on the environment.

The statement mentions that the school district has announced that all students will have to wear uniforms starting next semester. From this, it can be inferred that students will no longer be able to express their individuality through their clothing choices. This is a logical inference from the given statement. Additionally, it is commonly believed that uniform policies can improve student behavior and academic performance, which is why option III can also be inferred. Option I is incorrect as it is not mentioned that the school district is trying to save money by not having to provide different clothes to students.

The statement mentions that the company has announced that it will be laying off 500 employees due to financial difficulties. From this, it can be inferred that the company is struggling to stay afloat. This is a logical inference from the given statement. Option II is incorrect as it is not mentioned that the laid-off employees were not performing well. Option III is also incorrect as it is not mentioned that the remaining employees will receive a pay raise.

The statement mentions that the city council has approved a new law prohibiting smoking in public parks. From this, it can be inferred that the new law will make it illegal to smoke in public parks. This is a logical inference from the given statement. Option I is incorrect as the statement does not mention that the city council believes that smoking in public parks is harmful to the environment. Option III is also incorrect as the statement does not mention that the city council is trying to promote healthy habits among its citizens.

The statement mentions that the police have arrested a suspect in connection with the robbery that took place last night. From this, it can be inferred that the police have enough evidence to prove that the arrested person committed the robbery. This is a logical inference from the given statement. Option II is incorrect as there is no mention of whether the robbery was well-planned and organized or not. Option III is also incorrect as there is no mention of whether the police are taking steps to prevent such incidents from happening in the future.

The statement mentions that the government has announced a new tax on sugary drinks. From this, it can be inferred that the government is trying to reduce the consumption of sugary drinks by making them more expensive through the tax. This is a logical inference from the given statement. Additionally, it can be inferred that the tax will generate revenue for the government, as taxes are a source of government revenue. Therefore, option II is also correct. Option III is incorrect as there is no mention of whether the tax on sugary drinks will be the only tax imposed by the government.

The statement mentions that the number of tourists visiting the country has increased by 20% compared to last year. From this, it can be inferred that the country has increased its marketing efforts to attract more tourists. This is a logical inference from the given statement. Option I is incorrect as there is no mention of the country opening up more tourist attractions. Option III is also incorrect as there is no information provided in the statement about whether the country has relaxed its visa requirements for tourists.

The statement mentions that the company has announced a new policy to allow employees to work from home twice a week. From this, it can be inferred that the company wants to provide a better work-life balance for its employees. Additionally, it can be inferred that the company wants to reduce its office space and save costs by allowing employees to work from home. Therefore, both options I and II are possible inferences from the statement. Option III is incorrect as there is no mention of employee turnover in the statement.

The statement mentions that the government has announced a reduction in the corporate tax rate. From this, it can be inferred that the government wants to improve the profitability of domestic companies. Additionally, it can be inferred that the government wants to attract more foreign investment by making it more attractive to do business in the country. Therefore, options I and III are both possible inferences from the statement. Option II is incorrect as there is no mention of the government wanting to increase revenue by encouraging more companies to register in the statement.

The statement mentions that the government has announced a new policy that aims to promote the use of electric vehicles. From this, it can be inferred that the government wants to reduce the country’s dependence on fossil fuels, as electric vehicles are powered by electricity and do not rely on fossil fuels like traditional vehicles. Therefore, option II is the only possible inference from the statement. Option I is incorrect as there is no mention of air pollution caused by traditional vehicles in the statement. Option III is incorrect as there is no mention of electric vehicles being more affordable than traditional vehicles in the statement.

The statement mentions that the company has announced a new product line that includes eco-friendly packaging. From this, it can be inferred that the company is committed to reducing its carbon footprint. It can also be inferred that the company is responding to customer demand for more eco-friendly products. Therefore, options I and II are possible inferences from the statement. Option III is incorrect as there is no mention of the new product line being more expensive than the existing products in the statement.

The statement mentions that the CEO of the company has resigned, citing personal reasons. From this, it can be inferred that the CEO’s resignation is unexpected. Therefore, option II is the only possible inference from the statement. Option I is incorrect as there is no mention of the company’s financial performance under the CEO’s leadership in the statement. Option III is also incorrect as there is no mention of the company struggling to find a suitable replacement for the CEO in the statement.

The statement mentions that the government has announced a new policy to encourage the use of public transport. From this, it can be inferred that the government wants to reduce traffic congestion by encouraging people to use public transport. It can also be inferred that the government is concerned about air pollution, as public transport is often seen as a more environmentally friendly option than private vehicles. Therefore, options I and II are possible inferences from the statement. Option III is incorrect as there is no mention of the government wanting to increase revenue from public transport in the statement.

The statement mentions that the city council has approved a new plan to build more affordable housing. From this, it can be inferred that there is a shortage of affordable housing in the city. Therefore, option II is a possible inference from the statement. Option I is incorrect as there is no mention of the cost of housing in the city in the statement. Option III is incorrect as there is no mention of the city council wanting to increase property values in the statement.

The statement mentions that the government has introduced a new tax on luxury goods. From this, it can be inferred that the government is trying to raise revenue through taxation. This leads to the inference that option I is correct. Furthermore, the government has introduced the tax on luxury goods, which indicates that it wants to discourage their purchase. Therefore, option II is also a possible inference from the statement. Option III is incorrect as there is no mention of the government wanting to promote the purchase of locally made goods in the statement.