CTET Paper-II (Mathematics and Science) Mock Test - 10 (Hindi) - CTET & State TET MCQ

भाषा समय के साथ बदलती रहती है और हम जीवन पर्यन्त भाषा के नये-नये शब्दों को सीखते रहते हैं। इस कथन के पीछे भाषा सीखने का सिद्धांत कार्य करता है-

'ट्रांसफार्मेशनल ग्रामर' की बुनियाद निम्न में से किस वैज्ञानिक के द्वारा रखी गयी है?

दिए गए पद्यांश के आधार पर पूछे गए प्रश्नों के उत्तर के लिए सबसे उपयुक्त विकल्प का चयन कीजिए।
आकाश का साफा बाँधकर 
सूरज की चिलम खींचता 
बैठा है पहाड़ 
घुटनों पर पडी है नदी चादर सी 
पास ही दाहक रही है 
पलाश के जंगल की अंगीठी 
अन्धकार दूर पूर्व में 
सिमटा बैठा है भेड़ो के गल्ले सा 
चानक बोला मोर 
जैसे किसी ने आवाज दी 
अजी सुनते हो 
चिलम औंधी 
धुँआ उठा 
सूरज डूबा 
अन्धकार छा गया।

Q. ''सिमटा बैठा है भेड़ो के गल्ले-सा' - किस विकल्प में सभी शब्द 'गल्ला' के समानार्थी है 

भाषा सीखने की प्रक्रिया में बालक सर्वप्रथम किस भाषा को सीखता है?

दिए गए पद्यांश के आधार पर पूछे गए प्रश्नों के उत्तर के लिए सबसे उपयुक्त विकल्प का चयन कीजिए।
आकाश का साफा बाँधकर 
सूरज की चिलम खींचता 
बैठा है पहाड़ 
घुटनों पर पडी है नदी चादर सी 
पास ही दाहक रही है 
पलाश के जंगल की अंगीठी 
अन्धकार दूर पूर्व में 
सिमटा बैठा है भेड़ो के गल्ले सा 
चानक बोला मोर 
जैसे किसी ने आवाज दी 
अजी सुनते हो 
चिलम औंधी 
धुँआ उठा 
सूरज डूबा 
अन्धकार छा गया।

Q. अन्धकार के सिमटकर बैठे होने का क्या कारण है:

दिए गए पद्यांश के आधार पर पूछे गए प्रश्नों के उत्तर के लिए सबसे उपयुक्त विकल्प का चयन कीजिए।
आकाश का साफा बाँधकर 
सूरज की चिलम खींचता 
बैठा है पहाड़ 
घुटनों पर पडी है नदी चादर सी 
पास ही दाहक रही है 
पलाश के जंगल की अंगीठी 
अन्धकार दूर पूर्व में 
सिमटा बैठा है भेड़ो के गल्ले सा 
चानक बोला मोर 
जैसे किसी ने आवाज दी 
अजी सुनते हो 
चिलम औंधी 
धुँआ उठा 
सूरज डूबा 
अन्धकार छा गया।

Q. पलाश वन को अंगीठी कहा गया है क्योंकि 

व्याकरण के ज्ञान का मुख्य उद्देश्य है-

निर्देश: नीचे दिए गए गद्यांश के बाद  प्रश्न दिए गए हैं। इस गद्यांश को ध्यानपूर्वक पढ़ें और चार विकल्पों में से प्रत्येक प्रश्न का सर्वोत्तम उत्तर चुनें।
लगभग पांच शताब्दी पूर्व पुर्तगाली इतिहासकार डोमिंग पेस ने हम्पी (विजयनगर) को स्वप्नों की नगरी कहा था। यह संगम वंश के शासकों की राजधानी थी जिन्होंने 1336 में प्राचीन हम्पी के निर्माण स्थल पर विजय नगर साम्राज्य की नींव रखी थी। लेकिन वह कृष्णदेव राय (1509-1529) थे जिन्होंने भव्य महल और मंदिरों से राजधानी को अलंकृत किया और विजयनगर साम्राज्य की सीमाओं को दूर-दूर तक फैलाया जिससे वह दक्षिण भारत का सर्वाधिक शाक्तिशाली हिन्दु साम्राज्य बना। परन्तु इस साम्राज्य की शक्ति का पतन पड़ोसी बहमई राज्यों के संघ के 1565 में संयुक्त आक्रमण से आरंभ हुआ। इस विजयनगर को परास्त करके नष्ट कर दिया गया। यह उस साम्राज्य का दुखत अंत था जो कभी अरब सागर से बंगाल की खाड़ी और दक्कन पठार से भारतीय प्रायद्वीप तक फैला था। विजयनगर के भग्नाशेष एक दूसरे पर टंगी विशाल चट्टानों की निर्जन दृश्यावली के बीच फैले हैं। दक्षिण भारत के राजनीतिक परिदृश्य में अपने उदय से पूर्व हम्पी कई शताब्दियों से एक प्रख्यात पावन स्थल था। रामायण में जैसा वर्णित है यह बाली शासित क्षेत्र किष्किन्धा का एक भाग था। इस स्थान में बाली और सुग्रीव, हनुमान, राम सीता, लक्ष्मण से जुड़ी अनेक घटनाएं घटी हैं। तुंगभद्रा नदी के पार स्थित वर्तमान एनीगोण्डी दुर्ग इस वानर साम्राज्य का प्रमुख केन्द्र था। हम्पी के चट्टानी पर्वत जैसे हेमकूट पर्वत, मातण्ग पर्वत और माल्यावंथ पर्वत का उल्लेख रामायण में मिलता है। तुंगभद्रा का प्राचीन नाम और पार्वती का नाम पम्पा है जिसने विरूपाक्ष रूपी शिव से विवाह किया था। इसी नाम पर इस नगरी का नाम पड़ा है।

Q. हम्पी साम्राज्य की शक्ति का पतन कैसे हुआ?

बहुभाषिकता परिचायक है:

यह अंतरसंबंधित और नियम शासित चिन्ह व्यवस्थाओं से बनी है, यह सामाजिक है और अभिव्यक्त करने, खोजबीन करने, अर्थ संप्रेषित करने के संदर्भ में सिर्फ़ मानव के पास है। यह क्या है?

Direction: Read the passage given below and then answer the questions given below the passage. Some words may be highlighted for your attention.
The big fuss about consensus management is an issue that boils down to a lot of noise about not much. The consensus advocates are great admirers of the Japanese management style. Consensus is what Japan is famous for. Well, I know the Japanese fairly well: They still remember Douglas MacArthur with respect, and they still bow down to their Emperor. In my dealings with them, I found that they talk a lot about consensus, but there's always one guy behind the scenes who ends up making the tough decisions. It doesn't make sense to me to think that Mr. Toyoda or Mr. Morita of Sony sits around in committee meetings and says, "We've got to get everybody in this organization, from the janitor up, to agree with this move". The Japanese believe in their workers' involvement early on in the decision-making process and in feedback from employees. And they probably listen better than we do. But you can bet that when the chips are down, the yen stops at the top guy's desk. So, we're wasting time trying to Direction: Read the passage given below and then answer the questions given below the passage. Some words may be highlighted for your attention.
The big fuss about consensus management is an issue that boils down to a lot of noise about not much. The consensus advocates are great admirers of the Japanese management style. Consensus is what Japan is famous for. Well, I know the Japanese fairly well: They still remember Douglas MacArthur with respect, and they still bow down to their Emperor. In my dealings with them, I found that they talk a lot about consensus, but there's always one guy behind the scenes who ends up making the tough decisions. It doesn't make sense to me to think that Mr. Toyoda or Mr. Morita of Sony sits around in committee meetings and says, "We've got to get everybody in this organization, from the janitor up, to agree with this move". The Japanese believe in their workers' involvement early on in the decision-making process and in feedback from employees. And they probably listen better than we do. But you can bet that when the chips are down, the yen stops at the top guy's desk. So, we're wasting time trying to emulate something I don't think really exists.
Business structures are microcosms of other structures. There were no corporations in the fifteenth century. But there were families. There were city governments, provinces, and armies. There was the Church. All of them had, for lack of a better word, a pecking order.
Why? Because that's the only way you can steer clear of anarchy. Otherwise, you'll have somebody come in one morning and tell you: "Yesterday I got tired of painting red convertibles, so today I switched to all baby-blues on my own". You'll never get anything done right that way.
What's to admire about consensus management anyway? By its very nature, it's slow. It can never be daring. There can never be real accountability - or flexibility. About the only plus that I've been able to figure out is that consensus management means consistency of direction and objectives. And so much consistency can become faceless, and that's a problem too. In any event, I don't think it can work in this country. The fun of business for entrepreneurs, big or small, lies in the free enterprise system, not in the greatest agreement by the greatest number.
Business structures are microcosms of other structures. There were no corporations in the fifteenth century. But there were families. There were city governments, provinces, and armies. There was the Church. All of them had, for lack of a better word, a pecking order.
Why? Because that's the only way you can steer clear of anarchy. Otherwise, you'll have somebody come in one morning and tell you: "Yesterday I got tired of painting red convertibles, so today I switched to all baby-blues on my own". You'll never get anything done right that way.
What's to admire about consensus management anyway? By its very nature, it's slow. It can never be daring. There can never be real accountability - or flexibility. About the only plus that I've been able to figure out is that consensus management means consistency of direction and objectives. And so much consistency can become faceless, and that's a problem too. In any event, I don't think it can work in this country. The fun of business for entrepreneurs, big or small, lies in the free enterprise system, not in the greatest agreement by the greatest number.

Q. In the phrase 'emulate something I don't think exists', what according to the author is that does 'not exist'?

Directions: In the following sentence, an idiomatic expression or a proverb is highlighted. Select the alternative which best describes its use in the sentence.
The concert was brought to a close with a display of fireworks.

'We intend to go on a field trip with our teachers. This is our plan.'
In the given statement, which one is a reference word?

______ education is to use the students' native language to teach some academic content while simultaneously providing an additional L2 instruction.

"The focus is on using the language rather than analysis of the language and grammar is taught implicitly rather than explicitly." Identify  the approach of teaching the language.

The ‘question’ How will I achieve my teaching goal? In the design of a language instruction, which helps the teacher to ‘keep the lesson on target’ is/are the

Directions: Select the most appropriate option.
Compounding is

Summative assessment includes ______.

A good English textbook should primarily:

Directions: Read the following sentence to find out whether there is any grammatical error in it. The error, if any, will be in one part of the sentence. The letter representing that part is the answer. If there is no error, mark D as the answer.
Everybody know that his failure can (A)/ be attributed to (B)/ his lack of practice. (C)/ No error (D)

Teachers help learners ‘construct’ their knowledge in English by

The two-word stage of language acquisition which is also known as telegraphic speech includes words like:
I. mim-mim-mai-yaaaaa, ba-ba-ga-ga 
II. mummii khaanaa, ghuumii jaana

A person sitting behind you in a cinema starts talking on the mobile phone and you want to tell him/her to stop.
Choose how you will make the request.

Structures in second language are better assimilated in a pedagogical practice

Direction: Read the passage given below and then answer the questions given below the passage. Some words may be highlighted for your attention.
The big fuss about consensus management is an issue that boils down to a lot of noise about not much. The consensus advocates are great admirers of the Japanese management style. Consensus is what Japan is famous for. Well, I know the Japanese fairly well: They still remember Douglas MacArthur with respect, and they still bow down to their Emperor. In my dealings with them, I found that they talk a lot about consensus, but there's always one guy behind the scenes who ends up making the tough decisions. It doesn't make sense to me to think that Mr. Toyoda or Mr. Morita of Sony sits around in committee meetings and says, "We've got to get everybody in this organization, from the janitor up, to agree with this move". The Japanese believe in their workers' involvement early on in the decision-making process and in feedback from employees. And they probably listen better than we do. But you can bet that when the chips are down, the yen stops at the top guy's desk. So, we're wasting time trying toDirection: Read the passage given below and then answer the questions given below the passage. Some words may be highlighted for your attention.
The big fuss about consensus management is an issue that boils down to a lot of noise about not much. The consensus advocates are great admirers of the Japanese management style. Consensus is what Japan is famous for. Well, I know the Japanese fairly well: They still remember Douglas MacArthur with respect, and they still bow down to their Emperor. In my dealings with them, I found that they talk a lot about consensus, but there's always one guy behind the scenes who ends up making the tough decisions. It doesn't make sense to me to think that Mr. Toyoda or Mr. Morita of Sony sits around in committee meetings and says, "We've got to get everybody in this organization, from the janitor up, to agree with this move". The Japanese believe in their workers' involvement early on in the decision-making process and in feedback from employees. And they probably listen better than we do. But you can bet that when the chips are down, the yen stops at the top guy's desk. So, we're wasting time trying to emulate something I don't think really exists.
Business structures are microcosms of other structures. There were no corporations in the fifteenth century. But there were families. There were city governments, provinces, and armies. There was the Church. All of them had, for lack of a better word, a pecking order.
Why? Because that's the only way you can steer clear of anarchy. Otherwise, you'll have somebody come in one morning and tell you: "Yesterday I got tired of painting red convertibles, so today I switched to all baby-blues on my own". You'll never get anything done right that way.
What's to admire about consensus management anyway? By its very nature, it's slow. It can never be daring. There can never be real accountability - or flexibility. About the only plus that I've been able to figure out is that consensus management means consistency of direction and objectives. And so much consistency can become faceless, and that's a problem too. In any event, I don't think it can work in this country. The fun of business for entrepreneurs, big or small, lies in the free enterprise system, not in the greatest agreement by the greatest number.
Business structures are microcosms of other structures. There were no corporations in the fifteenth century. But there were families. There were city governments, provinces, and armies. There was the Church. All of them had, for lack of a better word, a pecking order.
Why? Because that's the only way you can steer clear of anarchy. Otherwise, you'll have somebody come in one morning and tell you: "Yesterday I got tired of painting red convertibles, so today I switched to all baby-blues on my own". You'll never get anything done right that way.
What's to admire about consensus management anyway? By its very nature, it's slow. It can never be daring. There can never be real accountability - or flexibility. About the only plus that I've been able to figure out is that consensus management means consistency of direction and objectives. And so much consistency can become faceless, and that's a problem too. In any event, I don't think it can work in this country. The fun of business for entrepreneurs, big or small, lies in the free enterprise system, not in the greatest agreement by the greatest number.

Q. What is the tone of the given passage?

A student of class IV is having some problem in writing. She may have

Which of the following involves a rich control on grammar, vocabulary, content, punctuation as well as abilities to organize thoughts coherently?