Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Judiciary Exams MCQ

OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala

OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala below.
Solutions of OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 1

In what state did the tragic incident involving Soumya, a 23-year-old victim, take place?

Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 1
The heinous crime against Soumya, a 23-year-old victim, occurred in Kerala. This tragic incident not only brought attention to the need for stricter laws and better law enforcement but also highlighted the importance of societal awareness and support in combating crimes against women.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 2

What fundamental issue persists despite constitutional provisions in cases like the 'Soumya rape' case?

Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 2
Despite constitutional guarantees of justice, cases like the 'Soumya rape' highlight the ongoing prevalence of sexual abuse and violence against women. This persistent issue necessitates a multifaceted approach involving legal, social, and educational interventions to create a safer environment for women and prevent such atrocities.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 3

What was the initial sentence handed down by the Thrissur Fast Track court to the accused in the case of Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala?

Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 3
The Thrissur Fast Track court initially sentenced the accused in the case to death under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). This decision was later altered by the Supreme Court to grievous assault, resulting in the accused being sentenced to seven years of rigorous imprisonment. This case highlights the complexities and considerations involved in the judicial system when determining appropriate sentences for criminal offenses.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 4
What lesson does the 'Soumya rape' case offer regarding the treatment of women seeking justice?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 4
The 'Soumya rape' case underscores the critical importance of adopting gender-sensitive approaches in addressing the needs of women seeking justice. By recognizing and addressing the unique vulnerabilities and challenges faced by female victims, authorities and society can ensure a more empathetic and effective response to cases of sexual violence, fostering a more supportive and just environment for all individuals.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 5
Where was the victim found after the assault by the accused, Govindaswamy, on the Ernakulam-Shornur passenger train?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 5
Following the assault on the Ernakulam-Shornur passenger train, the victim was found unconscious on the railway tracks near Vallathol Nagar station. This tragic incident led to her succumbing to her injuries after spending five days in the hospital. Such events underscore the importance of ensuring the safety and security of individuals in public spaces.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 6
What was the final decision made by the Supreme Court regarding the murder charge in the case of Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 6
The High Court of Kerala had initially upheld the death penalty, but the Supreme Court later altered the murder charge to grievous assault in the case of Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala. This decision showcases the role of higher courts in reviewing and revising legal judgments to ensure justice is served appropriately.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 7
How long was the accused, Govindaswamy, sentenced to imprisonment following the Supreme Court's decision in the case?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 7
After the Supreme Court altered the murder charge to grievous assault in the case of Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala, the accused was sentenced to seven years of rigorous imprisonment. This outcome reflects the judicial process of considering all aspects of a case before determining an appropriate sentence based on the revised charges.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 8
What does the absence of a deadly weapon in the case of Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala suggest about the accused's intention?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 8
The absence of a deadly weapon in this case suggests a lack of intention on the part of the accused to commit murder. The presence or absence of a deadly weapon is a crucial factor in determining the severity of intent in criminal cases. Analyzing this aspect can provide insights into the nature of the accused's actions and intentions.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 9
How does the accused's semen found in the victim's undergarments relate to his intention in the case of Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 9
The presence of the accused's semen in the victim's undergarments suggests his intention to satisfy his lust. This forensic evidence can be indicative of sexual assault or misconduct, shedding light on the accused's motives and actions in the case. Understanding the significance of this finding is essential in comprehending the accused's intentions and the nature of the criminal offense.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 10
How does the intent behind an action affect criminal liability in certain cases?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 10
The intent behind an action plays a crucial role in determining criminal liability in certain cases. In law, the concept of intent can affect the severity of the charges and the degree of culpability assigned to the accused. Intent to commit a specific crime or harm can lead to different legal consequences compared to accidental or unintentional actions. Understanding intent is essential in assessing the mental state of the accused and establishing criminal liability.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 11
What is the primary purpose of reviewing a judgment delivered by a High Court at the Apex Court level?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 11
Reviewing a judgment delivered by a High Court at the Apex Court level is essential to ensure the correct application of law and justice. The Apex Court serves as the final arbiter in the legal system, responsible for interpreting the law, resolving disputes, and upholding the principles of justice. By reviewing judgments, the Apex Court can assess the legal validity, fairness, and consistency of decisions made by lower courts, thereby maintaining the integrity and effectiveness of the legal system.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 12
In the case of Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala, what modification did the Supreme Court make to the murder charges against Govindaswamy?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 12
The Supreme Court modified the murder charges against Govindaswamy to rigorous imprisonment for seven years under section 325 IPC. This decision was based on the court's assessment of the case and the specific circumstances surrounding the victim's death.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 13
Who were the judges that comprised the Supreme Court bench in the case of Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 13
The Supreme Court bench in the case of Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala comprised Mr. Ranjan Gogoi, Prafulla C. Pant, and Uday Umesh Lalit. These judges played a pivotal role in the legal proceedings and final judgment of the case.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 14
How were the sentences imposed on Govindaswamy to be served according to the Supreme Court's decision?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 14
The sentences imposed on Govindaswamy were to run concurrently as per the Supreme Court's decision. This meant that the various sentences for different charges would be served simultaneously, rather than consecutively.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 15
Why is there an urgent call to reassess the position of women as victims of crime within the criminal justice system?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala - Question 15
There is an urgent call to reassess the position of women as victims of crime within the criminal justice system to highlight the importance of recognizing victims as integral players in seeking justice. By empowering and acknowledging victims, the justice system can better address their needs and ensure fair treatment throughout legal proceedings.
Information about OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams