All Courses
Get the App Signup / Login
Sign in Open App
Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

10 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa

Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa below.
Solutions of Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa | 10 questions in 10 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa - Question 1
Save

In the case of State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa, what was the central issue that led to the respondent's acquittal?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa - Question 1
The central issue that led to the respondent's acquittal in the case of State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa was a bona fide mistake of fact under Section 79 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). This section provides a legal defense for acts done in good faith under a mistaken belief, which is a crucial consideration in criminal law cases. It ensures that individuals who genuinely and reasonably believe in a certain state of affairs are not held criminally liable for their actions based on that belief.
Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa - Question 2
Save

What was the central issue in the case of State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa - Question 2
The central issue in the case of State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa revolved around the application of Section 79 of the Indian Penal Code. This section deals with the mistake of fact made in good faith and whether the standard of care was met. In legal terms, it addresses situations where an individual's actions, based on a genuine mistake of fact, might absolve them from criminal liability.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa - Question 3
Save

What led to the death of one woman and injuries to others in the case of State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa - Question 3
The death of one woman and the injuries to others in the case of State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa resulted from the respondent's misidentification of the women collecting flowers near the abandoned aerodrome as ghosts. This mistaken belief led to the tragic consequences of the respondent's actions, highlighting the importance of understanding the implications of one's perceptions and actions.
Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa - Question 4
Save
What was the outcome of the respondent's trial at the Sessions Court in the case of State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa - Question 4
The respondent in the case of State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa was acquitted by the Sessions Judge based on a bona fide mistake of fact under Section 79 of the Indian Penal Code. This decision stemmed from the acknowledgment that the respondent's actions were guided by a sincere belief, albeit mistaken, that the women were ghosts.
Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa - Question 5
Save
What was the key decision made by the High Court judges in the case of State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa - Question 5
The High Court judges in the case of State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa upheld the acquittal of the respondent. Their decision was based on the recognition that the mistake of fact made in good faith by the respondent played a significant role in the incident, leading to the conclusion that the acquittal was justified under the circumstances.
Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa - Question 6
Save
In the case of State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa, what was the basis for the Sessions Judge's decision to acquit the respondent?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa - Question 6
The Sessions Judge acquitted the respondent based on a genuine mistake of fact under Section 79 IPC. This means that the respondent genuinely believed he was attacking ghosts and not people, which influenced the judge's decision to acquit him. This legal principle recognizes that in certain circumstances, a mistake of fact can affect criminal liability, as the accused did not have the intent to commit the crime due to a genuine misunderstanding of the situation.
Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa - Question 7
Save
What was Justice R Narasimham's perspective in the appellant Court regarding the respondent's actions in State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa - Question 7
Justice R Narasimham linked the concept of duty of care to good faith under Section 52 of the IPC and emphasized that the standard of care varies depending on individual circumstances. He highlighted that the accused's capacity and intelligence must be considered when determining the standard of care, as seen in the case of Emperor v. Abdeol Wadood Ahmed. This perspective underscores the importance of assessing the accused's mental state and understanding when evaluating legal responsibilities.
Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa - Question 8
Save
How did Justice R Narasimham relate the concept of duty of care to the respondent's actions in State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa - Question 8
Justice R Narasimham connected the concept of duty of care to the respondent's actions by considering the respondent's mental capacity and individual circumstances. This approach recognizes that an individual's mental state and understanding play a crucial role in determining legal responsibilities and obligations. By factoring in the respondent's specific situation and mental capacity, Justice Narasimham sought to provide a nuanced assessment that accounts for the complexities of human behavior and decision-making in legal contexts.
Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa - Question 9
Save
According to the legal proceedings, what was the reasoning behind the judge finding it unreasonable to expect the respondent to verify the identities of the figures after identifying them as ghosts?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa - Question 9
The judge found it unreasonable to expect the respondent to verify the identities of the figures after he had already identified them as ghosts due to his immediate attack on the figures. This action was influenced by his strong belief in ghosts and the surrounding circumstances.
Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa - Question 10
Save
How did the judge connect the respondent's belief in ghosts to his actions in the legal case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa - Question 10
The judge connected the respondent's belief in ghosts to his actions by highlighting how this belief influenced his immediate attack on the figures involved in the incident. This belief, coupled with other factors, played a significant role in shaping the outcome of the case.
Information about Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Important Questions for Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa

Find all the important questions for Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa at EduRev.Get fully prepared for Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa resources.

Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace Case Brief: State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup