Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code

Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code below.
Solutions of Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 1

In the context of group liability under Section 149, which scenario makes all members of an unlawful assembly culpable?

Detailed Solution for Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 1
According to Section 149, all members of an unlawful assembly are held culpable if an offense is committed by any member in pursuit of the assembly's common goal. This provision establishes vicarious or constructive criminal responsibility, emphasizing that collective responsibility applies when an offense relates to the assembly's shared objective. This legal principle ensures accountability and discourages individuals from participating in unlawful activities under the guise of a group.
Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 2

Why is success not always necessary for determining common object under Section 149?

Detailed Solution for Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 2
In the context of Section 149, the requirement of achieving the common goal for determining common object is not contingent on the assembly's success. Even if the assembly fails to accomplish its objective, members remain culpable for offenses committed in pursuit of that goal. This legal principle underscores the shared responsibility of assembly members and ensures that accountability is upheld irrespective of the outcome of their actions.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 3

Which case clarified that the phrase 'in prosecution of the common object' in section 149 should be interpreted as 'in order to attain the common object,' emphasizing the intrinsic connection required among individuals involved?

Detailed Solution for Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 3
In the case of Bhargavan v. State of Kerala, the Supreme Court clarified that the phrase 'in prosecution of the common object' in section 149 should be interpreted as 'in order to attain the common object.' This connection must be intrinsic to the nature of the object, requiring a shared objective among the individuals involved. The common object is not a perpetual commitment but may cease to exist at a certain point.
Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 4
According to the Supreme Court in the case of Charan Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, what level of knowledge is implied by the term 'knew' in the latter part of the section related to determining the common object in an unlawful assembly?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 4
In the case of Charan Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, the Supreme Court emphasized that the term 'knew' in the latter part of the section implies more than a mere possibility; it necessitates actual knowledge. Positive knowledge is essential for liability in cases related to determining the common object in an unlawful assembly.
Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 5
According to the legal case of Vithal Bhimashah Koli v. State, what principle did the Supreme Court establish regarding individuals in an unlawful assembly?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 5
The Supreme Court ruling in the case of Vithal Bhimashah Koli v. State established the principle that individuals in an unlawful assembly, even if arriving independently and without coordination, bear collective responsibility for the crimes committed in pursuit of the assembly's shared goal. This means that all participants can be held accountable for the overall unlawful activities undertaken by the assembly.
Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 6
How did the Supreme Court approach liability in the case of Vithal Bhimashah Koli v. State for individuals who were not acquitted due to the state party's lack of appeal?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 6
In the case of Vithal Bhimashah Koli v. State, the Supreme Court had to assess the liability of individuals who were not acquitted due to the state party's lack of appeal based on their individual actions. This approach indicates that each individual's level of accountability was determined by the specific actions they undertook within the context of the unlawful assembly.
Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 7
In the context of an unlawful assembly, what scenario would lead to individuals being held accountable for the actions of the entire group?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 7
When individuals in an unlawful assembly divide into separate groups and commit offenses in pursuit of the assembly's shared goal, they collectively bear responsibility for the crimes. This legal concept is crucial as it holds all participants accountable for the actions taken in furtherance of the common objective, regardless of whether they arrived at the scene independently or engaged in different activities.
Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 8
According to the Supreme Court of India, what is emphasized as a necessity for vicarious convictions under section 34 or 149 of the Code?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 8
The Supreme Court of India highlighted the importance of proving overt acts by accused persons in furtherance of common intention or the common object of the unlawful assembly. This emphasizes the significance of establishing individual involvement in actions that align with the shared intention or objective of the group.
Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 9
In which case were the accused, who were part of an unlawful assembly, convicted for setting houses on fire rather than for murder?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 9
In the case of Mukteshwar Rai v. State, the accused individuals, who were part of an unlawful assembly, were convicted for setting houses on fire instead of being directly convicted for murder. This exemplifies how specific actions within an unlawful assembly can lead to distinct charges based on the nature of the acts committed.
Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 10
According to the Patna High Court, what responsibility was attributed to armed gang members in the context of disrupting the voting process?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 10
The Patna High Court, in the case of Nagina Sharma v. State, held armed gang members responsible for deaths while attempting to disrupt the voting process. This ruling underscores the accountability assigned to individuals who engage in unlawful activities that result in fatal consequences during such events.
Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 11
In the scenario presented in the case study of Bhimrao v. State of Maharashtra, what decision did the Supreme Court reach concerning individuals outside an unlawful assembly?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 11
The Supreme Court's ruling in the case of Bhimrao v. State of Maharashtra established that individuals positioned outside an unlawful assembly cannot be held responsible for the actions taking place within the assembly if they are unaware of the unfolding events. This decision underscores the legal principle that liability is typically not attributed to individuals who are not directly involved or informed about the criminal activities occurring within the group.
Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 12
What serious actions were involved in the case of Ranbir Yadav v. State of Bihar where a large mob targeted the 'Bind' community in a village?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 12
Ranbir Yadav v. State of Bihar involved a large mob aiming to eliminate the 'Bind' community from a village, resulting in murder and other serious offenses. This case highlighted the grave nature of the crimes committed by the accused.
Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 13
What is the key distinction between Section 34 and Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 13
The key difference between Section 34 and Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code lies in the requirement of collusion and pre-planning. While Section 34 necessitates these elements for joint liability, they are not obligatory under Section 149. This distinction emphasizes the varying levels of intent and coordination expected under each section, shaping the legal implications for individuals involved in a crime.
Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 14
What is a crucial factor regarding the number of individuals involved in offenses under Section 34 and Section 149 of the IPC?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 14
An important factor regarding the number of individuals in offenses under Section 34 and Section 149 of the IPC is that while Section 34 assumes the presence of at least two persons, Section 149 mandates the involvement of at least five individuals. However, not all five individuals under Section 149 must necessarily be convicted, highlighting a distinction in the required number of participants for liability under each section.
Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 15
Which of the following statements accurately represents the contrast between the liability requirements of Section 34 and Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code - Question 15
The distinction in liability requirements between Section 34 and Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code is crucial. Section 34 necessitates active participation by all parties for joint liability, while liability under Section 149 arises simply by being a member of an unlawful assembly pursuing a common object. This difference underscores the varying levels of involvement and responsibility expected under each section, shaping the legal implications for individuals in different scenarios.
Information about Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams