Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India

Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India below.
Solutions of Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 1

Who were the judges in the case of Kehar Singh vs Union Of India?

Detailed Solution for Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 1
The judges presiding over the case of Kehar Singh vs Union Of India were P Sathasivam, Ranjan Gogoi, and N.V. Ramana. These judges played a crucial role in interpreting and applying the law to the facts of the case, ultimately shaping the outcome of the legal proceedings.
Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 2

What is the significance of Article 21 in the Constitution of India 1949?

Detailed Solution for Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 2
Article 21 of the Constitution of India 1949 guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, which is one of the most fundamental rights provided to the citizens of India. This right has been interpreted expansively by the Indian judiciary to include various aspects such as the right to live with human dignity, the right to privacy, and the right to a clean and healthy environment.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 3

What legal charges was Kehar Singh found guilty of in 1986, resulting in a death sentence?

Detailed Solution for Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 3
Kehar Singh was found guilty in 1986 under Section 120-B and Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, which led to a death sentence. Section 120-B pertains to criminal conspiracy, while Section 302 deals with punishment for murder. This verdict indicated his involvement in a conspiracy related to the assassination plot against Prime Minister Indira Gandhi.
Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 4
What was the outcome of Kehar Singh's requests for pardon after multiple appeals and petitions, including one to the President under Article 72 of the Indian Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 4
Despite multiple appeals and petitions, including one to the President under Article 72 of the Indian Constitution, Kehar Singh's requests for pardon were denied. This denial ultimately resulted in the execution of the death sentence imposed on him. The legal process exhausted all avenues for clemency, leading to the tragic outcome for Kehar Singh.
Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 5
What is a significant aspect of the case of Kehar Singh vs Union of India?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 5
In the case of Kehar Singh vs Union of India, a crucial aspect revolves around the authority of the President under Article 72 to reconsider a matter already decided by the Supreme Court of India. This raises important questions about the separation of powers and checks and balances within the Indian constitutional framework.
Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 6
What legal concept empowers the President under the Indian Constitution to grant pardons, subject to certain limitations?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 6
The legal concept of a Presidential Pardon, as outlined in Article 72 of the Indian Constitution, grants the President the authority to pardon individuals, subject to specific constraints. This power allows the President to intervene in matters of clemency, but such decisions are restricted by certain limitations, including not revisiting cases already adjudicated by higher courts.
Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 7
What is the primary concern of the petitioner in the case of Kehar Singh vs Union of India?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 7
The core concern of the petitioner in the case of Kehar Singh vs Union of India revolves around understanding the extent of the President's power under Article 72 within the Indian constitutional framework. This issue delves into the boundaries and limitations of executive authority in revisiting matters already adjudicated upon by the Supreme Court.
Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 8
What was one of the key arguments presented by the petitioner in the case of Kehar Singh v. Union of India?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 8
One of the primary arguments made by the petitioner in the case of Kehar Singh v. Union of India was the reliance on circumstantial and inaccurate information for the potential execution. This argument highlighted a crucial aspect of the case where the petitioner believed that the basis for Kehar Singh's potential execution was not based on solid grounds. It emphasized the importance of accurate and substantial evidence in legal proceedings.
Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 9
According to the petitioner in the case of Kehar Singh v. Union of India, what was the plea's request aimed at achieving?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 9
The plea in the case of Kehar Singh v. Union of India included a request to establish clear guidelines governing the application of the pardon power. This request aimed to prevent arbitrary decisions and ensure a structured and transparent process for evaluating cases that fall within the discretionary powers of the President. Clarity in guidelines can help maintain fairness and consistency in the application of clemency measures.
Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 10
According to the arguments presented in the case of Kehar Singh vs. Union of India, what did the Attorney General emphasize regarding the President's power to grant clemency?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 10
The Attorney General contended that the authority vested in the President under Article 72 is not subject to judicial review, implying that the President's power to grant clemency is beyond the purview of the courts. This argument underscores the belief that the discretion to grant clemency is an exclusive prerogative of the President and should not be interfered with by the judiciary, highlighting the separation of powers and the independence of the executive branch in such matters.
Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 11
According to the Constitution of India, what is the significance of Article 21?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 11
Article 21 of the Constitution of India holds immense importance as it guarantees the protection of life and personal liberty through a lawful procedure. This means that no individual can be deprived of their life or personal freedom except through a lawful process. This provision serves as a fundamental safeguard for the citizens of India, ensuring that their rights to life and personal liberty are upheld and protected by the law.
Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 12
What authority does the President of India possess regarding pardons and sentences, as per Article 72 of the Constitution of India?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 12
Article 72 of the Constitution of India grants the President the authority to provide pardons, reprieves, respites, or remissions of punishment. Additionally, the President can suspend, remit, or commute the sentence of any person convicted of an offense in certain cases. This power is crucial as it allows the President to exercise discretion and mercy in appropriate situations where pardons or sentence modifications are deemed necessary, contributing to the administration of justice in the country.
Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 13
In what circumstances can the power to suspend, remit, or commute a death sentence be exercised by the Governor of a State?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 13
The power to suspend, remit, or commute a death sentence can be exercised by the Governor of a State according to the prevailing laws. This provision ensures that there is a mechanism in place at the state level to address such critical decisions, offering a level of autonomy and responsibility to the state in matters concerning the administration of justice.
Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 14
In the legal case of Kehar Singh vs Union of India, what did the Supreme Court emphasize regarding the President of India's authority?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 14
The Supreme Court emphasized in the case of Kehar Singh vs Union of India that the President of India has the authority to review a case's merits independently, regardless of previous court decisions. This underscores the significance of the President's independent power under Article 72 of the Indian Constitution.
Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 15
What did the Supreme Court clarify regarding a convicted individual's right in the case of Kehar Singh vs Union of India?
Detailed Solution for Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India - Question 15
The Supreme Court clarified that a convicted individual does not have an inherent right to demand an oral hearing before the President in the case of Kehar Singh vs Union of India. This ruling highlights the legal parameters surrounding the convicted person's engagement in the clemency process and the President's discretionary powers under Article 72 of the Indian Constitution.
Information about Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Kehar Singh vs Union of India, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams