Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India

Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India below.
Solutions of Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 1

What is the central issue in the case of Lok Prahari vs Union of India?

Detailed Solution for Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 1
The central issue in the case of Lok Prahari vs Union of India revolves around the constitutional norms governing the electoral process in India. This case specifically focuses on the right to vote and the right to contest elections as outlined in Article 324 of the Indian Constitution. It raises important questions about the electoral system and the fundamental rights associated with the democratic process.
Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 2

Which constitutional body is established to oversee and manage elections in India?

Detailed Solution for Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 2
The Election Commission is the constitutional body established to oversee and manage elections in India. It plays a crucial role in ensuring free and fair elections by implementing electoral rules and regulations, monitoring the election process, and resolving disputes related to elections. The Election Commission plays a key role in upholding the democratic principles of the Indian electoral system.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 3

What do Articles 58, 66, 102, and 191 of the Indian Constitution primarily provide for?

Detailed Solution for Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 3
Articles 58, 66, 102, and 191 of the Indian Constitution primarily provide qualifications and disqualifications for various elected positions. These articles outline the criteria that individuals must meet to be eligible to hold specific offices and the conditions under which they may be disqualified from holding such positions. This ensures that elected officials meet certain standards and qualifications to serve in government roles.
Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 4
What was one of the key concerns addressed in the Lok Prahari vs Union of India case regarding electoral transparency and accountability?
Detailed Solution for Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 4
In the Lok Prahari vs Union of India case, one of the key concerns raised was the necessity of specific information in Form 26. This highlighted the importance of including precise details in the form, contributing significantly to the broader discourse on electoral transparency and accountability.
Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 5
What aspect did the Lok Prahari vs Union of India case deliberate on in terms of potential legislative amendments?
Detailed Solution for Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 5
The Lok Prahari vs Union of India case focused on deliberating the essentiality of amendments to the existing legislation, particularly the Representation of the People Act, 1951. This aspect underscored the need for potential changes to the legislative framework concerning electoral processes.
Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 6
In the context of the Lok Prahari vs Union of India case, what issue was raised regarding the failure to disclose assets and income sources by candidates and their affiliates?
Detailed Solution for Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 6
The Lok Prahari vs Union of India case questioned whether the failure to disclose assets and income sources by candidates and their affiliates should be categorized as corrupt behavior. This highlighted the significance of transparency in revealing financial information in the electoral context to ensure accountability and integrity in the political process.
Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 7
What is the primary objective of the petitioner in the Lok Prahari vs Union of India case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 7
The primary objective of the petitioner in the Lok Prahari vs Union of India case is to advocate for reforms aimed at enhancing the electoral system and fortifying democratic processes. This initiative seeks to address concerns regarding the significant increase in assets of certain Members of Parliament, State Legislature, and their associates post-elections, as highlighted by the petitioner. By pushing for these reforms, the petitioner aims to promote transparency, accountability, and fairness within the electoral framework.
Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 8
What was the main concern expressed by the respondent in the Lok Prahari versus Union of India case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 8
The main concern expressed by the respondent in the Lok Prahari versus Union of India case was the dissatisfaction with the insufficient attention given by both Parliament and the Election Commission of India to the issue of transparency in election funding. This issue highlights the importance of ensuring transparency and accountability in the financial aspects of election campaigns to maintain the integrity of the electoral process.
Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 9
In the Lok Prahari vs Union of India case, what action does the petitioner urge the Central Board of Direct Taxes to take?
Detailed Solution for Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 9
Within the Lok Prahari vs Union of India case, the petitioner calls upon the Central Board of Direct Taxes to investigate whether the escalated assets of certain Members of Parliament, State Legislature, and their associates align with a corresponding increase in income from known sources. This request seeks to ensure that any surge in assets post-elections is justifiably supported by legitimate income sources, thereby addressing concerns related to potential discrepancies and promoting financial transparency among elected officials.
Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 10
What was emphasized as crucial by the second respondent in the case, as mentioned in a counter-affidavit?
Detailed Solution for Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 10
The second respondent in the Lok Prahari versus Union of India case emphasized the importance of every candidate revealing their income sources, as articulated in a counter-affidavit. This emphasis on financial transparency aims to promote accountability and integrity in the electoral process, ensuring that candidates are transparent about their financial backgrounds for the benefit of informed decision-making by voters.
Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 11
According to the court's directives, what action is considered a corrupt practice under "undue influence" as per Section 123(2) of the Representation of the People Act of 1951?
Detailed Solution for Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 11
The court has specified that the non-disclosure of assets and income sources by candidates and their affiliates is deemed a corrupt practice under "undue influence" as per Section 123(2) of the Representation of the People Act of 1951. This regulation aims to ensure transparency and integrity in the electoral process by holding candidates accountable for disclosing their financial information.
Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 12
Why does the court warn against broad investigations into disproportionate asset increases without a consistent monitoring mechanism?
Detailed Solution for Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 12
The court warns against broad investigations into disproportionate asset increases without a consistent monitoring mechanism because such investigations may be politically motivated. By emphasizing the need for targeted scrutiny and discouraging broad inquiries without proper oversight, the court aims to prevent misuse of investigative powers and maintain the integrity of the electoral process.
Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 13
What is the consequence for a member of Parliament, Legislative Assembly, or Legislative Council who is convicted of a crime and sentenced to a minimum of two years in prison, according to the Lok Prahari vs Union of India case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 13
According to the Lok Prahari vs Union of India case, any member of Parliament, Legislative Assembly, or Legislative Council who is convicted of a crime and sentenced to a minimum of two years in prison would promptly lose their membership. This ruling ensures accountability and upholds ethical standards within the legislative bodies.
Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 14
Who serves as the head of the executive branch at the Union level in India's governance system?
Detailed Solution for Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 14
In the governance system of India, the President serves as the constitutional head of the executive branch at the Union level. The President's role is pivotal in upholding the constitution, representing the country internationally, and ensuring the smooth functioning of the executive machinery.
Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 15
What is the time frame within which each House of Parliament in India must convene after its preceding sitting?
Detailed Solution for Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India - Question 15
It is essential for each House of Parliament in India to convene within six months of its preceding sitting. This timely requirement ensures the continuity of legislative sessions, the discussion of important issues, and the effective functioning of the democratic process in the country.
Information about Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Lok Prahari vs Union of India, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams