Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Judiciary Exams MCQ

OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala

OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala below.
Solutions of OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 1

In the Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala case, what was the significance of the 24th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1971?

Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 1
The 24th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1971 was significant as it was introduced to counter the impact of the Golak Nath case. This amendment aimed to restrict Parliament's power to amend the Constitution, particularly in response to the limitations set by the judiciary.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 2

Which of the following statements accurately reflects the outcome of the Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala case?

Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 2
The Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala case established a crucial precedent by ruling that Parliament cannot alter the basic structure of the Indian Constitution. This landmark judgment affirmed the limitations on parliamentary power in amending fundamental aspects of the Constitution.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 3

What was the primary legal issue contested in the Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala case?

Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 3
The primary legal issue contested in the Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala case revolved around the validity of specific Constitutional Amendment Acts, such as the 24th Amendment Act. This case raised questions regarding the extent of Parliament's authority to amend the Constitution, particularly concerning the doctrine of basic structure.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 4
Who were the key judges involved in delivering the judgment in the Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala case?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 4
The key judges involved in delivering the judgment in the Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala case were Justice H.R Khanna, Justice J.M Shelat, Justice K.K Mathew, and Justice K.S Hegde. Their collective decision played a pivotal role in establishing the principle that the basic structure of the Indian Constitution is beyond the reach of Parliament's amendment powers.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 5
What was the central focus of the Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala case?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 5
The central focus of the Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala case was to determine the scope of the amending power granted by Article 368 of the Indian Constitution. This case set a significant precedent regarding the limitations on amending the Constitution, highlighting the delicate balance between the amending power of the Parliament and the basic structure of the Constitution, which cannot be altered arbitrarily.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 6
How did the validity of the 24th Constitutional Amendment Act impact subsequent amendments in the Keshavananda Bharati case?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 6
The validity of the 24th Constitutional Amendment Act in the Keshavananda Bharati case had a significant impact on subsequent amendments like the 25th, 26th, and 29th Constitutional Amendments. This case highlighted the interconnection between different amendments and the importance of ensuring that each amendment aligns with the basic structure of the Constitution, as determined by the judiciary.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 7
Which specific article of the Indian Constitution was at the core of the dispute in the Keshavananda Bharati case?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 7
The core of the dispute in the Keshavananda Bharati case revolved around Article 368 of the Indian Constitution, which outlines the procedure for amending the Constitution. This case delved into the delicate balance between the amending power of the Parliament and the limitations imposed by the basic structure of the Constitution, emphasizing the importance of judicial review in ensuring the Constitution's integrity.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 8
What was the primary question that needed resolution in the Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala case?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 8
The primary question that needed resolution in the Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala case was the determination of the scope of the amending power granted by Article 368 of the Indian Constitution. This case was pivotal in establishing the doctrine of basic structure, which ensures that certain essential features of the Constitution cannot be altered through the amending process, safeguarding the core principles of the Constitution.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 9
What concept did the Supreme Court of India introduce within the Constitution in the Keshavananda Bharati case?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 9
In the Keshavananda Bharati case, the Supreme Court of India introduced the Basic Structure Doctrine within the Constitution. This doctrine asserts that there are implied limitations on the amending power of the Parliament, emphasizing that the fundamental structure of the Constitution cannot be altered.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 10
Why did the Supreme Court conclude that the Parliament lacks the authority to modify the fundamental structure of the Constitution?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 10
The Supreme Court's conclusion in the Keshavananda Bharati case, stating that the Parliament lacks the authority to modify the fundamental structure of the Constitution, aimed to safeguard the core principles and values enshrined in the Constitution. This decision aimed to protect the integrity and stability of the Constitution by preventing arbitrary changes to its essential framework.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 11
What pivotal aspect did the Supreme Court uphold regarding the amending power under the 24th Constitutional Amendment Act?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 11
In the Keshavananda Bharati case, the Supreme Court upheld the concept of implied limitations on amending power under the 24th Constitutional Amendment Act. This decision emphasized that the Parliament's amending power is distinct from its ordinary legislative authority, preventing it from altering the fundamental structure of the Constitution.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 12
How did the Supreme Court's decision in the Keshavananda Bharati case challenge parliamentary authority?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 12
The Supreme Court's ruling in the Keshavananda Bharati case challenged parliamentary authority by establishing that the amending power of the Parliament is separate from its legislative authority. This decision prevented the Parliament from modifying the basic structure of the Constitution, setting a significant precedent in Indian constitutional law.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 13
What concept was defined by the Supreme Court in the case of Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala that includes elements such as the Supremacy of the Constitution, Independence of the Judiciary, and Federalism?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 13
The concept defined by the Supreme Court in the case of Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, which includes elements like the Supremacy of the Constitution, Independence of the Judiciary, Federalism, and more, is known as the Basic Structure. This concept is crucial as it outlines the fundamental features that cannot be altered through amendments, ensuring the core integrity of the Constitution remains intact.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 14
What was the significance of the Preamble in the context of the Indian Constitution following the judgment in the Keshavananda Bharati case?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 14
After the judgment in the Keshavananda Bharati case, the Preamble was deemed integral to the Indian Constitution. It played a crucial role in imposing implicit limitations on amendments under Article 368. While the Preamble itself could be amended, the basic structure of the Constitution remained untouched, ensuring the foundational principles of the Constitution remained unchanged.
OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 15
Which of the following was NOT recognized as part of the Basic Structure as per the judgment in the Keshavananda Bharati case?
Detailed Solution for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Question 15
In the judgment of Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, the Supreme Court recognized various elements as part of the Basic Structure, including the Doctrine of Separation of Powers, Right to Livelihood, and Power of review by Courts. However, the Recognition of the Right to Freedom of Religion was not explicitly mentioned as part of the Basic Structure in this context.
Information about OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for OneTime: Test: Case Brief: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams