All Courses
Get the App Signup / Login
Sign in Open App
Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Judiciary Exams MCQ

OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India]

OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] below.
Solutions of OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 1
Save

What fundamental right was contested by the petitioner in the case of R. M. D. Chamarbaugwalla vs. Union of India?

Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 1
The petitioner contested the ban on conducting certain games of pure skill, arguing that such a restriction infringed upon their fundamental rights as per Article 19(1)(g) of the Indian Constitution. This article guarantees the right to engage in any trade, business, or profession.
OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 2
Save

In what year does the legal battle of R. M. D. Chamarbaugwalla vs. Union of India date back to?

Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 2
The case of R. M. D. Chamarbaugwalla vs. Union of India dates back to the year 1957, where certain provisions within the Public Gambling Act of 1867 were challenged for their constitutionality.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 3
Save

In the context of the Prize Competitions Act, what was the second issue addressed in the case of R. M. D. Chamarbaugwalla vs Union of India?

Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 3
Another crucial issue discussed in the case of R. M. D. Chamarbaugwalla vs Union of India was related to the enforceability of Sections 4 and 5, along with Rules 11 and 12, which were identified as invalid. The question raised was whether these specific provisions could be selectively enforced through the principle of severability, particularly concerning contests categorized as gambling.
OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 4
Save
Which aspect did the court aim to address by examining the enforceability of certain rules in the Prize Competitions Act of 1955?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 4
The court aimed to address the feasibility of enforcing specific rules in the Prize Competitions Act that were considered invalid, particularly in cases involving gambling activities. By examining this issue, the court sought to clarify the enforceability of certain provisions in the Act and ensure legal compliance in contests where skill and chance intersect.
OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 5
Save
What was the primary issue that the court was tasked with addressing regarding the Prize Competitions Act of 1955?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 5
The court was primarily tasked with evaluating the enforceability of specific sections of the Prize Competitions Act of 1955 in skill-based competitions. This involved addressing whether certain provisions could be applied selectively through the principle of severability in the context of contests classified as gambling. By examining this issue, the court aimed to ensure compliance with the Act's provisions and clarify the legal standing of skill-based competitions.
OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 6
Save
What was the primary argument made by the petitioners in contesting the constitutionality of Sections 4 and 5 of the Prize Competitions Act (42 of 1955)?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 6
The petitioners argued that the provisions of the Prize Competitions Act violated their fundamental right to conduct business under Article 19(6) of the Constitution. This argument stemmed from their belief that Sections 4 and 5, along with Rules 11 and 12, impeded their ability to engage in business activities related to prize competitions. Fundamental rights under the Constitution are essential safeguards for citizens in India, ensuring their freedom to engage in various lawful activities without undue interference from the government.
OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 7
Save
Why did the petitioners claim that the provisions of the Prize Competitions Act should be considered as a single inseverable enactment?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 7
The petitioners argued that the provisions of the Prize Competitions Act should be considered as a single inseverable enactment because they believed that the different sections of the Act were interconnected and relied on each other. By asserting that the provisions should be treated as inseverable, the petitioners aimed to demonstrate the inherent dependence of various sections within the Act. This legal strategy sought to emphasize the interconnected nature of the provisions and underscore the impact that any invalidation of one section would have on the Act as a whole.
OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 8
Save
According to the arguments presented by the Union of India in the case of RMDC vs Union of India, what was their main contention regarding the definition of competitions in question?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 8
In the case of RMDC vs Union of India, the Union of India argued that the definition of competitions, when carefully analyzed, solely encompassed activities related to gambling. This interpretation was a key aspect of their legal argument.
OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 9
Save
How did the Union of India justify the validity of the contested provisions in the context of gambling competitions in the case of RMDC vs Union of India?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 9
The Union of India contended that even if the definition of competitions did not exclusively pertain to gambling contests, the disputed provisions were argued to be separable in their implementation. They were deemed legally sound, especially concerning gambling competitions, according to the Union's arguments.
OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 10
Save
What legal concept did the court in RMDC vs Union of India emphasize when analyzing the restrictions under the Prize Competitions Act?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 10
The court in RMDC vs Union of India emphasized the importance of understanding legislative intent when interpreting laws. This concept involves looking beyond the literal meanings of statutes and considering factors like legislative history and purpose to determine the true scope and application of legal provisions.
OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 11
Save
In the context of the court's decision in RMDC vs Union of India, what legal principle did the court clarify regarding laws enacted by legislatures with limited legislative powers?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 11
The court in RMDC vs Union of India clarified the principle of severability concerning laws enacted by legislatures with limited powers. Severability allows valid parts of a law to be upheld even if other parts are found to be unconstitutional. This principle ensures that portions of a law that are in line with constitutional limits can remain in force despite potential issues with other provisions.
OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 12
Save
According to the court's decision in R. M. D. Chamarbaugwalla vs Union of India, why were the restrictions imposed by Sections 4 and 5 of the Prize Competitions Act not challengeable under Article 19(6) of the Constitution?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 12
The court's decision in R. M. D. Chamarbaugwalla vs Union of India concluded that the restrictions imposed by Sections 4 and 5 of the Prize Competitions Act were not challengeable under Article 19(6) of the Constitution because they were considered essential for regulating gambling competitions. This ruling emphasized the importance of regulating such activities to maintain order and protect public interest.
OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 13
Save
In the case of R. M. D. Chamarbaugwalla vs Union of India, what was the court's ruling regarding the applicability of the challenged provisions under Sections 4 and 5 of the Prize Competitions Act to gambling competitions?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 13
The court's ruling in the case of R. M. D. Chamarbaugwalla vs Union of India determined that the challenged provisions under Sections 4 and 5 of the Prize Competitions Act were separable, valid specifically for gambling competitions, and not null and void. This decision upheld the legality of these provisions in the context of gambling activities, establishing a clear precedent regarding their constitutional validity.
OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 14
Save
What did the court clarify in the legal interpretation of the R. M. D. Chamarbaugwalla vs Union of India case regarding gambling and constitutional protection?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 14
In the legal interpretation of the case, the court clarified that gambling does not fall under the protection of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. This clarification was crucial in determining the constitutionality of the provisions under Sections 4 and 5 of the Prize Competitions Act as they related to gambling competitions, setting a significant legal precedent regarding the scope of constitutional protection in such contexts.
OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 15
Save
In the context of the legal judgment provided, what did the precedent established by the court primarily focus on regarding the Prize Competitions Act?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] - Question 15
The precedent set by the court in this legal judgment primarily centered around the examination of the constitutional validity of specific provisions within the Prize Competitions Act concerning gambling competitions. This ruling has significant implications for the legal framework surrounding such activities, ensuring compliance with constitutional principles while regulating gambling competitions effectively.
Information about OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India], EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Important Questions for OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India]

Find all the important questions for OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] at EduRev.Get fully prepared for OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] resources.

OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India]

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace OneTime: Test: R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala vs Union of India [RMDC vs Union of India] with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup