Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

25 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930

Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 below.
Solutions of Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 | 25 questions in 25 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 1

According to the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, what are the primary obligations of the seller and the buyer in a contract of sale of goods?

Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 1
As per the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, in a contract of sale of goods, the seller is primarily responsible for delivering the goods to the buyer. This includes ensuring the goods conform to the contract and are delivered as per the agreed terms. On the other hand, the buyer's main obligation is to accept the goods and pay for them according to the terms specified in the contract. This division of responsibilities ensures a smooth transaction between the parties involved.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 2

What is the significance of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, in regulating transactions between sellers and buyers?

Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 2
The Sale of Goods Act, 1930, holds significant importance in governing the sale and purchase of goods in various transactions. This legislation provides a legal framework that outlines the rights, duties, and obligations of both sellers and buyers involved in such transactions. It covers aspects such as conditions and warranties related to goods, transfer of ownership, and remedies in case of breaches. By establishing clear guidelines, the Act helps ensure fair and smooth interactions between sellers and buyers, contributing to a more secure and transparent marketplace.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 3

What does Section 32 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 establish?

Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 3
Section 32 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 establishes that payment and delivery should happen simultaneously. This means that in a sales transaction, the buyer is obligated to make payment at the same time as the seller delivers the goods. This provision ensures a fair and balanced exchange between the parties involved, safeguarding the interests of both the buyer and the seller.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 4
What type of delivery involves the physical transfer of goods specified in the contract from the seller to the buyer?
Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 4
Actual delivery occurs when the goods specified in the contract are physically handed over from the seller to the buyer. This type of delivery ensures that the buyer gains control over the goods, even if immediate delivery is not always necessary.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 5
What does Section 37 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 address?
Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 5
Section 37 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 deals with situations where an incorrect quantity of goods is delivered. This section outlines the implications and procedures to be followed when there is an error in the quantity of goods delivered to the buyer. It aims to provide clarity on how such discrepancies should be resolved to ensure fair and transparent transactions between the seller and the buyer.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 6
In a contract of sale of goods, which section mandates the seller's obligation to deliver the goods?
Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 6
According to Section 31, the seller is obligated to deliver the goods in a contract of sale of goods. This legal requirement ensures that the seller fulfills their responsibility to transfer possession of goods to the buyer as per the agreement made between the parties involved.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 7
What is the primary characteristic of constructive delivery in a commercial transaction?
Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 7
Constructive delivery in a commercial transaction involves the transfer of legal ownership of goods without the physical movement of the goods themselves. This legal concept allows for the change in the legal status of the goods even when the physical transfer might not be feasible or necessary. It is based on the mutual agreement between the parties involved, signifying a significant shift in ownership rights without the actual movement of the goods.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 8
In a situation where goods are in the possession of the buyer, held either as a bailee or agent for the seller, and the seller consents to transfer ownership to the buyer, what kind of transaction does this represent?
Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 8
When goods are already in the buyer's possession and the seller agrees to transfer ownership to the buyer, it represents a sale transaction. This indicates a transfer of ownership from the seller to the buyer in exchange for payment, signifying a completed sale.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 9
In the scenario where goods are held by a third party on behalf of the buyer with mutual consent from both the buyer and the seller, what type of arrangement is being described?
Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 9
When goods are held by a third party on behalf of the buyer with mutual consent from both the buyer and seller, this situation refers to a bailment. A bailment occurs when goods are temporarily transferred from one party to another for a specific purpose, with the understanding that the goods will be returned or disposed of as agreed upon.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 10
According to Section 35 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, when must the buyer request delivery of goods?
Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 10
According to Section 35 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, the buyer is required to request delivery of goods before they are ready for delivery. This request needs to be appropriately made, regardless of whether the goods are currently available or will be available in the future. It is a crucial step in the buyer-seller transaction process to ensure a smooth and timely exchange of goods.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 11
What are the consequences for the buyer if the seller delays the delivery of goods and time is considered essential in the contract, as per Section 55 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872?
Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 11
According to Section 55 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, if the seller delays the delivery of goods and time is considered crucial in the contract, the buyer has the right to reject the goods. In such cases, the buyer can also claim compensation for the delay suffered. This provision ensures that buyers are protected in situations where timely delivery is essential as per the terms of the contract.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 12
According to Section 35 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, what is the buyer's obligation regarding the request for delivery of goods?
Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 12
As per Section 35 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, the buyer is obligated to request delivery of goods before the seller is expected to provide them. This request must be appropriately made by the buyer, whether it concerns goods ready for delivery or those that will be available in the future. It is a crucial step in the buyer-seller transaction process, ensuring that the buyer actively participates in the delivery arrangements.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 13
In a scenario where time is not essential to the contract, what right does the buyer have in the case of a delay in the delivery of goods by the seller, according to Section 55 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872?
Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 13
Under Section 55 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, if the seller delays the delivery of goods and time is not considered crucial to the contract, the buyer does not have the right to outright reject the goods. In such cases, the buyer is entitled to claim compensation for the delay as a recourse for the inconvenience caused by the seller's delayed delivery. This provision aims to balance the rights and responsibilities of both parties in commercial transactions.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 14
According to Section 36(5) of the law, who is typically responsible for the costs related to preparing goods for delivery in a sales contract?
Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 14
In a sales contract, as per Section 36(5) of the law, the costs associated with preparing goods for delivery are generally the responsibility of the seller. This means that unless there is a different agreement in place, the seller is expected to cover the expenses related to preparing the goods for delivery. This allocation of costs is a standard practice unless otherwise specified in the contract. It ensures that the seller bears the financial burden of readying the goods for delivery to the buyer.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 15
In a contract involving the delivery of goods, what determines the place of delivery when there is no specific indication in the agreement?
Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 15
In a contract where the place of delivery is not explicitly stated, the default location is where the goods are at the time of the sale. This principle applies to sales where the goods exist at the time of the agreement. It ensures clarity and establishes a standard reference point for determining the place of delivery to avoid ambiguity in contractual agreements.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 16
According to Section 34 of the law regarding part delivery of goods, what is the effect of delivering only a portion of the goods during the process of delivering the whole?
Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 16
Section 34 of the law clarifies that delivering a part of the goods during the process of delivering the whole has the same effect as delivering the entire quantity in terms of transferring ownership of those goods. This rule ensures that partial deliveries are legally recognized for ownership transfer, maintaining clarity in transactions involving part deliveries.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 17
In the case of Hammond v. Anderson, what was the key point regarding the delivery process that led to the buyer being responsible for the loss of the remaining bags of wheat?
Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 17
In the legal case of Hammond v. Anderson, the key point was that when the buyer began transporting the goods, the property in all 1,000 bags would have passed to the buyer. This passing of property made the buyer responsible for the loss of the remaining bags of wheat, even if they were destroyed before full delivery. This emphasizes the significance of understanding when ownership and responsibility transfer in the delivery process.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 18
According to the contractual obligation, what are sellers required to deliver when it comes to goods?
Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 18
Sellers are obligated to deliver goods according to the terms of the contract, including quality, quantity, and description specified. This ensures that buyers receive goods that meet the agreed-upon standards in terms of their quality, quantity, and description.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 19
In the legal case Barium Chemicals Ltd. v. Andhra Pradesh Mining Corporation Ltd., what legal concept guides the principle where the law disregards trivial matters in cases of exceeding contracted amounts of goods?
Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 19
In legal cases such as Barium Chemicals Ltd. v. Andhra Pradesh Mining Corporation Ltd., the principle of de minimis non curat lexis guides the situation where the law disregards trivial matters, allowing the buyer to either accept the surplus goods or reject them based on the excess delivery. This legal concept ensures that minor deviations from the contract are not heavily penalized, promoting fairness and practicality in business transactions.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 20
What principle overlooks trivial discrepancies when it comes to a buyer's right to reject goods?
Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 20
The principle known as the "Rule of de minimis" allows for the overlooking of trivial discrepancies when it comes to a buyer's right to reject goods. This rule recognizes that minor deviations or discrepancies that are insignificant should not warrant the rejection of goods, ensuring a fair balance between buyer and seller interests.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 21
When it comes to installment deliveries as discussed in the case Moore & Co. v. Landauer & Co., what does Section 38(2) emphasize regarding breach assessment?
Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 21
Section 38(2) highlighted in the case Moore & Co. v. Landauer & Co. underscores the importance of assessing contract terms and circumstances when determining the extent of a breach in installment deliveries. Factors such as breach proportion and the likelihood of recurrence play a crucial role in evaluating whether a breach has occurred and to what degree. This assessment helps in understanding the contractual obligations and rights of the parties involved in the transaction.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 22
In contract law, what principle does Section 38(1) typically emphasize regarding the delivery of goods?
Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 22
Section 38(1) in contract law typically emphasizes that goods should be delivered in one lot. This means that normally, goods are expected to be delivered as a single unit rather than in multiple parts. This principle helps ensure clarity and efficiency in transactions, setting a standard for the delivery of goods in contractual agreements.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 23
In the case of Moti Lal v. The Netha Cooperative Spinning Mills Ltd., what was the outcome when the buyer rejected the second instalment of goods?
Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 23
In the case of Moti Lal v. The Netha Cooperative Spinning Mills Ltd., when the buyer rejected the second instalment of goods due to adulteration and inferior quality, this rejection led to the justified repudiation of the entire contract. As a result, the sellers couldn't claim damages because they didn't provide additional instalments within the contract period and agreed to the contract's repudiation. This highlights the significance of meeting quality standards in contractual agreements to avoid contract repudiation.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 24
According to the case of Beer v. Walker, what action could the buyer take if perishable goods sent to a distant place deteriorated and became unsuitable for consumption upon arrival?
Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 24
In the case of Beer v. Walker, if perishable goods, like the rabbits sent from London, deteriorated and were unsuitable for consumption upon arrival in Brighton, the buyer had the right to refuse acceptance of the deteriorated goods. This case underscores the importance of ensuring that goods remain fit for sale not only when dispatched but also during transit and for a reasonable period afterwards, especially for perishable items.
Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 25
In the case of Bull v. Robinson, what was the court's ruling regarding the seller's liability for deterioration of goods during transit to a distant location?
Detailed Solution for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Question 25
In the case of Bull v. Robinson, the court ruled that the seller was not accountable for the deterioration of goods, such as the hoop iron that rusted during transit from Staffordshire to Liverpool. This ruling highlights an important aspect of the seller's liability in cases where goods are delivered to a distant location, emphasizing that deterioration inherent to the journey may not be the seller's responsibility.
Information about Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Performance of the Contract under Sale of Goods Act, 1930, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams