Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib

Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib below.
Solutions of Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 1

In the case of Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib, what was the significance of the test established by the Supreme Court of India?

Detailed Solution for Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 1
The test established by the Supreme Court of India in the case of Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib was significant for deciding whether an entity could be considered an instrumentality or agency of the government. This determination was crucial as it determined whether the entity could be treated as a "State" under Article 12 of the Constitution of India. When an entity is regarded as a "State" under Article 12, it becomes subject to a writ petition if it violates the Constitution.
Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 2

Who presented the Court's decision in the case of Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib, and what was the key outcome of this presentation?

Detailed Solution for Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 2
Justice P. N. Bhagwati presented the Court's decision in the case of Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib. The key outcome of his presentation was the condensation of the International Airport Authority case into a six-factor test for identifying whether an entity qualifies as an instrumentality or agency of the State. This test became instrumental in determining the status of entities under Article 12 of the Constitution of India.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 3

What was the central issue that led to the legal conflict in the case of Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib?

Detailed Solution for Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 3
The core conflict in the case of Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib stemmed from the alleged unfairness in the college admission process. The petitioners contested the validity of the admission procedure, particularly emphasizing discrepancies in the evaluation criteria and the manner in which the results were determined. This dispute underscores the importance of transparent and fair admission processes to ensure equal opportunities for all applicants.
Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 4
What was the primary contention raised by the petitioners regarding the viva voce examination in the Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 4
The petitioners' primary objection concerning the viva voce examination in the Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib case was that the questions asked during the brief 2-3 minute oral examination were unrelated to the course content. This raised concerns about the suitability and fairness of the assessment method in accurately evaluating the candidates' qualifications for admission. Such discrepancies highlight the significance of using relevant and appropriate evaluation methods in academic assessments.
Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 5
How did the petitioners in the situation described view the viva voce examination for admission?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 5
The petitioners viewed the viva voce examination as irrelevant and unfairly implemented. They raised concerns about the examination's duration, the nature of questions asked which they perceived as unrelated to the course, and how it was weighted in the overall evaluation process. This perception led them to question the validity and fairness of the admission procedure based on this examination component.
Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 6
What was the main concern in the case regarding the admission procedures of the Regional Engineering College in Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 6
The main concern in the case regarding the admission procedures of the Regional Engineering College in Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, was whether the college fell under the definition of "State" according to Article 12 of the Indian Constitution. This crucial determination would impact whether the college was subject to writ jurisdiction. In legal terms, the classification of an entity as a "State" under Article 12 holds significant implications for the applicability of fundamental rights and the scope of judicial review.
Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 7
What was the key issue related to the viva voce interviews as part of the admission process for the Regional Engineering College in Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 7
The key issue related to the viva voce interviews conducted as part of the admission process for the Regional Engineering College in Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, was the relevance of the questions asked during the interviews. Instead of focusing on the relevant subjects, the questions mainly centered around the candidates' backgrounds and residences. This raised concerns about the arbitrary nature of the viva voce process and whether it effectively assessed the candidates' qualifications for admission.
Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 8
What was the main argument presented by the petitioners in the case of Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib regarding the classification of the Regional Engineering College, Srinagar?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 8
The petitioners in the case of Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib argued that the Regional Engineering College, Srinagar, should be considered a 'State' according to Article 12 of the Indian Constitution. They contended that despite being formally registered as a society, the college operated more like a governmental institution, with significant government influence in its establishment and operations.
Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 9
What aspect of the Regional Engineering College, Srinagar did the petitioners emphasize as indicative of government control?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 9
The petitioners highlighted the composition of the Board of Governors of the Regional Engineering College, Srinagar, as indicative of government influence over the college. With a majority of government appointees on the Board, including representatives from various government bodies and officials appointed by the two governments, the petitioners argued that this demonstrated direct government control over the college.
Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 10
According to the arguments presented by the Respondents in the Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib case, what was emphasized as a key factor in categorizing the Regional Engineering College, Srinagar, as not being a 'State' under Article 12?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 10
The Respondents in the case emphasized the formal legal status of the college and its operational autonomy as key factors in arguing against categorizing the Regional Engineering College, Srinagar, as a 'State' under Article 12. They highlighted the college's independence in operations and its status as a registered society, which they believed distinguished it from a government entity.
Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 11
What was a critical point made by the Respondents in the Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib case regarding the relationship between the Regional Engineering College, Srinagar, and the government?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 11
The Respondents argued that the link between the Regional Engineering College, Srinagar, and the government was more nominal than substantial, preserving the college's autonomy. They maintained that despite government influence and funding, the college operated as an autonomous entity, with its own independent rules and regulations. This distinction was crucial in their argument against classifying the college as a 'State'.
Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 12
What criteria were considered by the court to determine if an entity qualifies as an instrumentality or agency of the state under Article 12?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 12
The court established a test to identify whether an entity qualifies as an instrumentality or agency of the state under Article 12. Factors considered included government ownership, financial aid, monopoly status, state control, and the public importance of functions. These criteria were crucial in determining the entity's classification under Article 12.
Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 13
What aspect did the court address regarding the selection procedures in the case of Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 13
The court in the case of Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib addressed the issue of the excessive allocation of marks for viva voce examinations in the selection procedures. This decision highlighted the importance of reviewing and potentially adjusting the weightage of viva voce examinations to ensure fairness and prevent potential discrepancies in future tests.
Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 14
In the context of the court's decision in Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib, what did the court emphasize regarding oral interviews during assessments?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 14
The court emphasized the importance of fair conduct in assessments, particularly focusing on oral interviews. This underscores the court's stance on ensuring that assessments, including interviews, are conducted in a manner that upholds principles of fairness and equality, thereby maintaining the integrity of the selection process.
Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 15
According to the six-factor test introduced in the Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib case, which factor assesses whether the corporation enjoys a monopoly status granted or protected by the state?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib - Question 15
In the context of the Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib case, the factor that evaluates whether the corporation enjoys a monopoly status granted or protected by the state is crucial. This criterion aims to determine the extent of monopoly power or protection conferred upon the corporation by the state. A monopoly status can significantly influence the entity's relationship with the government and the public, impacting various aspects of its operations and regulations.
Information about Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Ajay Hasia v Khalid Mujib, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams