Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

10 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India

Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India below.
Solutions of Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India | 10 questions in 10 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India - Question 1

According to the arguments presented, what is one of the criticisms against Exception 2 to Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code 1860?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India - Question 1
Exception 2 to Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 is criticized for being arbitrary and discriminatory, lacking a clear link to its intended purpose. This criticism stems from the belief that the provision unfairly puts underage girls at a disadvantage and contradicts key principles of the Indian Constitution. It is important to address such inconsistencies to ensure the protection and rights of vulnerable populations, especially underage girls.
Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India - Question 2

Why is Exception 2 to Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 criticized for violating human rights laws?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India - Question 2
Exception 2 to Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 is criticized for violating human rights laws because it grants husbands of underage girls the freedom for non-consensual sexual intercourse. This provision is seen as a violation of human rights and domestic violence laws, as it allows for forced sexual encounters with underage wives, undermining the rights and well-being of these vulnerable individuals.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India - Question 3

How does child marriage impact the educational standards of young girls based on the arguments presented?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India - Question 3
Child marriage is highlighted as a factor that leads to a decline in education standards for young girls. This is a significant concern as education plays a vital role in empowering individuals and shaping their future prospects. By understanding the detrimental effects of child marriage on education, efforts can be made to address this issue and promote educational opportunities for all girls, irrespective of their marital status.
Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India - Question 4
According to the provided argument, why is Exception 2 in Section 375 of the IPC considered necessary?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India - Question 4
Exception 2 in Section 375 of the IPC is deemed necessary to acknowledge and accommodate cultural traditions related to the age at which marriages are solemnized. This exception recognizes marriages conducted at the age of 15, highlighting the importance of cultural contexts within legal frameworks.
Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India - Question 5
What societal aspect does the respondent's argument emphasize in relation to the institution of marriage?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India - Question 5
The respondent's argument underscores the significance of societal norms and customs in the context of marriage. It highlights the importance of respecting traditions and customs, including the presence of exceptions in laws, as essential factors for maintaining societal harmony.
Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India - Question 6
How does the respondent's argument view the implications of prohibiting sexual relations between married minors?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India - Question 6
According to the respondent's argument, prohibiting sexual relations between married minors could potentially lead to increased societal issues, such as a rise in problems like child abuse. This viewpoint suggests that such prohibitions might have unintended negative consequences on society.
Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India - Question 7
What key concern is expressed in the case regarding girls most vulnerable to child marriage?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India - Question 7
The case highlights a key concern that girls most vulnerable to child marriage lack essential information, education, and agency to make informed decisions about their pregnancies and access to necessary healthcare. This lack of empowerment exacerbates the risks they face in such situations.
Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India - Question 8
What aspect of the Independent Thought case was highlighted in relation to safeguarding the rights of the girl child?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India - Question 8
The Independent Thought case marked a significant stride in safeguarding the rights of the girl child by specifically condemning sexual intercourse with a spouse under 18 years. This ruling aimed to protect minors from the harmful effects of such relationships and uphold their rights to safety and well-being.
Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India - Question 9
What was a notable concern regarding the Supreme Court's stance on Exception 2 in the Independent Thought case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India - Question 9
An important concern raised was that the Supreme Court did not address the issue of "marital rape" when the girl is over 18 years old. This omission raised questions about the court's stance on protecting the dignity and rights of girls in such circumstances.
Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India - Question 10

What key issue did the Supreme Court neglected to address in the Independent Thought case?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India - Question 10

The Supreme Court seemed to neglect the interests of the boy child in cases related to Exception 2 of the Independent Thought case. By not providing provisions that consider the well-being and rights of boys in such situations, there is a perceived imbalance in the court's approach to safeguarding minors' rights.

Information about Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Case Brief: Independent Thought vs. Union of India, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams