Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case)

Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) below.
Solutions of Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 1

What was the primary reason for Shafin Jahan approaching the Supreme Court in the case of Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors.?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 1
Shafin Jahan approached the Supreme Court to appeal against the Kerala High Court order, which declared his marriage with Hadiya null and void. This action stemmed from the High Court's decision annulling their marriage, leading him to challenge this ruling in the Supreme Court.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 2

Why was Hadiya initially directed by the court to stay with her parents in the case of Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors.?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 2
Hadiya was directed by the court to stay with her parents because of a writ petition of habeas corpus filed before it. This legal action led to the court's decision to have her reside with her parents during a specific period of time.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 3

What action did the High Court take regarding the marriage between Shafin Jahan and Hadiya in the case of Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors.?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 3
The High Court annulled the marriage between Shafin Jahan and Hadiya, declaring it null and void. This decision led to further legal actions, including Shafin Jahan's appeal to the Supreme Court against the High Court's ruling.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 4
What is the primary argument made by the appellant in the case of Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors.?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 4
The appellant argues that the High Court's decision violates Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the right to marriage for adults and the freedom to follow any religion. They believe that the annulment of the marriage between two consenting adults is unjust. This argument is based on fundamental rights and personal freedoms enshrined in the constitution, highlighting the importance of individual choice and autonomy in personal matters.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 5
What is the key contention raised by the respondents in the Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. case regarding the appellant's influence on Hadiya?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 5
The respondents argue that the appellant influenced Hadiya and coerced her into marriage without her parents' consent. This argument revolves around the idea that Hadiya was vulnerable and easily manipulated, leading to the assertion that the marriage was not entered into willingly and should be annulled to protect her interests.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 6
What constitutional right is emphasized in the appellant's argument regarding the court's decision in the Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 6
The appellant's argument focuses on the violation of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the right to marriage for adults. This constitutional provision underscores the importance of individuals being able to make their own choices regarding marriage and personal relationships, free from undue interference or constraints.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 7
What constitutional right is the appellant arguing has been violated in the case presented?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 7
The appellant in the case argues that the High Court's decision violates Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the right to marriage for adults and the freedom to follow any religion. This highlights a fundamental aspect of individual rights and freedoms enshrined in the constitution.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 8
What jurisdiction is contested by the appellant's legal representative in the case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 8
The appellant's legal representative asserts that the court should not have invoked its "Parens Patriae jurisdiction" in this particular case, as it was deemed unwarranted. Understanding various legal jurisdictions is crucial in comprehending the scope and limits of legal actions and decisions.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 9
What legal principle is raised by the appellant regarding Hadiya's confinement?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 9
The principle of habeas corpus, which protects against unlawful detention, is raised by the appellant regarding Hadiya's confinement. This principle emphasizes the right to challenge the legality of one's detention or imprisonment, ensuring individual liberty and protection against arbitrary confinement.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 10
What was the outcome of the appeal in the case of Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors.?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 10
The appeal in the case of Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. was successful, confirming the validity of the marriage between Shafin Jahan and Hadiya. This decision highlighted the legal recognition of their marriage despite initial controversies and challenges.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 11
Who is responsible for investigating potential undue influence in the marriage between Shafin Jahan and Hadiya?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 11
The National Investigation Agency (NIA) is tasked with investigating any potential undue influence in the marriage between Shafin Jahan and Hadiya. This agency plays a crucial role in ensuring the legality and authenticity of the marital union.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 12
Why was the High Court's intervention under Article 226 considered excessive in the case of Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors.?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 12
The High Court's intervention under Article 226 was deemed excessive because it exceeded its jurisdiction in personal matters. This decision reflects the limitations of the court's authority in intervening in certain private affairs, especially concerning personal relationships like marriage.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 13
Why was the habeas corpus writ considered unnecessary in the case of Hadiya in the legal proceedings?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 13
The habeas corpus writ, which ensures a person is not unlawfully detained, was considered unnecessary in Hadiya's case because she willingly appeared in court when summoned. This voluntary action by Hadiya eliminated the need for the court to intervene through the writ, demonstrating her cooperation with the legal proceedings.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 14
From a legal standpoint, what principle is emphasized as imperative in the context of the current case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 14
The legal standpoint emphasized in the context of the current case underscores the importance of prioritizing individual rights over entrenched social traditions. This principle advocates for according paramount importance to rights within the legal framework to effectively adjudicate cases involving conflicts between personal freedoms and societal expectations.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 15
What is the key aspect that courts diverge in their views on regarding inter-caste or inter-religious marriages?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 15
Courts diverge in their views on whether to grant freedom to consenting adults seeking to marry without regard to caste or religion, or alternatively, to uphold parental rights in accordance with traditional Indian norms. This divergence reflects the legal and societal debate surrounding the balance between individual autonomy in choosing a life partner and the adherence to familial and cultural expectations.
Information about Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case), EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams