Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

20 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India

Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India below.
Solutions of Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India | 20 questions in 20 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 1

What was the key focus of the Indra Sawhney vs Union of India case?

Detailed Solution for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 1
The Indra Sawhney vs Union of India case was a significant legal milestone that highlighted the importance of reservations for socially and economically backward classes as a means to achieve social justice. It underscored the necessity of affirmative action to address historical inequalities and promote a more equitable society.
Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 2

Which court delivered the judgment in the Indra Sawhney vs Union of India case?

Detailed Solution for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 2
The judgment in the Indra Sawhney vs Union of India case was delivered by the Supreme Court of India. As the highest judicial body in the country, the Supreme Court's decision upheld reservations for socially and economically backward classes, setting a precedent for affirmative action in India.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 3

When was the judgment pronounced in the Indra Sawhney vs Union of India case?

Detailed Solution for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 3
The judgment in the Indra Sawhney vs Union of India case was pronounced on 16th November 1992. This date marks a significant moment in Indian legal history, as the Supreme Court's decision affirmed the importance of reservations for socially and economically disadvantaged groups.
Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 4
Which articles of the Indian Constitution were referred to in the Indra Sawhney vs Union of India case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 4
The Indra Sawhney vs Union of India case referred to several key articles of the Indian Constitution, including Articles 14, 15, 16, 46, and 340. These constitutional provisions played a central role in the court's decision to uphold reservations for socially and economically backward classes, emphasizing the principles of equality and social justice embedded in the Indian legal framework.
Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 5
What was the primary focus of the Kaka Kalelkar Commission established in 1953?
Detailed Solution for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 5
The Kaka Kalelkar Commission, established in 1953, primarily focused on identifying 2,399 castes considered socially and economically backward in India. This commission played a significant role in understanding and addressing the social and economic disparities prevalent in Indian society at that time.
Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 6
When was the Mandal Commission formed, and what was its key proposal?
Detailed Solution for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 6
The Mandal Commission was formed on January 1, 1979, and its key proposal was to suggest a 27% reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and an additional 10% reservation for Socially and Economically Backward Classes (SEBCs). This recommendation aimed to address the educational and economic disparities faced by these communities.
Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 7
What was the main concern raised by Indira Sawhney and others regarding reservations in India?
Detailed Solution for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 7
Indira Sawhney and others raised concerns advocating for reservations in India to be based on economic criteria rather than caste. This perspective highlighted the importance of considering economic backwardness as a criterion for providing affirmative action and opportunities to marginalized sections of society.
Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 8
Why did the Supreme Court intervene in the reservation scheme proposed by the government?
Detailed Solution for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 8
The Supreme Court intervened in the proposed reservation scheme to seek additional information from the government. This intervention aimed to ensure that the reservation policies were justifiable, legally sound, and effectively addressed the issues of social equality and justice in India.
Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 9
According to the Constitution of India, which article pertains to the issue of reservation policies based on caste and their constitutional validity?
Detailed Solution for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 9
In the Constitution of India, Article 16 deals with the issue of equality of opportunity in matters of public employment. This article prohibits discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, descent, place of birth, residence, or any of them. It also allows the state to make provisions for reservations in government jobs to ensure adequate representation of backward classes. The constitutional validity of reservation policies based on caste is often debated in light of this article.
Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 10
According to the arguments presented by the petitioners in Indra Sawhney vs Union of India, what was a major concern regarding the implementation of the Mandal Commission's recommendations?
Detailed Solution for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 10
The major concern raised by the petitioners in Indra Sawhney vs Union of India regarding the implementation of the Mandal Commission's recommendations was the potential division and discontent in the nation. They argued that enforcing these recommendations could lead to societal discord and the revival of the caste system, which aligns with the broader concerns about maintaining social harmony and unity within the country.
Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 11
What was a fundamental issue highlighted by the respondents in the case of Indra Sawhney vs Union of India?
Detailed Solution for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 11
The fundamental issue highlighted by the respondents in the case of Indra Sawhney vs Union of India was the denial of Socially and Economically Backward Classes (SEBCs) their rightful benefit from Article 16(4). This denial was a key point raised by the respondents in countering the petitioners' arguments, emphasizing the importance of addressing the rights of SEBCs within the legal framework.
Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 12
What was the primary basis for identifying OBCs according to the respondents in the case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 12
The primary basis for identifying Other Backward Classes (OBCs) according to the respondents in the case was not the 1931 census data. Instead, systematic caste-wise enumeration ceased after 1931. This cessation marked a shift in the approach to identifying OBCs, moving away from reliance solely on historical census data towards other methods for classification and recognition.
Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 13
Why was the utilization of 1931 census data by the Commission justified, according to the respondents?
Detailed Solution for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 13
The respondents justified the utilization of 1931 census data by the Commission based on precedents like the "BALARAM CASE." This reference to past legal cases provided a basis for justifying the Commission's use of historical data in their decision-making process, highlighting the legal and procedural considerations that influenced their actions.
Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 14
What concept was discussed in relation to providing substantially equal opportunities to historically disadvantaged groups?
Detailed Solution for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 14
The concept of "equal protection" was discussed in relation to providing substantially equal opportunities to historically disadvantaged groups. This concept emphasizes the importance of ensuring fairness and equality in the distribution of opportunities, especially for groups that have faced historical disadvantages. It underscores the need for policies and measures that promote equal access and treatment for all individuals, irrespective of their background or social status.
Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 15
What is the primary focus of the Supreme Court of India regarding reservations?
Detailed Solution for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 15
The primary focus of the Supreme Court of India regarding reservations is to balance the interests of backward classes with national welfare. This ensures that while promoting social justice through reservations, the broader welfare of the nation is also taken into consideration.
Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 16
What factor is essential for determining backwardness in the context of reservations?
Detailed Solution for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 16
In the context of reservations, determining backwardness involves considering social and educational factors, not just economic status. This comprehensive approach ensures that deserving candidates who face various forms of disadvantage can benefit from reservation policies.
Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 17
Why is the exclusion of the "creamy layer" important in reservation policies?
Detailed Solution for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 17
Excluding the "creamy layer" from reservation benefits is crucial to ensure that reservations effectively target the truly disadvantaged individuals. This exclusion helps prevent the perpetuation of inequalities and ensures that reservation benefits reach those who are genuinely in need of support.
Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 18
What is the significance of periodic revisions in reservation policies?
Detailed Solution for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 18
Periodic revisions in reservation policies are essential to ensure that deserving candidates continue to benefit from these measures. By updating and revising policies, authorities can adapt to changing societal needs and ensure that reservations effectively support those who require assistance the most.
Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 19
What was the key outcome of the Supreme Court's decision in the Indra Sawhney vs Union of India case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 19
The key outcome of the Supreme Court's decision in the Indra Sawhney vs Union of India case was the establishment of a reservation cap of 50% under Article 16(4). This decision was crucial in setting a limit to prevent reverse discrimination and ensure a balanced approach to reservations for socially and economically backward classes.
Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 20
Why was the concept of the "creamy layer" introduced in relation to reservations in India?
Detailed Solution for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India - Question 20
The concept of the "creamy layer" was introduced to exclude certain privileged individuals from reservations. This measure aimed to ensure that affirmative action benefits those who have historically faced discrimination and lack equal opportunities by preventing individuals who are already privileged from taking advantage of reservation benefits.
Information about Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Indra Sawhney vs Union of India, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams