All Courses
Get the App Signup / Login
Sign in Open App
Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

20 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP

Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP below.
Solutions of Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP | 20 questions in 20 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 1
Save

What was the reason behind Kharak Singh being released after being investigated for robbery?

Detailed Solution for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 1
Kharak Singh was released after being investigated for robbery due to the lack of evidence. This crucial legal principle underscores the necessity of substantial evidence to convict someone of a crime, highlighting the importance of a fair and just legal system.
Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 2
Save

Under which provision did the U.P. police start monitoring Kharak Singh as a potential habitual criminal?

Detailed Solution for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 2
The U.P. police started monitoring Kharak Singh as a potential habitual criminal under Chapter 20 of U.P. Police Rules. This monitoring was initiated based on suspicions regarding his criminal activities, showcasing the legal framework's provisions for preemptive measures against potential threats to society.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 3
Save

What activities were allowed under Rule 236 in the surveillance of Kharak Singh's home?

Detailed Solution for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 3
Rule 236 permitted secret surveillance of Kharak Singh's home, emphasizing the extent to which law enforcement could monitor his activities. This intrusive measure exemplifies the balance between individual privacy rights and the state's interest in preventing crime.
Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 4
Save
Why did Kharak Singh challenge the fairness of the monitoring conducted by the U.P. police?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 4
Kharak Singh contested the fairness of the monitoring by the U.P. police primarily due to the violation of his privacy rights. This legal challenge underscores the significance of individual liberties and the boundaries within which law enforcement agencies can operate in their efforts to maintain public safety.
Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 5
Save
What was the key issue at the center of the case of Kharak Singh vs State of UP?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 5
The central issue in the case of Kharak Singh vs State of UP revolved around whether the surveillance authorized in Chapter 20 of U.P. Police Rules violated fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution. This case was primarily concerned with the concept of privacy rights and the boundaries of state surveillance in relation to individual freedoms.
Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 6
Save
Which constitutional rights did Kharak Singh argue were infringed upon by Rule 236 in the case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 6
Kharak Singh contended that Rule 236 infringed upon his constitutional rights, specifically his freedom to move anywhere in India as guaranteed by Article 19(1)(d) and his personal freedom under Article 21. His argument focused on how being followed restricted his freedom of movement and could have negative psychological effects, emphasizing the importance of these fundamental rights in the case.
Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 7
Save
How did Kharak Singh perceive the impact of being followed on his fundamental rights?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 7
Kharak Singh argued that being followed restricted his freedom of movement and could have negative psychological effects, highlighting the significant impact that surveillance and monitoring had on his fundamental rights as guaranteed by the Constitution. This perception underscored the importance of individual liberties and privacy in the context of state actions.
Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 8
Save
In the context of the legal issue discussed, which specific articles of the Indian Constitution are being examined regarding the breach of fundamental rights concerning freedom of movement and personal liberty?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 8
The specific articles being examined in the context of the breach of fundamental rights concerning freedom of movement and personal liberty are Article 21, Article 32, and Article 19(1)(d) of the Indian Constitution. Article 21 guarantees the protection of life and personal liberty, Article 32 provides the right to Constitutional remedies, and Article 19(1)(d) ensures the right to move freely throughout the territory of India.
Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 9
Save
Which of the following articles of the Indian Constitution covers the right to move freely throughout the territory of India?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 9
The right to move freely throughout the territory of India is covered under Article 19(1)(d) of the Indian Constitution. This article ensures that every citizen has the right to move freely throughout the territory of India, which is essential in upholding individual liberties and freedoms within the legal framework.
Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 10
Save
What was the primary reason behind the Supreme Court panel's decision to overturn certain provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Police Regulations in the case of Kharak Singh vs State of UP?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 10
The Supreme Court panel unanimously overturned certain provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Police Regulations in the case of Kharak Singh vs State of UP primarily due to the breach of the right to privacy. This decision highlighted the importance of safeguarding personal liberties from intrusive measures that violate an individual's privacy rights.
Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 11
Save
Which specific right protected under the Indian Constitution did Justice Subba Rao argue was significantly violated by the police surveillance regulations in the case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 11
Justice Subba Rao argued that the police surveillance regulations significantly violated the right to privacy, as he contended that these regulations infringed upon individuals' ability to keep their thoughts and actions private. This assertion emphasizes the crucial role of privacy as a fundamental right in protecting personal freedoms and autonomy.
Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 12
Save
According to Justice Ayyangar's opinion in the case, which specific constitutional right was argued not to be infringed by the house monitoring provisions of the regulations?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 12
Justice Ayyangar's opinion in the case argued that the house monitoring provisions of the regulations did not infringe upon the right to move freely (Article 19(1)(d)). He reasoned that visitors to the house would not be aware of the surveillance, thereby suggesting that the surveillance did not impede individuals' freedom of movement as per the Constitution.
Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 13
Save
What was the key recommendation made by Justice Shah regarding the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Police Regulations in the case of Kharak Singh vs State of UP?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 13
Justice Shah concurred with Justice Subba Rao's view that the provision for unannounced visits was unconstitutional. His key recommendation was to modify the provisions related to unannounced visits, indicating a need for specific changes to ensure alignment with constitutional rights and principles.
Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 14
Save
What was the primary concern raised by Justice Subba Rao regarding the Uttar Pradesh Police Regulations?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 14
Justice Subba Rao highlighted the violation of the right to privacy as a fundamental concern regarding the Uttar Pradesh Police Regulations. He argued that the regulations significantly infringed upon this right by invading individuals' privacy and restricting their freedom to express their innermost thoughts. This emphasized the importance of safeguarding personal liberties from both direct and indirect intrusions, even advocating for the recognition of the right to privacy as a fundamental right without explicit mention in the Constitution.
Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 15
Save
Which specific provision of the regulations did Justice Ayyangar recommend striking down as unconstitutional?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 15
Justice Ayyangar recommended striking down the regulations concerning unannounced visits as unconstitutional. He argued that such visits violated the right to life protected under Article 21, as they contradicted the concept of life with human dignity and exceeded permissible powers. By recommending the removal of this provision, Justice Ayyangar aimed to address the unconstitutional nature of certain surveillance powers granted by the Uttar Pradesh Police Regulations.
Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 16
Save
According to the case of Kharak Singh vs State of UP, which right did Justice Shah and Justice Subba Rao agree was being violated by the regulations?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 16
Justice Shah and Justice Subba Rao concurred that the regulations were violating the right to life, as protected under Article 21. They argued that provisions such as unannounced visits and other surveillance measures exceeded permissible powers, contradicting the concept of life with human dignity. By asserting the unconstitutionality of these provisions, both justices aimed to safeguard fundamental rights and ensure that personal liberties were not unjustly infringed upon.
Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 17
Save
How did Justice Ayyangar justify the surveillance power of house monitoring in the context of Article 19(1)(d) of the Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 17
Justice Ayyangar justified the surveillance power of house monitoring by arguing that visitors would not be aware of the surveillance, therefore not directly affecting their freedom of movement as protected under Article 19(1)(d) of the Constitution. This reasoning aimed to address concerns regarding the constitutionality of house monitoring while balancing the need for effective law enforcement measures within the framework of fundamental rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution.
Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 18
Save
Which articles of the Indian Constitution are specifically mentioned in relation to the rights questioned in the Kharak Singh vs. State of UP case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 18
The case references Articles 19(1)(d), 21, and 32 of the Indian Constitution in the context of examining the possible violation of the right to freedom of movement and personal liberty. These constitutional provisions are crucial as they safeguard fundamental rights and liberties of individuals, ensuring protection against arbitrary actions by the state.
Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 19
Save
What is the central concern raised regarding the surveillance measures in Regulation 236 within the Kharak Singh vs. State of UP case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 19
The Kharak Singh vs. State of UP case scrutinizes the surveillance measures outlined in Regulation 236 concerning their consistency with constitutional freedoms. This issue emphasizes the need for a balance between security measures and individual rights, ensuring that surveillance practices do not infringe upon the fundamental liberties enshrined in the Indian Constitution.
Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 20
Save
What key aspect of the Indian Constitution is underscored in the discussions surrounding the surveillance practices in the Kharak Singh vs. State of UP case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP - Question 20
The discussions surrounding the surveillance practices in the Kharak Singh vs. State of UP case highlight the paramount importance of safeguarding fundamental liberties as enshrined in the Indian Constitution. This emphasis reflects the foundational principles of democracy and the rule of law, ensuring that individual rights are protected in the face of potential encroachments by state authorities.
Information about Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Kharak Singh vs State of UP, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Important Questions for Kharak Singh vs State of UP

Find all the important questions for Kharak Singh vs State of UP at EduRev.Get fully prepared for Kharak Singh vs State of UP with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the Kharak Singh vs State of UP syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of Kharak Singh vs State of UP resources.

Kharak Singh vs State of UP MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the Kharak Singh vs State of UP within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for Kharak Singh vs State of UP

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace Kharak Singh vs State of UP with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup