Who was part of the Coram in the Supreme Court for the case 'Ranjit Udeshi v State Of Maharashtra'?

Gajendragadkar, P.B. (Cj), Wanchoo, K.N., Hidayatullah, M., Shah, J.C.

Bhagwati, P.N., Verma, Jagdish Saran, Kania, H.J., Ray, A.N.

Chagla, M.C., Desai, P.B., Sinha, Y.V., Ramaswami, V.

Khanna, H.R., Hegde, K.S., Mukherjea, B.K., Beg, M.H.

In the case of Ranjit Udeshi v State Of Maharashtra, what action did Udeshi take after being convicted by lower courts?

Fled the country to avoid further legal action

Accepted the verdict and served the sentence

Filed an appeal to the Supreme Court

What was the main legal concern raised by the appellants regarding Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code?

The restriction of freedom of assembly

The excessive restriction of freedom of speech

The limitation of religious practices

The hindrance to political participation

According to the appellants, what did they posit regarding the punishment under Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code?

Punishment should be solely based on the content of the book

Punishment should require proof of actual harm caused

Punishment should be imposed regardless of intent

Punishment should necessitate intent to corrupt the public

What legal concept did the Supreme Court of India defend concerning Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code?

Protection of public decency and morality

Upholding absolute freedom of speech

Promotion of artistic expression

Ensuring unrestricted publication

What was the court's ruling regarding the classification of Lady Chatterley's Lover?

The court overturned the ruling of the High Court, declaring the book not obscene.

Lady Chatterley's Lover was deemed obscene due to its intellectual themes.

The court upheld the High Court's decision that Lady Chatterley's Lover was obscene.

Lady Chatterley's Lover was considered a classic work of literature by the court.

What distinguished Aveek Sarkar's ruling from past judgments like Samaresh Bose v Amal Mitra (1985) and S Khushboo v Kanniammal (2010)?

Increased emphasis on social attitudes

Consistency in legal interpretation

Departure from past social attitudes

Greater accountability and consideration of the impugned image as a whole

What fundamental aspect did the Aveek Sarkar judgment emphasize in terms of accountability?

Increased leniency towards mens rea

Importance of evaluating items in isolation

Greater accountability of mens rea

Decreased scrutiny of impugned images

How does the Ranjit Udeshi case contribute to the broader legal landscape, particularly in terms of judicial interpretation?

It highlights the significance of intent in criminal law

It expands the scope of mens rea in all criminal offenses

It challenges the traditional approach to obscenity laws

It advocates for stricter liability in civil cases

How does the Ranjit Udeshi case differ from offenses like murder under Indian criminal law?

It imposes strict liability regardless of intent

It focuses solely on the accused's state of mind

It requires proof of intent for conviction

It aligns with the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act

What critique does legal scholar Latika Vashisht offer regarding the approach set by the Ranjit Udeshi case in shaping obscenity laws?

Overlooking societal norms in favor of individual perspectives

Ignoring the moral framework in favor of emotional considerations

Focusing on aesthetic and emotional aspects while neglecting societal norms

Prioritizing feminine perspectives over masculine viewpoints

Why is it suggested to revisit judgments like Ranjit Udeshi v. State of Maharashtra for understanding contemporary obscenity law?

To disregard their relevance in the legal landscape.

To appreciate their impact on feminist issues.

To comprehend the jurisprudential evolution in the present legal framework.

To emphasize their alignment with Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

Case Brief: Ranjit Udeshi v State of Maharashtra Free MCQ Practice Test with Solutions

Important Questions for Case Brief: Ranjit Udeshi v State of Maharashtra

Find all the important questions for Case Brief: Ranjit Udeshi v State of Maharashtra at EduRev.Get fully prepared for Case Brief: Ranjit Udeshi v State of Maharashtra with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the Case Brief: Ranjit Udeshi v State of Maharashtra syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of Case Brief: Ranjit Udeshi v State of Maharashtra resources.

Case Brief: Ranjit Udeshi v State of Maharashtra MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the Case Brief: Ranjit Udeshi v State of Maharashtra within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for Case Brief: Ranjit Udeshi v State of Maharashtra

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace Case Brief: Ranjit Udeshi v State of Maharashtra with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.

Education Revolution